logo
Higher prices on cars, food, electronics: How Trump's tariffs could impact Indiana

Higher prices on cars, food, electronics: How Trump's tariffs could impact Indiana

Yahoo05-02-2025
Following through on a key campaign promise, President Donald Trump began enacting tariffs on a number of foreign goods over the weekend and threatened that more could be on the way in the future.
Though the full details, timeline and impacted countries remain in flux, many Hoosiers are bracing for the extra costs that tariffs could bring to industries across the state.
Trump's proposed tariffs could heavily impact Indiana's robust automotive industry, as well as food, oil and construction industries, economic experts say.
Canada, Mexico and China — the three nations on whose goods Trump threatened to enact tariffs — ranked as the top trade partners for Indiana in 2023, leading many economic and industry experts grappling with the potential impact on consumers and the economy.This past weekend Trump announced plans to put tariffs on most goods from Canada, Mexico, and China. Earlier this week tariffs for the first two countries were placed on a 30-day pause after their leaders promised to take steps to curb the flow of fentanyl and undocumented immigrants into the United States.
However, on Tuesday at midnight, a 10% tariff on all Chinese goods went into effect, placing extra costs on thousands of goods from toys to electronics and renewing a trade war between the world's two largest economies.
Indiana Chamber of Commerce President and CEO Vanessa Green Sinders said the chamber was encouraged by the negotiations between Trump and the country's neighbors but remained cognizant of the strain tariffs could place on Indiana industries.
"We urge the President to keep negotiating to reach agreements that are beneficial to Indiana and our nation. We have asked our member companies for feedback on specific areas of concerns and will use that as the basis for any future action we would share with the Trump administration and Indiana's congressional delegation," Sinders told the IndyStar in an emailed statement.
Tariffs act as an extra tax on products brought into the United States. The importer typically pays the tax, meaning American businesses could pass down the extra cost to consumers to recoup profit margins, said Andreas Hauskrecht, professor of business economics at the Indiana University Kelley School of Business.
If the tariffs on all three countries Trump has already named go into effect, Hauskrecht estimates, American households would spend $180 to $240 more per month. He likened the tariffs to an added sales tax.
For instance, the tariffs on Chinese goods could mean higher purchase prices on goods from clothing to Apple products.
Indiana consumers could feel the impact sooner rather than later since businesses might decide to preemptively raise prices on foreign products already in the United States, said Purdue University international economics professor David Hummels.
As the uncertainty wears on, business leaders face an unsteady economic future, meaning Indiana could see less hiring and less investment in the local economy, Hummels said.
"Do I hire more workers? Do I expand my plant operations? Do I put in another order for parts and components? Or do we just kind of wait on all that stuff until I have a lot more certainty on my environment? I think they're in a very difficult position right now," Hummels said.
The Indiana Manufacturers Association, representing some 1,100 companies across Indiana, sounded the alarm on the proposed tariffs on Mexican and Canadian goods on Monday.
'However the next few weeks or months develop, Indiana's manufacturing industry and consequently the state's economy will be impacted,' President and CEO of the Indiana Manufacturers Association Andrew Berger said in a statement issued before Trump paused the plan to place tariffs on goods from Canada and Mexico.
If Trump follows through with plans to place tariffs on Canadian goods, the automotive industry would also likely take a big hit since even cars manufactured in the United States use parts that are manufactured abroad.
Indiana ranks second in the automotive industry among the states, producing more than 1.3 million trucks and cars each year, according to the Northeast Indiana Regional Authority. General Motors maintains a large presence in Northeast Indiana, having invested more than $23 billion in facilities here over the past decade.
Tariffs could essentially halt the state's car production in its tracks, Hummels said.
But more than commercial vehicles could be affected by tariffs.
A spokesperson for Columbus-headquartered Cummins Inc. said the engine manufacturing company was "monitoring actions closely." In a statement, Cummins's spokeswoman Melinda Koski said that the company "supports targeted trade actions and modern trade agreements that address systemic issues, promote U.S. manufacturing, and ensure American businesses remain competitive globally."
Nor would the impact be restricted to vehicles. The Midwest also relies heavily on Canadian crude oil to fill gas station pumps, said Patrick De Haan, head of petroleum analysis at GasBuddy, an oil price tracking website.
Should Canadian energy products face tariffs in the future, De Haan predicted a slow but modest growth in oil prices.
Averting tariffs for now also led leaders in the construction industry to breathe a sigh of relief. About 7% of American construction materials originate in another country, said Rick Wajda, CEO of the Indiana Builders Association.
New home constructions often rely on goods such as softwood timber from Canada and gypsum, a key product for cement and drywall, from Mexico. If the Trump administration does decide to institute tariffs, Wajda said he hoped some exceptions could be made to prevent impacts on home buyers.
"We certainly understand the bigger picture and the intentional policy goals on trade policy, but we continue to remind them of the effects on the housing industry and hope that they would consider exempting construction materials from potential tariffs to help ease that stress on the housing industry moving forward," Wajda said.
But individual consumers won't be the only Americans burdened by the tariffs, Hauskrecht said. The longtime trade economist said China, Canada and Mexico would likely respond to the United States with retaliatory tariffs of their own, directly harming American industries.
China retaliated with its own set of levies Tuesday —15% for U.S. coal and 10% for crude oil, farm equipment and cars — alongside a trade curb banning a handful of metals from sale to the United States. The five metals are used in various American defense and energy products.
'It's not only that we hit our consumers between the eyes,' Hauskrecht said. 'Also, our producers will have a reduction in demand and will sell less. It's a lose-lose strategy for everyone involved.'
While the automotive and consumer goods industries would likely be hardest hit, tariffs on food could increase restaurants' inventory costs. Last year from January through November, the United States imported $6.4 billion in meat and livestock products from Canada and $10.8 billion in fruit products from Mexico, according to data from the United States Department of Agriculture.
Carlos Villagrán, who owns Chao Vietnamese Street Food in Fishers, said his biggest worry isn't meat since he primarily sources from within Indiana. He worries more about tariffs on Chinese and Mexican products like napkins, gloves and the Styrofoam boxes crucial to Chao's take-out operation.
Villagrán maintains a spreadsheet to track expenses and estimates that since the COVID-19 pandemic, roughly 30-50% of his restaurant's sales on a given day are to-go orders. He said items like boxes, soup containers, sauce cups and chopsticks cost him a few hundred dollars each week. If the cost of these products — as well as ingredients from Mexico like avocados, peppers, mangoes and spices — reach a certain threshold outlined in his spreadsheet, Villagrán said he will have to compensate by increasing the price of certain menu items.
'The only person that's (ultimately) going to have to pay for (the cost of tariffs) is me,' Villagrán said. 'And I can't pay it myself, so I'm going to have to bring it onto the customers.'
Even some experts didn't want to place bets on what happens to Canadian and Mexican goods once the 30-day pause ends or whether Trump will impose other tariffs. Hauskrecht said that from a financial standpoint, the tariffs if imposed would likely wind up costing Americans more.
'It is a very aggressive, transactional negotiation technique,' Hauskrecht said. 'But economically, it makes zero sense. It's just a negotiation technique to convince our partners to follow our advice, to say it friendly.'
Alysa Guffey covers growth and development for IndyStar. Contact her at amguffey@gannett.com.
Contact dining reporter Bradley Hohulin at bhohulin@indystar.com. You can follow him on Twitter/X @BradleyHohulin.
This article originally appeared on Indianapolis Star: Higher prices on cars, food, electronics: How tariffs could impact Indiana
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Editorial: More unlawful tariffs: Trump has no authority to institute damaging trade barriers
Editorial: More unlawful tariffs: Trump has no authority to institute damaging trade barriers

Yahoo

timea minute ago

  • Yahoo

Editorial: More unlawful tariffs: Trump has no authority to institute damaging trade barriers

On Friday, Donald Trump followed up a concerning jobs report with massive new global tariffs, driving markets down and once more raising prices on consumers for no reason after weeks of supposed trade negotiations. Like with his first round of import duties, announced in the Rose Garden on his ludicrous April 2 'Liberation Day,' these tariffs are not only chaotic and destructive, but they're illegal. The president is leaning on a 1977 law meant to be invoked for targeted financial actions in certain emergency circumstances to reshape trade globally. Just the day before these newest tariffs were implemented, the administration's lawyers had been grilled by the 11 judges of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Washington, who pointed out among other things that the law doesn't even mention tariffs at all. If the plaintiffs, made up of states and businesses, need anywhere to look for inspiration and evidence for their legal arguments, they don't have to look much further than Trump's own ramblings and social media feed, where he constantly tells the whole world that he is engaging in the tariff actions for all manner of reasons completely unrelated to any economic objectives. So far, he's threatened tariffs over Brazil's domestic prosecution of its former president Jair Bolsonaro and over Canada's intent to recognize a Palestinian state, among other things. This is a real disparate set of rationales, but what they have in common is that they are ideological battles probably drawn from something Trump saw on TV and have nothing to do with correcting a supposed trade imbalance with those countries, already an incredibly flimsy argument to begin with. Don't just take our word for it; the Manhattan-based U.S. Court of International Trade — you know, the judicial entity set up specifically and explicitly to have expertise on these matters — already struck down most of Trump's tariff regime on the grounds that it was unlawful. That ruling has been stayed for now, but the evidence just keeps piling on that Trump is significantly exceeding his authority. Unfortunately, even if this insanity were to be fully struck down tomorrow, we've had months of chaos that has indelibly damaged trade relationships as well as general diplomatic relations. The world is not going to wait for the U.S. to hash out its chaos, and other countries are already moving to reorient parts of their manufacturing and trade schemes to circumvent an unreliable United States. Of course, this seems like one more issue headed at some point to the U.S. Supreme Court, perhaps the shadow docket where the court these days like to conduct its unsigned pro-Trump business. It's long since become clear that the high court is more interested in ideological outcomes than the uniform application of the law, but even then, siding with Trump here would be farcical. This is the exact same court that just last year ruled that Joe Biden attempting to clear some student debt by invoking emergency powers in the context of the COVID pandemic — a real global catastrophe that killed countless people and crashed the economy while putting millions out of work — was an unlawful exercise of authority. If that's the case, but Trump is in his rights to wildly alter tariff policies at a whim in service to random political grievances around the world, then the law truly means nothing anymore. Let's stop this madness while we still can, before economic forces take it out of our hands. ___

Former UK PM Johnson rejects China's bullying of Taiwan, calls for deeper ties with West
Former UK PM Johnson rejects China's bullying of Taiwan, calls for deeper ties with West

Yahoo

timea minute ago

  • Yahoo

Former UK PM Johnson rejects China's bullying of Taiwan, calls for deeper ties with West

TAIPEI (Reuters) -Former British prime minister Boris Johnson said on Tuesday that Taiwan did not deserve to be bullied by China and urged the West to build economic and political relations with Taipei in the face of Beijing's campaign against the democratic island. Johnson is the third former British prime minister to visit Taiwan, after Liz Truss in 2023 and Margaret Thatcher in the 1990s, and his trip comes at a time when Britain and China are seeking to further stabilise ties as Prime Minister Keir Starmer is expected to visit Beijing later this year. Britain, like most countries, has no formal diplomatic ties with Taiwan but the two governments have close economic and culture exchanges. Beijing has in recent years ramped up military and diplomatic pressure campaigns against Taiwan, including daily military activities near the island, to assert territorial claims the government in Taipei strongly rejects. "In very difficult and intense times, this is the moment for all western countries to build economic and political relations with Taiwan, not to tiptoe away from Taiwan at the pressure from any other country," Johnson told Taiwan President Lai Ching-te in the presidential office in Taipei. "There's absolutely no case for the current Chinese bullying of Taiwan. This is a free, peaceful society. It does not deserve to be intimidated in this way. There's no point in it and I hope it stops as soon as possible," Johnson said in video footage by Lai's office. China's Taiwan Affairs Office did not immediately respond to a Reuters request for comment. Beijing has previously condemned visits by British lawmakers to Taiwan for what it calls interference in China's internal affairs. Johnson was invited to deliver a speech at a security forum by Taipei-based think tank, the Prospect Foundation, which was also attended by Lai earlier on Tuesday. At the forum, Lai vowed to build a "democratic supply chain" with allies by deepening economic cooperation and said he would boost Taiwan's defence spending to more than 3% of its GDP next year. "I'm confident that if democracies can join hands in creating more robust, more resilient global democratic supply chains, we can spur even more economic prosperity and further consolidate our democracy," Lai said. A British Royal Navy patrol vessel sailed through the sensitive Taiwan Strait in June. (Reporting By Yimou Lee, Angie Teo and Yi-chin Lee; additional reporting by Ryan Woo; Editing by Michael Perry)

Dollar weakens as rate cut odds rise, tariff uncertainties linger
Dollar weakens as rate cut odds rise, tariff uncertainties linger

CNBC

timea minute ago

  • CNBC

Dollar weakens as rate cut odds rise, tariff uncertainties linger

The U.S. dollar wavered on Tuesday as the rising odds of Federal Reserve rate cuts weighed on sentiment, while investors assessed the broader economic impact of U.S. tariffs unleashed last week. The dollar remained under pressure following Friday's U.S. jobs report that showed cracks in the labor market, prompting traders to swiftly price in rate cuts next month. U.S. President Donald Trump's firing of a top statistics official and the resignation of Federal Reserve Governor Adriana Kugler also exacerbated market unease, leading to a sharp dive in the dollar on Friday. The U.S. currency found its footing on Monday but was weaker in early trading on Tuesday. The euro last bought $1.1579 while sterling stood at $1.3298. The dollar index, which measures the U.S. currency against six other units, was at 98.688 after touching a one-week low earlier in the session. Traders are now pricing in a 94.4% chance of the Fed cutting rates in its next meeting in September, compared to 63% a week earlier, CME FedWatch tool showed. Goldman Sachs expects the Fed to deliver three consecutive 25 basis point cuts starting in September, with a 50 basis point move possible if the unemployment rate climbs further in the next report. San Francisco Federal Reserve Bank President Mary Daly said on Monday that given mounting evidence that the U.S. jobs market is softening and no signs of persistent tariff-driven inflation, the time is nearing for rate cuts. "I was willing to wait another cycle, but I can't wait forever," Daly said. Meanwhile, the focus remains on tariff uncertainties after the latest duties imposed on scores of countries last week by Trump, stoked worries about the health of the global economy. The Japanese yen firmed slightly to 146.95 per dollar after minutes of its June policy meeting showed a few Bank of Japan board members said the central bank would consider resuming interest rate increases if trade frictions de-escalate. The Swiss franc was steady at 0.8081 per dollar after dropping 0.5% in the previous session as Switzerland geared up to make a "more attractive offer" in trade talks with Washington to avert a 39% U.S. import tariff on Swiss goods that threatens to hammer its export-driven economy. The long-term impact of the tariffs though remains uncertain, with traders bracing for volatility. "This is going to be like the pandemic, we all expect to see the transitory impact on supply chains to happen very quickly," said Rodrigo Catril, currency strategist at National Australia Bank in Sydney. "It'll probably take six months to a year to see exactly where we land and who's going to be winners and losers from all this." In other currencies, the Australian dollar was 0.11% higher at $0.64736, while the New Zealand dollar rose 0.11% to $0.5914. "We're still of a view that the big dollar is heading down," Catril said, referring to the U.S. dollar. "While global growth means pro-growth currencies like Asian currencies and the AUD should struggle, we've other structural dynamics in the USD, where policies are dollar-negative."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store