Top tech editor taking heat for Zuckerberg interview — which didn't mention their close friendship, family vacations: report
Jessica Lessin, founder and editor-in-chief of The Information, sat with Zuckerberg on Monday for an interview to promote the launch of the site's new weekday show TITV.
While the pair's friendship is well-known in most media circles, Lessin made no mention of their relationship during the interview and there was no disclosure on the website, according to the published transcript.
Advertisement
3 The Information's Jessica Lessin interviewed Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg on Monday.
The Information/Youtube
That's causing a stir among media insiders, some of whom are questioning whether Lessin should have recused herself and handed the interview off to another reporter, according to journalist Oliver Darcy's Status newsletter.
'If you decide to interview someone who you regularly go on vacation with, you should disclose that friendship at the start of the conversation,' a prominent tech reporter told Darcy.
'Readers deserve that context as they consider all the questions you ask – and the ones that you don't.'
Advertisement
Another tech reporter called the snafu 'an insult to her newsroom,' according to Status.
Lessin and The Information did not immediately respond to The Post's requests for comment.
The tech editor's relationship with Zuckerberg goes back years, as her husband Sam Lessin won big on Facebook stock he received in 2010 when the Facebook founder – and fellow Harvard pal – bought his startup, according to Vanity Fair.
Advertisement
Sam later worked as an executive in product management at Facebook for about four years, according to his LinkedIn profile.
3 Sam Lessin and Jessica Lessin at the 11th Breakthrough Prize Ceremony in April.
Getty Images for Breakthrough Prize
The Lessins and Zuckerbergs have vacationed together in Lake Tahoe to celebrate the Fourth of July, according to Status and The New York Times.
Jessica reportedly spent considerable time at Zuckerberg's compound in Hawaii during the COVID-19 pandemic, and her husband was seen alongside the Facebook CEO on a hunt in Kauai decked out in camouflage in a series of photos published by The Daily Mail.
Advertisement
The tech site editor previously said she does not view her relationship with Zuckerberg as a conflict of interest, and that she would step aside when 'there is something that could stand in the way of me doing my job objectively,' according to a 2021 New York Times report.
3 Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg speaks at LlamaCon 2025 in April.
AP
But other journalists have been left scratching their heads as to why Lessin did not recuse herself, especially as The Information pushes its new TITV launch and tries to position itself as a premium publication, according to Status.
Annual subscriptions to The Information cost $399, with a professional version offering access to databases and surveys at nearly $1,000 a year.
The interview itself contained few tough questions for Zuckerberg, Darcy noted in his newsletter, and had a rocky start – with no audio for the first few moments.
Eventually a journalist popped in to announce the glitch and end TITV's inaugural show, and the company published a transcript and video the following day.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
LA junkie charged in murder of ‘American Idol' exec spent six months in jail after attacking his family with knife — and had all charges dropped
The Los Angeles lowlife accused of killing 'American Idol' executive Robin Kaye in cold blood was previously accused of pulling a knife on his stepfather and threatening his own mother and sister — but only spent six months in custody before his charges were dismissed. Raymond Boodarian, 22, threatened his stepfather with a blade in November 2023 in the first in a series of busts in just eight months, according to KABC and court documents. He was arrested in February 2023 for misdemeanor battery and threatening his mother and sister — and then again in June 2024, the network reported. Advertisement 4 Raymond Boodarian, 22, was arrested Tuesday without incident at his Los Angeles home by numerous police officers. TMZ Details of the latter collar weren't clear. Boodarian was released the same day as his November and February arrests, but spent six months in jail for his June arrest — and then all the charges against him were dropped when he was declared mentally incompetent, placed on a conservatorship and let go in December. Advertisement On Tuesday — just seven months later — Boodarian was nabbed in the alleged murder of Kaye and her husband Thomas Deluca after breaking into the 70-year-olds' Encino home. It remains unclear exactly why Boodarian's charges were dropped, but California legal experts suggested he may have qualified for California's Mental Health Diversion program — which gives people with verified mental illnesses the opportunity to complete a treatment program in lieu of prison time, and then walk away scot-free without charges, convictions, or any monitoring or probation of any kind. 4 Robin Kaye and Thomas Deluca, both 70, were gunned down in their Encino home on Thursday. Facebook And nearly every crime in California is eligible for the program — with only accused murderers and sex offenders not qualifying. Advertisement 'I've gotten mental health diversion for clients for attempted murder at least seven, eight times,' said Kenneth Rosenfeld, whose Rosenfeld Law Firm specializes in mental health and crime. 'I've gotten mental health diversions for a client that shot a police officer, where the person has no criminal record.' The program typically consists of 18 months to two years of rigorous mental health treatment, Rosenfeld explained, but that six-month programs like Boodarian may have been in were not unheard of. 'It gives somebody the opportunity to get medication, to get the mental health illness identified, whichever one it might be,' Rosenfeld said, noting that to be admitted into the program somebody needs to have thoroughly documented and severe mental troubles. Advertisement 4 The couple's $4.5 million home is just 15 minutes from their suspected killer's condo. BACKGRID But once they complete the program and the charges are dropped, the accused are free to return to their communities as if their alleged crimes never happened — without any mandated monitoring from authorities or mental health professionals. 'There's no probation because there's no conviction, the charges are dismissed,' Rosenfeld said. 'So why would somebody like this who had documented mental health issues, why would they be able to get out on the streets and potentially commit an offense like this? It's because the charges that he was facing were not charges that made him ineligible under California law for mental health diversion,' he added. Boodarian's mental health problems were well known at home — neighbors say there were explosive fights at his house, that he would behave erratically around the block and was frequently high on various drugs. 'He would sit in front of my friend's house just staring and smiling. He did that on multiple occasions, sometimes in his own house, just looking out the window and smiling,' one neighbor told The Post, agreeing with others that families on the street were wary and scared of Boodarian. 4 Boodarian's home, where neighbors say he would frequently wander the street frightening them. David Buchan NY Post Boodarian was arrested on murder charges without incident at his home just 15 minutes from Kaye and Deluca's $4.5 million mansion. Advertisement It's alleged that he broke into the home on Thursday and then shot the couple when they walked in on him. Police connected him to the killing using fingerprints from his previous arrests. He was also allegedly seen on security footage at the couple's house. Boodarian was charged with two counts of murder and first-degree residential burglary and faces a maximum sentence of life in prison without the possibility of parole — or the death penalty. Advertisement 'In a matter of moments, this couple was senselessly killed in their own home as they returned from the grocery store,' District Attorney Nathan Hochman said. 'This tragic shooting has shaken a valley community and the notion that home should be our safe sanctuary. Our thoughts and prayers go out to their family and friends who are grieving this tremendous loss.' Though Boodarian's murder case disqualifies him from California's Mental Health Diversion, legal experts still think he's likely to spend most of his life behind bars if convicted. 'I don't think that they're going to seek the death penalty. But certainly life imprisonment is on the table,' said Danny Rubin of Rubin Law, PC. 'And if he does argue for not guilty by reason of insanity, he may be going to a mental health facility for a very, very long time. 'And that may be even worse than going to jail for life.'
USA Today
3 hours ago
- USA Today
3 biggest takeaways from T.J. Watt's record-setting extension with Steelers
T.J. Watt has signed a new, record-setting contract extension with the Steelers, keeping him in Pittsburgh for the foreseeable future. After dominating headlines over the past few months, Watt's new deal in the Steel City has sent shockwaves throughout the NFL — leaving behind three major takeaways fans should be aware of. Watt becomes highest-paid defender for second time Congratulations are in order for Watt, who became the highest-paid non-quarterback with his three-year, $123 million contract extension — marking the second time he's set a new standard in the NFL. Back in 2021, Watt signed a four-year, $112 million deal that averaged $28.003 million per year — establishing a new benchmark for defensive players and non-quarterbacks across the league. His return to the highest-paid non-QB was initially thought impossible, as his divisional rivals had dominated the contract market. AFC North market reshapes position value There's no debating that the AFC North is one of the NFL's most competitive divisions on the field — but the rivalry has taken on new life in contract negotiations. On March 9, Browns DE Myles Garrett signed a four-year, $160 million deal, making him the highest-paid non-QB — until Bengals WR Ja'Marr Chase claimed the title one week later. Chase signed a four-year, $161 million deal, averaging just $250,000 more than Garrett annually. The All-Pro Bengals wideout was simply keeping the seat warm for Watt, however, who now holds the crown as the highest-paid non-QB with his $41 million per year. It goes without saying — if you want to get paid, play in the AFC North. Steelers need to nail the 2026 NFL Draft on offense After the Steelers all but confirmed their defense-first mentality with Watt's record-setting extension, the offense is left with scraps heading into 2026 — but the NFL Draft presents the perfect opportunity to set things right. Depending on how this season shakes out, the Steelers may need to invest quickly at quarterback, offensive tackle, and wide receiver. If Pittsburgh misses on even one of those picks, it's not like they can afford to pay a premium for a playmaker in free agency. For up-to-date Steelers coverage, follow us on X @TheSteelersWire and give our Facebook page a like.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Meta investors, Zuckerberg reach settlement to end $8 billion trial over Facebook privacy violations
By Tom Hals WILMINGTON, Delaware (Reuters) -Mark Zuckerberg and current and former directors and officers of Meta Platforms agreed on Thursday to settle claims seeking $8 billion for the damage they allegedly caused the company by allowing repeated violations of Facebook users' privacy, a lawyer for the shareholders told a Delaware judge on Thursday. The parties did not disclose details of the settlement and defense lawyers did not address the judge, Kathaleen McCormick of the Delaware Court of Chancery. McCormick adjourned the trial just as it was to enter its second day and she congratulated the parties. The plaintiffs' lawyer, Sam Closic, said the agreement just came together quickly. Billionaire venture capitalist Marc Andreessen, a defendant in the trial and a Meta director, was scheduled to testify on Thursday. Shareholders of Meta sued Zuckerberg, Andreessen and other former company officials including former Chief Operating Officer Sheryl Sandberg in hopes of holding them liable for billions of dollars in fines and legal costs the company paid in recent years. The Federal Trade Commission fined Facebook $5 billion in 2019 after finding that it failed to comply with a 2012 agreement with the regulator to protect users' data. The shareholders wanted the 11 defendants to use their personal wealth to reimburse the company. The defendants denied the allegations, which they called "extreme claims." Facebook changed its name to Meta in 2021. The company was not a defendant and declined to comment. On its website, the company has said it has invested billions of dollars into protecting user privacy since 2019. A lawyer for the defendants declined to comment. 'This settlement may bring relief to the parties involved, but it's a missed opportunity for public accountability," said Jason Kint, the head of Digital Content Next, a trade group for content providers. Zuckerberg was expected to take the stand on Monday and Sandberg on Wednesday. The trial was scheduled to run through the end of next week. The case was also expected to include testimony from former Facebook board members Peter Thiel, Palantir Technologies co-founder, and Reed Hastings, co-founder of Netflix. By settling, Zuckerberg and other defendants avoid having to answer probing questions under oath. Sandberg was found during the litigation to have deleted what were likely her most sensitive emails and she was sanctioned, making it harder for her to tell her side of the story in court. The settlement allows plaintiffs to avoid trying a very difficult case. Meta investors alleged that former and current board members completely failed to oversee the company's compliance with the 2012 FTC agreement. The lawsuit also claimed that Zuckerberg and Sandberg knowingly ran Facebook as an illegal data harvesting operation. The oversight allegations are known as Caremark claims, considered the most difficult to prove under Delaware corporate law. It was the first time Caremark claims went to trial, and even if the plaintiffs had gotten a judgment in their favor, the case would have been appealed to the Delaware Supreme Court. That court has reversed major shareholder victories in recent years. The case followed revelations that data from millions of Facebook users was accessed by Cambridge Analytica, a now-defunct political consulting firm that worked for Donald Trump's successful U.S. presidential campaign in 2016. Those revelations led to the FTC fine, which was a record at the time. On Wednesday, an expert witness for the plaintiffs testified about what he called "gaps and weaknesses" in Facebook's privacy policies but would not say if the company violated the 2012 agreement that Facebook reached with the FTC. Jeffrey Zients, a former board member, testified on Wednesday that the company did not agree to the FTC fine to spare Zuckerberg legal liability, as shareholders alleged. The defendants' legal team also showed the court notes that Zients had taken when he was on the board that seemed to show he was urging the board to make user privacy a top priority, which would undercut plaintiffs' claims. The trial settlement marks the second time Zuckerberg avoided testifying in the court. In 2017, Facebook abandoned a plan to issue a new class of stock as a way for Zuckerberg to extend his control over the company while selling his shares. The decision came a week before Zuckerberg was expected to testify in the Court of Chancery to defend the stock plan. "Facebook has successfully remade the 'Cambridge Analytica' scandal about a few bad actors rather than an unraveling of its entire business model of surveillance capitalism and the reciprocal, unbridled sharing of personal data," Kint said. "That reckoning is now left unresolved."
