Ten year West Lothian plan raises concern as council given just weeks to agree
Concern has been raised over the amount of time West Lothian councillors have been given to consider a ten-year planning blueprint for the area.
Councillors may have just over a month before they are asked to agree to a 1,000-plus pages draft of evidence to submit to the Scottish Government for a new Local Development Plan.
The plan is a guide to what happens in the county between 2028 and 2038, and covers housing development, infrastructure, transport, and communities.
But the initial hefty document brought more questions and criticism than answers this week.
Linlithgow' Lib Dem councillor Sally Pattle told a meeting of the Economy Community Empowerment and Wealth Building PDSP that she had 'serious concerns' that councillors would have enough time ' to get this right.'
The document - 1059 pages long - is the combined two years of evidence gathered which has to be presented to the Division of Planning and Environmental Appeals DPEA to be ' gate checked' as the foundation of the next Local Development Plan (LDP).
This broad brush approach to evidence gathering threw up anomalies and outdated information which the SNP's Andrew Miller highlighted, including one suggestion that three buses served Livingston Village when in fact none do.
Only half way through the meeting did councillors find out that council officers had based their ward evidence on community council boundaries, which threw up anomalies such as bus services.
Councillors also picked over the lack of details in individual sections of the report demanding more detail be included before a final draft goes to a meeting of the full council and then on to the DPEA.
Councilor Susan Manion stressed on several occasions that this was the first draft of the document and was open to change and improvement.
All councillors moved to praise officers for the amount of work that has gone into the first draft.
Councillor Pattle said: 'I am now seriously concerned as I have sat here for the past ninety minutes, it's been revealed that we are supposed to go to full council to agree this and that its five weeks time.
'I was under the impression that when it went to full council it would be after recess in September, giving us months to prepare for this.'
Addressing the ranks of planning officers seated in the Livingston chamber, councillor Pattle continued: 'I appreciate your time today and I'm sorry that we have come across as hyper local but that's our job.
'We are here to scrutinise on behalf of our wards to make sure this incredibly important document is right when it goes to the gate check.
'I am now extremely concerned that we are not going to be given adequate opportunities to do that.'
And she warned: 'Developers are going to be watching us like hawks. they are going to be using this as the basis for development for the next ten years. We have to get this right. I would like some reassurance that we are going to be given enough time to do that.'
Fellow Linlithgow Councillor Pauline Orr, SNP, said: ' It's a huge piece of work and we are the face of our communities so we absolutely have to get it right.' She praised the 'amazing' work of the officers in producing the 1059 pages of evidence.
Director of Planning Craig McCorriston moved to reassure the meeting that he was happy to meet councillors and take additional information from them to correct inaccuracies.
He said that the draft evidence had to be ready to present to the DPEA by May 2028. The process is defined by government legislation but he conceded that the time frame for the council to prepare the draft was "tight and we do have to work at speed.'
He added: 'We have opened up to scrutiny today in a way which we hope is helpful to members and will engage further in the coming week to go through matters of concern or errors. Then we will ask the Provost to progress to a special meeting of the full council.'
He stressed: 'If we get this wrong it is going to independent scrutiny and the DPEA Reporter will send it back to us if we have not gathered enough evidence. I'm pretty confident that we are just about there but am happy to take that extra few days to go through things with members.'
Councillor Willie Boyle said: ' I'm looking forward to further opportunities to discuss it when it comes to actually putting the plan together. Power to your elbow I know we are up against a time schedule here and I fully accept that. We are where we are with that. We need to get it done.'
Depute SNP group leader Pauline Stafford said: "I'd like to acknowledge the work that's gone into this report and I hope members of the public will take time to read through it as well.'
Councillor Stafford added: ' I sit on the Development Management [Committee] and the reason I do is because I think it has such a vital role to play in all we do in council . This is what builds strong thriving communities. Planning is often, for elected members, misunderstood and for the public is often mistrusted, and as much transparency we can provide and show communities we have actually listened is vital.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
5 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
SNP's handling of Flamingo Land appeal 'risks being unlawful'
Since then, Green MSP Mr Greer, who is involved in the Save Loch Lomond campaign, had his legal advisor send a detailed letter of concern to the Government. Concerns raised include the reappointment of the same official who previously recommended that Flamingo Land's mega-resort be given permission to go ahead. This official will now lead on the recall case and make a new recommendation to Ministers, which Greer's legal advisor Ian Cowan warned risks making the process 'tainted by bias'. READ MORE: Yes to Flamingo Land, no to National Parks: what's the SNP playing at? What locals in Balloch think of Flamingo Land The Green MSP for the West of Scotland said: 'The public and the experts have said again and again that [[Flamingo Land]]'s destructive application must be rejected. The National Park did the right thing last year when they unanimously said no to this daft mega-resort. And when SNP Ministers were about to overturn that decision and let it go ahead, we forced them into a u-turn. 'But since then the Scottish Government has made some deeply questionable decisions. They refuse to hold any public hearing and have asked the same official who tried to approve the plans to 'mark his own homework' by making recommendation for a fresh decision." Another concern raised in the letter is the apparent contradiction in the dates of specific documents. The document formally reappointing the previous official to prepare a new report for Ministers was published on July 4th, having apparently been signed off by a senior planning official on June 24th. However, the document's properties show that it was created on July 4th, shorty after the publication of a separate document from this official which laid out the new process. The appointment document also did not carry the digital signature of the relevant senior official. Mr Greer added: 'Now they're [the Scottish Government] asking Flamingo Land to draft their own planning conditions on their own terms, against the wishes of the National Park. Is it any wonder that local people get the feeling that the cards are being stacked against them? 'I hope there is a simple explanation for this inconsistency in the date of the official's appointment, because it is hugely concerning. There needs to be full transparency here if the public are to have any confidence in this process. As it stands, the timeline just doesn't add up and that's a massive cause for concern.' The Scottish Government said the development raised issues of "national significance" and so they decided to recall the appeal. A Scottish Government spokesperson said: 'Ministers decided to recall the Lomond Banks appeal as the proposed development raises issues of national significance in view of its potential impact on Loch Lomond and the Trossachs National Park. As this is a live planning appeal it would not be appropriate to comment further.'
Edinburgh Reporter
9 hours ago
- Edinburgh Reporter
Charities criticise offshore wind farm decision
Conservation charities have criticised The Scottish Government's decision to grant consent for an offshore wind farm that they say could threaten some of the nation's globally important seabird colonies. RSPB Scotland has described the decision to grant consent for SSE Renewables' proposed Berwick Bank wind farm in the outer Firth of Forth as 'catastrophic' and warned it could 'catapult some species towards extinction'. Scotland's largest conservation charity, The National Trust for Scotland, said the decision was 'deeply disappointing' and would 'further erode Scotland's reputation as a nation that cares for its environment'. The charities had called for the plans to be refused, predicting that the development, close to known established colonies like the Bass Rock and St Abb's Head, will over its lifetime kill tens of thousands of seabirds including kittiwakes, puffins and gannets. Although Scottish Ministers require the developers to demonstrate that 'sufficient seabird compensation' will be put in place before the project can start, conservationists said it was 'not clear how the thousands of seabirds predicted to be killed can be compensated for'. Anne McCall, Director of RSPB Scotland, said: 'This is a very dark day for seabirds. It is a terrible decision on a really bad development. 'Berwick Bank would be catastrophic for Scotland's globally important seabirds which are already facing alarming declines. 'In addition, its impacts are so damaging they will make the relative impacts of other wind farms significantly higher. 'This one wind farm is going to make it really challenging to accelerate renewable projects across Scottish seas. 'We are incredibly concerned that Scottish Government have granted consent for a project which could catapult some of Scotland's most-loved seabird species towards extinction. 'RSPB Scotland recognises climate change is one of the biggest threats to seabirds, but there needs to be seabirds left to save. 'We support nature-positive offshore wind, in the right locations with minimised impacts on wildlife and measures to restore and protect seabird populations. 'But this is predicted to be one of the most damaging wind farms for birds we are aware of anywhere on the planet.' Berwick Bank is a proposal by SSE Renewables of more than 300 turbines covering 1000 square kilometres, off the East Lothian and Scottish Borders coastline. It is anticipated to generate 4.1 gigawatts (GW) of energy, which could generate enough electricity each year to power every household in Scotland around twice over, using turbines stretching 355 metres high to the blade tip. The Scottish Government's own assessment estimates that the project will kill 261 gannets, 815 kittiwakes, 2808 guillemots, 66 puffins and 154 razorbills in the first year of operation, with this level of mortality continuing throughout the 35-year lifetime of the development. McCall added: 'We will be carefully scrutinising the details of the consent documents over the coming hours and days and considering what further steps we will take.' Scotland is home to internationally important seabird populations, including 60% of great skuas and almost half (48%) of the world's Northern gannets, with one of the biggest colonies on Earth found at the Bass Rock. Research has shown that 70% of seabird species in Scotland are in decline, even before the significant impact of avian flu (Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza or HPAI). Last year, five more UK seabirds were added to the UK Red list of most conservation concern, meaning they are at risk of extinction or require urgent conservation action. Scotland has more than 50% of the UK population of each of these five species. RSPB Scotland said that since the Berwick Bank site was first identified around 15 years ago numerous other projects had come forward, most of which were 'much less damaging to seabirds'. Diarmid Hearns, the National Trust for Scotland's Interim Director of Conservation & Policy, said: 'Today's decision by Scottish Ministers is deeply disappointing. More than that, we fear it will also be the cause of significant harm to the seabird colonies of St Abb's Head National Nature Reserve and elsewhere on the coastline. 'As we observed in our submission, the proposed mitigations by the developers fell far short of alleviating the expected impacts in terms of fatalities and disruption. Indeed, the Scottish Government's own Chief Scientific Advisor Marine and a review panel drawn from the Scottish Science Advisory Council came to the same conclusion. 'We look forward to hearing more about the detailed seabird compensation plan that is a condition of the approval, as soon as this is available. If this is not adequate — and it needs to be a major improvement on what is currently proposed — then the development should not proceed. 'At the National Trust for Scotland we are supportive of the drive towards renewable energy, but not at the expense of the very nature and habitats this effort is supposed to help save in the face of climate change… 'This is not a good decision for nature and further erodes Scotland's reputation as a nation that cares for its environment and recognises its importance to our collective future.' Harry Huyton, CEO of the marine conservation and education charity The Scottish Seabird Centre, said the decision was 'devastating news for seabirds'. He added: 'The Scottish Seabird Centre and nature charities across Scotland have repeatedly called on the Scottish Government to refuse consent for Berwick Bank and to instead back lower impact wind farms. 'It's deeply disappointing that these concerns — and the advice of the Government's own adviser, NatureScot, who also objected to the development — appear to have been ignored.' Deputy First Minister Kate Forbes defended the decision, and said: 'Ministers have given the Berwick Bank wind farm application extremely careful consideration. 'The decision to grant consent to Berwick Bank is a major step in Scotland's progress towards achieving net zero and tackling the climate crisis, as well as supporting national energy security and growing our green economy. 'It is also an important decision for Scotland's renewables sector, and this investment will be further built upon through the delivery of Scotland's significant future pipeline of offshore wind projects under the ScotWind and the Innovation and Targeted Oil and Gas (INTOG) leasing rounds. 'We will continue to work closely with the developer and key stakeholders, including those working in fishing and conservation — to minimise the impact of the development on the marine environment and other marine users – and balance the needs of people and nature.' Anne McCall RSPB Scotland Director Northern gannet Morus bassanus, adult pair courting, PHOTO Les Cater RSPB Northern gannet Morus bassanus, adult pair courting, RSPB Bempton Cliffs Nature Reserve, Yorkshire, June PHOTO Les Cater Atlantic puffin Fratercula arctica, adult with fish in its beak, Shiant Isles, Hebrides, Scotland, July PHOTO Chantal Macleod Nolan Like this: Like Related
The National
17 hours ago
- The National
SNP under fire over public energy firm as Wales launches wind projects
The Labour-run administration in Cardiff set up Trydan Gwyrdd Cymru (which translates to Green Electricity Wales) in 2024, and in July announced plans for three wind farms on publicly owned Welsh woodlands – as well as more renewable energy projects yet to be finalised. Trydan said the initial three wind farms would be able to generate up to 400 MW of clean electricity – enough to power around one in four Welsh homes – with 'all profits generated reinvested in Welsh communities and public services'. In 2017, then-Scottish first minister Nicola Sturgeon pledged to establish a 'publicly owned, not-for-profit energy company', but the policy was dropped after the 2021 Holyrood elections. Robin McAlpine, from the Common Weal think tank, said that they had partnered with Plaid Cymru during their time in the Welsh government to lay the groundwork for Trydan Gwyrdd Cymru. 'The whole point of that conversation was to explain how to create a public energy company under a devolved settlement – and the fact that this is happening in Wales shows that it certainly could have happened in Scotland too,' he said. READ MORE: UK energy bills to rise as Ofgem approves £24bn investment 'Common Weal has made this point over and over again – the letter of the devolution settlement says the Scottish Government can't own a wind farm, but we've set out about six different workarounds. 'The fastest is to create an energy company which is co-ordinated and funded by the Scottish Government, but in which the actual wind farms are owned by local authorities. 'We have told the Scottish Government this again and again. It is a very active choice to maintain an almost wholly privatised energy system in Scotland.' Scottish Greens co-leader Patrick Harvie MSP also called for more to be done to ensure communities in Scotland see the benefits of energy generation projects. Scottish Green co-leader Patrick Harvie (Image: PA) 'Scotland has seen extraordinary growth in renewables, but this hasn't come with the growth of local, community and public ownership that some countries have achieved,' he told the Sunday National. 'We have an abundance of natural resources at our disposal that can generate clean, green, renewable energy, and we also have highly skilled people with years of experience working in the energy sector. The Greens want these resources to benefit everyone, not just giant private investors. 'It is great to see Wales taking steps in this direction. As Greens, we've long made the case for every local community to have its own energy company, as well as a role for the national level. 'The Scottish Government can do far more to ensure that the ownership models for renewable energy put money back into communities across Scotland, at the same time as cutting emissions. Local ownership, community ownership and public ownership should all be playing a much bigger role.' READ MORE: Scottish Government approves one of world's biggest wind farms amid controversy However, a Scottish Government spokesperson insisted that they did not have the powers required. 'A national public energy company that is involved in large-scale energy generation would only be possible in an independent Scotland where we had full powers over the energy market and full access to borrowing,' they said. 'We are committed to maximising the public benefits of our renewables revolution, and while many powers remain reserved, we will use the powers we do have and continue to grow community investment in energy-related projects and technology.' In January, Scottish Energy Secretary Gillian Martin told MSPs that setting up a publicly owned energy firm was "not something we are able to do at the moment with the current devolution settlement". Rebecca Evans is the Economy Secretary in the Welsh Labour Government (Image: Welsh Government) Announcing the Trydan Gwyrdd Cymru plans for 400MW of wind farm capacity, Welsh Labour's Economy Secretary Rebecca Evans said: 'These proposals demonstrate our commitment to harnessing Wales's abundant natural resources to generate clean energy while ensuring the benefits are felt locally. 'By developing these projects on the Welsh Government Woodland Estate, we're making best use of our public land to tackle the climate emergency and create sustainable economic opportunities." A press release said that the developments will 'create hundreds of jobs during construction and operation, with Trydan committed to involving Welsh companies throughout the process'.
