Utah Fits All Scholarship ruling on hold, program can continue until Utah Supreme Court decides
Lawyers for the state of Utah, the Utah Education Association, and the manager of the Utah Fits All, ACE, each joined a status hearing Wednesday, where the parties agreed that the case would ultimately be decided by the Utah Supreme Court.
'I will not impose a remedy at this point. I'll issue the final ruling [of all four claims], it will go up on appeal, there will be no injunction in place,' said Judge Laura Scott. 'My understanding is that would mean things would just proceed as normal…unless and until we have a decision by the [Utah] Supreme Court,' she said.
Judge Scott's April 18 ruling only decided two of the UEA's four claims, that the scholarship was unconstitutional under Articles X and XIII of the state's constitution, rendering the other two claims as moot.
Teacher salaries, scholarship families in limbo after court strikes down Utah Fits All
Judge Scott said that if there was clarity that the parties needed, they could ask for it in her new order that she plans to issue by May 15.
'It is in everyone's interest to move as expeditiously as possible into the Supreme Court,' said the lawyer for UEA, Raymay Ravindran.
'If we could have the matter presented before the Supreme Court with simply having the ruling itself stayed and have the entry of the remedy postponed until we get that guidance, that would be the state's preference,' said Scott Ryther, who represents the state.
The main question from the parties was whether scholarships could continue to be paid out for the current school year's recipients despite the ruling being deemed constitutional. The state board is also in the middle of picking a new program manager, something lawyers said was supposed to happen this week. There's also a May 1 deadline for new recipients to apply for next school year's money.
'My client wants to make sure what its obligations are under the order,' said Tyson Langhofer, who represents ACE. 'There is still a significant amount of money that needs to be paid out under the current year, because not everyone has drawn down on [their scholarship] and we want to make sure we understand what their obligations are.'
ACE has been terminated by the Utah State Board of Education and said that they're currently applying to run the program again.
Their management of the current UFA program ends May 15, Langhofer said.
Teachers also stand to lose some of their salaries that are tied up in the because the law that created the program said it had to be 'in effect' for that money to be realized.
Since 2023, funding for the scholarship has more than doubled from $40 million to over $100 million, which could reportedly fund about 10,000 students. The program offered a scholarship of up to $8,000 for eligible K-12 students, but thresholds were changed in the 2025 legislative session to $8,000 for private school, $6,000 for homeschoolers age 12-18, and $4,000 for those age 5 to 11.
'We are grateful for the court's consideration of this important issue and are glad that parents and teachers will be able to continue to rely on the law while the underlying legal and constitutional questions at issue in this case are resolved,' said Attorney General Derek Brown.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Bloomberg
25 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Supreme Court to Consider Ban on Race-Based Voting Districts
By Updated on Save The US Supreme Court indicated it will consider outlawing the use of race in drawing voting maps, setting up a blockbuster showdown with implications for dozens of congressional districts with predominantly minority populations. Expanding a Louisiana case already on their docket, the justices said they will consider arguments that the 1965 Voting Rights Act no longer provides a legitimate basis for map-drawers to intentionally create majority-Black or majority-Hispanic districts.


Fox News
an hour ago
- Fox News
Comer OKs delay for Ghislaine Maxwell's congressional testimony, denies immunity request
House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer, R-Ky., is delaying Ghislaine Maxwell's planned deposition until after the Supreme Court weighs her request to overturn her conviction, according to a letter obtained by Fox News Digital. Committee investigators were set to travel to a Tallahassee prison for an Aug. 11 sit-down with Maxwell after lawmakers voted to subpoena her over her close ties to late pedophile Jeffrey Epstein. In a letter sent to Comer earlier this week, Maxwell's lawyer claimed she "did not receive a fair trial" and petitioned to delay the deposition date until after her case before the Supreme Court was resolved. "On July 30, the U.S. Supreme Court noticed that your petition for writ of certiorari will be considered at its conference on September 29. In light of this notice, the Committee is willing to delay your deposition until a date following the Court's certiorari determination," Comer wrote on Friday. According to the Kentucky Republican's letter, Maxwell's lawyer warned she would invoke the Fifth Amendment to avoid answering any questions unless certain conditions were met. "These conditions include: (1) a grant of immunity, (2) the deposition occurring outside of FCI Tallahassee, (3) access to the Committee's questions in advance, and (4) the conclusion of your recent appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court and potential future habeas petition," Comer wrote. He denied her requests for congressional immunity and to get the questions in advance, but wrote the committee would continue to "engage in good faith negotiations." Comer also vowed the committee would honor its "long-standing practice of engaging in forthright and detailed discussions about scoping." The subpoena was issued to Maxwell after a unanimous vote by both Republicans and Democrats on the committee in late July. The motion to subpoena Maxwell was offered by Rep. Tim Burchett, R-Tenn. "Your testimony is vital to the Committee's efforts regarding Mr. Jeffrey Epstein, including the 2007 non-prosecution agreement and the circumstances surrounding Mr. Epstein's death," Comer wrote. "These investigative efforts may be used to inform potential legislation to improve federal efforts to combat sex trafficking and reform the use of non-prosecution agreements and/or plea agreements in sex-crime investigations." The letter comes hours after Fox News learned Maxwell was transferred from Florida to a federal prison camp in Bryan, Texas. Congressional investigators are looking to speak with Maxwell over her longstanding close ties to Epstein, who was awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges when he died by suicide at a jail in New York City in 2019. Maxwell herself was sentenced to 20 years in prison in June 2022 "for her role in a scheme to sexual exploit and abuse multiple minor girls with Jeffrey Epstein over the course of a decade," according to a press release by the Southern District of New York. In the delay request, Maxwell's attorney argued that "Any testimony she provides now could compromise her constitutional rights, prejudice her legal claims, and potentially taint a future jury pool." Maxwell already met with federal investigators last week when Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche sat down with her in Tallahassee at the direction of Attorney General Pam Bondi. Bondi said in a statement announcing the meeting, "President Trump has told us to release all credible evidence. If Ghislaine Maxwell has information about anyone who has committed crimes against victims, the FBI and the DOJ will hear what she has to say." Maxwell's lawyers told Fox News in response to Comer's letter, "We acknowledge Chairman Comer's letter and appreciate the Committee's willingness to delay Ms. Maxwell's deposition while her case is pending before the Supreme Court. We will continue to engage with Congress in good faith to find a way for Ms. Maxwell to share her information without compromising her constitutional right."


Bloomberg
an hour ago
- Bloomberg
Supreme Court to Consider Outlawing Race-Based Voting Districts
The US Supreme Court indicated it will consider outlawing the use of race in drawing voting maps, setting up a blockbuster showdown with implications for dozens of congressional districts with predominantly minority populations. Expanding a Louisiana case already on their docket, the justices said they will consider arguments that the 1965 Voting Rights Act no longer provides a legitimate basis for map-drawers to intentionally create majority-Black or majority-Hispanic districts.