Texas Law Requiring Warnings on Some Foods Signed by Governor
(Bloomberg) -- Texas legislation that will require warning labels on food and beverages such as M&Ms, Cinnamon Toast Crunch and Fanta will become law after Governor Greg Abbott signed the initiative.
Abbott signed Senate Bill 25 on Sunday night — a victory for Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s 'Make America Healthy Again' movement, which is looking to remove ingredients such as synthetic dyes from the nation's food supply.
Food companies, which have maintained that all of their ingredients are safe, now have until 2027 to eliminate more than 40 ingredients, including dyes and bleached flour, from their products sold in Texas.
If they don't, they'll have to include a label on new packaging warning the product contains ingredients 'not recommended for human consumption' by other countries. Many, but not all, of the additives are banned or require warnings in other countries.
The law creates a new requirement for packaged-food companies in a state with more than 31 million residents — the second-most populous in the US. Historically, state regulations have triggered national changes as companies look to streamline production.
Companies have already started to mobilize amid pressure from the government and activists to remove ingredients that officials have blamed for health problems including hyperactivity, obesity and diabetes in children.
Kraft Heinz Co. and General Mills Inc. recently announced the removal of synthetic dyes from their US products by the end of 2027. Industry groups have said no formal agreement exists with the federal government, however.
As currently formulated, products including Coca-Cola Co.'s Fanta, PepsiCo Inc.'s Cheetos Crunchy and Nacho Cheese Doritos and Mars Inc.'s Skittles and M&Ms would be subject to the warning labels. So would Kellanova's Frosted Strawberry Pop-Tarts.
Companies can avoid the label requirements for the targeted ingredients if the FDA or USDA declare them safe after Sept. 1. Additionally, if the agencies restrict an ingredient's use, require a warning label, or ban it outright after that same date, then that action would supersede the Texas regulation.
If the federal government mandates labeling for 'ultra-processed or processed foods,' that would also supersede Texas' required labels.
Barring these conditions or new qualifications for the ingredients' use from the federal government, the warnings will be required on labels beginning in 2027.
Questions remain in the industry about how the legislation will be implemented. The law applies for any food labeling copyrighted or developed beginning on Jan. 1, 2027, and under one interpretation, that means it only applies when a company next updates its packaging.
Gary Huddleston, a grocery-industry consultant for the Texas Retailers Association, said companies will be able to wait until they reformulate a product or otherwise change their labels.
Ingredients listed in the Texas law include BHT, a food additive, titanium dioxide, used for food coloring, and DATEM, an emulsifier.
Lawsuits from packaged-food producers are expected.
'I don't expect that to be the end of the debate here,' said Smitha Stansbury, a partner at King & Spalding's FDA and Life Sciences practice, predicting the law will be 'subject to litigation.'
'There's precedent for food companies to challenge this law under First Amendment grounds,' said Seth Mailhot, a partner at Husch Blackwell and the leader of the law firm's FDA group.
The food industry has argued that the legislation is too broad. It has also criticized the idea of making policy based on foreign governments' classification of ingredients, as opposed to US or Texas regulators.
--With assistance from Deena Shanker.
More stories like this are available on bloomberg.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
33 minutes ago
- Time of India
This common UAE summer effect could be worsening your health; doctors explain
As summer temperatures soar across the UAE, doctors are warning that extreme heat can trigger underlying health conditions and worsen symptoms in vulnerable individuals, particularly those with chronic neurological and cardiovascular diseases. While most people associate high temperatures with heat stroke and dehydration, medical experts say the impact goes deeper, often unmasking or aggravating dormant conditions. Among the most affected are patients with Multiple Sclerosis (MS), a neurological disorder that impacts the central nervous system. What is Multiple Sclerosis? Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic autoimmune disease that affects the central nervous system (brain, spinal cord, and optic nerves) by damaging the protective myelin sheath surrounding nerve fibers. This damage disrupts nerve signal transmission, leading to symptoms such as muscle weakness, numbness, vision problems, difficulty walking, coordination issues, fatigue, and cognitive impairments. Live Events 'Between 60 and 80 percent of people with MS report a worsening of symptoms such as fatigue, mobility issues, and visual disturbances during hot weather,' said Professor Anu Jacob, Director of Multiple Sclerosis and Autoimmune Neurology at Cleveland Clinic Abu Dhabi, as told to Khaleej Times. This temporary flare-up, known as Uhthoff's phenomenon, occurs when a rise in body temperature affects damaged nerves. Symptoms generally subside with rest and cooling. Jacob said hydration, cooling vests, and avoiding peak outdoor hours are key to symptom management. He also noted the UAE's efforts in building accessible, shaded, and air-conditioned public spaces, which are crucial for people with chronic conditions. According to a report by Khaleej Times, to move toward accessibility, the National MS Society has introduced the Universal Design for Inclusion Programme, partnering with six UAE universities to foster student-led innovations in inclusive infrastructure. Warning signs of severe heat-related illness include confusion, fainting, rapid heart rate, and cessation of sweating, which may require medical attention. Doctors stress that early intervention and preventive care are essential for at-risk groups. Economic Times WhatsApp channel )
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
Withdraw decision to hike GLR value: CPI (M)
The Communist Party of India (Marxist) has urged the government to withdraw the decision to increase the Guideline Land Register (GLR) value in Puducherry. CPI(M) secretary S. Ramachandran, in a statement, said the government's decision to increase the GLR value would impact all sections of society. The hike imposed was around five to six times more than the existing value making registration of property a very costly affair. 'The Tamil Nadu government had also effected a hike, but it was very marginal. The Puducherry government, without increasing the GLR value for a long time, has hiked it enormously all of a sudden. The present hike should be withdrawn immediately, and a more rational approach should be adopted,' he said.
Mint
3 hours ago
- Mint
You Should Be Able to Tell Who's an ICE Agent
(Bloomberg Opinion) -- Back in March, when masked, hoodie-clad federal immigration agents were caught on camera grabbing a Tufts University student off a sidewalk and forcing her into an unmarked vehicle, it was shocking. 'Why are you hiding your faces?' a bystander can be heard asking. It hasn't taken long for such aggressive tactics to become the norm in many US cities. But perhaps nowhere is this more evident than in and around Los Angeles, where President Donald Trump has decided to focus his administration's crackdown on undocumented immigrants, going so far as to bring in the National Guard and Marines over the objections of California officials. LA is full of agents, from Border Patrol and Immigration to Customs Enforcement to Homeland Security Investigations, many of whom aren't easy to identify. In the resulting confusion, police officers are getting mistaken for those agents. The trust that's so critical for local law enforcement to persuade people to report crimes, regardless of their immigration status, is eroding. And fear and paranoia are high that some of the masked people walking around with guns and chasing people aren't federal agents at all, but criminals pretending to be law enforcement. There's a real worry about the overall impact on public safety. California state Senator Sasha Renee Perez, who is sponsoring a bill to make federal agents display identification, told me police chiefs recognize the 'very dangerous' situation the Trump administration has created with its raids. She says she introduced her bill because she didn't know what to tell constituents after masked agents caused a panic in her district by pulling a high-powered rifle from the trunk of a car in a busy parking lot. 'They were asking, 'How will we be able to identify whether or not somebody's actually an ICE agent?' And 'I'm just supposed to get in a car with any masked person with a gun who claims that they're ICE?'' Numerous elected officials have been asking the same questions, given that criminals have been known to impersonate ICE agents. Los Angeles County Supervisor Kathryn Barger is convinced that a staffer's Latino godson was approached by two impersonators in an unmarked car. They told him he had a 'nice truck for someone with that surname' and tried to open the door. Lately, not a day seems to pass without a new viral video showing armed men in ski masks or neck gaiters climbing out of unmarked vehicles with out-of-state plates. Sometimes they wear tactical vests that say 'POLICE,' but almost never with name tags or badge numbers. And when bystanders ask whether they are federal agents, which agency they work for and whether they have a warrant, the men – and it's mostly men – typically refuse to answer. There are many reasons these tactics are problematic, including the basic affront to civil liberties. Americans, after all, are accustomed to seeing the faces of law enforcement and being able to demand identification. That transparency goes a long way toward creating the conditions for public safety. What's required is not just trust between law enforcement and the communities they serve, but also some level of communication and coordination among government agencies. Little of the latter is happening though, California Democrats continue to say. The Trump administration would likely blame the state's 'sanctuary' law for that. But nothing prohibits notifications to city or state officials about upcoming operations. Nevertheless, in that vacuum of information, tension and confusion have been allowed to build between the public and federal immigration agents. In suburban Pasadena, for example, elected officials have been left to guess about the identity of a man in a 'POLICE' vest who aimed a gun at a group of pedestrians. They assume he was a federal agent because he turned on the car's red and blue emergency lights before driving away. But local police weren't told of any operations. 'One question is this a law enforcement agent or someone pretending to be a law enforcement agent, and there is no good answer here,' Pasadena Mayor Victor Gordo told the Los Angeles Times. Elsewhere, protesters have confronted undercover police detectives, thinking they were federal agents. 'It is not safe for our officers, or for others involved in any active police operations if misrepresentations or misunderstandings lead to inappropriate engagement,' Michael Dorsey, police chief of the city of Fontana, wrote on Facebook. The San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department reported that its fleet of unmarked vehicles has been targeted, too. 'All white vehicles are NOT ICE,' it posted -- and then deleted – on X. And the mayor of Huntington Park has gone so far as to propose directing his city's police to make federal agents identify themselves before raids, which he called 'state-sanctioned intimidation.' California state Senator Scott Wiener, who has introduced a bill to prohibit federal agents from covering their faces, called the situation 'combustible.' (If enacted, such a bill, much like Perez's, would probably be impossible to enforce.) Why the secrecy? Tom Homan, Trump's border czar, insists it's not about 'intimidation.' It's 'because they've been doxxed by the thousands,' he recently told the New York Times podcast The Daily. 'Their families have been doxxed. ICE officers' pictures have shown up on trees and telephone poles. Death threats are sky high.' That is probably true, and if so, it's a problem. Nevertheless, letting law enforcement operate in masked secrecy, chasing down people without having to provide warrants or identification, is not a viable solution. 'Who are these people?' Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass asked at a recent press conference. 'And frankly, the vests that they have on look like they ordered them from Amazon. Are they bounty hunters? Are they vigilantes? If they're federal officials, why is it that they do not identify themselves?' These are questions that deserve answers. That there are none forthcoming from the Trump administration is just further evidence that despite what Trump says about upholding 'law and order,' the administration's deportations of random dishwashers, day laborers and landscapers has nothing to do with public safety. More From Bloomberg Opinion: This column reflects the personal views of the author and does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners. Erika D. Smith is a politics and policy columnist for Bloomberg Opinion. She is a former Los Angeles Times columnist and Sacramento Bee editorial board member. More stories like this are available on
