NCEA overhaul sparks optimism and concern
Photo:
Getty Images
Teachers' unions are cautiously optimistic changes to the country's secondary school qualifications framework will work, provided they are implemented and resourced well.
But the opposition is concerned the "complete overhaul" goes too far.
Prime Minister Christopher Luxon and Education Minister Erica Stanford
on Monday
said NCEA Level 1 would be replaced with foundation literacy and numeracy tests. Levels 2 and 3 would be replaced with a New Zealand Certificate of Education and an Advanced Certificate.
Students would be required to take five subjects and pass at least four to get each certificate. Marking would be out of 100, and grades range from A to E.
Stanford said as a parent, she did not understand how NCEA (National Certificate of Educational Achievement) worked.
"I thought that if you're sitting English, everyone's sitting the same English - but that's not the case… There is too much credit counting and bringing together of sometimes quite ad hoc standards because we moved to the standards-based assessment that are not setting students up for success."
But the new system is not a return to the days of single three-hour exams measuring a students' learning for the year, nor will it be graded, forcing a certain percentage of students to fail.
"I think it's really important to know that this is still standards-based assessment," Post Primary Teachers' Association president Chris Abercrombie told
Nine to Noon
.
"So the real heart of NCEA, that standards base, is still there, which is really good to see because we know that helps students show their knowledge and understanding in various forms, so that's really good to see that that still exists…
"Because it's all standards-based assessment… the 'bell curve' is not going to be put into the marking. So it's not gonna change that aspect fundamentally, which is really good."
The new system is expected to be implemented one year at a time, so students will not be doing a mix of NCEA and and the new qualifications.
Abercrombie said implementing it in a planned, robust and well-resourced way would be key to its success.
"There's a significant concern about this because we know because of the poor implementation plan of Level 1, it did create a lot of stress on schools and teachers and principals to do that.
"So, as I say, implementation is going to be absolutely key. We cannot repeat the mistakes made during the implementation of the new Level 1, and the co-requisites literacy and numeracy."
Secondary Principals Association president Louise Anaru said the government must give teachers the training, resources and time they needed to introduce the overhaul.
"The staging and sequencing of the changes are really important, and I can see that there is a timeline in place. Our schools will need to be resourced sufficiently, and they also need adequate time to implement all of the changes."
Anaru said the overhaul retained the best parts of NCEA.
Abercrombie noted that so far, principals had been consulted on the changes - but not teachers.
"We need to make sure the sector really is listened to in this and so, hopefully the consultation period will allow that to happen."
He also noted teachers "asked to do a lot of work for a 1 percent" pay increase, so "some more movement on the negotiation table" would be expected from the government.
Consultation closes on 1 September.
Students who will miss out on the new qualifications should not be worried, Abercrombie said.
"[NCEA] will still be recognised at universities. We have students using their NCEA grads to attend universities all around the world. We've had 20 years of people being lawyers and doctors and builders and plumbers and nurses and everything in between, based on their NCEA results…
"It's a very valid assessment, and they'll be able to reach their goals whatever they want to with that."
Education Minister Erica Stanford and Prime Minister Christopher Luxon announce changes to NCEA.
Photo:
RNZ / Nick Monro
Stanford agreed, saying her kids were doing NCEA - even her son, who had a choice between that and the alternative International Baccalaureate programme.
"It is a good qualification. Children still get into universities around the world with this qualification. We can make it so much better. There is a lack of consistency, but my message to parents who are still going through NCEA like me, you can still rely on NCEA. It's a good qualification, but we need to look to the future and be more ambitious for our kids, and that's what I'm doing."
Claire Amos, president of the Auckland Secondary Principals' Association and principal of Albany Senior High School, told
Midday Report
aside from replacing Level 1, the changes felt "a little bit like window dressing".
She feared there would be a narrowing of the current 67 subjects schools could choose to offer.
"It does look like it will be less flexible, with a focus on whole subjects rather than at present, we could actually put together a whole lot of achievement standards and unit standards to make up a total of 60 credits for students - and in some schools, that may not be just made up of four or five subjects."
She said rather than being dismissed as a "patchwork" qualification, NCEA Levels 1 and 2 should be seen as a "diverse definitions of success".
Amos was also concerned with the
discussion document's mention
of possibly raising the school leaving age from 16 to 17.
"On paper, that sounds great. But if you've got young people who don't see themselves in the qualification framework that's on offer, we're actually going to be managing these disengaged learners."
Opposition parties warned the overhauled risked throwing out the baby with the bathwater.
Photo:
RNZ / Angus Dreaver
Labour education spokesperson Willow-Jean Prime said NCEA was not perfect, but changes must be based on evidence and proper sector consultation.
"People are reading the consultation document and asking questions like, what will this mean for the subjects? What subjects are going to be offered? How will they be weighted?
"There's those questions that are unanswered and families are looking for and needing certainty for their children. What we don't want to see is these rushed overhauls and a generation of children being used as guinea pigs for things that have failed in the past,
like national standards
."
Green Party education spokesperson Lawrence Xu-Nan said the proposals risked turning back the clock on decades of progress, with a return to a one-size-fits-alls rigid approach.
"NCEA definitely has its strengths. It's a well-designed, inclusive and flexible qualification and it is an internationally recognised qualification. Chucking it all out isn't going to address the real problems, which are policy instability and under-resourcing of education."
He said there was a lot of "engineered fear" that the NCEA system could be gamed.
"By and large if you're talking to students and teachers, that doesn't happen as commonly as people think it does. There are areas of NCEA that need to be rejigged, but not to the extent of what we are seeing in the announcement today, which is a complete overhaul."
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter
curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
28 minutes ago
- RNZ News
NCEA isn't perfect but NZ shouldn't forget why it was introduced in the first place
First published on Photo: 123RF Education Minister Erica Stanford has called time on "credit counting", announcing plans to scrap the National Certificate of Educational Achievement (NCEA) . Under the proposed changes, from 2028 NCEA Level 1 will be replaced by foundational literacy and numeracy tests, dramatically reducing the amount of assessment in Year 11. Levels 2 and 3 will be replaced by a New Zealand Certificate of Education and an Advanced Certificate. The current achieved, not achieved, merit and excellence grades will give way to marks out of 100 and traditional letter grades: A, B, C, D and E. Students in Years 12 and 13 will be required to study at least five complete subjects and pass four of them in order to gain each certificate. The reforms are meant to address long-standing concerns over how students accumulate credits to complete their qualifications. With NCEA, students can opt out of assessments, including final exams, once they have accumulated enough credits. But as the government seeks to address the "gaming" of the system , it shouldn't lose sight of why NCEA was introduced in the first place - and who it was designed to help. While the system has its flaws, a return to an exam-based model may not make the grade either. Education Minister Erica Stanford says there's been too much "gaming" of the system. Photo: RNZ / REECE BAKER NCEA was introduced between 2002 and 2004 to replace the School Certificate, Sixth Form Certificate and Bursary qualifications. Its aim was to broaden educational success, recognising diverse forms of learning as legitimate. The previous qualifications primarily valued traditional academic subjects because those were, in large part, the only ones available for assessment. NCEA represented a shift away from viewing vocational learning - for example, in trades or creative subjects - as less valuable and not a viable path to formal qualifications. It also marked a departure from "norms" based assessment, which scaled student results to fit predetermined pass and fail rates. In contrast, NCEA was "standards" based: if a student could demonstrate the required skills or knowledge, they received the credits. But since the early days of NCEA, there have been concerns students could achieve the qualifications without really having gained an adequate education. The flexibility of NCEA - allowing schools, teachers and students to tailor learning pathways - is both its greatest strength and its greatest weakness. It has been criticised for being confusing, inconsistent and lacking credibility. Last year, Mike Grimshaw, an associate professor of sociology at Canterbury University, raised concerns that students were entering university "functionally illiterate". He said New Zealand was "under-educating but over qualifying". Concerns such as this over NCEA have fuelled repeated calls for reform. Photo: Unsplash/ Greg Rosenke While few dispute changes are needed, the scale and pace of the government's proposals are another matter. Schools have already contended with numerous policy shifts under this government, including rapid curriculum changes and new assessments in primary and secondary schools. Now they are being told the entire NCEA framework will be replaced. The sheer volume and speed of these changes puts significant pressure teachers. This is not the only concern. Under NCEA, a Year 12 student who worries they might fail the calculus "standard" can still do maths, knowing they have the option not to sit the calculus exam. Under the new system, this sort of flexibility disappears. Students will either take Year 12 mathematics - or they will not. This inflexibility raises the stakes. It may deter students from taking certain subjects altogether for fear of failure. The renewed emphasis on exams is also problematic. Research has shown exam outcomes can be influenced by gender, anxiety and even personal circumstances on exam day. In other words, exams are not necessarily the "credible" measure of learning they are made out to be. There are also important questions that the government's policy consultation proposal does not answer. What are the options for a student who fails the certificate on their first attempt? Will schools still be able to tailor internal assessments to suit their students? There are, however, reasons for cautious optimism. The government has promised to retain the NCEA standards-based approach. Preserving the integrity of whole subjects means students are more likely to learn topics, such as algebra, that keep academic options open but are often left out in NCEA. But this will come at a cost. The stakes will feel higher and students will face greater pressure to succeed. NCEA delivered on the promise that we shouldn't automatically assume half of our population will fail. Over the past two decades, more young people have left school with qualifications. But did they learn more? That remains an open question. The new system will likely bring consistency and arguably credibility to high school qualifications. But some students will pay the price of this higher-stakes approach to education. * David Pomeroy is Senior Lecturer in Mathematics Education, at the University of Canterbury. This article first appeared in The Conversation .
RNZ News
an hour ago
- RNZ News
Fisheries Act reforms to allow greater catch limits, on-board camera footage to stay hidden
Oceans and Fisheries Minister Shane Jones. Photo: RNZ / Mark Papalii An overhaul of fisheries rules will allow greater catch limits when fish are abundant and stop on-board camera footage being made public. The changes announced by Oceans and Fisheries Minister Shane Jones on Wednesday are part of a proposed new law that will be introduced later this year. The reforms would help the fishing industry achieve its "enormous potential for sustainable growth," Jones said. "These changes are the most significant reforms to the Fisheries Act for decades and they reflect my commitment to the success of our fishing industry which generates around $1.5 billion in exports each year." Changes to catch limits mean some fisheries will be allowed to "automatically respond" to fluctuations in the number of fish in the sea, for up to five years. The current process was slow and each change must be considered separately, Jones said. "These rules will be subject to the usual scientific evaluation and consultation processes but will allow for greater catch when there are more fish in the water and more responsive intervention when fisheries need to recover." Footage from onboard cameras would no longer be subject to the Official Information Act, but would still be used to "contribute to fisheries management", he said. More than 150 vessels have had cameras installed since the former Labour government's push to improve under-reporting of bycatch of species like penguins, dolphins and seals. Jones said the change would protect the privacy and confidentiality of people going about their legal business. He previously told media the courts should deal with illegal fishing, not the "court of public opinion". "Fishers won't need to worry about private or commercially sensitive footage being publicly released and either deliberately or unintentionally misconstrued," said Jones. The reforms also set out new rules around when fish must be landed and when they could be returned to the sea. "As long as the catch is monitored and accounted for under the Fisheries Act, fishers will be able to decide whether to land or discard relevant catch," Jones said. An amendment Bill would be introduced later this year, and people would be able to provide feedback during the select committee process. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
an hour ago
- RNZ News
Pasifika voices stand in Auckand local elections
Auckland's local elections are just months away and Pacific candidates are once again stepping forward.
