
Whatever happened to Caroline Lane? A Margate mystery
This is the background to Saltwater Mansions, the name of the apartment block from which Lane, a feisty (even grumpy) middle-aged woman had seemingly evaporated with no explanation. She had moved there in 2005 and made her presence well known to the residents' committee organising communal repairs. Although only one person remained in the block who had actually met Lane, Whitehouse does not skimp, and seeks out a man who had sat on the committee and been driven to distraction by Lane's refusal to comply with plans agreed by other residents.
Whitehouse's probing would be a credit to any police force. He is fascinated by the fact that it was only her neighbours who noticed that Lane had disappeared. They reported her as a missing person, but the mystery was never solved.
Whitehouse makes it his mission to find out what happened to Lane. But this is not just an investigation of a disappearance. Along the way, he questions the morality of delving into another person's private life. Isn't it their prerogative to leave town – or the world – if they wish? Is his interest prurient? At the same time he is haunted by the fact that when Lane's neighbours finally gained access to her flat to look for clues they found a vast pile of unopened mail and very little else. Why would this woman have carried on paying her direct debits for 13 years? Why would she have abandoned a flat she owned? And what was the legal situation for her neighbours, who were owed money for repairs, a sum that had swollen with each year?
Whitehouse is interested in people, and his curiosity and ability to listen mean that he finds out the stories of others, many of them complex and coloured by past experiences. He even looks for the reason why his father is as he is, avoiding deep analysis of his emotions or searching conversations. Paradoxically, his long-standing disquiet about his father's inability to open up acknowledges the man's extreme altruism.
A vivid portrait of Lane emerges from those who knew her. During one excruciating committee meeting, when she refused to agree with the other tenants and insisted on piling additional expenses on them by demanding an independent third-party audit, Mr Peake, the long-suffering secretary, 'had squeezed his mini pain au chocolat so tightly it was now roadkill in his palm'.
The small touches can make one shiver. 'Caroline may have disappeared, but it didn't feel like something had happened so much as something hadn't. It was as though they heard an echo when there had never been a sound.' 'Outside Caroline's kitchen window, streaks of rust appeared on the fire escape's metal banisters, a copper red trail glittering in the midday sun.'
Margate, too, is brought alive – downtrodden at first, then discovered by yuppies and gentrified. The rolling sea keeps time in the background like a metronome, its eternal nature testament to the fact that not all mysteries can be solved. Whitehouse realises that he has always associated the sea with an ending, invoking its presence at the close of his novels. His similes are poetic: 'I watched the tide edge out like someone trying not to wake a sleeping lover.'
It would be a spoiler to hint at how the story ends. But the reader is left with the understanding that everyone has their tale to tell, and that the reasons behind events are often mysterious.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
3 days ago
- Daily Mail
Newsom attacks White House press aide with cheap shot 'Hunger Games' jibe over $200m ballroom
Gavin Newsom has launched a cheap-shot attack on the White House press secretary over plans to build a $200million ballroom at the Capitol. The California Governor compared Karoline Leavitt to Effie Trinket - the aristocratic character from The Hunger Games known for her flamboyant outfits and privilege. He painted the project as the architectural equivalent of Marie Antoinette's renowned putdown - 'Let them eat cake.' The digital stunt, posted from Newsom's official press office X account, featured a photoshopped image of Effie Trinket holding up ballroom renderings inside the White House press room just as Leavitt had done earlier in the day. Echoing the snobby language from the Hunger Games franchise, Newsom wrote: 'While all the Districts pay extra for groceries and everyday goods, the White House is excited to announce that the Capitol is creating a grand ballroom for opulent parties! 'May the odds be ever in your favor!!!' But the post quickly backfired on Newsom, with Trump supporters rushing to defend Leavitt. 'It's not being paid for by taxpayers - but you knew that,' chimed in one X user. 'Trump and donors are footing the bill, not taxpayers. You seem to have *purposely* left that out,' explained another. 'Opulent parties? Like you and your cronies at the French Laundry during COVID?' jabbed another, referring to one of Newsom's biggest missteps during Covid when he was pictured dining with a large group of friends despite pandemic restrictions. But the California Democrat wasn't done. He followed up with a tweet mocking the Trump administration's priorities. 'They're more interested in defending their ballroom than the 17 million they kicked off health care.' Then in a third tweet dripping with sarcasm from his personal account, Newsom responded directly to the White House announcement: 'Oh thank god - this is what the American people were desperately pleading with you to do!' Leavitt, for her part, remained focused on the policy as she unveiled renderings for the planned 90,000sq ft State Ballroom, detailing the privately funded construction project she said would allow the White House to host major diplomatic events without resorting to makeshift tents on the South Lawn. 'The White House is one of the most beautiful and historic buildings in the world,' Leavitt said. 'But it does not have a space that can accommodate major functions without installing large and unsightly tents 100 yards from the main building entrance. 'This ballroom will change that,' she added, noting the facility would hold up to 650 guests, a massive upgrade from the East Room's 200-person capacity. She said construction would begin in September, with completion expected 'well before the end of President Trump's term.' Claims: The California governor mocked the White House defending the planned ballroom despite none of the money coming from public funds Too clever by half: In another sarcastic tweet Newsom continued to mock the announcement of the new ballroom For his part, President Trump embraced the ballroom plan with his usual bravado. 'We're good at building,' he said on Thursday. 'I'm good at building things, and we'll get it built quickly and on time. It'll be beautiful - top of the line.' The ballroom, he said, would reflect the design elegance of Mar-a-Lago and Turnberry, two of his signature properties, and would replace the East Wing - home to the First Lady's office - which will be temporarily relocated and modernized. Despite Newsom's implication, taxpayer dollars will not fund the project. Leavitt confirmed that Trump and private donors will cover the entire $200 million cost, although donor names were not disclosed. The ballroom will be built just south of the main mansion, and renderings show a white-columned neoclassical structure that mimics the White House's famous facade. It will be the first major structural addition to the Executive Mansion in nearly a century. The East Wing will not be demolished, but repurposed during the construction period. Leavitt reiterated the ballroom's diplomatic utility. 'This new facility will give the United States a world-class venue to host global leaders with the dignity and grandeur that such occasions deserve.' White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles emphasized the administration's commitment to architectural integrity. 'President Trump is a builder at heart and has an extraordinary eye for detail.'


Daily Mail
3 days ago
- Daily Mail
Gov Gavin Newsom launches mean attack on Karoline Leavitt as he blasts White House's $200million ballroom plan
Governor Gavin Newsom took a break from managing the Golden State to launch a biting and bizarre attack on White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt as she announced President Trump's plans to construct a new $200million ballroom at The White House. The digital stunt, posted from Newsom's official X account, featured a photoshopped image of Effie Trinket, the flamboyant elite character from The Hunger Games known for her garish clothes and callous privilege. In the image Trinket could be seen holding up ballroom renderings inside the White House press room just as Leavitt had done earlier in the day. The California governor likened Leavitt to the dystopian aristocrat while casting Trump's ballroom as the architectural equivalent of 'let them eat cake'. 'While all the Districts pay extra for groceries and everyday goods, the White House is excited to announce that the Capitol is creating a grand ballroom for opulent parties! May the odds be ever in your favor!!!' Newsom wrote, echoing snobby language from the popular franchise. But the post quickly backfired on Newsom with Trump supporters rushing to defend Leavitt. 'It's not being paid for by taxpayers - but you knew that,' chimed in one X user. 'Trump and donors are footing the bill, not taxpayers. You seem to have *purposely* left that out,' explained another. 'Opulent parties? Like you and your cronies at the French Laundry during COVID?' jabbed another, referencing one of Newsom's biggest missteps during Covid when he was pictured dining with a large group of friends despite pandemic restrictions. But the California Democrat wasn't done. He followed up with a tweet mocking the Trump administration's priorities. 'They're more interested in defending their ballroom than the 17 million they kicked off health care.' Then in a third tweet dripping with sarcasm from his personal account, Newsom responded directly to the White House announcement: 'Oh thank god - this is what the American people were desperately pleasing with you to do!' Leavitt, for her part, remained focused on the policy as she unveiled renderings for the planned 90,000-square-foot State Ballroom, detailing the privately funded construction project she said would allow the White House to host major diplomatic events without resorting to makeshift tents on the South Lawn. 'The White House is one of the most beautiful and historic buildings in the world,' Leavitt said. 'But it does not have a space that can accommodate major functions without installing large and unsightly tents 100 yards from the main building entrance. 'This ballroom will change that,' she added, noting the facility would hold up to 650 guests, a massive upgrade from the East Room's 200-person capacity. She said construction would begin in September, with completion expected 'well before the end of President Trump's term.' The California governor mocked the White House defending the planned ballroom despite none of the money coming from public funds In another sarcastic tweet Newsom continued to mock the announcement of the new ballroom For his part, President Trump embraced the ballroom plan with his usual bravado. 'We're good at building,' he said on Thursday. 'I'm good at building things, and we'll get it built quickly and on time. It'll be beautiful - top of the line.' The ballroom, he said, would reflect the design elegance of Mar-a-Lago and Turnberry, two of his signature properties, and would replace the East Wing - home to the First Lady's office - which will be temporarily relocated and modernized. Despite Newsom's implication, taxpayer dollars will not fund the project. Leavitt confirmed that Trump and private donors will cover the entire $200 million cost, although donor names were not disclosed. The ballroom will be built just south of the main mansion, and renderings show a white-columned neoclassical structure that mimics the White House's famous façade. It will be the first major structural addition to the Executive Mansion in nearly a century. The East Wing will not be demolished, but repurposed during the construction period. Leavitt reiterated the ballroom's diplomatic utility. 'This new facility will give the United States a world-class venue to host global leaders with the dignity and grandeur that such occasions deserve.' White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles emphasized the administration's commitment to architectural integrity.


The Guardian
3 days ago
- The Guardian
From Sydney Sweeney to Dunkin', why brands think being hot and white is ‘great genes'
Hot off a gig where she was selling a bar of 'morning wood' soap containing her used bathwater, the actor Sydney Sweeney is making headlines for another dubious advert. This one is for American Eagle and the campaign line idea is that Sweeney, clad in denim, has great jeans. Get it? An apparel company employing a zeitgeisty actor and exploiting an obvious genes/jeans pun to flog denim would not normally be noteworthy. But the ad has sparked an intense online discussion, one which has now bubbled up to the White House, about whether having a blond-haired, blue-eyed actor – who happens to keep pretty quiet about politics – talking about her great genes is a racist dog-whistle and nod to eugenics. The supporting evidence for this is a campaign video (which appears to have been removed after backlash) in which Sweeney, looking at the camera suggestively, says: 'My body's composition is determined by my genes.' There's then a little joke about the cameraperson looking at her breasts before she continues: 'Genes are passed down from parents to offspring, often determining traits like hair color, personality, and even eye color … My jeans are blue.' In a TikTok reaction video with almost 300,000 likes, one influencer accuses the Euphoria actor of ignoring the current political climate. 'It's literally giving, I don't know if I should say this, Nazi propaganda,' the TikToker proclaimed. (Probably shouldn't have said that, to be honest.) She also asked, exasperated: 'Why do you need to sexualize jeans so much?' Oh, my sweet summer child, have you never seen an advert before? Sex supposedly sells (although studies refute this piece of advertising wisdom) and even toothpaste will get sexualized. The pockets of liberal outrage over the Sweeney ad have been a godsend to Fox News, which has covered the backlash to the ad campaign 28 times more than it covered the Epstein controversy this week. Even White House staffers have spoken out about this extremely important issue. 'Cancel culture run amok,' the White House communications manager, Steven Cheung, wrote of the ad on X. 'This warped, moronic and dense liberal thinking is a big reason why Americans voted the way they did in 2024 ...' The conservative TV personality Megyn Kelly also decried the 'lunatic left' getting upset about nothing. You wait your whole life for an advert with a weird fixation on genetics to come out and then, what do you know, two come along at once. Instead of the American Eagle controversy fizzling out after a couple of days of online outrage, the story took on new dimensions this week after people noticed that a new Dunkin' ad for its Golden Hour refresher (some kind of alarmingly yellow beverage) also mentions genetics. 'This tan? Genetics,' actor Gavin Casalegno, says in the ad. 'I just got my color analysis back. Guess what? Golden summer, literally!' More like Angry Influencer summer, literally! 'Why are ads so obsessed with genetics all of a sudden?' one TikTok user commented on Dunkin's post. Another asked: 'Genuinely, what does a drink have to do with genetics?' (Again, have none of these people ever seen an advert before? Chocolate has nothing to do with gorillas, and the Cadbury's 'drumming gorilla' ad is one of the greatest pieces of marketing of all time.) It is established wisdom that you need at least three examples to call something a 'trend'. Unless a toothpaste advert featuring bright white teeth (the result of my superior genetics!) drops while I write this, we're currently at 'weird coincidence' rather than full-blown conspiracy. But this isn't to say that we should dismiss all the buzz as a load of influencers getting angry about nothing. Adverts hold a mirror up to society and the repeated reference to genetics does say something about the current moment. Perhaps what it screams the loudest is that brands are no longer concerned about trying to look progressive. For just under a decade (ending around 2022) we were very much in the era of woke-vertising, where brands were busy trying to co-opt feminism and activist culture. There was, for example, that famous Kendall Jenner Pepsi ad in 2017 in which Jenner creates world peace by giving a police officer at a protest a Pepsi. In the same year a financial firm installed a ''Fearless Girl'' statue by the famous Charging Bull in Wall Street, to make a point about how investment banking is empowering, actually. And even Victoria's Secret got a 'feminist' rebrand in 2017. Ad agencies also spent a lot of time pulling together panels about how important diversity is. (I worked in advertising for a long time and was on a lot of those panels.) Now that Trump has declared war on DEI, a lot of companies have gleefully done away with pretending to care about diversity or feminism. While I don't think the American Eagle and Dunkin' ads are in any way a nod to eugenics, I'm also not sure that they would have come out in 2020, when the George Floyd protests meant racism was a national conversation. There would probably have been a lot more sensitivity to how references to genetics might get perceived. The repeated reference to genes also reflects the way in which certain eugenicist views have started to move from the racist fringes into mainstream culture. Elon Musk has repeatedly said he wants smart people to have more kids, for example; a common refrain in pro-natalist circles. Meanwhile Simone and Malcolm Collins, who have been dubbed 'hipster eugenicists', have generated a million headlines for their quest to have an army of genetically optimized children via IVF. Meanwhile more startups are popping up that promise to screen IVF-created embryos for 'desirable' traits. One service has suggested that people who use their service might end up with a child who is, on average, six IQ points smarter than the child they would have had through natural conception. American Eagle may not be selling eugenics to the masses quite yet, but we are certainly entering an era of designer genes.