Supreme Court To Hear Rastafarian Lawsuit Over Shaved Locs
The U.S. Supreme Court announced Monday it will hear the case of Damon Landor, a devout Rastafarian whose dreadlocks were forcibly shaved by prison guards in Louisiana, despite a clear legal precedent protecting his religious right to wear them.
According to the lawsuit, Landor, who had vowed not to cut his hair for nearly two decades as part of his faith, entered the Louisiana prison system in 2020 to serve a five-month sentence for a drug-related offense. At the time when he began his sentence, his locs fell nearly to his knees.
After serving all but three weeks of his five-month sentence, Landor was transferred to the Raymond Laborde Correction Center. He claims the violation occurred at that facility.
Landor states that he entered with a copy of a court ruling that made it clear that practicing Rastafarians should be given a religious accommodation allowing them to keep their dreadlocks. But a prison officer dismissed his concerns, and Landor was handcuffed to a chair while two officers reportedly shaved his head after throwing the documents in the trash.
'When I was strapped down and shaved, it felt like I was raped,' Landor said in a statement. 'And the guards, they just didn't care. They will treat you any kind of way. They knew better than to cut my hair, but they did it anyway.'
Upon his release, Landor filed a lawsuit raising various claims, including the one at issue at the Supreme Court, which he brought under a federal law called the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act, seeking damages for the trauma and violation he endured. Source: JOSPIN MWISHA / Getty
Louisiana Attorney General Elizabeth Murrill said in court papers that the state does not contest that Landor was mistreated and noted that the prison system has already changed its grooming policy to ensure that other Rastafarian prisoners do not face similar situations.
At the heart of the case is whether individuals suing under RLUIPA can recover monetary damages. Currently, there's a similar law, the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, that allows for monetary compensation for damages, and Landor's attorneys point out that both statutes contain 'identical language.' In a 2020 decision, the Supreme Court affirmed that money damages were permissible under the RFRA. Landor's lawyers argue that precedent should apply here as well.
Nevertheless, both a federal judge and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ruled in favor of the state, barring Landor from collecting damages. Now, the highest court in the country will weigh in. The Supreme Court is set to hear oral arguments in its next term, which begins in October and concludes in June 2026. For Landor and many other incarcerated individuals who practice minority religions, the outcome could determine whether justice is just in name or inclusive of reparations.
SEE ALSO:
Jamaica Supreme Court Rules School Can Ban Dreadlocks
Black Men Sue To Keep Beards And Locks
SEE ALSO
Supreme Court To Hear Rastafarian Lawsuit Over Shaved Locs was originally published on newsone.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
an hour ago
- Boston Globe
Elon Musk says he will start a new political party
Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Musk has spoken with friends in recent days about his plan for a political party and what it would take to accomplish it, according to a person briefed on those conversations. The discussions have been more conceptual than pragmatic, the person said. Advertisement Even as Musk has proved that he is willing to use his resources to move quickly and dramatically, he also has a long history of not following through on promises. Musk, who helped slash government programs and funding by leading the Department of Government Efficiency before publicly feuding with Trump, had grown incensed by the president's sweeping domestic policy bill. Last month, on social media, he called it a 'disgusting abomination,' adding that it would 'massively increase the already gigantic budget deficit' and that 'Congress is making America bankrupt.' Advertisement For weeks, Musk teased that he would start a new political party if the legislation passed, but he had not explicitly stated his intention to do so until Saturday. The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The two-party system has been a defining feature of modern American politics, and plenty of moderate billionaires have dreamed of a successful third-party effort for decades. But the barriers to creating a new, influential political party are plentiful, including heavily gerrymandered districts, deep political polarization and onerous state laws, some of which require expensive and complicated ballot-qualification procedures that would most likely challenge even Musk. Musk donated nearly $300 million to Republican candidates in the 2024 election, and his super political action committee led Trump's get-out-the-vote operation in battleground states. But the tech billionaire failed to deliver the GOP a Wisconsin Supreme Court seat this year, even after putting over $20 million into that race. On Friday, Musk wrote on X that an initial approach could be to back America Party candidates in just two or three Senate races and between eight and 10 congressional races in next year's midterm elections. He reiterated a version of that plan Saturday, saying on X that he would 'crack the uniparty system' through 'extremely concentrated force at a precise location on the battlefield.' This article originally appeared in The New York Times.
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Eight men deported from US arrive in war-torn South Sudan
Eight men deported from the United States in May and held under guard for weeks at a US military base in the African nation of Djibouti while their legal challenges played out in court have now reached the Trump administration's intended destination, war-torn South Sudan, a country the US State Department advises against travel to due to 'crime, kidnapping, and armed conflict'. The immigrants from Cuba, Laos, Mexico, Myanmar, Vietnam and South Sudan arrived in South Sudan on Friday after a federal judge cleared the way for the Trump administration to relocate them in a case that had gone to the Supreme Court, which had permitted their removal from the US. Administration officials said the men had been convicted of violent crimes in the US. 'This was a win for the rule of law, safety and security of the American people,' said Homeland Security spokeswoman Tricia McLaughlin in a statement announcing the men's arrival in South Sudan, a chaotic country in danger once more of collapsing into civil war. The Supreme Court on Thursday cleared the way for the transfer of the men who had been put on a flight in May bound for South Sudan. That meant that the South Sudan transfer could be completed after the flight was detoured to a base in Djibouti, where they men were held in a converted shipping container. The flight was detoured after a federal judge found the administration had violated his order by failing to allow the men a chance to challenge the removal. The court's conservative majority had ruled in June that immigration officials could quickly deport people to third countries. The majority halted an order that had allowed immigrants to challenge any removals to countries outside their homeland where they could be in danger. A flurry of court hearings on Independence Day resulted a temporary hold on the deportations while a judge evaluated a last-ditch appeal by the men's before the judge decided he was powerless to halt their removals and that the person best positioned to rule on the request was a Boston judge whose rulings led to the initial halt of the administration's effort to begin deportations to South Sudan. By Friday evening, that judge had issued a brief ruling concluding the Supreme Court had tied his hands. The men had final orders of removal, Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials have said. Authorities have reached agreements with other countries to house immigrants if authorities cannot quickly send them back to their homelands.
Newsweek
7 hours ago
- Newsweek
Trump Admin Touts 'Win' After South Sudan Deportations Completed
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Eight men deported from the United States have arrived in South Sudan after a dramatic Independence Day court battle that saw multiple emergency hearings and conflicting judicial rulings. "This was a win for the rule of law, safety and security of the American people," Homeland Security spokeswoman Tricia McLaughlin said in a statement Saturday announcing the men's arrival. Newsweek has reached out to the White House via email on Saturday for comment. Why It Matters This case represents a significant test of President Donald Trump's administration immigration enforcement policies and establishes precedent for deporting individuals to third countries deemed dangerous by the State Department. South Sudan, the intended destination, remains under a State Department travel advisory warning against visits due to "crime, kidnapping, and armed conflict." The U.S. Supreme Court's June ruling that immigration officials can quickly deport people to third countries without allowing challenges could reshape how future deportations are handled, potentially affecting thousands of similar cases. What To Know The eight men, originally from Cuba, Laos, Mexico, Myanmar, Vietnam, and South Sudan, were transported Friday evening to the war-torn African nation following a federal judge's final ruling that cleared the way for their removal. The men had been convicted of violent crimes in the U.S., including murder, robbery, kidnapping, and sexual assault, according to the Department of Homeland Security. Only one of the men is actually a citizen of South Sudan. When their original May deportation flight was diverted to Djibouti, they were held for weeks in a converted shipping container at the U.S. military base while their legal challenges proceeded through the courts. Friday's legal drama unfolded rapidly on the Fourth of July, with courts otherwise closed for the holiday. District Judge Randolph Moss of Washington, D.C., initially issued an emergency order temporarily blocking the deportation until 4:30 p.m. ET. However, he later forwarded the case to Massachusetts District Judge Brian Murphy, who cited previous Supreme Court orders in denying the migrants' petition. Murphy wrote that the Court orders were "binding on this new petition" since the petitioners were raising "substantially similar claims." The Supreme Court had ruled in June that immigration officials could quickly deport people to third countries, halting an order that previously allowed immigrants to challenge removals to countries outside their homeland where they could face danger. This ruling effectively overturned Murphy's earlier decision that immigrants could not be sent to a new country without a court hearing. A worker loads items onto a plane chartered by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) before its departure from King County International Airport on April 15 in Seattle. A worker loads items onto a plane chartered by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) before its departure from King County International Airport on April 15 in People Are Saying DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin on Friday: "On Independence Day, an activist judge sided with barbaric criminal illegal aliens over American citizens." Judge Randolph Moss on Friday: "It seems to me almost self-evident that the United States government cannot take human beings and send them to circumstances in which their physical well-being is at risk simply either to punish them or send a signal to others." President Donald Trump's Truth Social message on Saturday: "This July 4th weekend I want to give a big 'THANK YOU!' to the Heroic ICE Officers fighting every day to reclaim our Sovereignty and Freedom. One of the most exciting parts of the 'ONE BIG BEAUTIFUL BILL ACT' is that it includes ALL of the Funding and Resources that ICE needs to carry out the Largest Mass Deportation Operation in History. Our Brave ICE Officers, who are under daily violent assault, will finally have the tools and support that they need." He added: "We will not let America become a Third World Country filled with Crime, failing Schools, collapsing Hospitals, and total Social Dysfunction. It's called 'REMIGRATION' and, it will, MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!" What Happens Next? The Trump administration has indicated this case sets a precedent for future deportations to third countries, with officials reaching agreements with various nations to house immigrants when authorities cannot quickly send them back to their homelands. Reporting from the Associated Press contributed to this article.
