‘Screwed': Consumers to wear cost of RBA card surcharge ban but central bank insists it won't be inflationary
In a consultation paper on Tuesday, the central bank proposed the removal of surcharge fees on eftpos, Mastercard and Visa transactions, expected to save $1.2 billion annually or about $60 per card-using adult.
The RBA first allowed businesses to start applying a surcharge in 2003 to encourage consumers to use lower-cost payment methods at a time of growth in the higher-cost credit card market.
But RBA governor Michele Bullock said it was now becoming increasingly difficult to avoid surcharges as consumers embraced card and digital payment methods over cash.
Representatives from the hospitality sector slammed the proposed blanket ban, describing it as another blow to businesses already buckling under the weight of skyrocketing operating costs like wages, rent, energy and insurance.
Australian Restaurant and Cafe Association chief executive Wes Lambert said while he appreciated the RBA was working to reduce merchant fees, its proposal added to small businesses' expenses.
'(Businesses) who have always passed on the merchant fee directly to consumers, so therefore never had a merchant fee expense on their (income statement), will either be forced to absorb those new merchant fees . . . or they'll have to pass those additional expenses that they've never had before onto their consumers in the form of increased menu prices,' he said.
'Consumers will end up getting screwed . . . consumers will pay more than $1.2b in increased menu prices.
'The RBA is sounding like a used-car salesman (by) trying to sell us a piece of junk as a brand new car.'
By including credit cards, the central bank's proposal goes further than Treasurer Jim Chalmers' plan to ban fees on debit card transactions from the start of 2026.
Council of Small Business Organisations Australia chair Matthew Addison described the RBA's claim of $1.2b in consumer savings as a 'mirage'.
'Removing surcharges doesn't remove all the cost, it simply hides it,' he said.
'The reality is that these fees will still be paid, just not disclosed. That cost will be baked into the price of coffee, groceries, and services across the country.'
But the RBA in its paper claimed the proposed reforms would not be inflationary, with the aggregate impact on consumer prices expected to be about 0.1 percentage points.
AMP economist My Bui also doesn't expect the removal of surcharges to 'play out in the inflation data'.
'If the cost to do business, in terms of using card or cash, is baked into the price then theoretically, it shouldn't change anything,' she said.
Mr Lambert said customers who pay with cash would be 'the biggest loser'.
'Because they never had to pay a merchant fee and now they will have to pay an increased menu price,' he said.
In a blow to major banks, the RBA has also called for interchange fees — the wholesale fees a merchant's bank pays to a cardholder's bank — to be lowered. The central bank claimed these fees were too high and the proposed changes would leave around 90 per cent of businesses better off.
Commonwealth Bank, Westpac and ANZ all declined to comment and instead directed questions be passed onto the Australian Banking Association.
A National Australia Bank spokeswoman said as the country's biggest business bank, it knew how important it was to support firms and consumers through changes that enhanced competition, transparency, efficiency and consistency.
She said NAB looked forward to the ongoing conversation with the Government and industry over the coming weeks.
The announcement triggered a 2.7 per cent drop in payments provider Tyro's share price to 90¢.
The company provides payment machines used by many retailers and hospitality businesses nationally.
In a statement to the market, Tyro chief Jon Davey said it welcomed the RBA's proposal, which aimed to increase transparency and lower card costs for consumers and merchants.
'The RBA's proposal supports a holistic view of payments reform that benefits small businesses,' he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
7NEWS
11 hours ago
- 7NEWS
Housing boom incoming? Surprise spike in building approvals sparks affordability debate
Economics Expert Last week we received confirmation from the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) that the rate of inflation has continued to slow. The further decline in inflationary pressures will likely result in the Reserve Bank (RBA) reducing official interest rates by 25 basis points when they meet next week. At the time of writing, market expectations are for another two 25 basis-point reduction in the cash rate this calendar year and a further 25 basis-point cut to the cash rate early in 2026. The RBA historically targets a rate of inflation of between 2 percent and 3 percent throughout the cycle, nowadays it specifically targets 2.5 percent annual inflation and with headline inflation at 2.1 percent over the year, inflation is below target. I think the public doesn't always grasp that the rate of escalation of inflation is slowing, but prices are still rising. It's rare that we go into a period of deflation, so the cost of goods and services remains elevated and is continuing to rise but the slower rate of growth is providing some relief for households. Let's be honest, deflation is terrible from an economic perspective. When you are in a period of deflation, purchase decisions are delayed because if you buy now and the expectation is that prices will continue to fall, people will decide to wait until the thing they want to purchase is even cheaper. But I would imagine most households would appreciate the cost of everything falling. Not that I think there is any chance that the RBA would sit by and let us go into a period of deflation but we would all appreciate lower prices. The harm caused by the high rate of inflation over recent years will persist for some time, especially considering that wage growth has not kept pace with inflation. For the housing sector the rapid growth in costs over recent years is pertinent, especially for new housing. On Friday of last week, the ABS published a quarterly data series which is called the Producer Price Indexes. This data measures price changes of goods and services as they leave or enter the production process. The Producer Price Index provides insight into what is happening with housing construction and housing materials costs. Over recent years, the cost of constructing housing in Australia has increased substantially. There have been several impacts of these increased housing construction costs. Firstly, these increased costs are passed on to the end user so new housing has become more expensive and the gap between new and existing house prices has widened making new housing less attractive to many purchasers. Secondly, higher interest rates have driven up financing costs for developers and increased borrowing costs for would-be purchasers further dampening both the demand for and the supply of new housing. Thirdly, labour and material shortages in the housing construction sector which built up during the pandemic and have persisted thereafter, particularly labour shortages, have led to a decline in construction activity and led to new housing taking longer to complete. Finally, because most housing only gets built when there is a sufficient level of pre-commitment to purchase, higher costs to purchase and higher finance costs due to higher interest rates for buyers have contributed to a reduction in new housing supply. The latest construction cost data from the ABS is encouraging because it points to a slowing of the escalation in these construction costs. When you couple a slower escalation in construction costs with lower interest rates, it is likely that the industry response will be a much-needed increase in the supply of new housing. Over the June 2025 quarter, both house construction and other residential (which represents medium and higher density housing) construction costs saw stronger growth than over the previous quarter. Despite this, the annual change in house construction costs fell to 0.3 percent which was the slowest rate of growth since December 2019 and the annual growth in other residential construction costs was 3 percent which was above the rate of inflation but the slowest rate of growth since June 2021. The escalation in housing material costs saw similar results with an acceleration in growth over the quarter but the annual rate of growth at 1.6 percent was higher than the previous quarter but inline with the December 2024 result. The 1.6 percent annual increase in these costs was also well below the rate of inflation. Even though the escalation in construction and material costs is easing, these costs are significantly higher over the past five years and have increased by more than inflation which was 26.2 percent higher over the period. Over the five years to June 2025, housing material costs are 34.5 percent higher, house construction costs are 42.1 percent higher and other residential construction costs are 28.7 percent higher. Remember, that these increased costs are typically passed on to the end user, that is the person purchasing a new property. Encouragingly, there is evidence that the housing sector is now starting to respond to the two interest rate cuts we've already had, the expectation of further cuts and the moderation in construction price increases. The latest building approval data, which is notoriously volatile month-to-month, found that dwelling approvals in June 2025 reached 17,076 for the month which was the highest monthly number since August 2022. The increase was driven by other dwelling approvals which were 86.6 percent higher than the previous June and at their highest monthly volume since December 2022. While monthly data is volatile, looking at annual approvals shows that things are improving. Over the 2024-25 financial year 187,333 dwellings were approved for construction which was 10.2 percent more approvals than the previous financial year and the highest annual approvals since the 12 months to January 2023. There were 112,483 house approvals over the year which was 7.9 percent higher than the previous financial year and the highest volume since February 2023. Other dwelling approvals reached 74,849 which was 14.2 percent higher than the previous year and the highest volume since January 2023. Dwelling approvals are necessary to commence and construct new dwellings but they are still lagging well behind the federal government's National Housing Accord target. If you aren't familiar, the National Housing Accord is a target to build 1.2 million new homes over the five years from 2024-25 to 2028-29 which comes in at 240,000 new dwellings each year. Not everything that gets approved will end up built, so in order to hit the Housing Accord target you would need to approve more than 240,000 new dwellings each year. As you can see, although dwelling approvals are increasing, they remain well behind that volume. Whilst I never thought that the National Housing Accord target was going to be achievable, assuming construction cost escalations remain moderate over the coming years and interest rates fall as expected, I anticipate a lift in dwelling approvals, commencement and construction. A lift in housing construction would be a welcome development considering how much housing prices and rents have increased over recent years. More supply can alleviate future price rises and with a rapidly growing national population it's imperative that we grow housing stock in line with our population growth. I am certainly hopeful that the construction cycle continues to turn and a greater volume of new housing is delivered over the coming years. More housing is going to be a key component of improving housing affordability and alleviating rapid housing price increases.
News.com.au
18 hours ago
- News.com.au
ABS data: New build costs surge, but data points to rate cut
The cost of Australia's average new home build has surged more than $22,500 to $492,410 in the past financial year. But the rising cost is no longer expected to impact Reserve Bank decisions on interest rates with a key building industry group who forecast July's shock hold now flagging there will be a cut to home loan costs next week. The Housing Industry Association analysed Australian Bureau of Statistics data released on Friday and found material costs rose at less than the consumer price index in the past year. Instead, they believe the increasing cost of new builds in housing approvals data is being caused by seven-star energy efficiency and accessibility minimum standards added to Victoria and South Australia in 2024, and flow on effects from the same code added to NSW and Queensland a year earlier. Much of the rest of the increase is being linked to homebuyers looking to build homes that are bigger, better quality, or both. HIA economist Maurice Tapang said given these factors, even with a 4.8 per cent increase in home building approval costs in the past year the way should now be clear for an August interest rate cut. 'I don't think they should be delaying any cuts to the cash rate in regards to people taking on larger or better quality homes, I don't think that will be their main concern,' Mr Tapang said. The Association was one of the few to predict the RBA's July decision to hold rates, but now believes the odds are they will cut in August, and again in November, as they follow what appears to be a more quarterly-linked schedule following cuts in February and May. While most building costs did not increase in the past financial year, there were some outliers. Copper pipes and fittings jumped by 13.9 per cent, electrical cable and conduit recorded an 8.3 per cent uptick, while fibrous cement products increased 7.5 per cent, ahead of ready-mixed concrete's 5.7 per cent gain. The ABS building approvals data showed NSW was home to the biggest increase in the cost of the average new house approval in the past financial year, rising more than $38,700 to almost $550,000. It eclipsed Western Australia, where the typical house build price rose $26,786 to hit $443,210. South Australia remains the most affordable mainland state to build a house in, despite a $25,400 increase bringing its typical house cost to $403,348. Queensland and Victoria both had similar increases, with the former rising $20,940 to $500,160 in the past year, and the latter up just under $20,000 to $510,000.
Sky News AU
a day ago
- Sky News AU
Three years of soaring inflation continues to weigh on Aussie households despite Jim Chalmers lauding inflation's decline
Aussies continue to be plagued with the cumulative impacts of years of price rises despite Treasurer Jim Chalmers lauding a recent drop in inflation. Mr Chalmers on Wednesday boasted about inflation falling to its lowest point since March 2021 when annual headline inflation sank to 2.1 per cent in the June quarter. 'No major advanced economy has achieved what Australia has been able to achieve,' the Treasurer said during Question Time. 'Inflation in the low 2s, unemployment in the low 4s (and) three years of continuous economic growth. 'At the same time that inflation is going up in the US, the UK, Canada, New Zealand, it's coming down here in Australia.' But household budgets are strained by cumulative price rises since Labor came to power with a myriad of factors including global supply chain constraints and large government spending being blamed for costs of many everyday goods soaring. analysis of Australian Bureau of Statistics inflation data has revealed how the costs of many household items have skyrocketed in the 36 months to July 1. Eggs are up a whopping 41 per cent with the good soaring 19.1 per cent over the past year alone. It comes amid shortages that left supermarket shelves bare after avian flu swept the nation's poultry farms. Insurances are up more than 35 per cent, while rents have jumped 19.68 per cent and gas and household fuels are up almost 30 per cent. Meanwhile, a litany of household staples including milk (up 17.88 per cent), bread (up 19.87 per cent) and fruit (up 18.37 per cent) have surged in recent years. The cost of food and non-alcoholic beverages as a whole are up 14.43 per cent, just above the 12.37 per cent total consumer price index rise over the past three years. Despite massive inflation amongst some goods, others have either sank in cost or increased below the CPI jump. Fuel costs (down 6.12 per cent) have settled since they spiked after Russia invaded Ukraine, while meat and seafoods have only risen about six per cent over three years. The rises feel unsustainable for many Australians, and the pain will not evaporate until wages catch up with the price jumps seen across the economy. Deloitte Access Economics partner Stephen Smith predicted it will be about half a decade before Australians can regain their pre-pandemic purchasing power. 'While inflation is now back within the RBA's target band, Australians are not going to see prices fall back to where they were before the pandemic,' Mr Smith told 'While some prices do fluctuate over time – such as petrol and certain groceries – prices more generally tend to rise. 'Inflation is generally forecast to remain in the RBA's target band of 2-3 per cent into the future, which means it will take several years before Australians' purchasing power is restored to pre-pandemic levels. 'In other words, the households today cannot afford the same basket of goods and services that they could before the pandemic, and they are unlikely to recover that purchasing power for at least another five years.' Shadow Treasurer Ted O'Brien said the recent inflation data was welcome news for millions of Aussies banking on further rate relief, but stressed cumulative price rises weighed heavily on households. 'A rate cut would be welcome relief to the average Australian mortgage holder who is currently paying an additional $1,900 in interest every month compared to when Labor came to office,' a statement from Mr O'Brien read. 'The price of everything has gone up under Labor and, despite today's announcement, it is never coming down. 'The ABS data simply indicates prices are now increasing at a slower rate.' Trimmed mean inflation – the middle 70 per cent of price changes core the RBA's rate decisions – continues to fall within the central bank's 2-3 per cent target band, sparking hopes of mortgage relief down the track. Many have criticized large government spending, which has soared to 27.6 per cent of GDP, for worsening inflation while prices jumped after the pandemic. 'Government spending did exacerbate the inflation problem, primarily because of income support and other payments to households, which added to spending in the economy,' Mr Smith said. 'Some of this support, such as the energy bill relief payments, could have been better targeted toward low-income households, reducing spending pressure in the economy. He acknowledged that government spending was 'not the primary driver of inflation' with administered prices - which are set by non-market forces, based on inflation data and are for services such as childcare, medical and insurance. 'This perpetuates the problems and makes it more difficult to bring inflation back down to more normal levels,' Mr Smith said. Lifting the nation's economy and putting more cash back into everyday Aussies' pockets will come into focus this month when leaders across business, politics and unions congregate at the upcoming economic roundtable. It is here where the leading minds will attempt to conjure up a solution to the nation's lagging growth and stalling productivity.
