logo
Basketball Ireland 'assessing next steps' for Israel fixture amid humanitarian crisis in Gaza

Basketball Ireland 'assessing next steps' for Israel fixture amid humanitarian crisis in Gaza

The Journala day ago
BASKETBALL IRELAND HAS said it is deciding what it will do regarding the women's match against Israel in November, as the humanitarian crisis in Gaza reaches breaking point.
The last time they played Israel, in February 2024, the Irish players
refused to shake hands
with the Israelis, contrary to the pre-match custom.
The controversial move followed calls for an outright boycott of the match in protest, which the Ireland team did not heed.
The FIBA Women's EuroBasket 2027 Qualifiers draw, which took place today, saw Ireland drawn in Group A, meaning they'll play back-to-back home games against Luxembourg on 12 November, followed by Bosnia and Herzegovina on 15 November, before an away game against Israel on 18 November.
Basketball Ireland subsequently released a statement saying it is 'extremely alarmed' by the ongoing humanitarian situation in Gaza.
Advertisement
It said that it will liaise with players, coaching staff, Sport Ireland, and the government to make a decision on whether the team will go ahead with the match, which would require the team to travel to Israel.
It added that it is awaiting clarity from FIBA, the international basketball federation, 'on a number of matters'.
Basketball Ireland would be subject to a fine of up to €80,000 should Ireland fail to fulfil their first fixture with Israel, while failure to play the return game would lead to a fine of up to €100,000 and removal from the FIBA Women's EuroBasket 2027 Qualifiers, as well as the FIBA Women's EuroBasket 2029 Qualifiers.
Should Basketball Ireland elect to withdraw from the FIBA Women's EuroBasket 2027 Qualifiers campaign entirely before they commence, a fine of up to €30,000 would be applied, or risk disqualification or exclusion from future competitions.
When the sporting controversy first reared its head in 2024, four months after the events of 7 October, Basketball Ireland CEO John Feehan said that a boycott wouldn't
'make a blind bit of difference'
.
Feehan said he is 'not prepared to destroy my sport for a gesture that will have no impact'.
The World Health Organisation today
warned of man-made 'mass starvation'
in Gaza, with food deliveries into the Palestinian territory 'far below what is needed for the survival of the population'.
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
Learn More
Support The Journal
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Andy Farrell and Joe Schmidt both expect better for second Test
Andy Farrell and Joe Schmidt both expect better for second Test

RTÉ News​

time20 minutes ago

  • RTÉ News​

Andy Farrell and Joe Schmidt both expect better for second Test

Andy Farrell has been here before with the British and Irish Lions. Twelve years ago he was an assistant to Warren Gatland as the Lions brought a 1-0 lead into the second Test in Melbourne, only for the tourists to show up lame in a tense and nervous affair, where Adam Ashley-Cooper scored the only try of the game on 74 minutes, to give the Wallabies a 16-15 win. Recent Lions history has shown how hard it is to repeat the physical and mental performances from a first Test win into a second, with South Africa in 2009 the last to have won the first two games of a Lions series. Last week in Brisbane, the Lions came out flying with Tadhg Beirne and Tom Curry launching into the Wallabies from the first whistle, and the game was effectively won by half time. But Farrell doesn't believe it's inherently difficult to hit that same emotional pitch two weeks in a row. "It shouldn't be [hard] because that's all here, in the head," the Lions head coach said on Thursday, after naming his side for the second Test in Melbourne. "I suppose everyone is a human being. But if you look at it from an Australian point of view, they played the same 80 minutes, the same contest. "It cannot be the case that they're more up for this game because they're in the exact same scenario. "I honestly believe this is one of the biggest, if not the biggest game we have all been involved with so selection always matters in that regard until we get to the next one." On paper, Saturday's Test at the MCG looks far more evenly balanced, with the Wallabies pack considerably bolstered by the return to fitness of Rob Valetini, Will Skelton and Dave Porecki. And while the Wallabies are likely to be better with another week of rugby in their legs, Farrell is demanding improvement from his own team, who he admits had "a dip in focus" during the second half, after they had cruised out to a 24-5 lead. "It wasn't just one thing, it was a number of things and a dip in focus is probably what goes with that, the intent drops off a little bit and what that looks like to us might look something different to another team. "During victory you get an opportunity to be unbelievably honest and show each other just how much you can improve and there has been nothing but that this week as far as honesty is concerned, about where we can get to. "We certainly feel we left a few things out there, most aspects of our game will need to better but it is proving to ourselves it can be better as well. "Doing things properly, that is what we have talked about all week, what it looks like for us and the expectation that it has to happen the majority of the time. "We are realists, we are all human and we realise it is not going to be perfect all of the time, it is not going to be a perfect 85-minute performance but staying on it as much as we can will give us a better chance of getting what we want. "This game might be completely different, we might have a role reversal and we have to adapt and be honest with ourselves and stay on point if we are in front, if we are behind, things going your way, not going your way. It is just staying honest as long as we possibly can." Farrell's opposite number Joe Schmidt remained optimistic after last Saturday's game, clinging to the positives of their two late tries in the 27-19 defeat at Suncorp Stadium, while also knowing he would have three more forwards back on deck for the MCG. However, while he repeated his pride in how his side fought back last week, Schmidt acknowledged that they can't allow a repeat of last week's first half, when they were bullied up front by the tourists. "We don't want to be nice, and we don't want to be submissive," the Wallabies head coach said. "I thought the First Nations Pasifika team did a fantastic job [on Tuesday], but after 31 minutes, they've conceded 13 linebreaks. If we do that in a Test match, we could be a lot further behind than the FNP team were on Tuesday evening. "So we've got to make sure we get the balance right, that some of that aggressive line-speed that they brought, we've got to bring that, but we've also got to make sure that it's connected because when you leak like that and they can play in behind you, then it's very hard to get back in front of them. So 13 line breaks to two, after 30 minutes, we can't afford to have that stat. "We didn't have the intention last week, and we don't have the intention this week of being submissive." And the former Ireland boss believes a win against the Lions, in front of an expected 90,000 crowd at Australis's most storied ground, could have a force-multiplier effect on his side going forward. "I'd certainly love that to happen. I've been lucky to have been on the periphery of some fantastic outcomes over the last 20 years of coaching professionally, but this would be special inevitably. "It'd be special for this group. I think it would accelerate a little bit of their growth as well, because in terms of gaining confidence, it's hard to top competing with the best. "At the same time, it's like any sport. If you play against a team that are stacked and maybe have more experience than you do and have a richness of talent across the board, then that's how you start to extend your own performance. And I'd love to see some of the players really extend their own performances. "I honestly felt we saw a little bit of it, particularly in that second half last Saturday, but also I'm a realist. I know that last Saturday will count for nothing at kick-off. Those last 25 minutes, we won't get to live those again -- we've got to be able to create those again."

Inspector of prisons backs findings of jail report by European watchdog
Inspector of prisons backs findings of jail report by European watchdog

Irish Examiner

time20 minutes ago

  • Irish Examiner

Inspector of prisons backs findings of jail report by European watchdog

The inspector of prisons Mark Kelly has echoed the 'deep concern' about the state of Irish prisons documented in a detailed report by a European inspection body. Mr Kelly said the findings by the Council of Europe Committee on the Prevention of Torture (CPT) mirrors those that he has made. The Irish Penal Reform Trust (IRPT) welcomed the CPT report and said that key ways of reducing overcrowding are to expand the availability and use of community sanctions and reduce the increasing numbers of people being held on remand in custody pending trial. The comments come as prison overcrowding reached another record on Thursday, with 5,539 in custody. That compares to just under 5,000 when the CPT team visited in May 2024. In a brief statement online, the office of the inspector of prisons in Ireland said: 'Council of Europe anti-torture committee publishes its new report, highlighting deep concern about the state of our prisons. OIP Ireland echoes that concern and notes that the CPT's recommendations mirror those of the Inspectorate.' IPRT legal policy and public affairs manager Niamh McCormack said the committee left no room for doubt that the cumulative impact of conditions in prisons 'may well amount to inhuman and degrading treatment and that overcrowding turns prisons into human warehouses'. She said the IPRT recognised the Irish Prison Service is 'treading water' and that it was 'simply not possible' for it to comply with basic human rights. 'Responsibility does not fall solely on the prison authorities as the Government must take clear and immediate action to reduce the prison population and alleviate pressure on the system,' she said. IPRT supports the committee's recommendation that when a prison has reached capacity, no one else should be admitted. Some justice sources have said the focus on building more prison spaces has resulted in the need for alternatives to custody being 'drowned out'. They questioned how many recommendations on community sanctions in various government reports and policy documents had been implemented. The CPT said that while legislation enables the judiciary to impose alternative sanctions for short and medium-term custodial sanctions, they were 'not used as fully as they could be'. It called on Irish authorities to adopt more community sentence measures, in "a systemic approach" that includes judges. The IPRT has also called for a supported bail service, where people are supervised in the community by probation officers, to cut down on rising remand numbers. It has sought €300,000 to enable the Probation Service to run a pilot supported bail service for women and €270,000 to build capacity on restorative justice. Justice minister Jim O'Callaghan said on Wednesday that €495m in the revised National Development Programme would go to prison capital projects over the next five years and create 1,500 spaces. They will be at Castlerea, Cloverhill, Mountjoy, Portlaoise, Wheatfield, Midlands, Dóchas, and the Old Cork prison site. The projects at existing jails are not expected until 2028 onwards. Some sources have doubted the old Cork prison could be demolished and a new male and female prison, for 400-500 people, built there within five years.

TP O'Mahony: Pope Leo's words on Gaza have gone unheeded in the Knesset and the White House
TP O'Mahony: Pope Leo's words on Gaza have gone unheeded in the Knesset and the White House

Irish Examiner

time20 minutes ago

  • Irish Examiner

TP O'Mahony: Pope Leo's words on Gaza have gone unheeded in the Knesset and the White House

With Gaza haunted by the spectre of mass starvation, Pope Leo XIV's call for respect for humanitarian law has gone unheeded in the two places on Earth where it requires compliance if peace in the Middle East is ever to be achieved - the White House in Washington DC and the Knesset in Jerusalem. The phrase 'the globalisation of indifference' has for too long accurately described the inaction of the international community to Israel's genocidal war in Gaza, and its collective punishment of the Palestinian people. When I learned just over a month ago that nine out of 10 members of one family had been killed in Gaza during an Israeli raid, I thought - in my naivety - that if one incident could stir the conscience of the international community this was surely it. Never, it seemed to me, were the lessons of Pope John XXIII's great encyclical Pacem in Terris ('Peace on Earth') more apposite. But in today's troubled world it is the absence of peace - the peace of which John XXIII spoke so eloquently and movingly back in 1963 - that is one of its most worrying features. Gaza is a shocking example, but it is by no means the only example of the world's lawlessness. In 2024 there were 61 'state-based conflicts' in the world, the most since 1946, according to the Peace Research Institute in Oslo. And that was before the Israel-Iran conflict. We may well ask: why are there so many wars? That lawlessness - fostered by President Donald's Trump's disregard for international law, conventions and norms - is tragically evident on a daily basis in Gaza. Each day Palestinians continue to be killed while attempting to collect food for their families. Medicins Sans Frontieres has accurately described the system as 'slaughter masquerading as humanitarian aid'. The Belfast rap trio Kneecap - who have drawn a lot of criticism, especially in the British media - have been unflinching in their support for the Palestinian people. JJ O Dochartaigh, one of the group, said in a pre-Glastonbury interview: Everyone knows what's happening is wrong. You can't even try to deny it now - Israel's government is just acting with impunity and getting away with it. Gaza's health ministry says that over 58,000 people (mostly civilians) have died in Israeli attacks since the war began. And that number grows daily. Studies at Yale and other universities suggest the official tolls are being underestimated. Meanwhile, the two-state solution - backed by Ireland and other countries - is looking more and more remote. The political situation is not helped by the fact that the Trump White House does not see an independent Palestinian state as a goal. Matters are also not helped by the fact that the EU is divided on support for a Palestinian state, or how to respond to the systematic destruction of Palestinian life in Gaza, beyond mere words. Kaja Kallas, the foreign policy chief of the EU - Israel's biggest trading partner - has said that 'all options are on the table'. But so far there is no agreement on a plan of action. Ireland has played its part, at least in terms of recognition, much to the chagrin of the Israelis. On May 22, 2024, it was officially announced by the then Taoiseach Simon Harris that 'Ireland will recognise the State of Palestine, effective 28 May'. Ireland made the announcement on the same day as Spain and Norway. 'Ireland today recognises Palestine as a nation among nations with all the rights and responsibilities that entails,' said the Taoiseach. Ireland has for many decades recognised the State of Israel and its right to exist in pace and security. We had hoped to recognise Palestine as part of a two-state peace deal but instead we recognise Palestine to keep the hope of that two-state solution alive. The formal recognition of the State of Israel was an altogether different story. The new state of Israel declared its independence on May 14, 1948, and it immediately sought diplomatic recognition from countries around the world. The United States, under President Truman, was the first to grant recognition. On May 28, 1948, Ireland received a telegram from the Israeli foreign secretary asking that 'Eire may grant official recognition to the state of Israel and its provisional government'. On June 4, the Irish government discussed the telegram, and it was decided that 'no action be taken on the telegram apart from the appropriate acknowledgement'. 'For Ireland the issues of Israeli statehood, protection of the Holy Places, the status of Jerusalem and diplomatic recognition remained unresolved. It could have chosen any tack concerning Israel, including the Arab position that the partition of Palestine was illegitimate . . . Instead, Ireland chose the position of the Holy See as a basis for its policy towards Israel. "Not only did the Holy Places argument win prestige for Ireland from the Holy See, but placing such a condition on recognition meant that Ireland would not be entering into diplomatic relations with Israel in the immediate future,' according to Paula Wylie, lecturer in international relations at the University of North Carolina (she studied at UCC). A charity organization distributed food to Palestinians facing severe difficulties accessing basic necessities due to Israel's ongoing blockade and military operations in the Gaza Strip on Thursday. Photo: Ali Jadallah/Anadolu via Getty Images The Holy See's policy was that there would be no recognition of Israel until it guaranteed the internationalisation of Jerusalem and the protection of, and free access to, the Holy Places throughout Palestine. 'Ireland's policy of non-recognition towards Israel was maintained by the Department of External Affairs from 1949 to 1963 as a unilateral foreign policy. To date, historians have accepted the thesis that Ireland refused de jure recognition to protest Israel's lack of regard for the Holy Places in and around Jerusalem,' wrote Ms Wylie. On February 11, 1949, the Irish Government had granted de facto recognition to the state of Israel, an acceptance of the situation on the ground. The New York Times reported Ireland's de jure recognition of Israel in January 1964, just after Pope Paul VI's historic visit to Israel and the Holy Places. Recognising the State of Palestine On June 29, 2025 - 10 years after the Holy See formally recognised the State of Palestine - the new minister of state for foreign affairs of the Palestinian Authority, Varsen Aghabekian, said the 2015 agreement offered a 'vision of hope for the future of the Holy Land'. The historic agreement between the Holy See and Palestine was signed on June 26, 2015, making the Holy See one of the first states in Europe to recognise the statehood of Palestine. The question now is who will follow the example of the Holy See and Ireland? The 'vision of hope' to which the Palestinian foreign minister referred will remain dormant until Israel's ends its collective punishment of the Palestinian people in Gaza. The Trump White House is the key to that. Only Washington can persuade Benjamin Netanyahu to abandon his genocidal war. Meanwhile, the peace for which Pope John XXIII so fervently pleaded and prayed still seems in this troubled world a distant prospect. But without it, at least in the Middle East, the dialogue that could prepare the way for a solution in which two states, Israel and Palestine, can co-exist side-by-side with equal dignity, respect and security, cannot even begin. Read More Israeli official says Gaza ceasefire proposal from Hamas is 'workable'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store