logo
How a credit lifeline for India's farmers has turned into a debt trap

How a credit lifeline for India's farmers has turned into a debt trap

Al Jazeera10-06-2025
Meerut, India – The last of the paint had begun to peel off Mohammad Mohsin's house two years ago. The faded green, white and yellow paints on the walls still bore stains from last year's monsoons.
A narrow, 3-foot-tall (0.9 metres) passage only possible to enter by crouching, led from the kitchen into a courtyard lined with buffalo dung, a rusting scooter, and a creaking cot in northern India's Meerut district, about 100km (62 miles) from New Delhi.
'We will get the house painted when it's finally wedding time,' Mohsin had said, leaning on an iron shovel, when Al Jazeera visited him in February earlier this year, referring to his sister Aman's wedding plans.
But the date for the wedding came and went – without it being solemnised.
In 2023, Mohsin had borrowed roughly $1,440 under the Indian government's Kisan Credit Card (KCC) scheme. 'Kisan' means 'farmer' in Hindi.
Launched in 1998, the KCC initiative is intended to modernise rural credit by providing accessible, short-term, low-interest credit to farmers for agricultural expenses, thereby replacing exploitative private moneylenders.
Issued against land holdings, the KCC operates like a revolving credit line, allowing farmers to borrow at the start of a crop cycle and repay after the harvest. With a modest interest rate of 4 percent annually, the scheme is among the most accessible financial instruments for millions of farmers.
But for years now, the KCC scheme has deviated from its original purpose. Farmers in rural India, where agriculture barely sustains families and where dowry in marriages is the norm, have used KCC loans as a convenient but dangerous alternative to family income.
The KCC money Mohsin borrowed in 2023 from a state-run bank's local branch was not meant to sow sugarcane or buy fertiliser. He always meant to use it for his sister's dowry: Aman's prospective in-laws had demanded a Maruti Wagon-R car, a larger Mahindra Scorpio SUV, and hundreds of thousands of rupees in cash, when the marriage was planned.
KCC looks and can be used like a regular credit card, including for cash withdrawals. Clutching the family's KCC card issued in his father Mohammad Kamil's name, Mohsin withdrew the money from an ATM and went straight to a car dealer in Meerut to make the down payment for a Wagon R car.
In February 2025, Aman's proposed marriage collapsed under a new set of dowry demands. By now, Mohsin was already in significant debt and had no money to sow crops, or invest in seeds or farm machinery.
He was also saddled with the car he had bought for the groom. He missed paying the monthly instalments a few times. When farmers fail to repay during a crop cycle, the interest rate jumps from 4 percent to 7 percent, which is what happened with Mohsin.
He now repays the loan in small instalments, but knows that he will be playing catchup for years. And the longer he delays his payments, the higher the risk that the loan could be classified as a non-performing asset (NPA), damaging his credit rating and future borrowing capacity.
Meanwhile, 22-year-old Aman finished Fazilat, a seven-year course in Islamic theology offered by Darul Uloom, a prominent Muslim seminary in Deoband, about 80km (50 miles) from Meerut. The course is considered the equivalent of a bachelor's degree from a regular college.
Aman's family has also resumed its search for another groom. 'I will get married when the right family agrees,' Aman told Al Jazeera.
But families do not just agree. They negotiate – and dowry is the currency. Tens of thousands of Indian women have been killed by their in-laws over dowry demands. In 2024 alone, India saw a dowry-related death every 30 hours, according to data from the National Crime Records Bureau.
'In our part of the world, no dowry means no groom,' Aman's 60-year-old mother, Amina Begum, told Al Jazeera, sitting in one of the corners of their sparse home.
Once a groom is finalised and the new dowry demands are negotiated, Mohsin will need cash again. And he may have to rely on the KCC scheme, again.
But a new KCC loan cannot be sanctioned until the previous one is fully repaid. The only way around this involves local middlemen who help farmers repay the interest on existing KCC loans, and get the principal renewed in the bank as a fresh loan. In exchange, these middlemen charge an interest rate as high as between 2 and 5 percent per day.
The result: If Mohsin gets another KCC loan sanctioned, he will need to use that to also repay the middlemen who helped him get it – perpetuating the cycle of indebtedness he is trapped in.
India's farmers receive limited state support for unexpected or heavy personal expenses, such as hospital bills, children's education, social obligations, or even weddings – often forcing them to rely on informal credit or agricultural loans meant for farming needs.
For instance, India's public healthcare spending is among the lowest globally, consistently under 2.5 percent of the gross domestic product (GDP). The limited resources put a significant strain on poor families in cases of medical emergencies.
As a result, across India's agrarian belt, mainly in the north, the KCC scheme is being drained to plug life's emergencies, exposing a deep rural distress.
A farmers' union leader and a politburo member of the Communist Party of India, Vijoo Krishnan, says that in addition to weddings, farmers are increasingly using KCC loans for healthcare and education. This diversion of money leads to what Krishnan calls a 'development debt trap', where farmers are forced to take on loans just to meet basic survival needs, rather than to invest in productivity or growth.
A 2024 study published in The Pharma Innovation Journal, an Indian interdisciplinary publication that also features research in agriculture and rural development, found that only a fraction of KCC loans go towards agriculture. About 28 percent of the KCC-holding farmers who were respondents in the study said they used the fund for household needs, 22 percent for medical expenses, 14 percent for children's education, and nearly 10 percent for marriage-related expenses.
'Farming barely pays enough to sustain a family,' said Mohammad Mehraj, the former head of Mohsin's Muslim-majority village of Kaili Kapsadh. 'If there's a medical emergency or a wedding, the pressure is too much.'
The fear of repayment haunts farmers, rooted in the deep shame that failure brings. Everyone has heard the stories. 'In a nearby village, a man in his forties was declared a defaulter. His name was read out in the village square. The shame was so unbearable that his wife moved back to her parents' home,' Mohsin recalled. The man in question, he says, has not been seen since. No one knows if he fled, or if he is even alive.
Mohsin lives with the same fear. 'The system doesn't break down your door, it breaks your dignity,' he said. In small villages with close-knit communities, a bank official's visit to the house to seek repayment of loans is seen as an embarrassment to be avoided at all costs.
'I'd rather starve than have a bank man knock on our door,' said Mohsin's father, Kamil, who is in his 70s, his voice barely above a whisper. Around him, others nodded in agreement.
To escape shame, farmers like Mohsin rely on the middlemen who charge a steep interest rate to help them renew KCC loans without settling the principal.
Thomas Franco, a former general secretary of the All India Bank Officers' Federation, said that while schemes like KCC have expanded credit access for farmers, they have also created a debt trap.
'At the harvest time, many farmers, already burdened with earlier debts, are forced to take additional loans. Loans intended for productivity often get diverted to meet immediate social obligations,' he told Al Jazeera.
By 2024, the Indian government's official data shows that the KCC scheme had disbursed more than $120bn to farmers, a sharp rise from $51bn in 2014.
But those numbers mask a more complex reality in which banks become a part of the serial indebtedness crisis, while showcasing high numbers of loan disbursals, Franco said.
'The loans get renewed every year without actual repayment, and in the bank's books, it shows as a fresh disbursal, even though the farmer does not get the actual funds. This exaggerates the success numbers,' he said.
Meanwhile, as India's farmers find themselves buried in mountains of debt, many are taking their own lives.
In 2023, Maharashtra, India's richest state, contributing about 13 percent to the country's GDP, reported the highest number of farmer suicides – at 2,851. This year, Maharashtra's Marathwada region is one of the worst hit. In the first three months of 2025 alone, the region recorded 269 suicides, marking a 32 percent increase from the same period in 2024.
In neighbouring Karnataka, between April 2023 and July 2024, 1,182 farmers died by suicide, primarily due to severe drought, crop loss and overwhelming debt. In the northern state of Uttar Pradesh, farmer suicides rose by 42 percent in 2022, compared with the previous year. Similarly, Haryana, also in the north, reported 266 farm suicides in 2022, up 18 percent from 225 in 2021.
Critics argue that without deep structural reforms aimed at providing better public welfare systems for farmers and their families, such as affordable healthcare, quality education, and reforms to make farming profitable, schemes like the KCC will remain short-term solutions.
Jayati Ghosh, a leading development economist and professor at the University of Massachusetts Amherst, said that India's agricultural credit system is fundamentally out of sync with how farming works.
'Crop loans are typically structured for a single season, but farmers often need to borrow well before sowing, and can only repay after harvesting and selling. Forcing repayment within that narrow window is unrealistic and harmful, especially when farmers lack the support to store crops and wait for better prices,' she said.
Ghosh, who co-authored a 2021 policy report for the Andhra Pradesh government and has studied agrarian distress for more than three decades, told Al Jazeera that key Indian financial institutions – the Reserve Bank of India (RBI), the central bank and NABARD, the apex rural development bank – were to blame for treating agriculture like any other commercial enterprise.
'The failure lies with NABARD, the RBI and successive governments. Agricultural lending needs to be subsidised, decentralised and designed around real conditions in the field,' she said.
Schemes like the KCC, she said, are built on the flawed belief that cash alone can solve rural distress.
'We've built a credit system assuming farmers just need money. But without investment in irrigation, land security, local crop research, storage and market access, loans won't solve the crisis,' she said.
The KCC scheme has also been riddled with controversies, with multiple loan scams surfacing across India in recent years.
In Kaithal, a town in northern Haryana state, six farmers used forged documents to secure nearly $88,000 in loans, which ballooned to $110,000 before detection, due to accrued interest over time after the farmers failed to repay them.
In the Himalayan state of Uttarakhand, agricultural dealer Mohammad Furkan, in collusion with a bank manager, created fake bills and ghost loans worth $1.2m in 2014, earning him a three-year sentence in March 2023.
In Lucknow, the capital of Uttar Pradesh state where Meerut is located, three State Bank of India managers sanctioned about $792,000 in fraudulent KCC loans between 2014 and 2017, using forged land records and fake documents. The federal Central Bureau of Investigations (CBI) booked them in January 2020 after an internal bank inquiry. The matter is still being probed.
Yet, bank officials say that despite years of scams and red flags, the KCC scheme continues to suffer from weak oversight.
'There's no systemic check in place,' said a loan disbursal agent affiliated with the National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development (NABARD), who has been processing KCC applications in rural Uttar Pradesh for more than a decade. He spoke to Al Jazeera on condition of anonymity, as he is not authorised to speak to the media.
But even if the KCC was cleaned up and all scammers punished, it would not solve the problem, say some farmer leaders.
'This is not about debt. It's about dignity,' said Dharmendra Malik, the national spokesperson of the Indian Farmers' Union, a prominent group. 'You can't solve agrarian distress with easy loans. You need investment in irrigation, storage, education and guaranteed prices for the crops.'
Back in Kaili Kapsadh, Mohsin's buffalo stood tethered in the courtyard, swatting flies with its tail. It is worth $960 and, in this village, that is a status symbol, akin to owning a vintage car in a wealthy urban suburb.
But prestige does not pay back loans. Mohsin has not been able to renew his family's KCC loan, worth about $1,500, for more than two years. He is still repaying the last one.
Each harvest yields the same bitter crop for him: more bills and losses. Looking at his sugarcane fields, already browning under a harsh sun, he said: 'Sometimes I wonder if farming even has a future.'
If you or someone you know is at risk of suicide, these organisations may be able to help.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

India, UK sign FTA with aim to enhance bilateral trade to $120 billion by 2030
India, UK sign FTA with aim to enhance bilateral trade to $120 billion by 2030

Qatar Tribune

time6 hours ago

  • Qatar Tribune

India, UK sign FTA with aim to enhance bilateral trade to $120 billion by 2030

Agencies London In a historic step, the India-UK free trade agreement (FTA) was signed in the presence of Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer. The trade deal which was agreed upon in May this year, was signed on Thursday during PM Modi's visit to the United Kingdom. The agreement has been finalised with an aim to enhance bilateral trade to $120 billion by 2030, effectively doubling the current trade volume between both nations. The free trade agreement signed today will help in facilitating reduced tariffs on exports of labour-intensive goods including leather, footwear and clothing, whilst reducing import duties on British whisky and automobiles. The trade agreement was formalised with Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer in attendance, with Commerce and Industry Minister Piyush Goyal and British counterpart Jonathan Reynolds signing the document. The agreement requires the British Parliament's endorsement before implementation, a process anticipated to take approximately one year, according to a PTI report. The agreement ensures that 99 percent of exports from India would receive duty-free access to British markets. On a braid basis tariffs on UK's exports to India will come down from 15 percent to 3 percent, implying cheaper goods available for Indians. Such bilateral trade arrangements typically involve both doing away with or substantially lowering customs duties on the majority of traded goods. Additionally, they aim to simplify regulations in order to encourage service trade and mutual investments. India's agricultural industry is positioned to benefit in a big way. India's global agricultural exports stand at $36.63 billion, whilst the UK's total agricultural imports are $37.52 billion. However, UK's imports from India are merely $811 million. The British market presents lucrative opportunities for specialised Indian agricultural products, including tea, mangoes, grapes, spices and seafood items, amongst others. The India-UK FTA has sections addressing different aspects of trade; this includes goods, services, innovation, government procurement, and intellectual property rights. The FTA's key provisions include halving import duties on UK-produced whisky and gin from 150 percent to 75 percent to begin with, followed by a further decrease to 40 percent within a decade. Additionally, tariffs on automobiles will see a big reduction from over 100 percent to 10 percent. This is subject to quota restrictions. The agreement also aims to facilitate market access and cost-effective trade for businesses and Indian consumers via reduced import duties on various products. These include cosmetics, aerospace components, lamb, medical equipment, salmon, electrical machinery, soft drinks, chocolate and biscuits. The agreement will create export prospects for domestic sectors that employ substantial workforce, encompassing textiles, marine products, leather goods, footwear, sports equipment and toys, gems and jewellery, engineering products, automotive components and engines, alongside organic chemicals. The services component of the trade deal will facilitate the movement of diverse professionals, including independent professionals—such as yoga instructors, musicians, and chefs—business visitors, investors, contractual service suppliers, intra-corporate transferees, as well as their partners and dependent children who are granted the right to work. India and the UK have also finalised discussions on the Double Contribution Convention Agreement, which is also known as the social security agreement. This arrangement would mean that Indian professionals working temporarily in Britain will not have to make duplicate payments towards social security funds.

UK and India sign free trade agreement during Modi visit
UK and India sign free trade agreement during Modi visit

Al Jazeera

time11 hours ago

  • Al Jazeera

UK and India sign free trade agreement during Modi visit

The United Kingdom and India have signed a trade agreement that will reduce tariffs on goods from textiles to whisky, cars and spices and allow more market access for businesses. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer hailed the agreement on Thursday as a 'landmark moment' for both countries. Starmer hosted Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi at his Chequers country estate, northwest of London, where the UK and Indian trade ministers, Jonathan Reynolds and Piyush Goyal, formally signed the agreement. Starmer and Modi announced in May that they had struck a free trade agreement after three years of stop-start negotiations, with both sides hastening efforts to clinch a deal in the shadow of tariff turmoil unleashed by United States President Donald Trump. The deal must still be ratified by the UK Parliament. 'This is not the extent or the limit of our collaboration with India,' said Starmer. 'We have unique bonds of history, of family and of culture, and we want to strengthen our relationship further, so that it is even more ambitious, modern and focused on the long term.' Starmer also said the deal was 'the biggest and most economically significant trade deal' the UK has made since leaving the European Union in 2020, though the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) has forecast that UK exports and imports will be about 15 percent lower in the long run compared with if Brexit had not occurred. Modi, standing alongside Starmer during a media appearance, described the deal as a 'blueprint for our shared prosperity'. For India, the deal represents its biggest strategic partnership with an advanced economy, and one which could provide a template for a long-mooted deal with the EU as well as talks with other regions. The two countries also announced almost 6 billion pounds ($8nm) in trade and investment deals in areas including AI, aerospace and dairy products, and pledged to work more closely together in areas such as defence, migration, climate and health. The UK and India hope the accord will boost trade between the two countries by 25.5 billion pounds ($34.4bn) and eventually add 4.8 billion pounds ($6.5bn) a year to the UK economy. The UK government said the deal will reduce India's average tariff on British goods from 15 percent to 3 percent. Import taxes on whisky and gin will be halved from 150 percent to 75 percent before falling to 40 percent by year 10 of the deal. Automotive tariffs will fall from more than 100 percent to 10 percent under a quota. India's Ministry of Commerce and Industry said in May that 99 percent of Indian exports will face no import duty under the deal, which applies to products including clothes, shoes and food. Britain and India are the sixth and fifth largest global economies respectively, with a trade relationship worth about 41 billion pounds ($55.3bn) and investment supporting more than 600,000 jobs across both countries. During Modi's two-day visit, Starmer and the Indian prime minister were also likely to discuss last month's Air India disaster in which 241 people died when a London-bound flight crashed after taking off from Ahmedabad in western India. Some 169 Indian passengers and 52 British nationals were killed in the June 12 crash, one of the deadliest plane disasters in terms of the number of British fatalities. Starmer and Modi have met twice recently, at the G7 summit in Canada last month and at the G20 meeting in Brazil last year. Modi was also due to meet with King Charles III during his brief stay in the UK, his fourth visit since becoming India's leader in 2014.

Indian football ‘hurt, scared' as domestic game hits new low
Indian football ‘hurt, scared' as domestic game hits new low

Al Jazeera

time14 hours ago

  • Al Jazeera

Indian football ‘hurt, scared' as domestic game hits new low

Former FIFA President Sepp Blatter once called India a 'sleeping giant' of football, but the sport is mired in a new crisis in the country, and faces problems from the top down to the grassroots. The men's national team are without a coach, and the Indian Super League (ISL) – India's top competition – is in danger of collapsing over a dispute between the federation and its commercial partner. 'Everybody in the Indian football ecosystem is worried, hurt, scared about the uncertainty we are faced with,' Sunil Chhetri, the celebrated veteran striker, wrote on X about the fate of the ISL. The former national skipper unwittingly summed up one of the issues facing Indian football when he came out of international retirement in March, aged 40. The striker has 95 goals for his country and is only behind Cristiano Ronaldo (138), Lionel Messi (112) and Ali Daei (108) in the all-time international scoring charts. His best days are well behind him, but with no younger replacements coming through, he returned to the national side. India's men are 133rd in the FIFA rankings – their lowest placing in nearly a decade – and have won just one of their last 16 matches. They have never reached the World Cup, and Spaniard Manolo Marquez stepped down this month as head coach after just one year and one win in eight games. His last act was to oversee a 1-0 defeat in Asian Cup qualifying to Hong Kong, population 7.5 million to India's 1.4 billion. The ISL is usually played between September and April. But a rights agreement between the All India Football Federation (AIFF) and Football Sports Development Limited (FSDL), the company that runs the ISL, ends on December 8 and is yet to be renewed. The league is now paralysed in advance of the new campaign, and the uncertainty has affected more than 5,000 players, coaches, staff and others. National football team director and former captain Subrata Paul is confident the sport in India – a country obsessed with cricket – will come out stronger. 'Indian football, like any growing ecosystem, will face its share of challenges and transitions,' Paul, regarded as one of India's best-ever goalkeepers, told the AFP news agency. 'I see this as a time to pause, reflect and refocus. Yes, the recent results and the uncertainty around the ISL are difficult for all of us who love the game, but I see a silver lining as well. 'It's an opportunity to strengthen our foundation by investing in youth development, infrastructure and quality coaching.' The franchise-based ISL started in 2014 as a league that brought global stars, including Italy's Alessandro Del Piero, to India, and aimed to promote the game in a new avatar. Bur rather than boom, the ISL has seen dwindling TV ratings and declining sponsor interest. Football's global bosses have long been eager to tap India's potential, as the world's most populous country. Arsene Wenger, the former Arsenal manager and now FIFA's chief of global football development, visited in 2023 to inaugurate an academy. Last month, AIFF President Kalyan Chaubey, who is also a politician with the governing Bharatiya Janata Party, met Wenger, who has backed India's football development, particularly at the grassroots level. Chaubey said Wenger believes starting football at 13 years of age, as is the norm in India, is too late. Players should start by eight, he said. While India has never reached the World Cup and again will be absent in North America next year, there has been modest success in the distant past. India qualified for the Olympics four times between 1948 and 1960. At the 1956 Melbourne Games, India came fourth after losing the bronze-medal match to Bulgaria. Since Blatter's 'sleeping giant' characterisation in 2007, India has remained in a deep slumber. Football is a distant third in popularity in India after cricket and hockey, with the eastern city of Kolkata and the southern state of Kerala hotspots for the sport. Compounding football's struggles in India, there has long been mismanagement by Indian football chiefs, said veteran sport journalist Jaydeep Basu. 'The fact that the team, which was ranked 99 in September 2023, has come down to 133 basically shows poor management,' Basu told AFP. 'There is a caucus working in the AIFF of two or three people who are running the show for their own benefit,' added Basu, who recently authored a book titled, Who Stole My Football? AFP has contacted the AIFF for comment.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store