Immigration officer charged over nearly RM1mil in bribes
Nas Suffian Nasrun, 41, entered his plea after the charges were read out to him before Judge Datuk Mohd Nasir Nordin.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
9 hours ago
- The Sun
Art museum owner fined RM300k for illegal wildlife parts possession
KUALA LUMPUR: An art museum owner has been fined RM300,000 by the Sessions Court for illegally possessing protected wildlife parts without a licence. Yiu Shoou Rang, 66, pleaded guilty to eight amended charges and was also sentenced to nine months' imprisonment if he failed to pay the fine, which he later settled. The charges included possession of an orangutan skull, two estuarine crocodile skulls, and seven elephant tusks—all fully protected species under the Wildlife Conservation Act 2010. The offences took place at a business premises in Central Market, Jalan Hang Kasturi, on January 8, 2024. Yiu also faced four additional charges for possessing 150 wild boar parts, 10 porcupine quills, and six sambar deer parts without a valid licence. These offences fall under Section 60(1)(a) of the Wildlife Conservation Act, which carries penalties of up to RM50,000 in fines or three years' imprisonment. Deputy public prosecutor Suhaila Rashid pushed for a deterrent sentence, while defence counsel Teh See Khoon argued for leniency, stating the items were part of an Orang Asli collection meant for museum display. Five other charges were taken into consideration by the court. - Bernama
The Star
10 hours ago
- The Star
Art museum owner fined RM300,000 for illegally possessing wildlife parts
KUALA LUMPUR: An art museum owner was fined RM300,000 by the Sessions Court here on Friday (July 25) for possessing various protected wildlife parts without a licence or special permit last year. Judge Mohd Zaki Mohd Salleh sentenced Yiu Shoou Rang, 66, after he pleaded guilty to eight amended charges. The court also ordered nine months' imprisonment in default of payment. Yiu subsequently paid the fine. Yiu was charged with four counts of possessing, without a special permit, protected wildlife parts, including an orangutan skull, two estuarine crocodile (Crocodylus porosus) skulls, and seven elephant tusks, all of which are fully protected species under the Second Schedule of the Wildlife Conservation Act 2010 (Act 716). The offences were committed at a business premises in Central Market, Jalan Hang Kasturi, around 3.20pm on Jan 8, 2024. He was charged under Section 68(1)(b) of the Wildlife Conservation Act 2010, which carries a fine of between RM50,000 and RM500,000, or imprisonment for up to three years, or both. Yiu also faced four additional charges of possessing other wildlife parts without a valid licence at the same time and location. These included 150 parts of wild boar (Sus scrofa), 10 porcupine quills and six parts of sambar deer. These charges were brought under Section 60(1)(a) of the Wildlife Conservation Act 2010 (Act 716), which provides for a maximum fine of RM50,000, imprisonment for up to three years, or both, upon conviction. However, five additional charges previously brought against Yiu were taken into consideration by the court under Section 171A of the Criminal Procedure Code. Deputy Public Prosecutor Suhaila Rashid urged the court to impose a sentence commensurate with the severity of the offence to serve as a deterrent. In mitigation, defence counsel Teh See Khoon pleaded for a lenient sentence, submitting that the items in question were part of an Orang Asli collection intended for museum display. - Bernama
Borneo Post
10 hours ago
- Borneo Post
Man fined RM12,000 for possessing unregistered abortion pills
KOTA KINABALU (July 25): A man with a previous conviction of selling unregistered products, was fined a total of RM12,000 by a Sessions Court here today for two counts possessing unregistered medication commonly used for abortion. Judge Amir Shah Amir Hassan imposed the fine on Edrick Agunchai, 29, after he pleaded guilty to both the charges. On the first count, Edrick was fined RM5,000, in default, five months' jail for possessing five straps of Cytotec (Misoprostol) Tablets 200mcg in Inanam on October 27, 2022. On the second count, Edrick received another RM7,000 fine, in default, six months' imprisonment for possessing 86 pills of the same medication in Penampang on the same day. Both the offences were under Regulation 7 (1) (a) of the Control of Drugs and Cosmetics Regulations 1984. The indictment provides for a jail term of up to three years or a fine of up to RM50,000, or both, upon conviction. During mitigation, Edrick, who was not represented, asked for a lenient sentence claiming that he was just a middleperson selling the medicine online. However, the prosecution urged the court to impose an appropriate sentence on Edrick and submitted that Cytotec was the brand name for a medication known as Misoprostol and originally registered with the Drug Control Authority in Malaysia for the approved indication of treating gastric and duodenal ulcers. The prosecution further explained that in November 2016, the medicine registration holder had cancelled its registration and since then, Cytotec was classified as an unregistered product and prohibited from being sold in Malaysia. 'In addition to treating ulcers, Cytotec functions by inducing intense uterine contractions, which can result in miscarriage. Due to this effect, the medication has become a tool commonly exploited by unscrupulous parties for use as an abortion pill. 'Over the years, Misoprostol has been found for sales across various online platforms, in this case, based on investigation, Edrick was believed to use the Telegram account to illegally sell Cytotec online,' said the prosecution, adding that, the accused was caught red-handed during a raid at a post office for possession of parcels containing Cytotec tablets, ready to be shipped to buyers. The prosecution said that this unauthorised sale endangers public health and puts the lives of pregnant women at serious risk. The prosecution also said that Edrick's actions amount to facilitate or to promote unlawful abortions as he was not a licensed medical practitioner and hence he was neither qualified nor authorised for causing a miscarriage/abortion. The prosecution informed court that Edrick was a repeat offender as he was previously convicted in 2023 under the same regulation for the same product.
