Tooth pain's origins traced to 465-million-year-old armored fish with sensors
Scientists have long debated where teeth came from. One idea was that they evolved from small bumps on the tough outer shells of ancient fish. These bumps, known as odontodes, were once a mystery.
But now, a new study confirms that these structures in an early vertebrate fish from the Ordovician period, about 465 million years ago, contained dentine.
Using 3D scans on fossils of the fish, researchers discovered that these bumps were sensitive and were likely used to sense their environment, like detecting cold water or pressure from nearby objects.
While studying the fossils, the team also found that odontodes in ancient fish looked a lot like sensilla — tiny sensory organs found in the shells of animals like crabs and shrimp. Sensilla are also seen in fossils of ancient invertebrates.
Surprisingly, these two features evolved in completely different animal groups: fish, which have backbones, and arthropods, which don't. According to Dr. Yara Haridy, who led the study, this is a classic case of evolutionary convergence — when different species develop similar traits on their own.
'These jawless fish and Aglaspidid arthropods (extinct marine arthropods) have an extremely distant shared common ancestor that likely had no hard parts at all,' Haridy said. 'We know that vertebrates and arthropods evolved hard parts independently and amazingly they evolved similar sensory mechanisms integrated into their hard skeleton independently.'
The findings also help explain a long-standing mix-up in the fossil record. For decades, a Cambrian-era fossil called Anatolepis was thought to be one of the earliest vertebrates, thanks to tooth-like bumps on its surface.
But when the researchers closely examined the fossil using high-resolution CT scans, they realized those bumps didn't contain dentine after all. Instead, they looked just like the sensory structures — sensilla — seen in arthropods.
That meant Anatolepis wasn't a vertebrate fish, but likely an ancient arthropod.
The confusion, it turns out, is understandable. Sensory armor evolved in both vertebrates and invertebrates, and it often looks strikingly similar under the microscope. That's because both groups developed ways to sense their environment using nerve-connected structures embedded in hard outer coverings — whether it was fish skin or crab shell.
To compare these features more broadly, the team scanned fossils and modern specimens ranging from snails and barnacles to sharks and catfish. One discovery stood out: suckermouth catfish raised in Haridy's own lab had small tooth-like scales on their skin — called denticles — that were directly connected to nerves.
These denticles, like the ancient odontodes and arthropod sensilla, weren't just armor — they were sensory tools.
'We think that the earliest vertebrates, these big, armored fish, had very similar structures,' Haridy said.
'They look the same in ancient and modern arthropods because they're all making this mineralized layer that caps their soft tissue and helps them sense the environment.'
This research also adds weight to a key theory in evolutionary biology. Called the "outside-in" hypothesis, the theory suggests that teeth evolved from external sensory structures like these. In other words, long before animals had mouths full of teeth, they had sensitive armor that helped them survive.
While they didn't pin down the earliest vertebrate fish, Neil Shubin, the senior author of the study, said this discovery was more than worth the effort.
'For some of these fossils that were putative early vertebrates, we showed that they're not. But that was a bit of misdirection,' he said. 'We didn't find the earliest one, but in some ways, we found something way cooler.'
The study has been published in the journal Nature.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Gizmodo
5 hours ago
- Gizmodo
We Might Have Been Wrong About Where Spiders Came From
Technically speaking, every living thing on Earth can trace its origins to the sea. Some of these earliest creatures crawled onto land, evolving to become many different kinds of animals and insects—including, scientists believed for a long time, spiders and their relatives. A new study published today in Current Biology challenges the popular conception that spiders first emerged on land, instead suggesting that these arachnids and their relatives originated and evolved in the ocean. The team reached this conclusion by investigating the fossilized central nervous system of Mollisonia symmetrica, a long-extinct animal from the Cambrian era (between 540 and 485 million years ago), thought to be the ancestor of horseshoe crabs. Mollisonia's brain structure closely resembled that of modern spiders and their relatives, not their supposed crab descendants. 'The discovery of an arachnid brain in such an ancient creature as Mollisonia suggests that the major groups of arthropods alive today were already established then,' Nick Strausfeld, study lead author and neuroscientist at the University of Arizona, told Gizmodo in an email. He added that this 'casts a fresh view on the question: Where did arachnids first evolve?' Until now, scientists had assumed—based on the external features of arachnid-like fossils found in sedimentary rocks formed on land—that modern spiders and their relatives evolved on land. For the study, however, Strausfeld and his colleagues looked inside a well-preserved fossil of Mollisonia, which they did using an optical microscope and other imaging techniques to investigate its cerebral arrangements in higher detail. The team uncovered several similarities between modern spiders and Mollisonia, but the most striking feature was that of the creatures' central nervous system. Unlike insects, arachnid brains have a strange backward structure, in which the 'forebrain lies on top of circuits that control the movement of the legs,' Strausfeld explained. It's this that makes spiders and their relatives so 'incredibly versatile in their movements.' As the new research shows, 'the backward organization is enough of a 'tell' to demonstrate [that] Mollisonia's brain arrangement typifies those of living arachnids,' he said. Other common features the team found included external resemblances, such as jointed limbs or pincer-like claws. They bolstered their hypotheses by running a statistical analysis comparing 115 anatomical traits across both living and extinct arthropods (which includes arachnids), which placed Mollisonia as a 'sister' to modern arachnids, the authors reported in the study. 'This is very interesting, but we do not yet know how it relates to the vast array of arachnids other than spiders,' said Paul Selden, a paleontologist and arachnologist at the University of Kansas who wasn't involved in the new work, in an email to Gizmodo. 'Clearly, their conclusions on the phylogenetic [study of evolutionary history using visual cues] placement of Mollisonia are fascinating but merely mark the start of further investigation.' It's probably premature to declare spiders as spawns of the sea, but the good news is that Strausfeld and his colleagues already seem to be on the case. 'Most Cambrian fossils look very different from modern species, so it is really exciting when such outward appearances reveal something inside them—a fossilized brain and nervous system—that tells a different story,' Strausfeld said. 'Arachnids are a crucial feature of our biosphere, and we should pay attention to what they contribute to our well-being.'
American Military News
2 days ago
- American Military News
1,600-year-old settlement discovered with Roman military artifacts
A Roman-era settlement estimated to be roughly 1,600 years old was recently discovered by archaeologists in Delbrück, Germany. The archeological discovery included the remains of at least two buildings and hundreds of ancient artifacts. According to Fox News, the Roman-era settlement was recently discovered as part of an excavation by the Regional Association of Westphalia-Lippe (LWL) at Schafbreite, which is located in Delbrück, Germany. In a statement obtained by Fox News, the LWL confirmed that hundreds of ancient artifacts were discovered at the Schafbreite location, with most of the artifacts traced back to the fourth and fifth centuries A.D. Fox News reported that archaeologists uncovered two 'clearly identifiable' buildings, two wells, two pit houses, a cremation grave, and hundreds of artifacts as part of the excavation. The LWL stated, 'Seven hundred and fifty individual finds were recovered from the ancient cultural layer preserved under a thick ash soil, 600 of which were metal.' According to Fox News, LWL archaeologists noted that the site of the excavation appears to have been 'settled at different times, making it a multi-period settlement site.' 'The finds from various periods also show that the inhabitants had access to Roman material culture,' archaeologists added. READ MORE: Captain Cook's lost ship found off Rhode Island coast Fox News reported that Sven Spiong, one of the lead archaeologists for LWL, suggested that the mysterious excavation provides insight into the Migration Period, which took place from 300 to 600 A.D. Spiong explained, 'Sites like these help us better understand how the people of the region lived and worked during the arrival of the Romans and in the following centuries, what interregional contacts and connections they had, and how the settlement structure changed during the Migration Period.' LWL confirmed that an 'isolated cremation grave' was discovered during the excavation and that archaeologists discovered that a person was buried with a spearhead, a broken bone comb, two garment clasps, a fire steel, and an animal head buckle. 'Experts date this buckle to the 4th or 5th century based on its shape,' LWL stated. 'It further confirms the settlers' contact with the Roman cultural sphere, as it belonged to the Roman military belt.' According to Fox News, while researchers were not able to identify the burial, the archaeological organization suggested that the individual could have been a Germanic mercenary who served in the Roman military. '[It's] a special find, as it is the first burial in East Westphalia where parts of a Roman military belt have been detected, previously only known from surface finds in other regions,' the LWL said.
Yahoo
4 days ago
- Yahoo
8 ancient Roman shoes of 'exceptional size' discovered at Roman fort near Hadrian's Wall
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. Archaeologists excavating a Roman-era fort in northern England have unearthed several enormous ancient leather soles that measure more than 11.8 inches (30 centimeters) long. The finds add to the archaeologists' growing collection of supersized ancient footwear found at the ancient fort, known as Magna. The researchers now have eight of these extra-extra-large shoes — a quarter of the total found at the site. "I think there is something very different going on here at Magna," Elizabeth Greene, an archaeologist at Western University in Ontario, Canada and a specialist in ancient shoes, said in a statement. "Even from this small sample uncovered, it is clear that these shoes are much larger on average than most of the Vindolanda collection." The shoes were discovered at Magna — also known as Carvoran — a fort along Hadrian's Wall, which was built around A.D. 122 to demarcate the northern extent of the Roman Empire. Magna is situated about 7 miles (11 kilometers) west of Vindolanda, the large Roman auxiliary fort that's well known for the remarkable preservation of writing tablets, military medals and leather shoes. In May, archaeologists unearthed an enormous leather shoe while digging at the bottom of one of Magna's "ankle-breaker" defensive ditches — narrow, deep trenches that, when full of water, could cause an enemy soldier to trip and snap their ankle. The waterlogged conditions in the ditch created an oxygen-free environment that preserved the leather shoe. The sole of the giant shoe measured 12.6 inches (32 cm) long, which is the equivalent of a men's U.S. 14 or U.K. size 13 shoe today. For context, the average U.S. men's shoe size is around 10.5, while basketball player LeBron James wears a size U.S. 15 and Michael Jordan wears a U.S. 13.5. Further excavations revealed the Magna ditch contained a total of 32 shoes in a range of sizes, from children's to adults', which adds to the collection of more than 5,000 ancient leather shoes found at the nearby fort of Vindolanda, according to the statement. Related: Roman-era 'fast food' discovered in ancient trash heap on Mallorca But the Magna shoes live up to their name — 25% of the shoes recovered to date are more than 11.8 inches long. One of them, measuring 12.8 inches (32.6 cm) long, is now the largest shoe on record in the Vindolanda collection. By contrast, only 16 of the 3,704 measurable shoes from the Vindolanda fort — just 0.4% — were over 11.8 inches long. Archaeologists are unsure why Magna's shoes are so large. This discovery "reminds us that not every population was the same, that wide variations between the regiments and people who served along Hadrian's Wall could be cultural and physical," Andrew Birley, the director of excavations for the Vindolanda Trust, said in the statement. RELATED STORIES —Roman army camp found in Netherlands, beyond the empire's frontier —Smooth wooden phallus found at a Roman fort was likely a sex toy —Infant twins buried together in Roman Croatia may have died from lead poisoning Greene, who has measured every shoe in the Vindolanda collection, cautioned that direct comparisons between Magna and Vindolanda cannot yet be made, as the Magna leather has not yet gone through the conservation process, which can result in shrinkage of up to 0.4 inches (1 cm). But even taking this into account, Greene said, "it still means these shoes are very large indeed." "We can only celebrate and marvel at the diversity and differences of these people if we can still see them in the archaeological data we gather today," Birley said. Roman emperor quiz: Test your knowledge on the rulers of the ancient empire Solve the daily Crossword
