Former North Tyneside Mayor Dame Norma Redfearn granted Freedom of Borough
She said the former mayor "really did make North Tyneside a great place to live, work, and visit."The position of mayor is an elected role and is effectively the leader of the council.Dame Norma announced her decision last year not to seek re-election, marking the beginning of the end of her 12 years in power.Clark narrowly retained the mayoralty for Labour in May after beating Reform UK by a thin margin.
Dame Norma's administration saw the regeneration of large parts of Whitley Bay including the re-opening of the long-disused Spanish City Dome. She also played a key role in regional devolution, which saw the creation of the North East Combined Authority and the North East mayor.First elected to North Tyneside Council as a councillor for the Riverside ward in 2004, Dame Norma joined the cabinet and was responsible for the children and young people portfolio in 2005.She was first elected as mayor in 2013, defeating the then Conservative incumbent Linda Arkley.Prior to her 20-year career in local politics, she spent 30 years as an educator, culminating as the head teacher of West Walker Primary School.While the Conservative opposition supported the nomination, Tory councillor John Johnson lamented that the same honour was not bestowed to her late predecessor.However, following clarification from the council's legal officer, it was determined the Freedom of the Borough could not be handed over posthumously, according to the Local Democracy Reporting Service.
Follow BBC North East on X, Facebook, Nextdoor and Instagram.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
13 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Prison officer sacked after refusing to call male-born inmates ‘she'
A prison officer was sacked after refusing to refer to male-born transgender inmates as 'she' or 'her'. Army veteran David Toshack, 50, was dismissed by GEOAmey, one of the UK's largest security firms, during a training course just days before taking up a role as a prison custody officer at Kirkcaldy Sheriff Court in Fife. However, he said that he was 'shocked' to be dismissed before even starting the job. Mr Toshack is now taking the company to an employment tribunal on the grounds of unlawful discrimination and harassment for his beliefs. The father of three said he told a safeguarding workshop he would not be comfortable using a transgender inmate's preferred gender pronouns and said he had gender-critical beliefs that people are unable to change sex. 'I'm just a normal, working-class person who's never been in trouble with the law before, not got a criminal record, lived a good life,' he told the Mail on Sunday. 'I've been prepared to go and fight and die for my country, and then I have come back here and been told that there's certain things you can't think or can't say.' Mr Toshack, who spent more than 10 years with the Army's medical reserves and who describes himself as a regular churchgoer, added: 'There must be loads of folk like me who don't have any of that, who are on their own, so I want to show folk you can stand up against this stuff.' His case comes after the UK's Supreme Court's ruling in April which said that the terms 'woman' and 'sex' in the Equality Act refer only to biological women and biological sex. This excludes transgender women who hold gender recognition certificates. The judgment has far-reaching ramifications regarding single-sex spaces. The UK Government said at the time that the ruling brought 'clarity and confidence' for women and those who ran hospitals, sports clubs and women's refuges. It is expected Mr Toshack's case will increase the pressure on the Scottish Prison Service to review its transgender policies in light of the Supreme Court ruling, and Mr Toshack's employment tribunal. It could also lead to further complaints from other prison custody officers asked to use transgender inmates' preferred pronouns. A spokesman for GEOAmey said: 'As this matter will be subject to tribunal proceedings, it would not be appropriate to comment at this time.'
Telegraph
43 minutes ago
- Telegraph
John Lewis threatens to slash affordable flats
John Lewis may slash the number of affordable flats at its new rental home scheme in Reading if the project faces hold-ups, local councillors have been told. Advisers for John Lewis Partnership warned that any planning delays and further demands on funding provided to local services risked making the scheme unviable. In a letter to Reading councillors, building consultants at DS2, who conducted a review for John Lewis, said the new flat scheme would already cost more to build than it was worth on paper, meaning John Lewis would not be able to 'viably provide any affordable housing'. John Lewis has committed to making 10pc of the flats at its 170-home rental development in Reading affordable and available at lower rents. However, they said this was conditional on the council approving the scheme 'within a reasonable timeframe'. John Lewis first submitted the plans for the scheme almost a year ago. DS2 said any requests for further contributions, such as new demands for extra funding of local services, would also be 'reflected in any reconsideration of the affordable housing final commitment at that time'. It is the latest sign of trouble for Labour's ambitions to 'turn the tide on the housing crisis', as developers grapple with demands to build cheaper homes at a time of sky-high building costs. Earlier this month, Angela Rayner, the Housing Secretary, said she wanted to provide the biggest boost to the number of social and affordable homes across the country in a generation. However, developers say they are facing hold-ups in planning applications, with builders waiting an average of 515 days – nearly a year and a half – for so-called Section 106 agreements to be finalised. This is where developers and local authorities must negotiate agreements on funding for public infrastructure such as schools, roads or affordable homes. The waiting time for the negotiations has increased by a fifth over the past two years. John Lewis has already faced local opposition to its Reading home scheme. Earlier this year, The Telegraph revealed NHS officials said they would need more funding to cope with an influx of new patients from the John Lewis flats. They argued local GP surgeries would be overwhelmed by the new housing scheme. At the time, the council said it was working with John Lewis to 'achieve the right outcome for Reading and its residents, which may include additional funding to help meet identified public health needs in the area'. John Lewis said it was in talks with Reading Council, and would 'agree the payment which councils normally receive from developments to fund local services and infrastructure'. Since then, John Lewis has reduced the size of the rental scheme. Last month, the company submitted revised plans for the development, including cutting down the number of homes to 170 from 215. John Lewis Partnership's director of build-to-rent, Katherine Russell, said at the time: 'It's very important to us that we deliver the best possible scheme and one that benefits the community.' The Reading scheme is one of three rental home developments being pursued by John Lewis, with the other two having faced setbacks before being given the green light. John Lewis was forced to launch an appeal with the Government's planning inspector to get approval for its West Ealing, London, scheme after the council failed to make a decision. Its project in Bromley, meanwhile, faced a backlash from locals and councillors, although the development was ultimately approved last year. A spokesman for John Lewis said: 'We're committed to providing as much affordable housing for Reading as is viable. We're working constructively with the Council on our plans to transform this brownfield site with high-quality rental homes.'
Telegraph
43 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Fewer than a third of voters would back Brexit again, poll finds
Fewer than a third of voters would back leaving the European Union if the Brexit referendum were held again, a new poll has found. Just 29 per cent of people would vote to withdraw from the EU if a vote was held again compared to 52 per cent in June 2016, according to a survey for The Sunday Times. The More in Common research also found that nearly half of respondents believe there should be another referendum on whether to rejoin the bloc. The results represent a marked shift in attitudes towards being part of the EU less than ten years after the historic result in 2016. Supporters of Sir Keir Starmer's approach to restoring closer ties with European partners will see the results as a sign that the policy shift is the right move. The Prime Minister agreed a 'reset' deal in May with the EU that removed border checks and red tape on agri-food, making it easier to trade with European countries. But critics seized on clauses in the deal which give European fishermen access to the UK's coastal waters until 2038 and, and force Britain to follow EU rules on food standards. The issue of fish and being tied to the EU on trading standards, and therefore under the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice, were among reasons that Brexiteers originally advocated leaving the bloc. London and Brussels also agreed to hold future talks on a youth mobility scheme, under which an unknown number of EU citizens would be able to come to Britain each year. The poll found that the only voting groups for which the majority would still back leaving the EU were Tory voters, at 52 per cent, and Reform UK voters, at 68 per cent. Sir Keir was accused by Reform of ' trying to kiss goodbye to Brexit ' with his EU deal, with Richard Tice, the party's deputy leader, claiming it was 'surrender on steroids'. Elsewhere, the poll found that almost 30 per cent of voters want Britain to leave the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). Support for leaving the convention was at its highest among those who voted for Reform at the general election last year, at 68 per cent. But the survey also found that a majority, 58 per cent, think that Britain should remain in the ECHR, an increase of eight points since June. It was in June that Kemi Badenoch, the leader of the Conservative Party, announced that the party would conduct a review into Britain's membership of the convention, and that she was 'minded' it was necessary to leave. But last month Mrs Badenoch brought Sir James Cleverly, the former home secretary and Tory leadership rival, back onto her front bench. Sir James has refused to endorse her position on the treaty, having suggested before the reshuffle that quitting the ECHR would not necessarily lead to more foreign criminals being deported.
