&w=3840&q=100)
FirstUp: IND vs ENG 5th Test, verdict in Malegaon bombing case… Top news today
Team India will face England in the final match of their five-Test series. Reuters/File Photo
It is a busy Thursday.
Team India and England are set to play the final match of their five-Test series at The Oval in London, beginning today.
Nearly 17 years after a blast killed six people and injured over 100, a special NIA court is expected to announce its verdict in the Malegaon bombing case.
After public outrage, Ukraine's parliament is due to vote on a bill from President Volodymyr Zelenskyy to bring back powers to two anti-corruption bodies.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
SpaceX is preparing to launch its Crew-11 mission to the International Space Station (ISS).
The Delhi High Court will hear a petition from Lok Sabha MP Abdul Rashid Sheikh alias Engineer Rashid, who is requesting an exemption from paying for his travel and security arrangements to attend Parliament.
Let's take a look at the events:
India vs England 5th Test match
Team India will face England in the final match of their five-Test series at The Oval in London starting today. Notably, India still has the chance to draw the series level.
It has been an exciting contest, with momentum shifting between the two teams. England currently leads 2-1, but India has fought hard throughout.
India still has the chance to draw the series level. AP/File Photo
Weather forecasts suggest overcast skies, high humidity, and possible afternoon showers at the start of the match on Thursday. Cloudy conditions are likely over the next couple of days, with rain expected again during the final stages of the Test.
The match will be broadcast live on the Sony Sports Network and will also stream on the JioHotstar app and website.
India is expected to take confidence into this must-win game. A win here would level the series 2-2.
Malegaon bombing verdict likely to be delivered
Nearly 17 years after a blast killed six people and injured over 100 in the communally sensitive town of Malegaon in Maharashtra, a special NIA court is likely to announce its verdict today.
Seven people, including BJP leader and former MP Pragya Thakur and Lt Col Prasad Purohit, stood trial under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) and the Indian Penal Code.
The trial began in 2018 and concluded on April 19, 2025. The court reserved its judgment after the final hearings.
The explosion took place on September 29, 2008, when a bomb strapped to a motorcycle went off near a mosque in Malegaon, about 200 km from Mumbai.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Ukraine to vote on restoration of power of anti-corruption agencies
Ukraine's parliament is expected to vote today on a bill from President Volodymyr Zelenskyy to restore the powers of two anti-corruption bodies, following criticism from both the public and the country's international partners.
After pressure from wartime street protests and rare criticism from European allies, Zelenskyy promised to maintain the independence of the country's anti-corruption institutions.
Ukraine's parliament is due to vote on a bill from Zelenskyy to bring back powers to two anti-corruption bodies. Reuters/File Photo
The proposed law faced strong objections from both agency heads and a senior European Union official. It also led to the largest public protests since Russia's full-scale invasion in 2022.
In the first major protests during the war, young people, civil society activists and war veterans gathered, shouting slogans like 'Shame' and 'Veto the Law'. Critics say the legislation could be an attempt to curb these agencies in order to shield officials from scrutiny.
SpaceX Crew-11 set for launch to ISS
SpaceX is scheduled to launch its Crew-11 mission to the International Space Station (ISS) today.
The mission will carry four astronauts aboard a SpaceX Crew Dragon spacecraft. It marks the 11th operational flight under Nasa's Commercial Crew Program and the 12th human spaceflight as part of the initiative.
Weather officials predict an 85% chance of favorable weather conditions at Launch Complex 39A for the liftoff of @SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket and Dragon spacecraft carrying #Crew11 to the @Space_Station on July 31.
Follow along for updates: https://t.co/9yc2MJYZDy pic.twitter.com/lbpaBx0a4v — NASA's Kennedy Space Center (@NASAKennedy) July 29, 2025
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Crew-11 will include Nasa astronauts Zena Cardman and Mike Fincke, JAXA astronaut Kimiya Yui, and Roscosmos cosmonaut Oleg Platonov. They will head to the ISS for a six-month science mission.
These astronauts will take over from Crew-10, who are currently onboard the space station, as part of the regular crew rotation to ensure continuous presence on the ISS.
Hearing of Engineer Rashid's plea in Delhi HC
The Delhi High Court will hear a plea by Lok Sabha MP Abdul Rashid Sheikh alias Engineer Rashid who is requesting exemption from covering the costs of his travel and security arrangements to attend Parliament.
A bench of Justices Vivek Chaudhary and Mini Pushkarna confirmed that the matter would be heard on July 31.
Last week, a trial court in Delhi granted custody parole to Rashid, the Independent MP from Baramulla in Jammu and Kashmir, from July 24 to August 4 for the Monsoon Session. The court directed that he would have to bear the expenses for his travel and security.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Notably, Rashid has been held in Tihar Jail since 2019 in connection with a terror funding case.
With inputs from agencies
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
29 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
'Discipline? Defence? All went out of window': English media rant after India's 'miracle'; Aussies drop Ashes truth bomb
The English media showed no mercy after England lost the fifth and final Test against India at The Oval on Monday, as the tourists drew the Anderson-Tendulkar Trophy 2-2. Meanwhile, the Australian media delivered a brutal reality check to the Ben Stokes-led side ahead of their upcoming Ashes assignment. England's Gus Atkinson bowled out by India's Mohammed Siraj on day five of the fifth cricket test match between England and India at The Kia Oval (AP) England, at one point, were cruising towards the 374-run target, riding on centuries from Harry Brook and Joe Root. Their 195-run stand for the fourth wicket took them to 301 for three. But their hopes took a major hit on the fourth afternoon when India struck thrice around the Tea break, removing three batters for just 26 runs. On the final morning, England began positively, hitting back-to-back boundaries with just 35 runs needed. But Mohammed Siraj turned the tide, striking twice in his first two overs before cleaning up the final wicket to complete his five-wicket haul. England fell just six runs short—suffering their narrowest defeat on home soil in 123 years. The Telegraph article titled 'Chris Woakes' remarkable act of bravery will be remembered forever' questioned England's approach against the Indian seamers, strongly criticising Jacob Bethell and Jamie Smith. It argued that tail-ender Gus Atkinson was the only batter with a clear plan, while the rest 'did exactly what India's seamers wanted them to do—either by throwing the bat at anything and everything, or poking their bats at anything and everything.' The piece read: 'Discipline? Defence? It all went out of the window in the nerves of the occasion. The disease had actually started on the fourth evening when Joe Root played a shot—or dab—which he regretted the moment he had tried it. He had lost the strike as Jacob Bethell struggled to come to terms with a red ball, and after the euphoria of his 39th Test hundred, Root tried something that was unworthy of his reputation. Bethell was given scant chance by England's selectors.' The Guardian, on the other hand, in its piece 'Are you not wowed? Bazball, India and a one-armed man deliver drama and beauty', couldn't stop gushing about India's heroism on the final morning and Siraj's fire. It wrote: 'England needed 35 to win and India three and a half wickets to level the series. The players came out to a huge rolling wave of applause, India's fielders breaking from their huddle to sprint in unison, impossibly heroic already—a group who have given us everything over the past two months. And this was a day for Mohammed 'the Demon' Siraj, who really is the most lovable maniac in sport, and who bowled like a god here to win this game.' England ready for Ashes? Since the summer of 2022, when the Bazball era began in England, the Stokes-led side has played 13 Test series and won eight of them. While that tally suggests success for the McCullum-Stokes partnership, the Bazball philosophy has faltered in crucial moments—a drawn Ashes at home in 2023, a 1-4 defeat in India in 2024, and now a 2-2 draw at home against an Indian side that recently saw the retirements of Virat Kohli, Rohit Sharma, and R Ashwin. The most recent result has prompted many—especially the Australian media—to deliver a scathing Ashes verdict. "Toppling India would have given England a timely boost of confidence ahead of the upcoming Ashes tour, but the lingering Bazball sceptics would grow in volume if Brendon McCullum's troops failed to win another marquee series," a Fox Sports article titled 'Test miracle for the ages as Poms stunned at the death despite one-arm sacrifice' read. "Regardless, failure to defeat an undermanned Indian team — who are without retired superstars Virat Kohli, Rohit Sharma and Ravichandran Ashwin — is a hammer blow for England's Bazballers." The Sydney Morning Herald noted that England were expected to turn a corner in this series, shifting from crowd-pleasers to serious contenders. But their recurring struggles—especially the inability to manage key fast bowlers—highlighted deeper problems that Bazball alone couldn't fix. The article titled 'The hard truths that show England will struggle to win the Ashes' read: "It is worth remembering that this was the series in which England were meant to have evolved from entertainers to winners. They had become more pragmatic in tactics, more inclined to sledge opponents on the field, and more susceptible to the petulance that followed India's series-saving rearguard in Manchester. Putting on a show was no longer enough. All those changes were, however, largely cosmetic next to a couple of hard cricket truths. First, winning big series generally requires keeping your best fast bowlers fit, something England have consistently failed to do over many years, not just during the Bazball era that began in 2022."
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
29 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Injury substitution in cricket: Big no from Stokes, Ashwin calls out karma
The 2025 Anderson-Tendulkar Trophy between India and England came to a close on Monday with one of the most dramatic finishes of all time, where India pulled off a perfect Stone Cold 'Stunner' on England on the final day of the match and series, orchestrated by Md Siraj, to win the match by just six runs to end the series on level terms of 2-2. The series had been home to some extraordinary moments of cricketing action and also of determination. From Rishabh Pant coming out to bat with a fractured toe in Manchester to add a crucial 17 more runs to his total in India's first and ready to do it all over again in the second innings if required, to Chris Woakes' entry at the Oval with his arm tucked inside his sweater to keep England's hopes of winning the series alive—this was a series where emotions and grit were put on the highest pedestal. But these instances also call for a big question to be asked, i.e., should ICC allow player substitution for all types of injury instead of restricting it only to head injuries? While many believe ICC should, the English skipper Ben Stokes believes otherwise. Stokes, who ended up on both the giving and receiving end of the injury replacement question in the post-match press conference at the Oval, quoted a British idiom called Sod's law, which means if something can go wrong, it will go wrong—and usually at the worst possible time—and outwardly refused to support the idea of injury replacement in cricket. I don't see it being a thing: Ben Stokes Stokes, who almost mocked the idea of injury replacement in cricket after the Manchester Test where India were left struggling after their best red-ball batter of the last five years, Rishabh Pant, suffered a fractured toe, found himself surrounded by the same question after the Oval Test—after his team lost a game they might have won if the rule of player substitution for any kind of injury existed. Stokes, after the match, said that teams would continue to find loopholes around the rule if made, which will be unfair. Stokes, who himself was ruled out of the final Test due to a shoulder injury, further added that if the rule existed, he could have made himself available for the match, taken a chance, and would have simply replaced himself with someone else if it didn't work out. Stokes did acknowledge how his team suffered due to Woakes' injury in a similar fashion to how India struggled due to Pant's injury, but he simply dismissed the idea of substitution by saying we all need to just deal with the injury and rules as they are and move forward. While Stokes quoted Sod's law, his current situation can more perfectly be described by Murphy's law post his comments on Pant's injury, as the law states: whatever can go wrong will go wrong. Stokes was given karma treatment: Ashwin Former Indian off-spinner R Ashwin, while talking on his YouTube show 'Ash Ki Baat' after the Oval Test, called out Ben Stokes while mentioning Woakes' situation for them as karma and said, 'As you sow, so shall you reap.' Ashwin called out Stokes by saying that the English skipper was joking about the idea of player substitution after Pant's injury but karma hit him, and his team found themselves in a similar situation with Woakes. Although the off-spinner did not shy away from commending Woakes' effort and said that he is in awe of the English all-rounder who put his life and career on the line to almost help England walk away with the match, he simultaneously urged some serious discussion around these types of situations and asked teams to have some empathy towards the opposition. I am all for it: Gautam Gambhir India's head coach Gautam Gambhir voiced strong support for the introduction of injury replacements in cricket, especially in high-stakes Test series after the Manchester Test. According to Gambhir, if the umpires and match referee determine that an injury is serious and clearly visible, teams should be allowed to bring in a substitute. He believes this would be a fair move, particularly in tightly contested series like the one currently underway. Gambhir emphasised that no team should be forced to continue with just ten players due to an unfortunate injury, calling such a scenario highly unfair in a competitive setting. Legends side with Gambhir's views The English skipper Ben Stokes found no support for his comments about injury replacement, as cricketing legends from India and England such as Sunil Gavaskar and Michael Vaughan also voiced their support for Gambhir's comments. Gavaskar said, 'Here, it is a clear injury; there has to be a substitute. I want some committee to take a call on this kind of injury so that teams are not left handicapped.' Vaughan's comments came after England's unfortunate situation with Woakes, but his remarks eventually supported Gambhir's ideas. During the morning session of the fifth day, while Woakes was running around with just one good arm, Vaughan said, 'If there's a genuine injury in the first innings, it affects the game and the entertainment, which fans pay money to watch. The first innings is a good cutoff to make it fair.' How does player substitution actually work in cricket For most of its history, cricket had no injury-related replacement, as if a player was unable to continue, he simply had to walk away and his team had to play with one less player. However, on August 1, 2019, the ICC made a change and introduced player replacement for head-related injuries. According to the latest player substitution rule, cricket's substitution rules are set out by the MCC in Law 24 ('Fielder's Absence; Substitutes'). Here's how substitutions work: If a player on the field gets injured or falls sick, the team can bring in a substitute fielder. This substitute can only field—they are not allowed to bat, bowl, or act as captain in the match. A substitute can keep wicket only if the umpires agree, but only as a stand-in, not permanently. A big change was made in 2019 with the introduction of the concussion substitute rule. If a player suffers a head injury (concussion) during a game, a 'like-for-like' substitute is allowed. This means the replacement can do everything the injured player could—bat, bowl, field, or keep wicket. This substitution needs approval from the match referee to make sure the swap is fair. Runners (who used to run between the wickets for injured batsmen) are no longer allowed in international cricket. Tactical substitutions—replacing a player for strategy reasons—are not allowed according to MCC Laws, except in franchise leagues like the IPL, which have their own 'Impact Player' rule. In standard cricket (Tests, ODIs, most T20s), only substitutes for injury, illness, or concussion are permitted.
The Hindu
29 minutes ago
- The Hindu
I hope workload management disappears from Indian cricket dictionary, says Gavaskar after Siraj heroics
Mohammed Siraj has "debunked forever this business of workload", said India batting great Sunil Gavaskar, questioning the concept by asserting that playing for the country should be enough to "forget the aches", something that soldiers guarding the nation are doing routinely. Siraj played all five Tests of the just-concluded drawn series against England and bowled 185.3 overs in total, picking up 23 wickets in all. However, pace spearhead Jasprit Bumrah was available for only three of the games, skipping the must-win fifth Test at The Oval as part of his workload management. Gavaskar, however, made it clear that his criticism was not directed at Bumrah, saying that his was a case of "injury management" more than anything else. "When you are playing for your country, forget the aches and the pains. On the border, do you think that the jawans are complaining about cold? What did Rishabh Pant show you? He came out to bat with a fracture. That is what you expect from the players. Playing cricket for India is an honour," Gavaskar told 'India Today'. "You are representing 140 crore people and that is what we saw in Mohammed Siraj. I think Siraj bowled his heart out, and he debunked forever this business of workload. "For five Test matches, non-stop he has bowled 7-8 over spells, because the captain wanted him and the country expected of him," added the former skipper. The 76-year-old said workload management cannot come in the way of fielding the best available team. "If you are going to succumb to people who are talking about workload, then you are never going to have your best players on the field for your country," he said. "I hope that the word 'workload' goes out of the Indian cricket dictionary. I've been saying that for a long time... And I think that is the one thing that we all should keep in mind that this workload is only a mental thing, not so much a physical thing," he added.
