logo
Suspect in Michigan Walmart stabbings is charged with a rarely used state terrorism count

Suspect in Michigan Walmart stabbings is charged with a rarely used state terrorism count

Al Arabiya6 days ago
A Michigan prosecutor filed a terrorism charge Monday against a man accused of stabbing 11 people at a Walmart store. The charge has been rarely used in the states' courts since it was adopted more than 20 years ago during the national outrage over 9/11. Grand Traverse County Prosecutor Noelle Moeggenberg said she believes the charge fits because the weekend attack was intended to put fear in the entire community and to change how maybe we operate on a daily basis. But proving that could be difficult.
Bradford Gille, 42, has a history of mental health problems. A judge signed an order Friday–the day before the attack–telling police to find him and take him to a hospital because he was considered a risk to himself or others. Police said they were unable to find him. Moeggenberg also filed attempted murder charges, one for each Walmart stabbing victim. A not-guilty plea was entered for Gille and bond was set at $100,000.
A look at Michigan's terrorism law: Lawmakers respond to 9/11–The Michigan Legislature in 2002 created and amended a stack of anti-terrorism laws after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks in New York and Washington. A terrorism crime is defined as an act intended to intimidate or coerce a civilian population or influence or affect the conduct of government or a unit of government through intimidation or coercion. A conviction carries a sentence of up to life in prison.
'I don't see the prosecutor being able to establish this,' said Margaret Raben, a Detroit-area lawyer who has served as president of a statewide association of defense attorneys. 'It seems to have been a random thing and the fact that he injured 11 people doesn't make it any less random.' Gille's mental health will be an issue. He'll likely be evaluated to determine if he understands the charges and can assist his lawyer. Experts will also determine if he can be held criminally responsible.
In 2016, Gille was accused of smashing a cemetery vault that had not yet been covered with grass, one of many encounters with local police over many years. He was found not guilty by reason of insanity, according to Emmet County court records. 'He never should have been out on the street. It was just sad,' Karl Crawford, superintendent of Greenwood Cemetery in Petoskey, Michigan, told The Associated Press.
School shooter convicted of terrorism–There's no dispute that a terrorism charge is rare in Michigan. Wayne County, the largest in the state, has never used it, according to Maria Miller, a spokesperson for the prosecutor. The biggest case: the 2021 Oxford High School shooting in which four students were killed and more were wounded. Ethan Crumbley, who was 15 at the time of the shooting, pleaded guilty to terrorism, murder, and other crimes and is serving a life sentence. He had planned the attack. 'It was the first time that a school shooter was convicted of terrorism in the United States,' Oakland County Prosecutor Karen McDonald said. 'The sheer force of destruction, violence, trauma, and murder the shooter caused that day did not stop at the doorway of Oxford High School. It was carried through the doors and out into the community,' McDonald said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Tesla Hit with $243 Million Verdict Over Fatal Crash
Tesla Hit with $243 Million Verdict Over Fatal Crash

ArabGT

timean hour ago

  • ArabGT

Tesla Hit with $243 Million Verdict Over Fatal Crash

A courtroom in Florida may have just drawn a new line in the sand for autonomous driving. In a landmark ruling, a jury ordered Tesla to pay $243 million in damages following a fatal 2019 crash involving its Autopilot system. But beyond the headline figure, what really stands out is the message: when technology falls short, it can—and will—be held accountable. The tragedy claimed the life of Naibel Benavides Leon and left her former partner, Dillon Angulo, with lifelong injuries. Both were standing beside their parked Chevrolet Tahoe when a Tesla Model S, driven at high speed by George McGee, slammed into them. McGee had reportedly dropped his phone and was reaching for it when he ran a stop sign and red light—without any warning from the Autopilot system. The jury didn't let Tesla off the hook. While the driver bore a significant share of the blame, the court also held Tesla responsible—arguing that the design of Autopilot allowed for misuse, and that public claims from Elon Musk about its safety may have misled consumers. The verdict awarded $129 million in compensatory damages and $200 million in punitive damages. Tesla was found liable for 33% of the total. For Tesla, this is more than just a legal blow. It's a moment of reckoning. The company pushed back, insisting the crash was due solely to human error and warning that this kind of ruling could slow progress in developing life-saving technology. 'No car—then or now—could have avoided this accident,' Tesla said in a statement. But for Dillon and the family of Naibel, this ruling was something else entirely: a recognition that something broke down when it mattered most, and that someone needed to be held responsible. Legal experts are calling it a turning point. Professor Alex Lemann of Marquette University noted, 'We've seen many fatal Autopilot crashes, but this is the first time Tesla has been hit with a major financial judgment. It changes things.' And it comes at a sensitive time. As Tesla navigates slowing EV sales and rising pressure to justify its massive market valuation, the spotlight is back on whether its bold promises about autonomy and AI are outpacing reality. At its core, this case raises a vital question: in a world racing toward automation, what happens when the machines we're told to trust fail us? The answer, at least in this Florida courtroom, is that someone must answer for it.

Another American Palestinian killed in West Bank
Another American Palestinian killed in West Bank

Arab News

time6 hours ago

  • Arab News

Another American Palestinian killed in West Bank

CHICAGO: The relatives of an American Palestinian who moved with his five children and wife in 2020 to the West Bank are calling on the US to investigate the circumstances of his death. Relatives in Chicago told Arab News that Khamis Ayyad, 40, had died of smoke inhalation on July 31 when he entered a home that was engulfed in flames to save people. State Rep. Abdelnasser Rashid, who represents the southwest suburbs of Chicago in the Illinois legislature and is of Palestinian descent, met with Ayyad's relatives. He said the fires were started by Israeli settlers who have been rampaging through West Bank villages. 'This wasn't random. It's part of an ugly pattern of Israeli government-sponsored brutality from settler terrorism in the West Bank to the genocide unfolding in Gaza — enabled by US military funding and political support for Israel,' Rashid told Arab News. 'I've seen this violence firsthand. I was in Palestine in June 2023 when settlers invaded my family's village in broad daylight. They killed a young man. There was no accountability, no justice. 'That lack of accountability has led to continued Israeli terrorism against Palestinians fighting for survival and liberation, including the murder of Palestinian American Khamis Ayyad.' Rashid's district represents a region of the southwest suburbs of Chicago called Little Palestine because of its large concentration of American Palestinians. Relatives said the village of Silwad, where Ayyad lived, was hit with several arson fires in recent months by settlers, including homes, farmland and vehicles. Ayyad is the second American Palestinian to be killed in July, and the fifth since the war on Gaza began in October 2023, ABC News reported. On July 11, 2025, 20-year-old American Palestinian Sayfollah Musallet was murdered by a gang of Israeli settlers in the family's farmlands located near Ramallah. Israeli soldiers prevented Musallet's family from reaching him while he was alive but wounded, relatives told Arab News. Soldiers also prevented an ambulance from reaching him for more than two hours after the attack. He died as paramedics were placing him in the ambulance to take him to a nearby hospital. Musallet is the cousin of Muhammad Ibrahim, who was arrested in the middle of the night by 20 soldiers wearing black masks in February and has been detained in the notorious Megiddo Prison without access to his parents or legal representation. Ibrahim has not been charged with a crime, his family told Arab News, adding that he is suffering from an illness caused by the unsanitary conditions at the prison. 'Who will speak up for these Americans?' a relative of Ayyad asked.

US agency probes special counsel Jack Smith who prosecuted Trump: Report
US agency probes special counsel Jack Smith who prosecuted Trump: Report

Al Arabiya

time10 hours ago

  • Al Arabiya

US agency probes special counsel Jack Smith who prosecuted Trump: Report

US officials have opened an investigation into Jack Smith, the former special counsel who led two federal criminal cases against President Donald Trump, US media reported Saturday. The Office of Special Counsel told The New York Times it was investigating Smith for potentially violating the Hatch Act, which prohibits federal workers from engaging in political activity while on the job. Republican Senator Tom Cotton had reportedly asked the agency to investigate whether Smith's actions had been designed to influence the 2024 election. The agency, which monitors the conduct of federal employees, did not immediately respond to request for comment by AFP. Smith was appointed special counsel in 2022, and charged Trump with plotting to overturn the results of the 2020 election and mishandling classified documents after leaving the White House. Trump denied both charges and sought to frame them as politically motivated, accusing the Justice Department of being weaponized against him. Neither case ever came to trial, and the special counsel -- in line with a Justice Department policy of not prosecuting a sitting president -- dropped them both after Trump won the November 2024 presidential election. Smith then resigned before Trump could fulfil his campaign pledge to fire him. The Office of Special Counsel operates separately from special counsel offices at the Department of Justice, such as the one headed by Smith. The prosecutorial decisions made by Smith do not typically fall under its remit, according to the Times. It cannot lay criminal charges against Smith but could refer its findings to the Department of Justice, which does have that power. The most severe penalty under the Hatch Act is termination of employment, which would not apply to Smith as he has already resigned. Since taking office in January, Trump has taken a number of punitive measures against his perceived enemies. He has stripped former officials of their security clearances and protective details, targeted law firms involved in past cases against him and pulled federal funding from universities. Last month the FBI opened criminal investigations into its former director James Comey and ex-CIA chief John Brennan, two prominent Trump critics. Days later Comey's daughter Maurene -- a federal prosecutor who handled the case of notorious sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, who has been repeatedly linked to Trump -- was abruptly fired.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store