UK government, museums urged to stop display of ancestral remains, repatriate them
LONDON (Reuters) - Some British lawmakers, NGOs and researchers have called on the government to fix what they have described as a "legislative vacuum" that allows museums and other institutions to hold and display African ancestral remains taken during the colonial era.
For centuries, African ancestral remains, such as mummified bodies, skulls and other body parts, were brought to Britain and to other former colonial powers, often as "trophies" or as commodities to be traded and displayed.
There are growing calls worldwide for such remains, as well as looted art, to be repatriated to their communities or countries of origin.
Although some efforts have been made to confront the long-standing issue, African remains are still held in various institutions across the country, such as museums and universities.
"We cannot allow the dehumanisation of our ancestors," Connie Bell, from the 'Decolonising the Archive' project, said at an event on Wednesday organised by a cross-party parliamentary group on reparations, chaired by Labour MP Bell Ribeiro-Addy.
In November 2024, Ribeiro-Addy brought the issue to parliament, saying colonial-era remains were being listed for sale by auction houses, on e-commerce platforms and social media.
A month before Ribeiro-Addy's remarks, an auction house in Tetsworth, Oxfordshire, withdrew a sale of such remains, including skulls from West Africa's Ekoi people, following criticism by native by local communities and advocates.
UK's deputy prime minister Angela Rayner said it was horrifying to hear Ribeiro-Addy's account, and agreed to further discuss the issue. A meeting with the culture minister will take place soon, Ribeiro-Addy said on Wednesday.
The cross-party group will present to the government 14 policy recommendations, including making all sales of remains illegal "on the basis they are not commercial objects but human beings".
The policy brief, produced by the African Foundation for Development (AFFORD), said the government should close loopholes in the Human Tissues Act 2004, which covers the removal, storage, use and disposal of human tissue.
The act does not, however, cover activities related to remains of people who died over a century ago, which excludes most ancestral remains held by museums and other institutions, AFFORD said.
AFFORD said the act should be amended to make public display of human remains an offence if done without consent. It also said a national restitution policy should be adopted, a body should be created to handle repatriation claims and collections of human remains should be mapped out.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
3 hours ago
- Bloomberg
A Wealth Tax Would Signal Britain Is Closed for Business
As the UK teetered on the edge of an economic precipice 50 years ago, Environment Secretary Anthony Crosland, Labour's leading public intellectual, warned improvident local councils that 'the party is over.' The author of the optimistic tract The Future of Socialism was sounding the death knell of an era of seemingly limitless public spending. Crosland's speech, written by my former Times colleague David Lipsey who passed away last weekend, detonated like a bomb. Many Labour party officials, however, responded by sticking their fingers in their ears — the left opposed fiscal restraint even when Britain had to turn to the International Monetary Fund for a bailout. Margaret Thatcher, the newly elected Conservative opposition leader, however, took Crosland's words to heart and waited for her moment.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Tax, tax and more tax. Does Rachel Reeves not know there's another way?
Wealth taxes, pension raids, inheritance tax, does Labour really not know there's another option, asks John O'Connell There are recipients of enhanced personal independence payments (PIP) for conditions such as tennis elbow, writer's cramp, acne, alcohol misuse and food intolerance. Last year, 13 people received enhanced PIP for 'factitious disorders', including for munchausen syndrome which the NHS describes as a 'psychological condition where someone pretends to be ill or deliberately produces symptoms of illness in themselves'. Recipients of this part of PIP can use their benefits to receive a car through the motability scheme. Read the new Taxpayers' Alliance benefits dashboard, and weep. It's unsurprising, therefore, that the scale and cost of incapacity and disability benefits are spiralling out of control. But a Labour government with an historic majority was unable to reduce the rate of increase in spending on certain elements of welfare, let alone cut it. So, there will be tax hikes in October's Budget. Given the government has already ruled out increases to the rates of income tax, employees' national insurance and VAT, there's not much room for significant revenues to fill their £20bn fiscal blackhole. And it's not as if they haven't already soaked families and businesses in their short time in office. The Chancellor reportedly called last year's brutal hike to employers' national insurance 'low hanging fruit'. Tell that to the small firms around the country who have shut down, sacked staff or frozen pay as a result. Proving, of course, that companies can't pay taxes, only people can pay taxes. So where else can they go? Of course, they are floating old classics like a wealth tax, this time pitched as two per cent on assets over £10m. The real world backs up the economic literature in showing conclusively that wealth taxes don't work. We don't even have to look at the raft of international evidence – Labour politicians can refer back to their brethren from the 1970s, when the Chancellor Denis Healey found it 'impossible to draft one which would yield enough revenue to be worth the administrative cost and political hassle'. And talking of classics, further pension raids are being considered. It seems as if the Treasury has been itching to get their hands on bigger chunks of pension contributions for quite some time, with variations of the idea road-tested in the run up to every Budget I can remember. But again, it's not as if this government hasn't already come after savers; last October, it was announced that pension pots from private defined contribution pensions (including SIPPs) – which have been inheritable with only income tax to pay – will be included in inheritance tax (IHT) assessments. This means beneficiaries could face a 40 per cent IHT charge on top of potential income tax liabilities, leading to taxation well in excess of 80 per cent for some, due to taper relief. What's even more pernicious is that this could apply retrospectively, which is a dangerous precedent for tax changes more generally. A campaign has sprung up to fight this change through legal means, such is the potentially destructive nature of it. Aren't we taxed enough already? With its ballooning bills, the government probably feels it has no choice but to give it another go in October. But there is, of course, another way to think about all of this: maybe, just maybe, public spending is too high. Perhaps it would be better to cut costs, rather than come back to badly bruised taxpayers and demand more from them? Although they failed spectacularly to get welfare under control, it's not as if the government has been tightening its belt elsewhere. Chagos, anyone? But our fiscal fundamentals are in dire shape – more of the same simply won't cut it. John O'Connell is chief executive of the Taxpayers' Alliance
Newsweek
7 hours ago
- Newsweek
NATO Ally Bordering Russia Withdraws From International Weapons Treaty
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Finland has formally notified the United Nations (U.N.) of its intention to withdraw from the Ottawa Convention, which bans the use of antipersonnel land mines, according to Reuters—a move that several European allies have made in the face of Russia's ongoing aggression in Ukraine. Newsweek reached out to NATO via email outside of normal business hours on Friday night for comment. Why It Matters The move by Finland, a country sharing an 830-mile border with Russia, highlights growing apprehension in Eastern Europe due to the heightened threat of Russian invasion. Finland joined NATO after decades of holding a position of neutrality between the alliance and Russia, but changed course following the invasion of Ukraine. In a joint statement earlier this year, Poland and the Baltic defense ministers said their decision would send "a clear message: Our countries are prepared and can use every necessary measure to defend our territory and freedom." The Ottawa Convention, which took effect in 1999, requires signatory states to ban the use, stockpiling, production and transfer of antipersonnel mines. Finland's withdrawal was announced as regional partners—including Poland, Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania—also indicated their exit amid fears of Russia's military actions following its 2022 full-scale invasion of Ukraine. Last year, international watchdog Landmine Monitor reported that Russia and other countries had actively used land mines in recent conflicts. At least 5,757 people were killed or wounded by the mines and unexploded ordnance in the past year, most of whom were civilians—including significant numbers of children. Finnish Prime Minister Antti Petteri Orpo is pictured in Brussels on June 26. Finnish Prime Minister Antti Petteri Orpo is pictured in Brussels on June 26. Martin Bertrand/Hans Lucas/AFP via Getty Images What To Know Finland's Parliament voted for withdrawal in June and notified U.N. Secretary-General António Guterres of its intent in July, in accordance with treaty provisions, according to Reuters. Guterres, in a statement to the fifth review of the Mine Ban Treaty, called on states and signatories to "meet their obligations and ensure compliance to the convention, while addressing humanitarian and developmental impacts through financial and technical support." Pope Francis, who died in April, had also joined calls for nations to end production and use of land mines, warning of their long-term impact on civilians. This regional trend gathered pace in March, when Poland and the Baltic states declared their intention to leave the Ottawa Convention due to perceived new threats along NATO's eastern flank. Poland has proposed turning its border with Russia into a minefield and has begun preparations to produce antipersonnel mines domestically. Eastern European leaders argue that remaining in the convention is no longer tenable while facing adversaries unconstrained by the treaty. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky recently signed a decree to withdraw from the treaty as well, citing Russian "armed aggression" as forcing a political reassessment. What People Are Saying Polish and Baltic defense ministers in a joint statement issued in March: "With this decision, we are sending a clear message: Our countries are prepared and can use every necessary measure to defend our territory and freedom." Guterres in December said: "I call on states parties to meet their obligations and ensure compliance to the convention, while addressing humanitarian and developmental impacts through financial and technical support. "I also encourage all states that have not yet acceded to the convention to join the 164 that have done so. A world without antipersonnel mines is not just possible. It is within reach." What Happens Next Finland will fully terminate its obligations under the Ottawa Convention after the requisite waiting period. The international community will be monitoring how these policy changes affect military postures across NATO's eastern flank as the war in Ukraine continues. This article includes reporting by the Associated Press.
