logo
Four jailed after £1m worth of cannabis found hidden in candles

Four jailed after £1m worth of cannabis found hidden in candles

BBC News24-03-2025
Four men who hid cannabis with a street value of £1m in pots disguised as candles have been jailed.Some 182kg of cannabis resin was seized by Border Force officers at Tilbury Docks in Essex, on 17 April 2023, Merseyside Police said.The pots - disguised as Citronella candles - had been imported from Malaga, Spain, and were destined for business premises in Bootle, Merseyside.Det Insp Paul McVeigh said the case showed how cannabis was a "drug with concrete links to serious, organised crime".
The four men, from Merseyside and West Yorkshire, were sentenced at Liverpool Crown Court.Ian Hannah, 56, of Liverpool Road, Lydiate on Merseyside, was sentenced to four years and three months after he pleaded guilty.Steven Garbutt, 64, of Middleton Park Road, Leeds, was jailed for six years, while Raja Hamid Ali, 39, of Thornbury Ave, Bradford, was sentenced to five years and six months.Shahrukh Ali, 28, of Kenley Mount, Bradford, was also sentenced to four years.Det Insp McVeigh said: "The quantities of drugs being imported were significant and the group stood to make a great deal of money from selling it on the streets of Merseyside via other criminals."This is yet another example where cannabis is proven to be a drug with concrete links to serious organised crime, and in fact is not a harmless drug at all."
Listen to the best of BBC Radio Merseyside on Sounds and follow BBC Merseyside on Facebook, X, and Instagram. You can also send story ideas via Whatsapp to 0808 100 2230.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

EXCLUSIVE I ordered an everyday item of clothing from overseas when it was seized at the Australian border... then came the $2,500 bill to get it back
EXCLUSIVE I ordered an everyday item of clothing from overseas when it was seized at the Australian border... then came the $2,500 bill to get it back

Daily Mail​

time30 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

EXCLUSIVE I ordered an everyday item of clothing from overseas when it was seized at the Australian border... then came the $2,500 bill to get it back

An Australian business owner has lashed out after his clothing shipment was seized at the border and he was forced to pay more than $2,500 before he could get it back. Andy Lowry, who runs clothing store Pamboes, had ordered a shipment of 'blanket hoodies' from China before they were withheld by the Australian Border Force. Authorities had searched the clothing for illegal materials, however they found nothing suspicious inside of them. Mr Lowry was slugged with a $2,524 bill for airport storage fees and informed he would not be able to collect the items until he settled it. 'Apparently because I'm the importer on record, I had to pay that $2,524 bill and they pretty much told me to get stuffed,' he said. 'This is like the cost of doing business essentially.' Mr Lowry claimed the seizure put him behind schedule for marketing the new clothes. 'I can confirm that [Master Air Waybill number] is subject to border processing and we're unable to provide a timeframe as to when it may be available,' an official advised in an email. 'At this point I'm getting stressed cause they like can't give me a timeframe. I'm like how long are they going to keep it for?' Mr Lowry said. In correspondence from the ABF, Mr Lowry was told he could not collect his items until he paid to lift the storage fees. He believed it would cost a few hundred dollars. 'After I wait a week and a half, I get my storage charges and it's storage for $2,524. For what? A hoodie?' Mr Lowry said. 'Then I sort of had this huge back and forth on why I'm having to pay for this, and lo and behold, it is legal. 'The Australian Border Force can do that to any person who is importing.' Mr Lowry said to chase a reimbursement he was deferred to the Department of Home Affairs. He was told he would have to lodge an investigation and complain. Mr Lowry told Daily Mail Australia any fee 'coming out of nowhere' makes it 'tough' to do business. He said the 'seasonal' business relies on customers purchasing his products at the beginning of winter, and estimates the border mishap in June cost him dearly. Mr Lowry began selling the loungewear during the Covid pandemic before realising there was a market for 'blanket'-style clothes. 'This delay cost us two weeks in June, which would be above a six-figure loss in lost sales,' he said. 'Understandably customers do their winter shopping at the beginning of winter so they can get full use out of whatever they have bought.' When he tried to chase an investigation, Mr Lowry found there was no way around paying the fees, as the importer on record is liable for the costs. 'In the time Australian Border Force is checking your goods, your shipping company is forced to hold the goods at their warehouses until Australian Border Force is finished and storage charges are imposed,' he said. 'Some companies may be kind enough to waive these charges, but understandably they are a business too.' Mr Lowry said the costs around occupying commercial real estate are expensive as port space is in high demand. In general, importing can be 'quite difficult' he said. He added Pamboes has thankfully had few issues but acknowledged he had heard 'horror stories'. 'Border holds cost companies millions each year and it's not something you can really prepare for, it's almost a random check,' he said. 'We understand they have to keep our borders safe, but we pay taxes at the border. You would think part of those taxes we pay would cover ABF's work.' He said it hasn't put him off doing business as Pamboes moves into more fashionable blanket-wear and tries to sell off remaining stock in a winter sale.

Toxteth fire: Residents tell of 'shock' after two houses torched
Toxteth fire: Residents tell of 'shock' after two houses torched

BBC News

time15 hours ago

  • BBC News

Toxteth fire: Residents tell of 'shock' after two houses torched

The home of a couple and their young child was gutted by fire along with the house next door in a suspected arson attack. Merseyside Police said petrol had been poured into the front porch of one of the properties, in the Toxteth area of Liverpool, to ignite the blaze, which then spread to the second house.A relative of the woman living in the house said she was out of the country on holiday with her family but was "in shock" after the attack in Carlingford Close, just before midnight on Saturday night. It is the second serious house fire believed to have been deliberately started in Liverpool within just over 24 hours after a man also escaped a property in Everton. The second property is also believed to have been empty at the time according to neighbours, with the family also understood to be on holiday. Both houses had suffered visibly extensive damage throughout, with charred and blackened furniture piled into the front gardens by forensic investigators. The relative, who did not wish to be named, lives close by but said he was at his father's house when his wife called with news of the fire. He said: "I think the whole close was out, everybody was in shock."I can't think why anyone would do this, there is no logic to it at all."He said both families had been "very lucky" not to be at home, although his relative had been informed and was "in shock". He added: "This close is normally very nice and peaceful, all the kids who live here all go out and play and it's very peaceful, very multi-cultural with people from all around the world. "Nobody expected for this to happen, it's shocking." Merseyside Police said no injuries had been reported. The investigation comes after another attack on Roxburgh Street in Everton on Friday evening. The force has also recently charged a man with murder after an elderly couple, Eric Greener and Sheila Jackson, died in a fire in St Helens on 15 July. Det Insp Victoria Lanceley: "We all know too well the devastation and fatal consequences such an incredibly dangerous act can cause and puts the lives of residents in the street at risk. "It's only down to sheer fortune that no one was injured in this incident and clearly it could have been a lot worse." Listen to the best of BBC Radio Merseyside on BBC Sounds and follow BBC Merseyside on Facebook, X, and Instagram, and watch BBC North West Tonight on BBC iPlayer.

Four in 10 migrants crossing the Channel on small boats and claiming to be children lie about their age, official figures show
Four in 10 migrants crossing the Channel on small boats and claiming to be children lie about their age, official figures show

Daily Mail​

timea day ago

  • Daily Mail​

Four in 10 migrants crossing the Channel on small boats and claiming to be children lie about their age, official figures show

Four in 10 migrants crossing the Channel in small boats lie about being children, official figures show. Many are believed to have destroyed their identification documents before arriving in Britain in a desperate attempt to cheat the asylum system. Child refugees cannot be deported and have the rights to the same healthcare, education and sustenance as British children. Home Office figures show that from mid-2022 to June 2024, 11,449 age disputes were raised by UK Border Force staff. A staggering 1,305 of those caught lying about their age were from Afghanistan, in a bid to get special protection in the UK. While Sudan came below with 571 trying to con officials. A whopping 8,791 were resolved with 3,570 — 40 per cent — having lied about being under 18. And 355 Iranians, 325 Eritreans and 318 Vietnamese asylum seekers were caught pretending to be children. Last year, 56 per cent of disputes identified adult migrants lying about their age, figures from The Sun on Sunday revealed. It comes as a damning report by borders inspector David Bolt found a 'lack of curiosity from immigration staff about the genuine age of Channel migrants. So much so that one Iranian with grey hairs and stubble managed to pass for 17-years-old. The Government is set to trial AI-powered facial recognition technology to determine whether Channel migrants are being wrongly identified as children. The Home Office last week announced testing on new technology will begin later this year with the hope it could be fully integrated into the asylum system in 2026. There have long been fears that some of those who cross the Channel in small boats - who often don't carry official documents such as passports - are wrongly claiming to be children. Unaccompanied minors are more likely to be granted asylum than adults, with some suspected to be faking their ages in a bid to boost their chances of staying in the UK. In the first half of 2024, a total of 1,317 migrants claiming to be minors at the border were later judged to be adults. There were a total of 2,122 age disputes raised over the same period. Currently initial age decisions are made by Home Office staff based on a migrant's physical appearance and demeanour. A Home Office spokeswoman told The Sun: 'Robust age assessments for illegal migrants are vital to maintaining border security. 'We will start to modernise that process in the coming months through the testing of fast and effective AI Age Estimation technology at key Border Force locations, with a view to fully integrate Facial Age Estimation into the current age assessment system over the course of 2026.' The Home Office have been contacted for comment by MailOnline.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store