With backs to the wall on IDF draft, Haredi MKs slam Edelstein, A-G
Members of Knesset from the haredi (ultra-Orthodox) parties criticized Knesset Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee chairman MK Yuli Edelstein (Likud) and Attorney-General Gali Baharav-Miara on Wednesday and Thursday over their conduct regarding haredi service in the IDF.
Edelstein has yet to present the text of a new law proposal based on agreements reached with haredi representatives on June 12, the eve of Israel's attack against Iran. A spokesperson for Edelstein said on Thursday that the bill would indeed be based on the agreements, but that there were still many details to work out.
However, in a Thursday article in Shas's newspaper Haderech, party spokesperson Asher Medina argued that Edelstein had reneged on some of the agreements.
'The act of deceit and fraud surrounding the draft law knows no rest,' Medina wrote. 'The ink on Edelstein's festive [June 12] announcement about the agreements barely dried, and already it turned out [that] the promises remained only on paper. The public and media pressure wasn't long in coming, and Edelstein, as is his way, began to feel pressured and panicked and started dragging his feet.
'Suddenly, he asked to backtrack, reopened issues that had already been settled, and shifted the blame onto the committee's legal adviser. At the same time, he launched a symphony of briefings to journalists,' Medina wrote.
'The very agreement that Edelstein proudly boasted about... has suddenly, according to him, become a tactical concession forced upon him by the attack in Iran. The level of trust the haredi delegation has in Edelstein is close to nothing. Even lower is the level of trust the Council of Torah Sages has in the chance that this committee will produce a law that satisfies them.
'If, at this stage, there are demands to reopen issues that were already agreed upon, what will stop them from deceiving Torah scholars again and again?' Medina added.
He argued that the haredi parties had 'no choice' but to use the only parliamentary tool at their disposal to apply pressure. For weeks, haredi MKs have boycotted voting on bills proposed by private MKs, which usually come up on Wednesdays.
However, for the first time this week, the MKs boycotted the plenum on Monday as well, forcing the coalition to remove from the agenda government-proposed bills and bills that were in advanced stages of legislation.
THE AGREEMENTS stipulated that an increasing number of haredi draftees would enlist annually, with the ultimate goal of 50% of each graduating class drafting within five years.
The bill included a series of sanctions that would apply to draft dodgers gradually, with some relatively light sanctions applying immediately, and heavier sanctions added at six-month increments. Financial sanctions would also be applied to yeshivot that do not reach draft quotas. In the meantime, current sanctions against draft dodgers, which include blocked funds to yeshivot and the cessation of state-subsidized daycare, would be lifted.
Medina's mention of the committee's legal adviser, Miri Frenkel-Shor, was notable, since the agreements drew legal and public criticism soon after they were published.
The head of the Finance Ministry's Budget Department, Yoav Gardos, wrote in a letter to Frenkel-Shor on July 2 that the agreement would actually serve as an incentive not to enlist and not to work and, in effect, perpetuate the issues that it set out to solve.
Gardos pointed out that the idea of quotas may already be a nonstarter since they did not place a specific requirement for individual haredim to enlist. In addition, he explained that the immediate sanctions would not significantly affect many young haredi yeshiva students. In the meantime, the law's passage will free up funds to yeshivot and to parents that are currently frozen because of students' draft evasion.
THE PREVIOUS exemption for haredi men officially ended with a High Court ruling in June 2024, and since no new bill has passed, the current legal status requires the enlistment of all of the approximately 80,000 eligible haredi men.
Attorney-General Gali Baharav-Miara has held monthly meetings since then to ensure that the High Court ruling is being implemented.
The most recent meeting took place on Sunday. According to a summary of the meeting put out by the A-G's spokesperson, IDF representatives said they had taken a number of measures to increase enforcement against draft dodgers.
These included a change of protocol to shorten the grace period for draftees before they are considered draft-dodgers; increased enforcement at border crossings, roadblocks, and regular arrests; pre-initiated enforcement based on intelligence; a special plan during the month of September to ease punishment on draft-dodgers who report for service on their own accord; and adding jail cells for draft-dodgers who continue to refuse service.
In addition, on top of the approximately 24,000 draft orders sent out over the past year, the IDF will send out the remaining 54,000 by the end of July, which will apply gradually until June 2026, pertinent to the IDF's capacity to process new recruits.
Degel Hatorah chairman MK Moshe Gafni said on Thursday, 'Baharav-Miara has declared herself the leading fighter against the world of Torah, its students, and those who uphold the Jewish people. We will not allow even a single yeshiva student to be prevented from learning Torah or to interrupt his studies.
'The Jewish people are well-acquainted with the trials of history, both near and distant, in which attempts were made to stop Torah study, and we know how those attempts ended.'
In his article on Thursday, Medina wrote the following about Baharav-Miara:
'At the Attorney-General's Office, they gleefully rubbed their hands and raced, eyes wide open, toward chaos. There, they pressured the IDF to issue tens of thousands more draft notices to haredim, toughen sanctions, shorten enforcement timelines, and even consider extreme measures like arrests and checkpoints at the entrances to haredi cities.'
Medina continued, 'In their view, the draft law is the last card left to shatter the Netanyahu government through a rupture with the haredi public. And they won't relent. They will do everything to sabotage a legal arrangement, to prevent a resolution, lest even a single yeshiva student escape the 'draft-dodger' label they've assigned him.'
The boycotts drew criticism from within the coalition. MK Dan Illouz (Likud) on Wednesday and MK Moshe Saada (Likud) on Thursday expressed their opposition to the haredi maneuver, which they claimed was unacceptable during wartime.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Bloomberg
an hour ago
- Bloomberg
Israel Strikes Syria After New Clashes Involving Druze Minority
Israel launched attacks in southern Syria on Monday after deadly clashes that involved the Druze community, a minority group that the Jewish state has pledged to protect. The Israel Defense Forces struck several tanks advancing toward Suwayda province, where confrontations broke out Sunday and persisted into Monday. 'The IDF struck the tanks in order to prevent their arrival to the area,' the army said on Telegram.


Fox News
an hour ago
- Fox News
Iran vows retaliation if UN Security Council issues snapback sanctions on anniversary of nuclear deal
Iran on Monday warned that it would retaliate if the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) took steps to impose "snapback" sanctions as nations mull further action to halt Tehran's nuclear development. "The threat to use the snapback mechanism lacks legal and political basis and will be met with an appropriate and proportionate response from the Islamic Republic of Iran," Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmaeil Baghaei claimed during a press conference, according to a Reuters report. Baghaei did not expand on how Iran would retaliate, but his threats come amid repeated warnings from security experts that time is running out to enforce the sanction mechanism by Oct. 18 under terms dictated by the 2015 nuclear deal. The comments coincided with the 10-year anniversary of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), which was originally intended to halt Iran's nuclear ambitions, but which some have argued was insufficient to adequately deter Tehran. Under the terms of the JCPOA, any signatory can unilaterally call up snapback sanctions if Iran is found to have violated the terms of the agreement. Though the U.S., which, alongside the U.K., France, Germany, China and Russia, signed the 2015 deal, was deemed by the U.N. and other JCPOA members unable to utilize the mechanism after Washington withdrew from the agreement in 2018 during President Donald Trump's first term. Despite repeated calls by the U.S. to enforce snapback – which would legally enforce all 15 U.N. members on the council, including Russia, to reimpose sanctions on Iran – no one on the UNSC or JCPOA has yet taken steps to enforce the sanctions. "I would say one of the few good things about the JCPOA is that it reverse engineers the veto in the sense that you really only need one of the permanent members to be able to do this," Behnam Ben Taleblu, senior director of the Foundation for Defense of Democracies' Iran orogram told Fox News Digital. "But why is no one doing it? It's because it's a risky move. "I think it's a worthwhile move, but we have to be honest – it's a risky move," he added. Ben Taleblu explained that Iran's most likely response to the severe sanctions under the snapback mechanism would be its abandonment of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) – an international agreement that over 190 nations have signed, pledging either not to transfer weapons to another recipient by nuclear-capable nations, or not to develop atomic arms by non-nuclear nations, among other commitments. The terms of the agreement are monitored by the U.N.'s International Atomic Energy Agency – which Iran has already suspended cooperation with following U.S. and Israeli strikes against its nuclear program last month. "In a world in which Iran's most likely response is to leave the NPT, one has to be confident in at least the ability of military threats to deter Iran further, or at least the credibility of America's and Israel's, or the international community's, military options against Iran moving forward," Ben Taleblu said. "The problem is the lack of a game plan. Has America provided Europe with a game plan, a road map for post-snapback?" he added, noting there needs to be a much larger strategy for next steps should sanctions be reinforced. Though the U.S. assesses that Iran's nuclear program has been stunted by up to two years, experts remain convinced that Tehran's atomic ambitions have not been deterred, and its ties to terrorist networks and adversarial nations mean it remains a top security concern. Trump has said he is still committed to negotiating with Iran on its nuclear program, though questions remain over how long he will continue to allow negotiations to drag out before a European nation like the U.K., France or Germany must step in to enact snapback sanctions not only before the October deadline, but before Russia takes over control of the UNSC presidency that month. Pushing through the snapback mechanism is expected to be a roughly six-week process. Reports on Sunday suggested that German Chancellor Friedrich Merz could call up the snapback measures as soon as Tuesday, and U.S. Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee championed the move in a post on X. But Fox News Digital could not independently verify these claims and the German Foreign Ministry told Israeli news outlet JNS that the claims were incorrect. The chancellor's office did not immediately respond to Fox News Digital's questions.


Washington Post
2 hours ago
- Washington Post
Why Tucker Carlson still matters
A couple of days after the U.S. airstrikes on nuclear targets in Iran, former Fox News personality Tucker Carlson made a radical proclamation: 'I think I'm going to pull back from the internet a little bit, and I think I'm going to be a wiser person for doing so.' To show his dedication to the disconnected life, Carlson spent the next three weeks or so interviewing commentator Saagar Enjeti; Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian; libertarian Scott Horton; former Navy SEAL Rob O'Neill; Department of Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.; Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Georgia); reporter Liz Collin; and former Fox News host Clayton Morris.