logo
Looking for financial independence? Follow 'The Simple Path.'

Looking for financial independence? Follow 'The Simple Path.'

Yahoo15-06-2025
Author and blogger JL Collins's book 'The Simple Path to Wealth: Your Road Map to Financial Independence and a Rich, Free Life' was published in 2016 and has since sold more than 1 million copies. It's hands-down one of my favorite investing books.
Drumroll. He has now returned with a second edition of the book, which his daughter, Jess, collaborated on.
I asked Collins to share some insights. Here are edited excerpts of our conversation.
What has changed since your first edition in terms of your philosophy? Anything you tweaked in this new edition?
JL Collins: Nothing. Zero. I designed the simple path to wealth to be something that you implement over decades. If it were to require major modification after a single 10-year period, I would not have designed it very well. The basic philosophy is the same, and that's important. What has changed is all the little details — the government regulations around income limits for investing in 401(k)s and the amount of money you can put in individual retirement accounts and all that kind of stuff.
You kick off the book with your three key principles. Can you share?
Avoid debt, live on less than you earn, and invest the surplus — if you're following my simple path, you'll be doing that in low-cost index funds.
Avoiding debt, or getting out of it... is critical. You can never achieve financial independence if you're dragging that particular ball and chain around. I'm a little appalled that in our culture, carrying debt has become (so) normalized that people sort of assume, well, of course I'm going to borrow money to buy this, that, or, or the other thing.
How should we spend our money?
Spend money on what is most valuable to you. For me, there is nothing more valuable than buying my freedom, my freedom of time, my freedom of choice. You do that by having money and investments that ultimately pay all of your expenses.
How do you define financial independence? How is your approach aligned with the FIRE (Financial Independence Retire Early) movement?
I love the FIRE acronym. It's very clever, and it's a great goal if that's your goal. Retiring early was never my goal. I like working. My goal was, and is, to have enough money to allow me to make bolder choices. Being financially independent means that you have enough money invested to throw off enough to cover all of your expenses and then some — a little bit of a cushion.
You write that 25 times your annual expenses is the amount you need to be financially independent. Explain.
There is the concept of what's called the 4% rule. And what the 4% rule suggests, and I think it's a great guideline, is that when you have enough money invested, that 4% of it will cover all of your expenses. Let's suppose that you have a million dollars invested. Well, that throws off at 4%, $40,000 a year. So if you can live on $40,000 a year comfortably, you are now financially independent. If you need $100,000, you multiply it by 25, you'd be at $2.5 million.
You advocate saving 50% of your income if you want to become financially independent. Isn't that a tad unrealistic for most people?
This is one of the things I probably get the most pushback on because, well, it depends on how you construct your lifestyle. And I'm sympathetic to people who feel that way, but there are people who are doing it very successfully. The more you can set aside, the greater the percentage, the shorter your journey will be to get to that financial independence thing.
You are all in on owning stocks, but what advice or do you have for people when it comes to dealing with rocky uncertainty in markets?
The single thing that determines whether the market will make you wealthy or leave you bleeding at the side of the road is what you do when it drops. Because market corrections, which are 10% and bear markets, which are 20%, are all normal. They are to be expected. If you're going to be investing in the stock market, you have to be prepared for those things to happen. And they are unpredictable in spite of all the people out there who are claiming they can predict it.
I've been doing this for 50 years, and the answer to what do you do when you know these things are going to come and you can't predict them? Well, you just stay the course. You don't panic and sell, which is the worst thing you can do because that will leave you bleeding at the side of the road. And not only do you stay the course, but if you're building your wealth, and you've been adding money on a regular basis, which is what the simple path calls for, these things are a blessing because now you're accumulating those shares at a lower cost.
Read more: How to protect your money during stock market volatility
What's your ideal investment strategy?
This is the simple path to wealth. It's not only easier, but it's also more powerful. So when you're building your wealth, you hold one index fund, and in my case, that's Vanguard's Total Stock Market Index Fund.
The key thing is it's a total stock market index fund. And caveat here is I hear from people all the time who say, you know, I'm at Fidelity, or I'm at Schwab and they have total stock market index funds. Are those okay? The answer to that question is, yes, those are fine.
You own virtually every publicly traded company in the United States of America, and everybody from the factory floor to the CEO is now working to make you richer. That keeps me warm and comfortable at night when I go to sleep.
When you stop having earned income to flow into that total stock market index fund, then you want to add a bond fund. And in my case, that's Vanguard's Total Bond Market Index Fund. I also hold some money in a money market fund.
Frequently people will go to their 401(k) and they won't find a total stock market index fund, but they will find an S&P 500 fund, those are fine.
Read more: 12 money market accounts with interest rates of 4% APY and higher
What about the international angle?
I'm a little bit alone in this position. I simply don't see the need because those largest companies... which make up the bulk of my total stock market index fund, are by definition international companies. An enormous amount of their sales and profit comes from all over the world.By subscribing, you are agreeing to Yahoo's
Terms
and
Privacy Policy
What's your take on target-date funds? They are the primary investment vehicle for people in employer retirement plans these days.
They're effective. One of these target-date retirement funds is a great way to go. That fund will handle all of the rebalancing when it comes time for adding bonds. For those people who want ultimate simplicity, you never have to think about it at all. I don't think it's going to perform quite as well which is why I don't personally use it, and by the way, it will give you that international exposure.
What's your take on crypto creeping into investment portfolios as well as private equity and such? Still stick with the index funds?
I'm not a fan of the multiple income stream school of investing. Simple is better. So no cattle, gold, annuities, crypto, or the like. For the most part, so far, cryptocurrencies are a speculation. Sometimes speculations work out very well, often these speculations don't work out. That's what makes them speculations.
I'm not a speculator. I'm an investor. An investor buys assets that have operations that can generate cash and growth — stock in a company or rental real estate, for example. Such things grow in value because of the underlying activities that earn money.
Kerry Hannon is a Senior Columnist at Yahoo Finance. She is a career and retirement strategist and the author of 14 books, including the forthcoming "Retirement Bites: A Gen X Guide to Securing Your Financial Future," "In Control at 50+: How to Succeed in the New World of Work" and "Never Too Old to Get Rich." Follow her on Bluesky.
Sign up for the Mind Your Money newsletter
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

EQT and CPP Investments to acquire NEOGOV, a provider of HR and compliance software for U.S. public sector agencies, from Warburg Pincus and Carlyle
EQT and CPP Investments to acquire NEOGOV, a provider of HR and compliance software for U.S. public sector agencies, from Warburg Pincus and Carlyle

Yahoo

time24 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

EQT and CPP Investments to acquire NEOGOV, a provider of HR and compliance software for U.S. public sector agencies, from Warburg Pincus and Carlyle

The EQT X fund ("EQT") and Canada Pension Plan Investment Board ("CPP Investments") have agreed to acquire NEOGOV, which serves over 10,000 public sector agencies with purpose-built government HR and compliance software solutions NEOGOV's cloud-native solutions support the full employee lifecycle and help public sector agencies drive efficiency and stay compliant with local policies and regulatory frameworks EQT and CPP Investments will partner with CEO Shane Evangelist and the management team to accelerate growth and expansion, building upon their track records in the US software sector STOCKHOLM, July 28, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- EQT announced today that the EQT X fund ("EQT") together with Canada Pension Plan Investment Board ("CPP Investments") have agreed to acquire NEOGOV (the "Company") from funds managed by Warburg Pincus and Carlyle. Founded in 2000 and headquartered in El Segundo, California, NEOGOV delivers purpose-built human capital management and public safety solutions to nearly 10,000 public sector organizations across North America. NEOGOV's cloud-native suite supports the full employee lifecycle – from recruitment and onboarding to performance management and compliance management – while helping agencies stay compliant with local policies and regulatory frameworks. "Local governments are the backbone of our communities. Our mission is to help them operate more efficiently and serve citizens more effectively. EQT and CPP Investments share our vision and bring the experience and capital to help us scale faster," said Shane Evangelist, CEO of NEOGOV. "Our priorities include advancing product innovation and AI capabilities to help public sector agencies drive increased efficiency and compliance adherence. EQT and CPP Investments' deep expertise in software and broad network of advisors will be instrumental to supporting NEOGOV's growth." "We are excited to partner with Shane and the NEOGOV team, who are operators at the highest levels. The team brings a deep understanding of the challenges that public sector agencies face, and we're proud to support a company that has earned such trust in the public sector," said Arvindh Kumar, Partner and Co-Head of EQT's Global Technology Team. Tyler Parker, Managing Director in the EQT Private Equity advisory team, added: "It's rare to find a software company that is so well-loved by its customers, and we look forward to partnering with NEOGOV to continue to modernize public sector operations and deliver impactful technology to those on the front lines of civic service." "NEOGOV is a leading software platform with distinct customer offerings that is poised for growth due to increasing demand from its customers across North America. Together with its strong management team, the Company is a good fit for our strategy to invest in high-quality software companies. We look forward to supporting the Company in this next phase of development alongside EQT and the management team," said Sam Blaichman, Managing Director, Head of Direct Private Equity, CPP Investments. With this transaction, EQT X is expected to be 60 – 65 percent invested (including closed and/or signed investments, announced public offers, if applicable, and less any expected syndication). The transaction is subject to customary conditions and approvals and is slated for completion in the coming months. Moelis & Company LLC served as exclusive financial advisor and Willkie Farr & Gallagher served as legal counsel to NEOGOV. Jefferies LLC served as exclusive financial advisor and Ropes & Gray served as legal counsel to EQT. Contact EQT: EQT Press Office, press@ CPP Investments: Asher Levine, Public Affairs & Communications, alevine@ T: +1 929 208 7939NEOGOV: Scott Jensen, Vice President of Marketing, sjensen@ This information was brought to you by Cision The following files are available for download: PR_EQT CPPI NEOGOV_25.07.28 DSC03016 View original content: Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data

Why Dispo's co-founder made the leap from social media to steelmaking
Why Dispo's co-founder made the leap from social media to steelmaking

Yahoo

time24 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Why Dispo's co-founder made the leap from social media to steelmaking

Daniel Liss, co-founder of the social network Dispo and the dating app Teaser AI, is convinced he's onto the next big thing: steelmaking. It all started, incongruously, with a few op-eds he wrote for TechCrunch about anti-trust enforcement in social media. The commentaries apparently caught the attention of some folks in Washington D.C., Liss told TechCrunch, and resulted in him being invited to guest judge a war game capstone exercise in spring 2023 hosted by the National War College. The war game was very au courant, running a scenario in which the U.S. and China fought for supremacy over Taiwan and the South China Sea. Liss's take away from the exercise? 'Our core supply chain of the arsenal of democracy — literally, the ships that my grandfather fought in — we don't have the ship-building capacity. If we did, we don't have the steel to make it,' he said. At that point, Liss said he became 'really interested — obsessed, even' with the steel supply chain. 'That was really the birth of Nemo Industries.' The basic pitch for Nemo Industries, Liss's latest startup, appears as though it were drawn from a Venn diagram of two very American anxieties, steelmaking and AI. The company, until now, has been operating in stealth, but Liss gave TechCrunch a peek behind the scenes. First, the obvious part: Nemo will use AI to optimize the production of pig iron, modernizing an industry that Liss said is woefully outdated. 'These plants are run on, at best, Excel spreadsheets. At worst, clipboard technology,' he said. The people who run them have 'unbelievable expertise,' he added, but that's the sort of thing that doesn't scale well. But Liss isn't pitching Nemo as just another piece of industrial software. Rather, Nemo is planning to build its own furnaces. The decision was driven by Liss's conviction that companies which use AI from inception will have a '20% to 30% margin advantage' over competitors. In steelmaking, such conviction doesn't come cheap. Hyundai Motor Group said in March that it would build a $6 billion steel plant in Louisiana to supply its factories in the U.S. Nemo's plant may not cost that much since its operations will be focused on pig iron, an intermediate product which steelmakers use to make a range of different alloys. Nemo will fire its furnaces using natural gas, which releases less carbon dioxide than coal, which is commonly used in the iron and steel industry. Liss said the company is considering capturing the furnaces' carbon pollution; tax incentives introduced under the Inflation Reduction Act remain largely intact, and they make the endeavor profitable for Nemo, he said. Liss's partner in Nemo is Michael DuBose, an investor who previously worked at Cheniere Energy, a natural gas company. 'He's built billions of dollars in LNG infrastructure,' Liss said. The startup will need that sort of scale if it's to succeed. Nemo previously raised $28.2 million, according to PitchBook, and it is currently in talks with existing investors to raise a $100 million Series A with existing investors, a person familiar with the matter told TechCrunch. The company also has received offers for over $1 billion in incentives from two southern states if the company can build three plants over the course of 15 years, the person said. It's a tall order for anyone to tackle, but Liss said that sort of ambition is required if the steel industry is going to deliver the sort of returns desired by venture capitalists. And, he added, basic industries like steel have historically delivered big wins for investors. 'When you look at the history of our country, many of the greatest companies that created outsize outcomes for their initial investors were in these categories,' Liss said. 'Ultimately, what were the Rockefellers and the Carnegies and the Melons and the Fricks investing in? The dollar amounts are so big in these categories.'

EU vowed $600B US economy investment from Trump trade deal. Hours later, European bloc admitted it can't back that promise
EU vowed $600B US economy investment from Trump trade deal. Hours later, European bloc admitted it can't back that promise

Yahoo

time24 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

EU vowed $600B US economy investment from Trump trade deal. Hours later, European bloc admitted it can't back that promise

Less than a day after President Donald Trump claimed that the European Union had agreed to invest $600 billion into the United States as part of a trade deal that will see Trump ask Americans to shoulder a 15 percent import tax on many European goods, EU officials are quietly backtracking. The deal to avert a full-on trade war between the U.S. and one of its major trading partners came into shape over the weekend as Trump met with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen at his Turnberry golf resort in Scotland. Trump had threatened to impose a 30 percent tax on EU imports in a letter to von der Leyen earlier this month. But he told reporters traveling with him on his extended-weekend golf holiday that he and von de Leyen had agreed that the U.S. would impose 'a straight-across tariff of 15 percent' for 'automobiles and everything else' imported into the U.S. from the bloc. Trump also said the EU had agreed to open its own markets by not raising any retaliatory taxes on American goods. Though tariffs are designed to promote domestic production and purchasing by taxing imported goods, the increase in cost typically falls on consumers, not foreign governments. This is because retailers often sidestep the increased import costs by raising prices. Still, the president's public statements have indicated that he sincerely believes that tariffs are paid by foreign nations as a sort of tribute for the purpose of accessing American markets. In fact, they are paid by American importers and passed on to consumers in the form of higher prices. The European Commission president called the agreement a 'huge deal' that would 'bring stability' and 'bring predictability,' calling both benefits 'very important for our businesses on both sides of the Atlantic.' The president also claimed that the agreement would bring $600 billion into American coffers by way of investments made by the EU into U.S. companies. But on Monday, multiple EU officials walked back the massive outlay by noting that it would be made by a variety of private companies over which the bloc has no authority when it comes to corporate spending priorities. One such official told Politico that none of the funds touted by Trump would be from the public coffers of any EU nation. 'It is not something that the EU as a public authority can guarantee. It is something which is based on the intentions of the private companies,' the official said. Another official stated that the $600 billion figure had been calculated "based on detailed discussions with different business associations and companies in order to see what their investment intentions are,' but as of Monday the European Commission has not announced any plans to use any sort of incentives to encourage the investment at issue. Sign in to access your portfolio

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store