logo
Next Guernsey States likely to revisit plans for GST-plus

Next Guernsey States likely to revisit plans for GST-plus

BBC News23-06-2025
The majority of Guernsey's new government would not support proposals for a tax package including a goods and services tax (GST-Plus) should they stick to their manifesto pledges.Most of the deputies elected last week campaigned on a ticket to oppose GST-plus – which is due to be introduced in 2027, or said they wanted to explore other revenue raising options.It means the taxation plans, which would raise £50m annually, may be at risk when Guernsey's States Assembly resumes.It comes as Guernsey States accounts for 2024 are set to be published later on Monday, revealing a deficit in public finances.
The outgoing President of Policies and Resources Committee (P&R) Lyndon Trott previously announced the States spent £44m more than it brought in last year.In this context, candidates' views on taxation and the economy were of critical importance to many voters deciding where to cast their votes for last week's general election.Should deputies stick to their promises, the next mandate for government could see GST-Plus – which was agreed in November - scrapped altogether.The GST-Plus package of tax reforms includes a 5% GST, lower income tax rates for earnings under £30,000 and social security reform, to start in 2027.Most candidates said in their manifestos they wanted a "fairer tax system" for the island, but lacked detail as to how they would approach tackling the financial deficit.
Half of Guernsey's next assembly - 19 in total - said they were firmly against GST or GST-Plus. Some of them indicated they had opposed the policy in the past and were hopeful it would be reconsidered.A further eight said they wanted to explore other options before ratifying the last States' decision to introduce the new tax, but would consider GST-Plus as a last resort.Four prominent GST-supporting politicians were voted out.Out of the 38 elected candidates, only 11 pledged to back GST-Plus in upcoming votes the new States is expected to hold early on.Other ways to tackle expenditure included closing corporate tax loopholes, improving tax administration, reforming the zero-10 corporation tax model and slashing public spending.
Former States economist and incoming deputy, Dr Andy Sloan said the new government had a mandate to "turn over every stone" before introducing GST-Plus.He said he would like to see a three-pronged approach to "introduce a consumption tax, reform corporate tax and restraining expenditure" to balance the public accounts, but stressed that the introduction of a GST should be the last resort.He said: "The message from the electorate was they wanted no stone left unturned before GST being introduced and they don't believe that's been done yet."The States has to follow the will of the electorate and listen to that message and focus on restraining expenditure."He said when he first came to Guernsey over a decade ago spending was about £296m and it has now "ballooned" to £700m."I think the public really want to see expenditure restraint first. The majority of those who topped the poll were elected on that message," he said."We can't keep spending at twice the rate that we have income coming in, which we have been doing for 10 years."
Returning Deputy Gavin St Pier, the leader of Forward Guernsey, is among those not supportive of GST-Plus "in its current form".He said: "We don't oppose a consumption tax but before it hits the streets it does need reform to make it fairer. It's really important to get the community behind this kind of tax change."It is so fundamental - it will affect everyone on the island for generations to come."At the first States meeting where business will be discussed - on 15 July - members will debate the accounts for 2024.With public finances set to become a major theme next term, all eyes will be on what the States does next.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Economic Survey Reveals Mixed Quarter for Welsh International Trade
Economic Survey Reveals Mixed Quarter for Welsh International Trade

Business News Wales

time19 minutes ago

  • Business News Wales

Economic Survey Reveals Mixed Quarter for Welsh International Trade

An evolving trade landscape produced mixed results for Welsh businesses who trade internationally in Q2 2025, according to Chambers Wales South East, South West and Mid's latest Quarterly Economic Survey. 41% of businesses in Wales reported that their export sales remained constant in Q2. However, 31% stated that export orders and advanced bookings increased during the same period, compared to 25% in Q1, marking a positive shift in future custom. Following President Trump's 'Liberation Day' announcement in early April and changing tariffs throughout the quarter as a result of UK-US trade talks, businesses in Wales revealed the impact the announcements have had on their firms. 15% of businesses in Wales said they had been affected by the 10% tariffs introduced by the US on imports, while almost a quarter (23%) said that their business or supply chain had been affected by wider global tariffs that had been implemented by the US. While some businesses shared that the tariffs did not have an effect on their trade, others reported that trade with the US had slowed down, with fewer enquiries and a reduction in orders due to uncertainty. 23% of businesses in Wales indicated that they would reassess country origin of goods to avoid the impact of tariffs. David Pena, Director of International Trade David Peña, Director of International Trade at Chambers Wales South East, South West and Mid, said: 'It has been an unpredictable period for international trade, with ever-changing tariff decisions and trade talks progressing. Tariffs can act as a trade barrier to fostering long-term growth, and it is clear that the US' decisions have impacted businesses in Wales whether directly or through supply chains. 'At Chambers Wales, we stand for trade, commerce and economic growth and this data will shape how we support businesses in Wales through market volatility and towards growth.' Away from trade, the Quarterly Economic Survey for Q2 also revealed businesses' experiences of recruitment, plans for investment and key concerns of the last quarter. 44% of businesses in Wales attempted to recruit in the last three months, and two thirds of these businesses experienced difficulties because of a shortage of suitable applicants. Over two thirds of businesses (67%) expect their workforce to remain constant in the next quarter, with 24% increasing their investment plans for training in Q2, suggesting that firms may be turning to upskilling and staff development in lieu of recruiting. As per previous Quarterly Economic Surveys, businesses still feel under pressure to raise their prices because of labour costs and taxation remains the external factor causing the most concern. Gus Williams, interim CEO of Chambers Wales South East, South West and Mid, said: 'Despite a mixed picture in the world of international trade, it is heartening to see the positives in our survey results from increases in export orders to investment plans for training. 'Of course, pressures persist particularly around recruitment, labour costs and taxation. With the UK Government unveiling its Industrial Strategy and Trade Strategy, we are seeing the beginnings of a long-term coherent approach for business support which may alleviate some of the recurring concerns that businesses in Wales are sharing with us.'

Gap in law could see young people ‘committing terrorist acts by weekend'
Gap in law could see young people ‘committing terrorist acts by weekend'

The Independent

time27 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Gap in law could see young people ‘committing terrorist acts by weekend'

Young people 'are going to be committing terrorist acts, probably, by the weekend', Lord Walney has warned during a debate on the proscription of protest group Palestine Action. The former independent adviser on political violence and disruption described a 'gap in the law', because the Government cannot proscribe protest groups which are 'committing systematic criminality' without using terrorism powers. He backed the Home Office's plan to ban Palestine Action, adding it to the list of 81 organisations which are already proscribed including Hamas, al Qaida and National Action. Lord Walney told peers it was 'a nonsense' that groups which have advocated causing 'damage', such as Palestine Action, 'have been able to operate freely for as long as they have'. But opposing the move, Labour former Northern Ireland and Wales secretary Lord Hain warned: 'If you start labelling people willy-nilly terrorists right across the board, you're going down a very, very dangerous route.' Lord Walney said: 'There is a gap in the law, it seems to me at the moment, where we ought to be able to place a restriction on an organisation that is committing systematic criminality in the name of a cause without necessarily branding them as terrorists.' He suggested a future law change could mean authorities do not 'end up branding young people who are going to be committing terrorist acts, probably, by the weekend' as terrorists. The independent crossbench peer, who was previously a Labour MP, later said: 'I think we have to think more in the Labour movement about working people here, because they have been systematically targeted in defence factories. They have been deeply intimidated. 'At times, they have been violently injured, and it's totally unacceptable for the Labour movement to say, 'well that's ok, because it's in a cause'.' The Home Office's order, using the Terrorism Act 2000, will make it a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison to be a member of Palestine Action or to support it. The group claimed responsibility for a break in at RAF Brize Norton last month, when activists damaged two RAF Voyager aircraft using paint. Crossbencher Lord Carlile of Berriew, a former independent reviewer of terrorism legislation, urged peers to 'act responsibly' by 'accepting this instrument'. He said: 'Every day the police prosecute people for theft. The maximum for theft – I'm not sure if it still is, but it was seven years at one time. Practically nobody gets seven years for theft. 'Most people get a non-custodial sentence. The assumption that everybody who's prosecuted is going to be locked up for years and years and years is a misleading premise for this debate.' Lord Hain was one of three Labour rebels who backed a motion to 'regret' the Home Office's plan, which Green peer Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb moved. He was joined in the 'content' lobby by Lord Hendy and former Trade Union Congress general secretary Baroness O'Grady of Upper Holloway. 'Frankly, I'm deeply ashamed,' Lord Hain told peers. 'This Government is treating Palestine Action as equivalent to Islamic State or al Qaida, which is intellectually bankrupt, politically unprincipled and morally wrong.' Lord Hain earlier said: 'In 1969-70, I was proud to lead a militant campaign of direct action to disrupt all-white, racist South African rugby and cricket tours, and we successfully succeeded in getting them stopped for two decades. 'No doubt, I would have been stigmatised as a terrorist today rather than vilified as I was then. 'That militant action could have been blocked by this motion, as could other anti-Apartheid activity, including militant protests to stop Barclays bank recruiting new students on university campuses, eventually forcing Barclays to withdraw from Apartheid South Africa.' Home Office minister Lord Hanson of Flint said he had previously protested. ' Freedom of expression, freedom of assembly are cornerstones in our democracy,' he said. 'I have protested. I know of many other members who've protested against various things in our lives, and we have done so in a fair and open way.' He added: 'People engaged in lawful protests do not need weapons. 'People engaged in lawful protests do not throw smoke bombs and fire pyrotechnics to innocent members of the public, and people engaged in lawful protest do not cause millions of pounds of damage to national security infrastructure, including submarines and defence equipment for Nato.' Baroness Jones described a 'long and noble tradition of the use of direct action by protest movements'. She added that 'Palestine Action is not like any other group that the British Government has declared a terrorist organisation so far'. Her motion to regret was rejected by 144 votes to 16, majority 128. Peers who had stayed in the chamber afterwards called 'content' to back the order, which has also received MPs' backing in the Commons after a vote on Wednesday.

Ofsted head: Scrapping one-word ratings will hit house prices
Ofsted head: Scrapping one-word ratings will hit house prices

Times

time29 minutes ago

  • Times

Ofsted head: Scrapping one-word ratings will hit house prices

Scrapping single-word Ofsted judgments could hit local property prices in areas where schools are rated outstanding, the chief inspector of Ofsted has said. Sir Martyn Oliver described how average house prices near two schools previously in special measures jumped £15,000 'within a week' after their rating was upgraded to outstanding. Speaking at the Festival of Education in Berkshire, Oliver said parents rely heavily on Ofsted judgments when choosing where to live and are often guided by the single-word ratings. Meanwhile debate over plans to overhaul the Ofsted grading system, which some critics argue oversimplifies school performance but others say provides a clear benchmark for parents, is intensifying. From November, the single-word judgments — outstanding, good, requires improvement and inadequate — will be replaced by a more nuanced five-point scale assessing multiple areas of school performance.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store