Elon Musk launches new America Party
"When it comes to bankrupting our country with waste & graft, we live in a one-party system, not a democracy. Today, the America Party is formed to give you back your freedom," he posted on X, the social media platform he owns, on Saturday.
The Tesla and SpaceX CEO floated the idea of forming a new political party after a public and bitter falling-out with President Donald Trump.
Musk a vocal opponent of Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill'
Musk spent hundreds of millions of dollars to support Trump's re-election and led the so-called Department of Government Efficiency or DOGE in the Trump administration, which aimed to cut government spending, before their disagreements spilled into the open.
He revived the idea of a new political party this week as US lawmakers approved Trump's sweeping tax and spending bill.
Musk was among the legislation's most vocal critics and has pledged to establish a new party to oppose Republicans who supported the bill.
On Friday, he posted a poll asking whether users "want independence from the two-party (some would say uniparty) system," drawing over 1.2 million responses, with more than 60% in favor of a new party.
Musk faces a difficult legacy of third-party challenges
A truly competitive third party could disrupt over a century of Democratic and Republican dominance at all levels of government.
But Musk would not be the first person trying to establish a party to challenge their dominance.
Former President Theodore Roosevelt came the closest in 1912, after splitting from the Republican party. He ran as Progressive Party candidate and won 27% of the popular vote and 88 electoral votes.
More recently, Ross Perot, another billionaire, won 19% of the popular vote but no electoral votes in the 1992 presidential campaign as an independent and later formed the Reform Party.
Musk's billions meet ballot reality
Musk has already indicated that he is not aiming for an all-out win. Instead, his America Party would focus on flipping a couple of House and Senate seats by applying, "extremely concentrated force at a precise location on the battlefield."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Observer
5 hours ago
- Observer
Australia wants to bar children from social media. Can it succeed?
SYDNEY — Australia has long been one of the most proactive countries in the world in trying to police the internet. It has clashed with Elon Musk over violent videos and child exploitation on social platform X, forced Google and Facebook to pay for news, and tried to filter out large swaths of online content. Its latest aim may be the most herculean yet. By December, the country wants to remove more than 1 million young teens from social media, under a groundbreaking law that sets a minimum age of 16 to use the platforms. But with fewer than six months before the new regulation goes into effect, much about its implementation remains unclear or undecided. YouTube, which young teens in Australia report using more than any other service, may or may not be covered by the law. Authorities have yet to lay out the parameters of what social media companies need to do to comply, and what would constitute a violation, which could lead to fines of $30 million or more. The government has studied how to verify users' ages but has not released the full results of an extensive trial. 'We may be building the plane a little bit as we're flying it,' Julie Inman Grant, the commissioner of online safety who is tasked with enforcing the law, said in a nationally televised address last month. 'I'm very confident we can get there.' The law could have far-reaching influence if Australia can succeed in getting substantial numbers of teens off social media. Several governments around the world and in various U.S. states are in the process of or planning to impose their own rules on social media for young people, as alarm over the platforms' mental health effects and addictive nature has reached a fever pitch. Passed late last year, the Australian law was billed as one of the first nationwide endeavors aimed at getting children off social media. In May, New Zealand introduced legislation closely modeled on the Australian one, which puts the onus of verifying users' ages on social media platforms. In June, President Emmanuel Macron of France said he wanted to bar children under 15 from social media within months. The questions that remain unsettled in Australia should be a sign to other countries of the thorny path ahead — starting with how to define social media. In Australia, authorities had initially planned to exempt YouTube from the law. But the online safety agency last month advised that it should not be excluded, noting that it was the most popular platform — used by three-quarters of 10- to 15-year-olds — and had features that could lead to excessive use, like infinite scroll and short-form videos. YouTube has strongly objected to the recommendation, saying that it was a video streaming platform rather than a social media service and that more than 4 out of 5 teachers use its videos in the classroom. In an interview, Inman Grant said her office began consultations last week with tech companies to set expectations on what 'reasonable steps' they need to take to comply with the law. The companies will have to demonstrate, to her satisfaction, that they are doing enough to identify underage users and remove their accounts. They will also have to provide ways that parents or teachers can flag accounts belonging to people under 16; show that they are countering attempts at circumvention, such as through a VPN; and prove that they are tracking the efficacy of their methods, she said. Even if not every underage account is immediately purged from all platforms, she said, the law being in place will lead to change in the right direction. 'This is one of the biggest questions of our time, the intersection of social media and children's mental health,' Inman Grant said. Some tech company officials who are working on carrying out the law said that more than halfway through the year, they were still waiting on the government to define the 'yardstick' by which they would be evaluated. Meta, for its part, has already invested in developing technologies to understand users' age and created separate teen accounts with safeguards, Joanna Stevens, a spokesperson for the parent company of Instagram and Facebook, said in a statement. Critics of the law have pointed out that it has numerous blind spots. For instance, it does not address the content that children are able to access without being logged into an account; it only specifies that underage users should be prevented from having accounts. Axel Bruns, a professor of communications and media at the Queensland University of Technology, said that in requiring tech companies to find a way to keep children out through unspecified means, rather than requiring them to better moderate harmful content, the government was choosing to 'go down the sledgehammer way,' he said. 'It's a bit like saying we want to have this magical technology — if you don't come up with it, then it's your fault,' he said. 'It's law as wishful thinking, essentially.' This article originally appeared in
Observer
5 hours ago
- Observer
Hamas ready to start Gaza ceasefire talks 'immediately'
Hamas on Friday said it was ready to start talks "immediately" on a proposal for a ceasefire in Gaza, where the civil defence agency said Israel's ongoing offensive killed more than 50 people. The announcement came after it held consultations with other Palestinian factions and before a visit on Monday by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to Washington, where President Donald Trump is pushing for an end to the war, now in its 21st month. "The movement is ready to engage immediately and seriously in a cycle of negotiations on the mechanism to put in place" the terms of a draft US-backed truce proposal received from mediators, the militant group said in a statement. ' A Hamas ally said it supported ceasefire talks, but demanded "guarantees" that Israel will not resume its aggression once hostages held in Gaza are freed. Trump, when asked about Hamas' response aboard Air Force One on Friday, said: "That's good. They haven't briefed me on it. We have to get it over with. We have to do something about Gaza."
Muscat Daily
5 hours ago
- Muscat Daily
Elon Musk launches ‘America Party' to challenge US two-party system
Elon Musk, billionaire CEO of Tesla and SpaceX, has officially launched the 'America Party', signaling a dramatic attempt to disrupt the long-standing two-party political system in the United States. Announced via a post on X, the social media platform he owns, Musk declared, 'When it comes to bankrupting our country with waste & graft, we live in a one-party system, not a democracy. Today, the America Party is formed to give you back your freedom.' The timing of the announcement is strategic, with the new party expected to focus on contesting House and Senate races in the upcoming midterm elections. Musk emphasised a tactical approach, stating the America Party would apply 'extremely concentrated force at a precise location on the battlefield' to flip key seats and influence legislation. The move comes on the heels of Musk's growing dissatisfaction with the Republican Party, particularly after a falling-out with President Donald Trump. Musk, who previously poured hundreds of millions into supporting Trump's re-election campaign and led the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) during his administration, broke ranks following the passage of Trump's controversial tax and spending package — a bill Musk vocally opposed. He reignited the idea of a new political movement after Congress approved the legislation, which he criticised as fiscally reckless. On Friday, Musk polled his followers on X, asking if they wanted 'independence from the two-party (some would say uniparty) system.' The poll drew over 1.2mn responses, with more than 60% expressing support for a new party. Musk's vast resources could give the America Party a unique edge. In the 2023–24 election cycle, he was the single largest political donor, contributing over $291 million to Republican candidates. He has also experimented with direct influence, providing million-dollar checks to voters in Wisconsin during a state's Supreme Court race in April. Even with all his money, history shows that funding alone isn't enough to build a successful political party. Musk will still need to build a strong team, get on ballots across the country, and keep people interested. Still, his move brings a new and unpredictable twist to US politics. Agencies
