
Coroner rejects Garda probe into farmer's death a day after 'secret' marriage
The dramatic application was made at the conclusion of a three-day inquest into the death of Joe Grogan (75) who died at his home in Screggan, Tullamore, Co Offaly on April 15, 2023 just 24 hours after he got married to to his part-time carer, Lisa Flaherty, in a registry office unknown to any of his relatives who were unaware the couple were even in a relationship.
Mr Grogan was a well-known figure in Irish farming circles for hosting the National Ploughing Championships between 2016 and 2018, while the farm will also stage this year's event in September.
The inquest at Offaly Coroner's Court in Tullamore heard that Ms Flaherty – a special needs assistant and mother of three who was 26 years junior to her husband – stands to inherit the 220-acre farm which is valued at €5.5 million as his widow.
It had previously heard that the cause of the farmer's death could not be determined because it was embalmed before a postmortem could be carried out which restricted the tests that could be conducted by a pathologist.
The farmer had been diagnosed with Stage IV Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (a form of blood cancer) in January 2023 and had responded well to treatment, although Ms Flaherty gave evidence that he believed he was dying. 19/07/25 - Widow of Joe Grogan, Lisa Flaherty, pictured leaving the Tullamore Coroner's Court (Image: Colin Keegan, Collins Dublin)
On Tuesday, counsel for three cousins of the deceased – Alo, Margaret and Seán Grogan – Damien Tansey SC, called on the coroner, Raymond Mahon, not to return a verdict and to refer the matter to the DPP for a forensic examination of Mr Grogan's death by gardaí.
Mr Tansey said it would be most unfair to the farmer's memory and to his family if the request was declined.
Separately, Peter Jones, a solicitor for an aunt of the deceased, Teresa Mooney, also asked the coroner to refer the death to gardaí and to return an open verdict.
Mr Jones claimed the inquest had left 'an awful lot of unanswered questions' and the circumstances of Mr Grogan's death could only be challenged by trained personnel used to investigating 'suspicious deaths.'
However, Mr Mahon returned a narrative verdict based on extensive evidence and claimed the farmer's death was probably due to an infection on the balance of probabilities.
He noted the deceased was a person with a Stage IV high grade cancer who was receiving chemotherapy treatment with a compromised immune system who had also suffered 'significant weight loss.'
Mr Grogan's weight went from 79kg in June 2022 to 67.6kg at the time he was diagnosed with cancer and to 51kg at the time of his death.
The coroner said evidence from witnesses of Mr Grogan's 'slow, elongated decline' lent support to his view that Mr Grogan's death was caused by an infection. 19/07/25 - Sean Grogan, cousin of the late Joe Grogan speaks to the media with his counsel, Damien Tansey SC and family members pictured leaving the Tullamore Coroner's Court (Image: Colin Keegan, Collins Dublin)
He rejected the suggestion of Mr Tansey that a verdict of unlawful killing could be considered as the evidence was not 'anywhere near the level of proof' required to support such a finding.
Referring to a claim by Mr Jones that the farmer had been 'left to die,' Mr Mahon said there was valid criticism about the way Mr Grogan's care was managed following his last session of chemotherapy.
However, Mr Mahon, who retired as coroner following the case, noted that the deceased had repeatedly told people he did not want to go to hospital and a relative had stated that it was obvious he was dying.
In a submission, Mr Tansey said there was disquiet in the area where Mr Grogan lived over the circumstances of his death which had been significantly added to by the evidence heard at the inquest.
He claimed that the coroner also appeared 'sufficiently troubled' to repossess the body after it had been embalmed to allow an examination to be carried out to try and establish the cause of death.
Mr Tansey said the pathologist Charles D'Adhemar, was working in impossible circumstances due to the 'irreparable damage' caused by the embalming process.
However, he noted that Dr D'Adhemar had been able to detect the presence of three drugs in the body of the deceased which if used in a combination of large quantities could cause respiratory depression.
Mr Tansey accused Ms Flaherty of telling 'porkies' by putting out a false narrative that the farmer was at the end stage of life and requiring palliative care.
He observed that Ms Flaherty had not tried to explain that she was in an 'on-off relationship' with Mr Grogan when she gave evidence that their relationship had been over 16 years but later having to admit that she had another partner up to 2020.
Mr Tansey said another troubling issue was the secrecy surrounding the couple's marriage about which even Ms Flaherty's sister and best friend were unaware. 19/07/25 - Friends and Grogan family members hug pictured leaving the Tullamore Coroner's Court (Image: Colin Keegan, Collins Dublin)
He also observed she had not called any doctor to see Mr Grogan for the ten days he had been at home before his death after being discharged from hospital after chemotherapy.
The barrister claimed Ms Flaherty had also called an undertaker with 'indecent haste' and had tried to 'ensnare' a doctor in her scheme for getting the body released.
There was a gasped reaction among the large crowd attending the inquest when Mr Tansey reminded the coroner that a verdict of unlawful killing was open to him.
He pointed out that Mr Grogan was clearly ill in the days before his death and there was going to be 'a dreadful end' if there was no appropriate medical intervention.
However, he said the only time the farmer was taken from his house during that period was to go to a registry office 'to hurriedly and secretly arrange a marriage.'
In his submission, Mr Jones said the most solid evidence at the inquest came from doctors who had never given a direction that Mr Grogan required palliative care as suggested by Ms Flaherty.
He noted an oncologist had stated the farmer's death was not inevitable and Mr Jones said it would be a travesty to suggest otherwise.
The solicitor remarked that a 'reign of secrecy' had prevailed over Mr Grogan's final days, while adding that his death was not due to cancer, heart failure or any infection.
However, he claimed the inquest, despite the coroner's best efforts, had not come any nearer to establishing the cause of death.
Mr Jones also noted the 'cruelty' of members of the Grogan family being excluded and only being told of the farmer's death by a friend.
He argued the only people who could 'get to the bottom of this' would be An Garda Síochána and a further investigation would 'satisfy public disquiet.'
The solicitor said Mr Grogan wanted to live and had 'everything to live for.'
However, counsel for Mr Flaherty, Stephen Byrne BL, claimed the inquest had been used to attack Ms Flaherty's good name and reputation.
Mr Byrne said one submission had just stopped short of accusing her of causing Mr Grogan's death.
He claimed the fact that gardaí had not taken any further steps to date 'must carry some weight.'
Mr Byrne reminded the coroner that one of Mr Grogan's own relatives, Enta Conroy, had given evidence that he was fading and approaching the end of his life.
He pointed out that no member of the Grogan family had contacted any doctor if they were so concerned about his health.
The barrister said he struggled to find the relevance of the marriage to the inquest, while the coroner had directed that its validity was not open for discussion.
He also sharply criticised the approach adopted by the Grogan family to the inquest and how they thought it fit and appropriate that Ms Flaherty should have been asked if her marriage had ever been consummated.
The previous two days of evidence of the inquest had also been dominated by bad-tempered exchanges between the legal representatives after the validity of the marriage was questioned, despite a marriage certificate being produced at the hearing.
There were further heated exchanges on Tuesday after Mr Tansey claimed previous evidence of Ms Flaherty which stated her relationship with the deceased started when she was 16 'puts it in the realm of being a paedophile.'
Ms Flaherty was heard to call the barrister a 'scumbag' in response.
Offering his commiserations to all parties at the conclusion of the inquest, the coroner said it had been 'a very difficult case for everyone.'
Speaking afterwards, Seán Grogan said his family had just wanted to find that 'our cousin was treated properly in his dying days' after concerns were first raised when his funeral arrangements had been 'chopped and changed.'
Mr Tansey said the Grogans had been surprised and concerned to find out that no medical personnel had been contacted by Ms Flaherty in the 10 days before his death when it was clear he was suffering some infection from his last session of chemotherapy.
The barrister said the focus 'from here on in will be the merit and circumstances of that marriage.'
Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest news from the Irish Mirror direct to your inbox: Sign up here.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Sunday World
4 hours ago
- Sunday World
MMA fighter accused of corruption involving garda bribes is sent for trial
It follows a probe by the anti-corruption unit, and the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) had also directed trial on indictment. MMA fighter Charlie Ward has been returned for trial accused of corruption offences involving "confidential" Garda information and helping to pervert the course of justice. The mixed martial artist, 44, of Acragar, Mountmellick and co-accused Noel Carroll, 57, of Ballyfinn Road, Portlaoise, both Co Laois, appeared at Dublin District Court yesterday when the gardaí served them with books of evidence. It follows a probe by the anti-corruption unit, and the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) had also directed trial on indictment. Charlie Ward News in 90 Seconds - July 26th Judge Gerard Jones granted an order, sending them forward for trial to the Dublin Circuit Criminal Court, which has wider sentencing powers and where the case will be listed for mention on October 16. The defendants, who have yet to enter a plea, did not address the court and were warned by the judge to notify the prosecution within 14 days if they intend to use an alibi. Gardaí must also furnish the defence with copies of interview videos. Legal aid was granted. Earlier, Detective Sergeant Paul Dowling and Kieran Kilcoyne said the two men "made no reply" when charged. The pair face charges contrary to section 5 of the 2018 Criminal Justice (Corruption Offences) Act about requests for information concerning three men. According to the court documents, on March 2, 2022, at an unknown location in the state, both men corruptly requested a gift, consideration or advantage on account of a named garda requesting that confidential information relating to another person be obtained and disclosed. Mr Ward is accused of the same type of offence on February 28, 2022, about Garda information on a second male. Another charge states that on the previous day, Mr Ward corruptly offered the same officer an inducement for doing an act in relation to his employment as a member of An Garda Síochána. Mr Ward is also accused of an offence under section 7 of the Criminal Law Act 1997. That alleges that between October 15 -17, 2019, when another person committed an arrestable offence, namely, perverting the course of justice, that he "did aid, abet, counsel or procure the commission of this offence". It is alleged that on January 26, 2022, at an unknown location, Mr Carroll corruptly requested a gift consideration or advantage on account of the garda seeking confidential information about a search operation at the home of a third named man.


Sunday World
6 hours ago
- Sunday World
Widow of man killed in Creeslough explosion sues over fatal blast
James O'Flaherty was 48-years-old when he lost his life in the explosion which occurred at 3.17 pm on October 7th 2022. Emergency services at the scene after an explosion at a service station in Creeslough, Co Donegal Pic:Mark Condren 8.10.2022 Mourners at the funeral mass of Creeslough victim James O'Flaherty at St Mary's Church Derrybeg. Photo by Steve Humphreys12th October 2022. THE WIDOW of a father-of-one killed in the deadly Creeslough explosion has initiated a personal injury case in the High Court. Papers were lodged before the High Court on June 17th by solicitors Damien Tansey on behalf of James O'Flaherty's widow Tracey O'Flaherty naming 11 parties to be summonsed. The parties include Danny and Annette Lafferty, the siblings who owned the petrol station destroyed in the explosion, Applegreen, Vivo/Shell Ltd, the Duntally Wood apartment owners management company, the Commission for the Regulation of Utilities, the Registrar of Gas Installers of Ireland and Donegal Co. Council. Two other named individuals and an architecture company have also been summonsed. Mourners at the funeral mass of Creeslough victim James O'Flaherty at St Mary's Church Derrybeg. Photo by Steve Humphreys12th October 2022. Contacts from the Sunday World with solicitors Damien Tansey Solicitors did not elicit a response this week. The company, which has offices in Dublin and Sligo, is known for its expertise personal injury claims and says it helped clients 'win some of the largest compensation payouts through the Irish courts.' James O'Flaherty News in 90 Seconds - July 26th James O'Flaherty was 48-years-old when he lost his life in the explosion which occurred at 3.17 pm on October 7th 2022. Mr O'Flaherty, was originally from Sydney in Australia, but was living with his wife Tracey and son Hamish in Dunfanaghy, a village about 10 minutes' drive from Creeslough. 12-year-old Hamish was sitting in Volvo in the service station forecourt when the explosion demolished a shop, filling station and a block of apartments. Emergency services at the scene after an explosion at a service station in Creeslough, Co Donegal Pic:Mark Condren 8.10.2022 In total, the explosion caused the deaths ten people and left eight hospitalised. Investigators later identified an accidental gas leak as a possible cause. At Mr. O'Flaherty's funeral mass, tribute was paid to the caring husband and father by Fr Brian O Fearraigh. He said Mr O'Flaherty lived for his wife Tracey and son Hamish. "James showered his loving son and wife in hugs and kisses every day," he said. "James O'Flaherty was a generous and a kind man. He loved chatting to other people and he just wanted to spend all his free time with you - his family. "He had honesty and integrity in abundance. "He was a man who had high morals which I'm told are traits and values that he shared with his late father." Hamish described his father as a "great man", who worked "very hard and very long each day". "He wore a jacket with a huge paint stain on the side of it everywhere. He managed this by leaning on a wall which was still wet with paint," he said. "He wore the jacket everywhere. To the shops, to the movies, to the beach." He urged mourners to "cherish" their families. "Be grateful, for they won't be there forever… Use the time you have wisely," he said. A gardai investigation into the circumstances of the deadly explosion continues. A total of six arrests have taken place but no charges have yet been brought against any individual. Earlier this month, at the July Plenary meeting of Donegal County Council, 100% Redress Councillor Tomas Sean Devine submitted a motion calling on Donegal County Council to purchase the site where the explosion by way of negotiation with the owner or with a Compulsory Purchase Order (CPO). The motion also asked the Council to sit down with the bereaved families and design a memorial garden in memory of all those affected. However, the motion did not pass and councillors will instead hold a workshop about the future of the site.


Sunday World
6 hours ago
- Sunday World
Man accused of threatening customer with a hammer while working at Aldi
The court heard Aaron Dempsey had been a member of staff when there was a dispute with the alleged victim, A man has been sent for trial accused of brandishing a hammer while working at a supermarket and threatening a customer. Aaron Dempsey (30) is alleged to have produced the hammer during a dispute at an Aldi in north Dublin. He had a book of evidence served on him when he appeared in Dublin District Court. Judge Michèle Finan sent him forward to Dublin Circuit Criminal Court. Mr Dempsey, of Elm Mount Road, Beaumont, is charged with producing an implement capable of causing serious injury in a manner likely to intimidate. The incident is alleged to have happened at Aldi, Santry Avenue, on June 26 last year. A prosecuting solicitor said the DPP was consenting to the accused being returned for trial to the current sittings of the circuit court. He was remanded on continuing bail Judge Finan gave Mr Dempsey the formal notice that he had 14 days to provide any alibi details to the prosecution. She also ordered the State to furnish the defence with the accused's garda interview video. He was remanded on continuing bail to appear in the circuit court later this month. Previously, the court heard Mr Dempsey had been a member of staff when there was a dispute with the alleged victim, during which 'the accused produced a hammer and threatened the customer'. The DPP had consented to the case being heard in the district court, but Judge Finan refused jurisdiction after hearing the outline of the prosecution's case. The charge is under section 11 of the Firearms and Offensive Weapons Act. Aaron Dempsey. Photo: Paddy Cummins News in 90 Seconds - July 26th