
Trump administration freezes $339M in UCLA grants and accuses the school of rights violations
The federal government has frozen or paused federal funding over similar allegations against private colleges, but this is one of the rare cases in which it has targeted a public university.
Several federal agencies notified UCLA this week that they were suspending grants over civil rights concerns, including $240 million from the Department of Health and Human Services and the National Institutes of Health, according to the person, who spoke about internal deliberations on the condition of anonymity.
The Trump administration recently announced that the U.S. Department of Justice's Civil Rights Division found UCLA violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 'by acting with deliberate indifference in creating a hostile educational environment for Jewish and Israeli students.'
Last week, Columbia agreed to pay $200 million as part of a settlement to resolve investigations into the government's allegations that the school violated federal antidiscrimination laws. The agreement also restores more than $400 million in research grants.
The Trump administration plans to use its deal with Columbia as a template for other universities, with financial penalties that are now seen as an expectation.
The National Science Foundation said in a statement that it informed UCLA that it was suspending funding awards because the school isn't in line with the agency's priorities.
UCLA's chancellor Julio Frenk called the government's decision 'deeply disappointing.'
'With this decision, hundreds of grants may be lost, adversely affecting the lives and life-changing work of UCLA researchers, faculty and staff," he said in a statement.
The Department of Energy said in its letter it found several 'examples of noncompliance' and faulted UCLA for inviting applicants to disclose their race in personal statements and for considering factors including family income and ZIP code. Affirmative action in college admissions was outlawed in California in 1996 and struck down by the Supreme Court in 2023.
The letter said the school has taken steps that amount to 'a transparent attempt to engage in race-based admissions in all but name,' disadvantaging white, Jewish and Asian American applicants.
It also said UCLA fails to promote an environment free from antisemitism and discriminates against women by allowing transgender women to compete on women's teams.
Mr. Frenk said that in its letter, the federal government "claims antisemitism and bias as the reasons' to freeze the funding, but 'this far-reaching penalty of defunding life-saving research does nothing to address any alleged discrimination.'
Earlier this week, UCLA reached a $6 million settlement with three Jewish students and a Jewish professor who sued the university, arguing it violated their civil rights by allowing pro-Palestinian protesters in 2024 to block their access to classes and other areas on campus.
UCLA initially had argued that it had no legal responsibility over the issue because protesters, not the university, blocked Jewish students' access to some areas. The university also worked with law enforcement to thwart attempts to set up new protest camps.
The university has said that it's committed to campus safety and inclusivity and will continue to implement recommendations.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
8 minutes ago
- First Post
Trump influence? US museum receives backlash for removing Potus's impeachment display
The parent organisation of a top-visited history museum in the United States denied that political pressure played a role in the removal of a display about the impeachment of US President Donald Trump, during his first term in office read more Signage for the exhibition, titled "The American Presidency: A Glorious Burden", is displayed at the National Museum of American History in Washington, DC, on August 1, 2025. Reuters The parent organisation of a top-visited history museum in the United States denied that political pressure played a role in the removal of a display about the impeachment of US President Donald Trump, during his first term in office. The Smithsonian Institution, which runs the National Museum of American History in Washington, DC, said on Sunday that it removed the 'temporary' placard for failing to meet the museum's standards in 'appearance, location, timeline, and overall presentation'. 'It was not consistent with other sections in the exhibit and blocked the view of the objects inside its case. For these reasons, we removed the placard,' the institution said in a statement. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'We were not asked by any Administration or other government officials to remove content from the exhibit," the statement further reads. The American institution runs around 21 museums and the National Zoo. In the statement, the Smithsonian Institution made it clear that the museum would be updating the impeachment section in the coming weeks to 'reflect all impeachment proceedings in our nation's history'. What led to the clarification? The statment came after The Washington Post on Thursday reported that the museum removed an explicit reference to Trump's impeachment last month. This resulted in the exhibit about impeachment incorrectly reading that 'only three presidents have seriously faced removal'. The Post cited an unnamed source familiar with the exhibit plans and reported that the display was taken down following a 'content review that the Smithsonian agreed to undertake following pressure from the White House to remove an art museum director'. The museum's decision to remove the display swiftly drew backlash, with critics of Trump calling the development the latest capitulation to the whims of an authoritarian president. 'You can run, but you cannot hide from the judgment of history,' Democratic Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said on Friday. 'So, here's my message to the president: no matter what exhibits you try to distort, the American people will never forget that you were impeached – not once, but twice," he added. Since the start of his second term, Trump has been seeking greater control over political, cultural and media institutions as part of his transformative 'Make America Great Again' agenda. In March this year, the US President signed an executive order to remove 'improper ideology' from the Smithsonian Institution's properties and deny funding for exhibits that 'degrade shared American values' or 'divide Americans based on race'. It is pertinent to note that during his first term in the White House, Trump was impeached by the House of Representatives twice, in 2019 and 2021. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD However, he was eventually acquitted by the US Senate on both occasions. Trump was the third US president to be impeached, after Andrew Johnson and Bill Clinton, and the only US president to be impeached twice. Interestingly, former US President Richard Nixon faced a near-certain impeachment before his resignation in 1974 following the Watergate Scandal.


Time of India
8 minutes ago
- Time of India
‘If tariff pain continues for months, we will have to let go of workers'
'If tariff pain continues for months, we will have to let go of workers' Satviki SanjaySwati Gupta Bloomberg Aug 3, 2025, 15:52 IST IST Indian businesses are scrambling to cope with the fallout of Trump's tariff shock as New Delhi weighs options to placate the White House, including boosting US imports Shock, dismay and angst swept across India as businesses, policymakers and citizens digested US President Donald Trump 's sharp remarks and a surprise 25% tariff rate last week. While government officials weighed a response and business groups tallied the cost of the trade barrier, the local social media flared up with users protesting Trump's comments and criticising Prime Minister Narendra Modi for not speaking up.

Time of India
8 minutes ago
- Time of India
India's Crude Oil Imports From U.S. Jump 51% Since Donald Trump's Return To White House
India has sharply increased crude oil imports from the US during President Donald Trump's second term, marking a major energy policy shift. In the first half of 2025, US crude imports rose over 50% year-on-year, reaching 0.271 million barrels per day. The April–June quarter saw a 114% surge, with the value rising from $1.73 billion to $3.7 billion. In July, imports rose 23% over June, increasing the US share in India's oil mix from 3% to 8%. LNG imports nearly doubled to $2.46 billion, and LPG imports also grew. Talks are ongoing for a long-term LNG deal. Despite growing energy ties, a setback emerged as Trump announced 25% tariffs on Indian goods, effective August 7, citing trade barriers, imbalances, and India's ties with Russia. He posted strong criticism of India on Truth Social, dismissing its economic relationship with the US and calling for separation from Russia-linked economies.#crudeoil #indiaustrade #trumptariffs #energytrade #indiarussia #lng #lpg #truthtalk #geopolitics #internationalrelations #toi #toibharat Read More