The Colony Next Door -West Papua
Joe Collins of AWPA said, 'Yes, the international community recognises Indonesian sovereignty over West Papua, and West Papua is not on the list of Non-Self-Governing Territories, but it should be'.
21 May 2025
The Special Committee on Decolonization (C24) is set to meet in Dili, Timor-Leste, from May 21 to 23, 2025 for its Pacific Regional Seminar .
The event is part of the Fourth International Decade for the Eradication of Colonialism, which spans from 2021 to 2030.
As the Committee meets in Dili, there will be blind spot in their discussions, the forgotten colony next door-West Papua.
Joe Collins of AWPA said, 'Yes, the international community recognises Indonesian sovereignty over West Papua, and West Papua is not on the list of Non-Self-Governing Territories, but it should be'.
A colony is a country or area under the full or partial political control of another country, typically a distant one, and occupied by settlers from that country. West Papua is a classic case.
62 years ago, the United Nations Temporary Executive Authority (UNTEA) transferred West Papua to Indonesian administration, who then removed it from the list of Non-Self-Governing Territories.
And yes, Indonesia did hold a referendum in 1969, the so-called 'Act of Free Choice', which was a sham and is referred to by West Papuans as the act of no free choice.
The C24 must know about the ongoing human rights abuses in the territory. The situation in the territory is seriously deteriorating with regular armed clashes between the West Papua National Liberation Army
(TPNPB ) and the Indonesian security forces. West Papuans continue to be arrested at peaceful demonstrations and Papuans risk being charged with treason for taking part in the rallies.
There are over 80,000 internally displaced people (IDPs), many facing starvation because they fear returning to their food gardens because of the Indonesian security forces operations in the highlands.
Joe Collins said, 'West Papua is a complete failure by the UN to protect the people of West Papua. Although we cannot expect the C24 Committee to review the situation of West Papua at this stage, it is up to the countries in the region to seriously lobby the UN on the human rights situation in the territory. This is a fear from Jakarta, the internationalisation of the issue of West Papua and why Jakarta is targeting the Pacific leaders with aid, to convince them to stop supporting the West Papuan struggle'. Jakarta granted Fiji $6 million in financial aid and offered to cooperate with them on military training.
If some of the governments in the region are wavering in their support, the people of the Pacific are not. The NGO Coalition on Human Rights in Fiji (NGOCHR). has expressed 'deep concern over the Fiji Prime Minister's ongoing engagements with Indonesia'.
The Chair of the NGOCHR said 'As members of the Melanesian and Pacific family, bound by shared ancestry and identity, the acceptance of financial and any other benefit from Indonesia—while remaining silent on the plight of West Papua—is a betrayal of our family member and of regional solidarity.' 'True leadership must be rooted in solidarity, justice, and accountability.'
The West Papuan people will continue their struggle for self-determination. Time for the countries in the region including Australia to take the issue seriously .
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NZ Herald
4 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Hostage videos show emaciated Israelis, Hamas blames Israel for starvation
David's sister, Ye'ela, said watching the clip of her emaciated brother felt like 'one million punches to the heart'. She pleaded with the public not to share the images, as her mother and other brother had not yet seen the footage. Earlier on Thursday, the Islamic Jihad terrorist group released a video of hostage Rom Braslavski, 21, also looking emaciated. The terror group claimed the six-minute video was recorded days before it lost contact with the captors holding Braslavski, saying it did not know what had happened to him. His mother, Tami, said the terrorists had 'broken' her son. 'They broke my boy. I want him home now. I know how many beatings he is taking. Look at him. Thin, limp, crying. All his bones are out. Don't cry over the children in Gaza. Cry for Rom. Have compassion for the hostages,' she told Israeli media Ynet. With two hostage videos released in 24 hours, both of which blame Israel for starving the people of Gaza, Hamas seeks to increase international pressure on the Israeli Government. Aid agencies, including the UN, are warning that hunger and malnutrition may have reached a tipping point, raising fears of mass starvation. Israel has denied accusations of starving Palestinians, instead pointing the finger at the UN for failing to collect and distribute the food that enters through border crossings. US President Donald Trump said this week that starvation was happening in Gaza, despite Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's denials. 'You can't fake that,' he said on Tuesday, adding that he was 'not particularly' convinced by his ally. Steve Witkoff, Trump's Middle East envoy, spent five hours visiting controversial aid distribution sites in the war-battered enclave on Friday. Witkoff, the first senior official to visit Gaza since the war began, said that what he learnt would help Washington 'craft a plan' to get more food and aid to Palestinians. On Friday, 126 aid packages, containing food for the residents of the southern and northern Gaza Strip, were airdropped by France, Spain, the UAE, Jordan, Egypt and Germany, the Israel Defence Forces said. Witkoff and Mike Huckabee, the US ambassador for Israel, toured one of the four sites run by the controversial Israeli and US-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF). Aid agencies have accused the foundation of contributing to the hunger crisis. More than 1300 people seeking aid in Gaza have been killed since GHF took over aid operations in late May, according to the UN, most of them shot by Israeli forces 'in the vicinity' of the aid hubs. GHF has denied the claims. Israel claims Hamas is looting aid for its own fighters, thus enabling accusations the Jewish state is deliberately starving Palestinians. Hamas denies this. Eli Sharabi, an Israeli former hostage, testified before the UN Security Council in March that 'Hamas eats like kings, while hostages starve'. Sharabi said: 'I saw Hamas terrorists carrying boxes with the UN and UNRWA emblems on them into the tunnels, dozens and dozens of boxes, paid for by your Government. They would eat many meals a day from the UN aid in front of us, and we never received any of it.'
NZ Herald
a day ago
- NZ Herald
Offshore oil ban repeal: Coalition seeks consensus amid opposition
However, in a statement on Thursday, Jones said the ban was 'ill-fated' and 'has exacerbated shortages in our domestic gas supply by obliterating new investment in the exploration and development needed to meet our future gas needs'. 'New Zealanders are bearing the brunt of this constrained gas supply, and energy security concerns are impacting investor sentiment ... we are seeing businesses in the regions closing as a result with Kiwis losing their jobs, and we're importing hundreds of tonnes of Indonesian coal to meet peak energy demand. 'This legislation is just one of many actions we are taking to get the right settings in place to resuscitate sector confidence, shore up energy supply, and protect electricity affordability.' He was absent from Parliament on Thursday, leaving the main Government speech to the National Party's Simon Watts – the Minister for Energy and Climate Change. Watts said the opposition's argument that reversing the ban would not yield new gas for a decade was 'a distraction'. 'The immediate signal that this bill sends to investors is critical now. It encourages immediate investment in long-term exploration and in maximising production from our existing fields, which can deliver benefits far sooner. 'New Zealand is committed to a clean-energy transition and meeting our emissions targets. We have committed to deliver net zero by 2050, including by doubling renewable electricity, and removing consenting barriers. Natural gas remains critical to our energy security. Without gas, we would need to either rely on more coal, which results in around twice the carbon dioxide emissions than natural gas, or face energy insecurity and higher prices.' His Labour Party counterpart Megan Woods, however, said the evidence showed record investment in existing fields after 2018. Labour MP Megan Woods has slammed the Government's offshore exploration push. Photo / Mark Mitchell 'For this Government to claim that it had a chilling effect on investment is simply wrong. What we had was those offshore oil and gas operators looking for every last bit they could eke out of the existing fields, and it is not there. 'Then we had Shane Jones saying that this will open up opportunities off the East Coast of the South Island. Well, news flash: billions of dollars have been spent looking for that particular El Dorado ... this Government is going to give $200 million to offshore companies to go and have a look again where they've already decided there are not commercial finds available.' She pointed to official analysis showing reversing the ban would add 14.2 million tonnes of emissions, and 'a bit that should have been redacted from the regulatory impact statement' showing it could affect trade. 'Let me read from that: 'Legally privileged: Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade assessed that reversing the 2018 ban would likely be inconsistent with the obligations in several of New Zealand's free-trade agreements' – so farmers need to be worried, our access to the EU and the UK are being put at risk.' The Green Party spokesman for just transitions, Steve Abel, was also sceptical the oil industry could be attracted back. He was part of the Oil-Free Seas Flotilla in 2011 that harried Petrobras' surveying ship for 42 days, welcomed to the area by a 500-strong haka 'said by Te Whānau-a-Apanui, the iwi greeting us, to be the biggest haka since James Cook had arrived in that part of the country – I'm hoping we were more worthy of it than he was', Abel said. The Green Party's Steve Abel says the 2018 ban simply sealed the fate of an oil industry already in decline. Photo / Marty Melville He listed off a series of oil companies that exited New Zealand before the ban came into place: Exxon Mobil abandoning its southern oil and gas hunt in November 2010 after three years, Petrobras in December 2012, Texan driller Anadarko exiting its permit on the North Island's west coast in May 2014, Statoil quitting its Northland permit in October 2016, and Shell selling its remaining assets to OMV in March 2018. He said the ban was the 'final nail in the coffin of an industry that was already declaring its own demise in this country, because they came, they prospected, they found nothing, and they found nothing but overwhelming public opposition from the people of this country'. Echelon Resources – the company formerly known as New Zealand Oil and Gas, last month told RNZ the best wells are typically drilled first, so new drilling will be more difficult and expensive. Its managing director, Andrew Jeffries, said other countries had more political consensus, making New Zealand an even more unattractive option for investment. Act Party MP Simon Court said the repeal would restore certainty, credibility and confidence, but called on Labour not to reimpose the ban if it won power. 'Today marks the end of an era – a really bad one. It marks the end of a six-year reign of economic vandalism and energy illiteracy by the previous New Zealand Labour Government. 'Even the Honourable Shane Jones said at the time – bless his soul – that ending oil and gas exploration 'is the only scenario'. When he stood at that podium, I was shocked, but I'm pleased that minister has come to his senses – but profoundly disappointed that the Labour Party still has not.' Court's leader, David Seymour, said it was 'very possible that they won't find the gas, but the impediment to people getting cheaper energy should not be our own Government, and that's why I say if New Zealand First can change their mind then Labour should be able to do that too'.
The Spinoff
2 days ago
- The Spinoff
Calls grow for NZ to take a stand on Palestinian statehood
Canada, the UK and France are on the brink of recognising Palestine – so why is New Zealand still holding back, asks Catherine McGregor in today's extract from The Bulletin. Pressure mounts as allies take a stand New Zealand is coming under increasing pressure to recognise Palestine as a state, as key allies signal they're preparing to do just that. On Wednesday, foreign minister Winston Peters joined 14 other counterparts in signing a statement declaring their 'willingness or positive consideration' of Palestinian recognition. But Peters, backed by prime minister Christopher Luxon, made clear that formal recognition won't happen any time soon, reports RNZ's Craig McCulloch. In parliament this week, Peters argued that 'if we are to recognise the state of Palestine, New Zealand wants to know that what we are recognising is a legitimate, representative, viable political entity'. His caution hasn't stemmed the growing chorus of criticism. Former prime minister Helen Clark said that on the statehood issue, New Zealand has been hamstrung by its desire not to upset the US. 'That is no longer tenable,' she told Morning Report. Greens co-leader Marama Davidson was more blunt: 'History will judge Aotearoa if we fail to do what is right at this pivotal moment. It's time for the government to make a clear stand for human rights and for justice, and recognise Palestine as a state.' A shifting international tide New Zealand's hesitation comes as other liberal democracies move towards recognition. Canada on Thursday became the third country in a week to announce it will recognise Palestine, following similar pledges from France and the UK. Britain's promise is conditional on Israel allowing more aid into Gaza, ending its annexation plans and committing to a two-state peace process. As the UK foreign secretary David Lammy pointed out in a speech to the UN this week, Britain carries a particular responsibility to Palestine due to its colonial-era role in shaping the modern Middle East, beginning with the 1917 Balfour Declaration. Support for a two-state solution, he said, should be viewed as part of that legacy. Currently, 147 of the UN's 193 member states recognise Palestine; that number is poised to grow in the coming months. In Australia, prime minister Anthony Albanese is 'preparing the ground' for recognition, reported the ABC, but has indicated he wants to choose a moment that will have the most impact on peace prospects. The case for economic pressure In a powerful article for The Spinoff this week, New Zealand journalist Cole Martin – currently based in a refugee camp in the occupied West Bank – accused the government of offering only 'empty rhetoric' in the face of Israel's ongoing assault on Gaza. While New Zealand has signed joint statements and imposed targeted travel bans on a handful of Israeli officials, Martin says it has taken no significant action in 21 months to deter what he describes as 'genocidal' violence and apartheid policies. Martin argues that 'meaningful disruption is essential', and that economic pressure – including divestment, sanctions and boycotts – is among the most effective non-violent tools available. 'Global economic sanctions played a pivotal role in ending apartheid in South Africa,' he wrote. 'The same tools must now be applied to Israel.' What else can New Zealand do? While sanctions and trade restrictions are the most obvious tools available, they're not the only ones. Auckland University law professor Treasa Dunworth, writing for The Conversation, outlines several other ways New Zealand could demonstrate its opposition to Israel's conduct and support for Palestinian rights. These include creating a special visa pathway for Palestinians seeking family reunification, launching an inquiry into New Zealand's intelligence-sharing with Israel via the Five Eyes network, and withdrawing from Operation Prosperity Guardian, the US-led naval coalition in the Red Sea. Dunworth also points out that New Zealand could act unilaterally to refer Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu to the International Criminal Court for the use of starvation as a weapon of war. Each of these steps, she argues, is legally and diplomatically feasible – but all require political will. The question now, as more peer nations act, is whether New Zealand's government is willing to move beyond words.
