
Echo Chamber: Youth parliament is even better than the real thing
Echo Chamber is The Spinoff's dispatch from the press gallery, recapping sessions in the House. Columns are written by politics reporter Lyric Waiwiri-Smith and Wellington editor Joel MacManus.
A walkout in the House, claims of censorship and rogue MPs on rogue press conferences: youth parliament didn't need long to prove it can be as much of a circus as the one meant for adults. Tri-annually, pint-sized progressives and tories in the making (as well as their young peers in the fourth estate) spend three days in parliament (following a four-month training programme) to learn up close what democracy is – although if you asked this year's cohort of teens, they might be more likely to tell you what it isn't.
General debates held on Tuesday and Wednesday gave all 123 youth MPs a chance to highlight the issues that matter most to them, whether that's mental health and the environment, or boy racers and 'backing the farmers' – some of these teens are already so entrenched across party lines you might expect some kind-of Scooby-Doo mask-off to reveal it was Grant McCallum all along. Youth MPs are supposedly non-partisan and aren't expected to parrot the belief of the parties they've been mentored under, but when in Rome, act like the emperor.
There were claims of censorship and 'fear-based control' from some youth MPs (who are also part of the advocacy group Make It 16), but in the end, everyone got their say – even if some teens felt others should have had more vetting in the end. As was the case for Jermaine Del Mondo, youth MP for Winston Peters, whose challenge in the House to look past race – much like his mentor might say – caused a partial walkout (although no one could really leave, you see).
The drama continued on Wednesday morning, with Karen Chhour's youth MP Jerry Wei having his three-minute speech last for 10 thanks to the opposition MPs raising multiple points of order in an attempt to shut him up. There was supposedly a walkout planned for him, but the progressive youth MPs felt it would just give him the satisfaction – clearly the youth parliament works, because it didn't take them long to learn the fine art of politicking.
Suffice to say, some potential future leaders have already made themselves heard. Nate Wilbourne, youth MP for Labour's Damien O'Connor, had one of the strongest speeches on Wednesday morning after going off-script and directly calling out ministers Penny Simmonds, Tama Potaka and Shane Jones for putting 'profit over papatūānuku'. Later, Terangitukiwaho Edwards, youth MP for Te Pāti Māori Mariameno Kapa-Kingi and son of Ngātiwai chairman Aperahama Edwards, earned a standing ovation for his impassioned speech on prioritising mokopuna-led solutions in state care.
The mock question time kicked off just before midday, with National MP Barbara Kuriger as the speaker, and only a handful of ministers – James Meager, Penny Simmonds, Louise Upston, Casey Costello and Chris Bishop – taking oral questions. This activity seemed to provide two learning points: for the government youth MPs, how to pass off patsies to your colleagues to ensure good PR, and for the opposition youth MPs, how to argue back.
When Vashika Singh, youth MP for Helen White, asked RMA minister Bishop how he planned to incorporate the Treaty into the Planning Act and Natural Environment Act, she was told straight up by the minister that he had no commitment to doing that. Bishop wasn't a popular man that session – his answer to a question on housing targets from Esha Ram (youth MP for the Greens' Steve Abel) caused a few youths to rustle in their seats and attempt supplementaries, which the speaker denied.
Sam Allen (youth MP for National's Hamish Campbell) then offered to 'guide' Kuriger through the speaker's rulings, which she ignored for time purposes. 'We are not having supplementary questions, and that's the last point of order I'm going to take on that issue,' Kuriger declared, before the voice of Thomas Brocherie, youth MP for the Greens Lan Pham, popped up for the hundredth time: 'Point of order, Miss Speaker …'
Bishop was next questioned by Louis McSporran, youth MP for NZ First's Jenny Marcroft, on how he would 'incentivise and support' the revitalisation of rural areas through infrastructure, and a rebel youth MP in the Labour benches held up a note to the House in protest. 'DISSAPOINTED IN NAT' it read, causing Wei to raise a point of order: would the speaker consider removing the member from the House?
Later, outside the chamber, a group of NZ First Youth MPs – and friends from other branches of the coalition – held a last-minute press conference on the parliament steps. They weren't happy with the narrative playing out in the media about censorship – we're not being censored, nor would we like the right to vote, they told reporters. It was 'dangerous' to let a minority group (as in, the youth MPs from Make It 16) purport to speak for the nation, an Act Party youth MP claimed.
Their attempt at winning back the narrative was immediately stifled, as the press conference spurred an off-the-cuff argument from the Labour and Greens-aligned youth MPs walking past. It was probably the debate the teens would have liked to have had in the House – with each other, in verbal fisticuffs, and no expectation to be non-partisan.
Parliament is a place that often feels like a high school simulator – and for three days this week, it was the real thing. Even if half of these teens still think they shouldn't have the right to vote until they're a bit older, they're already perfect for the role of politician.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Spinoff
4 hours ago
- The Spinoff
The many complex truths within the ‘censoring' of youth parliament
The biggest story to come out of youth parliament was the supposed censorship of its MPs-in-training. They had no trouble blowing the lid off on that, but is it really so black-and-white? The tri-annual return of youth parliament this week was not without its controversies. 123 youth MPs and 20 youth press gallery members descended on parliament for three days of training and debates, and while many of these teens gave great speeches in the House, the attention has been on what they supposedly haven't been allowed to say. Youth parliament – despite what its name may suggest – is a non-partisan learning experience for young people who want to be politically engaged. And if you talked to these teens, you'd realise many of them already are – they're in advocacy groups, are dedicated posters to certain Reddit forums, already have fully-fledged political leanings they don't want to budge on and also have an MP whispering politicking tricks in their ears. It was a truly divided parliament this week: with one side desperately telling the media they've been censored, and the other desperately telling the media they haven't. As always, when it comes to politics, the truth is more nuanced than just one position. Truth #1: Claims of censorship haven't been totally genuine. It's more accurate to say that the ministry of youth development made suggestions to speeches, which the youth MPs were allowed to accept or deny, and these rules were also in place for the 2022 youth parliament. Yeah, it sounds silly, but this is a non-partisan event and the youth MPs know this, and at the end of the day, everyone still spoke their piece. Truth #2: Youth MPs are not protected by parliamentary privileges – if they defame a minister, they can be taken to court. Truth #3: Those crying wolf about censorship were mostly aligned with Make It 16, Gen-Z Aotearoa and SchoolStrike4Climate. Make It 16 and SchoolStrike4Climate have both described themselves as 'non-partisan', though their values tend to align with left-leaning politics, specifically those you might find within the Green Party kaupapa. Truth #4: Those teens pulled a pretty bloody good PR stunt, especially from a political campaigning group which hasn't yet been able to have much sway on voting age policy, and another which has been largely operating under the radar for the last few years while the government abandons its climate targets. Truth #5: NZ First and Act youth MPs did have a chance to take back the narrative, but they bungled their press conference by letting their progressive peers hijack it. Truth #6: There are plenty of 16-year-olds who would feel intimidated by an authoritative figure – especially a government official – making suggestions about their work. The ministry should have been clearer about its expectations. Truth #7: In a way, some of the progressive party-aligned kids are almost guilty of censorship themselves, having attempted a walkout during a speech from Winston Peters' youth MP, and trying to shut up Karen Chhour's youth MP by raising multiple points of order during his speech. This is where the censorship argument gets tricky, you see – wouldn't the likes of the Free Speech Union and David Seymour argue that that is a form of suppressing speech? Truth #8: There are far more racist and controversial things said on a near-weekly basis in this House than anything these youth MPs have said. Truth #9: Unfortunately in life, you have to listen to opinions you don't want to listen to. Unfortunately as a politician, you do this basically every day, and can't always run away from it. Truth #10: The 'real' politicians also have ministry officials and press secretaries begging them not to say something that will get them, their party or their agency in trouble. Truth #11: There were concerns about censorship among some of the youth press gallery members, too, though the ministry has described the checking-over of these stories as 'moderating' rather than editing. Truth #12: This does lead into an editorial grey area, because while the youth press gallery is supposed to operate under the same expectations as the youth MPs, having a ministry shape the story up to their standard, and then encouraging budding reporters to pitch these stories to independent outlets, is kind-of just like sending out a government press release. Truth #13: But this also teaches you some valuable lessons in journalism: how to recognise spin, how to deal with an editor you don't agree with and what to expect when an entity doesn't want you to reveal the worst of them. Truth #14: And, at the end of the day, you go into journalism to be a reporter, not an activist. One youth gallery reporter held the tino rangatiratanga flag over the bannister, others gave their peers standing ovations – the reality of being in the press gallery is that you are the observer, not the demonstrator. And everyone in that House deserves an equal level of scrutiny. Truth #15: All the drama that has gone down this week only proves that youth parliament has done its job: teaching these kids how to be effective politicians – and in the modern era, this often looks a lot like controlling the media narrative. Truth #16: It also suggests the future of our political landscape looks like more publicity stunts, and less cross-party communication, which is a shame.


NZ Herald
9 hours ago
- NZ Herald
House passes tax and immigration bill, sending it to Trump's desk
Republicans on Thursday notched the first major legislative victory of President Donald Trump's second term, a mammoth tax and immigration agenda the GOP hopes will reshape the US economy and unwind many of the Biden administration's accomplishments. The House, in a 218 to 214 vote, passed Trump's so-called 'One Big

1News
10 hours ago
- 1News
House approves Trump's 'big, beautiful' tax bill ahead of July 4 deadline
House Republicans propelled US President Donald Trump's US$4.5 trillion (NZ$7.4 trillion) tax breaks and spending cuts bill to final congressional passage overnight, overcoming multiple setbacks to approve his signature second-term policy package before a Fourth of July deadline. The tight roll call, 218-214, came at a potentially high political cost, with two Republicans joining all Democrats opposed. GOP leaders worked overnight and the President himself leaned on a handful of skeptics to drop their opposition and send the bill to him to sign into law. Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries of New York delayed voting by holding the floor for more than eight hours with a record-breaking speech against the bill. "We have a big job to finish," said House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La. "With one big beautiful bill we are going to make this country stronger, safer and more prosperous than ever before." The outcome delivers a milestone for the President, by his Friday goal, and for his party. It was a long-shot effort to compile a lengthy list of GOP priorities into what they called his "one big beautiful bill", an 800-plus page measure. With Democrats unified in opposition, the bill will become a defining measure of Trump's return to the White House, aided by Republican control of Congress. Tax breaks and safety net cuts ADVERTISEMENT At its core, the package's priority was US$4.5 trillion (NZ$7.4 trillion) in tax breaks enacted in 2017 during Trump's first term that would expire if Congress failed to act, along with new ones. This included allowing workers to deduct tips and overtime pay, and a US$6000 (NZ$9900) deduction for most older adults earning less than US$75,000 (NZ$123,619) a year. There was also a hefty investment, some US$350 billion ($577 billion), in national security and Trump's deportation agenda and to help develop the 'Golden Dome' defensive system over the US. To help offset the lost tax revenue, the package includes $1.2 trillion (NZ$2 trillion) in cutbacks to the Medicaid health care and food stamps, largely by imposing new work requirements, including for some parents and older people, and a major rollback of green energy tax credits. House staffers carry American flags through a corridor outside the House chamber which will be used for a ceremony with Speaker of the House Mike Johnson. (Source: Associated Press) The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimated the package would add US$3.3 trillion (NZ$5.4 trillion) to the deficit over the decade and 11.8 million more people would go without health coverage. "This was a generational opportunity to deliver the most comprehensive and consequential set of conservative reforms in modern history, and that's exactly what we're doing," said Representative Jodey Arrington, R-Texas, the House Budget Committee chairman. Democrats united against 'ugly bill' ADVERTISEMENT Democrats unified against the bill as a tax giveaway to the rich paid for on the backs of the working class and most vulnerable in society, what they called "trickle down cruelty". Tensions ran high in the chamber. Jeffries began the speech at 4.53am EDT and finished at 1.37pm EDT, 8 hours, 44 minutes later, a record, as he argued against what he called Trump's "big ugly bill". House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., left, speaks in the House chamber as House Democrats stand to applaud him. (Source: Associated Press) "We're better than this," Jeffries said, who used a leader's prerogative for unlimited debate and read letter after letter from Americans writing about their reliance of the health care programmes. "I never thought that I'd be on the House floor saying that this is a crime scene," Jeffries said. "It's a crime scene, going after the health, and the safety, and the well-being of the American people." And as Democrats, he said, "We want no part of it". ADVERTISEMENT Hauling the package through the Congress has been difficult from the start. Republicans have struggled mightily with the bill nearly every step of the way quarrelling in the House and Senate, and often succeeding only by the narrowest of margins: just one vote. The Senate passed the package days earlier with Vice President JD Vance breaking the tie vote. The slim majority in the House left Republicans little room for defections. Political costs of saying no Despite their discomfort with various aspects of the sprawling package, in some ways it became too big to fail — in part because Republicans found it difficult to buck Trump. As Thursday's stalled floor action dragged overnight Trump railed against the delays. "What are the Republicans waiting for???" the president said in a midnight post. "What are you trying to prove???" Donald Trump presses for votes to his big beautiful bill. (Source: Truth Social) ADVERTISEMENT Johnson relied heavily on White House Cabinet secretaries, lawyers and others to satisfy sceptical GOP holdouts. Moderate Republicans worried about the severity of cuts while conservatives pressed for steeper reductions. Lawmakers said they were being told the administration could provide executive actions, projects or other provisions in their districts back home. The alternative was clear. Republicans who staked out opposition to the bill, including Representative Thomas Massie of Kentucky, and Sen. Thom Tillis of North Carolina, were being warned by Trump's well-funded political operation. Tillis soon after announced he would not seek re-election. Rollback of past presidential agendas In many ways, the package is a repudiation of the agendas of the last two Democratic presidents, a chiselling away at the Medicaid expansion from Barack Obama's Affordable Care Act, and a pullback of Joe Biden's climate change strategies in the Inflation Reduction Act. Rep. Jim McGovern, D-Mass., the top Democrat on the House Rules Committee, waits on the marble stairway outside the House chamber. (Source: Associated Press) Democrats have described the bill in dire terms, warning that cuts to Medicaid, which some 80 million Americans rely on, would result in lives lost. Food stamps that help feed more than 40 million people would "rip food from the mouths of hungry children, hungry veterans and hungry seniors," Jeffries said. Republicans say the tax breaks will prevent a tax hike on households and grow the economy. They maintain they are trying to rightsize the safety net programmes for the population they were initially designed to serve, mainly pregnant women, the disabled and children, and root out what they describe as waste, fraud and abuse. ADVERTISEMENT The Tax Policy Centre, which provides nonpartisan analysis of tax and budget policy, projected the bill would result next year in a $150 tax break for the lowest quintile of Americans, a US$1750 (NZ$2885) tax cut for the middle quintile and a US$10,950 (NZ$18,053) tax cut for the top quintile. That's compared with what they would face if the 2017 tax cuts expired.