
Immigration lawyers criticize Justice Department push to pull citizenship
Federal authorities have sparingly sought to rescind naturalized citizenships in recent decades, a process known as 'denaturalization,' with a handful of cases each year.
In a memo last month, Brett A. Shumate, who leads the Justice Department's Civil Division, said it would now 'prioritize and maximally pursue' court cases aimed at taking citizenship away from people accused of wrongdoing.
Shumate wrote that the agency would focus on several categories, including those involving people accused of being threats to national security, committing violent crimes or failing to disclose felonies during their naturalization. Previous administrations have also sought to denaturalize citizens in similar cases.
But immigration experts and attorneys expressed concerns that Shumate's announcement — which involved a wider pool of people who could be targeted, including those allegedly affiliated with drug cartels or gangs — may signal a broader use of denaturalization as a tool.
Since President Donald Trump's inauguration, his administration has taken an aggressive approach to immigration and sought to ramp up deportations, cut down on border crossings and eliminate birthright citizenship.
'This fits into very hostile attitudes towards people who are foreign-born in the U.S.,' said Jean Reisz, who teaches law at the University of Southern California and co-directs the school's Immigration Clinic.
Denaturalization cases historically have most often been deployed against people accused of hiding their past ties to war crimes, terrorist groups and human rights violations while applying for citizenship, according to experts and data on cases brought by the government. Many of the most prominent cases, for instance, involved people who hid their connections to the Nazis when applying for U.S. citizenship.
'It is really about proving there was some misrepresentation, a material misrepresentation or fraud in the process itself,' said David Thronson, a law professor at Michigan State University who has worked on and studied immigration matters. 'It's an error-correcting procedure.'
Finding errors in the process is not easy, Thronson said, because officials are 'fairly rigorous in vetting people in the front end,' which involves background checks and interviews. 'You don't just walk in and get naturalization,' he said.
Naturalized citizens account for a significant portion of the American population. According to the Migration Policy Institute, in 2022 there were more than 24 million naturalized citizens living in the United States.
From 1990 to 2017, the government filed an average of 11 denaturalization cases a year, according to research by the Immigration Legal Resource Center, though year-by-year numbers began to tick upward after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks and again under an initiative launched by President Barack Obama.
Trump's first administration, which began in 2017, sought to expand those efforts even further. His first attorney general, Jeff Sessions, described denaturalization as a 'strategic objective' for the Justice Department. In 2020, the department launched a section focused on denaturalization, with a specialized group of attorneys focused on pursuing criminal and civil denaturalization cases in court.
Despite the resources focused on that effort, the administration did not produce a deluge of cases, said Matthew Hoppock, a Kansas-based attorney who represents people in denaturalization cases.
'They didn't file thousands of cases, likely because these cases are so resource-heavy, and their attorneys were so tied up in court defending Trump's various other immigration policies, many of which were found to be unlawful,' he said in an email.
Irina Manta, a Hofstra University law professor, began compiling a database tracking denaturalization cases and found 168 in federal courts during Trump's first term in office. During President Joe Biden's term, the Justice Department filed another 64 cases, her research found.
The department's Biden-era priorities emphasized denaturalizing alleged human rights violators, national security threats and people with felony convictions who posed an ongoing public safety risk.
Shumate's guidelines — issued in a memo dated June 11, the day he was sworn in as an assistant attorney general — incorporated those priorities and expanded the pool of potential targets for denaturalization.
The larger group of categories included people who further 'the unlawful enterprise of criminal gangs, transnational organizations and drug cartels,' those 'engaged in fraud' against corporations or individual victims and any other cases referred to Shumate's division that it deems 'sufficiently important to pursue.'
Shumate's memo 'is incredibly broad and open-ended,' said Lori Nessel, a law professor at Seton Hall University and director of its Immigrants' Rights/International Human Rights Clinic. Nessel said she was particularly concerned about the unspecified cases that might be deemed important enough to pursue.
'That is so broad, and that really leaves it open for this incredible politicization, just using this as a weapon,' she said.
Trump allies have in recent weeks publicly suggested rescinding naturalized citizenships of the administration's political opponents. Rep. Andrew Ogles (R-Tennessee) recently wrote to Attorney General Pam Bondi asking for an investigation into whether Zohran Mamdani, the Democratic nominee for New York mayor, should face denaturalization proceedings. Mamdani, who was born in Uganda, was naturalized in 2018.
Attorneys and experts said the broader list of categories in Shumate's memo could open up more people to facing possible denaturalization if the administration disapproved of their actions.
Many of the potential targets for denaturalization described in the memo have been long-standing priorities for Justice Department lawyers under both Democratic and Republican administrations, said César Cuauhtémoc García Hernández, a professor at Ohio State University's Moritz College of Law.
But the Trump administration has 'taken the view that there are people who are a threat to national security who historically presidential administrations would not have considered threats.'
Trump administration officials have labeled student demonstrators protesting Israel and advocating for Palestinians as threats to national security, most notably in its efforts to revoke the green card of Columbia University activist Mahmoud Khalil.
Hoppock noted that the Trump administration has already used allegations of gang activity to summarily deport hundreds of undocumented migrants based on evidence that courts later called into question.
'We have seen this administration use that designation to do bad things already,' he said.
Christopher Wellborn, president of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, said in a statement that Shumate's memo 'sends the message that those not born in the United States risk losing their citizenship for previous or future conduct, creating an unacceptable threat that a criminal charge could rip them from their communities.'
Attorneys raised other concerns, particularly about the issues being raised in civil cases, rather than criminal ones, where defendants are guaranteed a lawyer.
'Because they're civil, there's no right to a lawyer if the person can't afford to hire a lawyer on their own,' Nessel said. 'I can picture situations where the government is putting incredible resources into this,' she said, and facing off with someone who cannot hire an attorney.
The Justice Department said in a statement that it was 'committed to maintaining the integrity of the naturalization program.'
'As stated in the memo, denaturalization proceedings will only be pursued as permitted by law and supported by evidence against individuals who illegally procured or misrepresented facts in the naturalization process,' a spokesperson said in the statement. 'Those who gain citizenship through unlawful means and endanger our national security will not maintain the benefits of being an American citizen.'
Immigration experts and attorneys said they doubted Shumate's memo would lead to a sudden flood of denaturalizations. These cases require resources and attorneys to work on them, they said, and the Justice Department would have to persuade federal judges to sign off on them.
'I think the district courts are going to be very skeptical when it comes to denaturalizing individuals,' said Reisz, the law professor, particularly when cases involve something 'less egregious than lying about your identity or lying about a criminal offense. If it's going to be extending to tax fraud or something that isn't clear cut.'
Denaturalization cases are brought by the Justice Department's Office of Immigration Litigation, and they typically account for a small fraction of the office's work. Like many other parts of the Justice Department, the office has seen a significant number of departures during Trump's second term, and it is not clear how it would address any large uptick in denaturalization cases.
The Justice Department did not respond to a question about whether it planned to dedicate more attorneys to denaturalization cases or how many.
Last month, the Justice Department said that it had successfully petitioned a judge to revoke the citizenship of someone naturalized in 2013 and later accused of possessing and sharing child pornography.
Some legal experts said that even if Shumate's memo does not lead to a flood of people losing their citizenship, the impact could be felt across the country in other ways.
'Even if they're not going to successfully denaturalize a lot of people, many immigrants or naturalized citizens might not want to stay in a country that is openly hostile to people who are not born in the United States,' Reisz said.
Perry Stein contributed to this report.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Young Pierce County voters see their ballots challenged due to poor penmanship
Voters in Pierce County between the ages of 18 and 26 account for 51% of challenged ballots in Pierce County due to their signatures not matching those on file, the Pierce County Elections office announced in a recent news release. If the signature on a ballot envelope doesn't match the signature on file, that vote won't count, the office said. Pierce County recently sent a postcard to 73,000 voters aged 18 to 26 (in addition to 17-year-olds eligible to vote in the 2025 general election), encouraging them to update their signature online at the Pierce County Elections website. In Pierce County 9.4% of 18-year-old voters have had signature issues and 7.9% of 19-year-olds, according to the county. During the 2024 presidential election, Pierce County saw a strong voter turnout, with 76.73% of registered voters casting ballots. 'It's an interesting challenge,' said Pierce County Auditor Linda Farmer in a June news release. 'On the one hand, we have more young voters in the system, which is awesome. On the other, we're capturing that baseline signature while their handwriting styles are still developing. This often shows up as a mismatch when they cast their first ballot.' Signature mismatches in Pierce County are declining (0.46% of ballots were rejected for that reason in 2024, down from 0.56% in 2020 and 0.86% in 2016), according to the county. 'Young people don't have to sign things on a regular basis like those of us in other generations (I'm Gen X), so it's an interesting conundrum,' Farmer said in an email. 'We're trying to get the word out to this age group in particular.' Farmer said her 18-year-old daughter is a classic example of the issue. She registered to vote when she was 16 under the state's future voter program, 'but her signature today is practically unrecognizable from the one she gave at the driver licensing office. And it's only been two years,' she said. In 2019, Washington established the Future Voter Program, allowing 16- and 17-year-olds to pre-register to vote and automatically receive a ballot once they turn 18. In 2022, a new law made voters eligible to participate in the August primary if they will be 18 by the November general election, according to Pierce County. 'The trend is moving in the right direction,' Farmer said. 'I'd love to see signature challenges become a non-issue.' Learn more about how to register to vote, who your candidates will be and where your nearest ballot box is online at the Pierce County Elections website. The primary election is Aug. 5.
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Two suspects served with warrants for felony murder, assault in Oglethorpe Mall shooting
The Savannah Police Department has obtained "several warrants," including for felony murder and two counts of aggravated assault, for two suspects in the July 2 Oglethorpe Mall shooting, according to an SPD press release. Those suspects are currently hospitalized at Memorial Health University Medical Center, where they were transported after the shooting. The individuals will be taken into custody and transported to the Chatham County Detention Center upon release from the hospital, the press release said. Other warrants served to the suspects, who are both under 18 years old, include possession of a handgun by a person under the age of 18 and possession of a firearm during commission of a crime. It is expected the suspects will await formal charges from the Chatham County District Attorney upon arrival at the detention center, the press release said. 'The Savannah Police Department intends to hold all those involved in this senseless crime accountable to the fullest extent of the law,' said SPD Chief Lenny Gunther. Recent news: One person dead due to heart complications "exacerbated" by Oglethorpe Mall shooting The arrest warrants mark a major breakthrough in the still ongoing investigation, which began Wednesday evening after the shooting occurred. SPD said names and identities of "those involved" in the shooting will not be released at this time in order to "preserve the investigation," the press release said. Chatham County District Attorney Shalena Cook Jones said Thursday the case would take "highest priority" once the "baton is passed" to her office from local law enforcement. She also promised to bring the "full weight" of the law on those responsible for the shooting. The first fatality related to the shooting was announced Friday morning. Olislene 'Tina' Smith died around midnight, late July 3 or early July 4 due to heart complications exacerbated by the incident. Smith was one of three individuals transported to Memorial for non-gunshot-wounds related medical complications. Three other individuals were taken to the hospital with gunshot-related wounds. The expected charges come after SPD initially signaled Thursday it would bring underage firearm possession charges on two individuals. Later Thursday, SPD detectives decided not to peruse those charges at that time. Announcement of the warrants came with additional charges, including for felony murder and aggravated assault. With the ongoing investigation, anyone with information can contact CrimeStoppers at 912-234-2020, or submit an anonymous tip through the SPD mobile app. Evan Lasseter is the city of Savannah and Chatham County government reporter for the Savannah Morning News. You can reach him at ELasseter@ This article originally appeared on Savannah Morning News: Savannah Police serve warrants to two suspects in Oglethorpe Mall shooting
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Two people dead after early morning stabbing in Augusta County: Sheriff's Office
Two people are dead after an early morning stabbing in Augusta County July 5. The Augusta County Sheriff's Office reports that it is actively investigating two fatal injuries that occurred in the early morning hours in Mount Solon. At approximately 2:20 a.m. July 5, according to a release, deputies responded to a 911 call reporting a stabbing in the 100 block of Old Quarry Road. Upon arrival, law enforcement discovered two adult male victims who were involved. The Sheriff's Office said that, despite life-saving efforts, both individuals died from the injuries they received. The victims have been transported to the Office of the Chief Medical Examiner in Manassas for autopsy and identification. According to the release, a preliminary investigation indicates this was an isolated incident that occurred during a party involving known associates. The Sheriff's Office said that, at this time, there is no known threat to the Augusta County community. 'This is a tragic and deeply disturbing incident," said Sheriff Donald Smith. 'Our investigators are working diligently to determine the circumstances surrounding these deaths." The investigation is active and ongoing. Additional details will be released as they become available. Per the release, the Augusta County Sheriff's Office has numerous persons detained for questioning. More: Walking tall: Fishersville stilt performer showcases talent in July 4 parade More: Trump signs megabill that slashes taxes, Medicaid while boosting national debt Patrick Hite is a reporter at The News Leader. Story ideas and tips always welcome. Connect with Patrick (he/him/his) at phite@ and on Instagram @hitepatrick. Subscribe to us at This article originally appeared on Staunton News Leader: Early morning stabbing leaves two dead in Augusta County