The Zuckerbergs stopped funding social causes – 400 children lost their school
At its separate preschool across San Francisco Bay, 98 per cent of families have incomes that would qualify for state-subsidised tuition at a conventional school that charged fees.
Many families will likely turn to the local public school district, Ravenswood, which closed two schools around the time the Primary School was launched. At a board meeting late last month, the district's assistant superintendent of finance, William Eger, said it would face 'long-term financial pressure' because of the closure, despite CZI's commitment to cover the cost of educating any students from the Primary School until 2031.
To address the shortfall after that, the district is considering turning one of its campuses into housing.
CZI declined to make Chan available for an interview. 'We're hopeful that the most successful elements of the school's model will become accessible to more students and families through integration with the Ravenswood City School District, building on its strong foundation in health programming and parent engagement,' communications director Jane Packer said in an emailed statement.
CZI has promised a parting gift totalling $US50 million ($76.5 million) to the community. Parents were told students wouldreceive $US1000 to $US10,000 for their future education based on age, and the school district received $US26.5 million in grant funds last month. The district declined to comment for this article.
'We're very proud of the work we've done at the Primary School over the past decade, and of what our children and families have achieved,' Carson Cook, a spokesperson for the Primary School, said in an email.
Shannon Todd, a parent who has been with the school since it opened, said its closure would be difficult for her family, whose three children attend the school. It provided disability testing, coaching and helped navigating healthcare, said Todd, who has unsuccessfully pushed for Chan to meet with families.
'For her to come into our community and give us the hopes of a better future for our kids, and now just pull the plug like that is not fair for these kids,' she said.
Dream school
East Palo Alto is a neighbour to wealthy Silicon Valley towns like Palo Alto, where the children of employees at Google and Meta, as Zuckerberg's company is now called, can receive top-rated public education for free. Because of historical redlining, residents of East Palo Alto are mostly lower-income families of colour. Many struggle with the region's cost of living.
The Primary School opened in 2016 with 40 students and a 'whole child' philosophy that offered free healthcare for students and families, plus coaching and mental health support for parents.
'It takes three to five years of consistent leadership for a school to really take off. The Primary School never had that.'
Former Primary School administrator
Chan, the daughter of refugees who fled Vietnam and settled in a low-income Boston neighbourhood, hoped to prove that access to good healthcare and schooling could help economically disadvantaged students achieve more.
'We are working toward a world where every child gets an education that gives them a fair shot,' she said in a 2019 speech.
The East Palo Alto project was the billionaire couple's second major intervention in a city's education system, after a controversial 2011 gift of $US100 million to the Newark public schools. Some experts and community members have claimed that money was largely squandered. In 2017, a Harvard study funded by CZI found that by 2015, the growth rate of student achievement in English had significantly improved, but there had been no significant change in mathematics.
Chan's partner on her new mission was education leader Meredith Liu, whom she hired from Boston's Codman Academy, a model for her project.
'People thought they were going to get the school of their dreams,' one former school administrator said, speaking on the condition of anonymity to protect her career. Current staffers at the Primary School were asked to sign non-disclosure agreements.
In reality, the school met stumbling blocks. Two principals left in its early years, which three former school leaders said made it difficult to establish stability.
The school tested innovative ideas but lacked some standard features found in many schools.
It didn't have the special education system or disciplinary rules that are required of charter schools, the former administrator said. But students wore recording devices dubbed 'speech pedometers' so that software could analyse the speech patterns of children and the adults around them. The technology was designed by a non-profit to encourage staff to talk more with students in ways that studies suggest encourage brain and language development.
'It was beyond naivete,' the former administrator said. 'It was hubris.' In annual reports, the school credited the devices with helping staffers track and improve students' language development.
In the Primary School's fourth year, the coronavirus pandemic brought disruption, especially to the school's literacy rates.
Katherine Carter, a former public school administrator brought on in 2019 to assess the school's academic struggles, was surprised to find that staff did not use science-based methods to teach reading, according to a 2023 blog post on the school's website.
'It takes three to five years of consistent leadership for a school to really take off,' the former administrator said. 'And the Primary School never had that.'
In 2023, Liu, Chan's co-founder and the school's president, died unexpectedly. The two were close, people familiar with the school and their relationship said. According to the former administrator, Liu 'was the visionary'.
The tragedy cost the school its closest tie to Chan, who by then had stepped down as the board's chair. In recent years, she has been seen at the school infrequently, according to three people familiar with its operations.
Another former administrator recalled that leaders of a similar school advised it might take 20 years for the Primary School to deliver the outcomes it sought. 'I remember hearing that and thinking, 'We don't need to be rushing … we just need to keep at it,'' the former staffer said, also speaking on the condition of anonymity for fear of damaging her career prospects.
The Primary School had been operating for only nine years when its board voted unanimously in April to close it because of the lack of funding.
'Any model that leans on one primary funder is not something I've felt was sustainable,' board chair Jean-Claude Brizard said in an interview with the Post, although he praised the school's work.
Cook, the school's spokesperson, said in an emailed statement the focus on literacy made the percentage of students meeting or exceeding grade-level reading standards steadily increase.
'I don't think it was enough time,' the former administrator said.
Wound down
CZI's withdrawal from the Primary School came after a flurry of changes at the philanthropy in the early months of US President Donald Trump's second term. They included announcing lay-offs, abandoning diversity policies and pulling out of work on community, education and social issues.
CZI had been founded alongside the start of the school project in 2015 as part of Chan and Zuckerberg's pledge to emulate Bill and Melinda Gates in giving away the majority of their wealth.
The founding couple has led CZI even as Zuckerberg continues to serve as chief executive of Meta, possibly meaning their philanthropic ventures could complicate the company's relationship with politicians and regulators.
In 2020, during Trump's first term, Zuckerberg touted CZI's work on racial equity after the death of George Floyd. Some employees saw the comments as tone-deaf and his philanthropic work as insufficiently ambitious, according to previous Post reporting as well as a person familiar with the matter.
The same year, the couple gave $US400 million to help state and local governments run the pandemic election, but some Republicans called the donation 'Zuckerbucks' and claimed it was part of an alleged scheme to favour Democrats.
Under the new Trump administration, some of CZI's established programs may appear out of step with moves by the White House to eradicate diversity, equity and inclusion programs.
Shortly after the 2020 election, Zuckerberg and Chan began to pull CZI back from social issues. Its criminal justice reform work was spun off into a separate organisation. To insiders, it seemed part of a strategy to separate the CZI name from a sensitive political topic.
'People can promise stuff all day long. If nothing is legally binding, they're going to pull out, and we're going to be left with the fallout.'
Kyle Brown, East Palo Alto resident and activist
CZI stopped launching new racial and criminal justice equity programs, and its immigration work moved to FWD.US, an advocacy group that supports expanding immigration.
After Trump's re-election last year, Zuckerberg reversed some of his previously stated positions on diversity and content moderation, ending Meta's fact-checking programs and many of its diversity initiatives.
In parallel, more changes came to CZI, which laid off members of its community team that worked on affordable housing, supported local civil society groups and helped underrepresented entrepreneurs. Days after it publicly confirmed that the Primary School would close, it emerged that the philanthropy was also ending its statewide housing program, which studied housing policy and tried to spur production of affordable homes.
'As we've focused on science, we've wound down our social advocacy funding,' chief operating officer Marc Malandro wrote in a February email to CZI staff, in favour of 'pushing the frontiers of biology and AI'.
In an emailed statement, Packer, CZI's director of communications, said the initiative was focused on 'building technology to help scientists unlock a deeper understanding of how the human body works,' which she said 'has been a core mission since our earliest days.'
'Tremendous impact'
Gisselle Munoz, a 24-year-old mother who attended public school in Ravenswood, was excited to offer her three- and four-year-old children something better at the Primary School.
In April, when parents were asked to attend an important meeting, she joined via Zoom and heard staff announce that the school would be closing. Some parents were so shocked and angry that they hung up, she said.
The school's closure 'stresses me out', Munoz said. 'We have to find another school and start all over again.'
At the meeting, a presentation stated that each family would be allocated a 'transition specialist' to help them choose a new school and detailed the education savings money students would receive: $US10,000 for elementary and middle school students, $US2500 for preschoolers and $1000 for younger children.
'We understand that this news has a tremendous impact on your family,' read a copy viewed by the Post. Some parents said in interviews that the money promised to their children felt insignificant compared with the costs ahead.
Kyra Brown is a fourth-generation East Palo Alto resident and activist who has written about displacement and gentrification caused by the tech industry. She has long been sceptical of allowing the community to become dependent on billionaires like Zuckerberg.
'People can promise stuff all day long', Brown said, but 'if nothing is legally binding, they're going to pull out, and we're going to be left with the fallout'.
When the political climate changed under Trump, Brown surmised, so did the Chan-Zuckerberg commitment to East Palo Alto.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Sky News AU
20 hours ago
- Sky News AU
ASX plunges as Trump tariffs trigger healthcare, tech stock sell-off
Technology, healthcare and the big four banks led the market sell-off on Friday as US President Donald Trump made two announcements that smashed the Asian markets. The benchmark ASX 200 slumped 80.80 points or 0.92 per cent to 8662, while the broader All Ordinaries fell 81.90 points or 0.91 per cent to 8917.10. Australia's dollar gained against the greenback and is now buying 64.25 US cents. On an overall sea of red, 10 of the 11 sectors finished in the red. The utilities sector was the only sector to trade higher. Healthcare shares were among the major market falls after Mr Trump wrote letters to the 17 largest US drug companies demanding they lower prices for local consumers, making up the difference in other foreign countries. CSL slumped 2.53 per cent to $264.05, Pro Medicus dropped 2.45 per cent to $313.99 and Sigma Healthcare finished in the red down 1.04 per cent to $2.86. Technology stocks also led the falls. WiseTech Global dropped 2.55 per cent to $116.34, Xero fell 3.45 per cent to $174.75 and Technology One slumped 2.17 per cent to $40.19. Three of the big four banks also slumped. CBA led the losses down 1.60 per cent to $175.06, NAB dropped 1.21 per cent to $38.44 and Westpac slipped 1.09 per cent to $33.45. ANZ bucked the trend gaining 0.49 per cent to $30.87. The second announcement that rattled Asian markets was an announcement from the President around tariffs. While Australia will only face the 'base rate' of 10 per cent, many of the US trading partners will face higher levies, which is feared to slow down global growth. According to Commonwealth Bank's senior economist and senior currency strategist Kristina Clifton, US tariffs are now at their highest level since the 1930s. 'We expect the large increase in the US's global effective tariff rate will raise US business and consumer prices, weighing on purchasing power and demand,' Ms Clifton wrote in an economic note. But the impact on Australia is tipped to be relatively subdued. 'We estimate Australian GDP will be just 0.3 per cent lower over a few years because of the tariffs,' Ms Clifton said. Only about five per cent of Australia's exports are to the US and Australia's tariff rate is a relatively low 10 per cent. In company news, Star Entertainment will be forced to pay about $41m back to Hong Kong-based business partners, Chow Tai Fook Enterprises and Far East Consortium after a deal to buy the newly opened Queen's Wharf hotel and casino complex fell through. In a statement to the ASX on Friday, Star Entertainment confirmed it was 'unable to reach an agreement,' and will now be liable for almost $1bn in debt for the precinct. Shares plunged 16.36 per cent to $0.09. Five ways Trump's tariffs will impact youHouse prices defy RBA rate hold Shares in diversified investment house Soul Patts slipped 0.64 per cent to $40.32 after announcing preliminary, unaudited net asset values to come in between $12.18 to $12.68bn for the year ending July 31. Resmed shares flirted with a record high after the medical sleep device maker announced profits that beat market expectations. Shares jumped 1.01 per cent to $42.88. Originally published as Banks, healthcare drop on two Trump moves


Perth Now
20 hours ago
- Perth Now
ASX slumps on latest Trump tariff rates
Technology, healthcare and the big four banks led the market sell-off on Friday as US President Donald Trump made two announcements that smashed the Asian markets. The benchmark ASX 200 slumped 80.80 points or 0.92 per cent to 8662, while the broader All Ordinaries fell 81.90 points or 0.91 per cent to 8917.10. Australia's dollar gained against the greenback and is now buying 64.25 US cents. On an overall sea of red, 10 of the 11 sectors finished in the red. The utilities sector was the only sector to trade higher. Healthcare shares were among the major market falls after Mr Trump wrote letters to the 17 largest US drug companies demanding they lower prices for local consumers, making up the difference in other foreign countries. CSL slumped 2.59 per cent to $262.88, Pro Medicus dropped 2.40 per cent to $314.17 and Sigma Healthcare finished in the red down 1.21 per cent to $2.855. Technology stocks also led the falls. WiseTech Global dropped 2.35 per cent to $116.57, Xero fell 3.20 per cent to $175.19 and Technology One slumped 2.02 per cent to $40.25. Three of the big four banks also slumped. CBA led the losses down 1.64 per cent to $175, NAB dropped 1.29 per cent to $38.41 and Westpac slipped 0.95 per cent to $33.50. ANZ bucked the trend gaining 0.72 per cent to $30.94. The second announcement that rattled Asian markets was an announcement from the President around tariffs. While Australia will only face the 'base rate' of 10 per cent, many of the US trading partners will face higher levies, which is feared to slow down global growth. According to Commonwealth Bank's senior economist and senior currency strategist Kristina Clifton, US tariffs are now at their highest level since the 1930s. 'We expect the large increase in the US's global effective tariff rate will raise US business and consumer prices, weighing on purchasing power and demand,' Ms Clifton wrote in an economic note. The economic fallout for Australia from Trump's tariffs is expected to be minimal. Gaye Gerard / NewsWire Credit: News Corp Australia But the impact on Australia is tipped to be relatively subdued. 'We estimate Australian GDP will be just 0.3 per cent lower over a few years because of the tariffs,' Ms Clifton said. Only about five per cent of Australia's exports are to the US and Australia's tariff rate is a relatively low 10 per cent. In company news, Star Entertainment will be forced to pay about $41m back to Hong Kong-based business partners, Chow Tai Fook Enterprises and Far East Consortium after a deal to buy the newly opened Queen's Wharf hotel and casino complex fell through. In a statement to the ASX on Friday, Star Entertainment confirmed it was 'unable to reach an agreement,' and will now be liable for almost $1bn in debt for the precinct. Shares plunged 16.36 per cent to $0.09. Shares in diversified investment house Soul Patts slipped 0.64 per cent to $40.32 after announcing preliminary, unaudited net asset values to come in between $12.18 to $12.68bn for the year ending July 31. Resmed shares flirted with a record high after the medical sleep device maker announced profits that beat market expectations. Shares jumped 1.01 per cent to $42.88.

Sydney Morning Herald
21 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
New trade war looms as Trump's disruptive tariffs become reality
'Grateful for small mercies' is a phrase that springs to mind after US President Donald Trump failed to follow through on his previous threats and allowed Australian goods to continue being subject to a US tariff of 10 per cent. Should Trump have made good on his ultimatums to hike the levy to 15 or 20 per cent, it would not have been the action of a special friend, especially given the US already enjoys a trade surplus with Australia. Displaying his patented bluster and blunder, Trump announced his tariff regime last April on what he called Liberation Day. It barely discriminated between friend or foe, tanked stock markets, caused the gold price to soar, and imposed a universal 10 per cent tariff on all imports, with Asian nations hit with even steeper tariffs. Four months later, some clarity has emerged. Trump's battery of new tariffs on more than 60 countries starts on August 7. He kept Australia on the same 10 per cent rate as another close ally, the United Kingdom. However, he was not so disposed to other allies: although the US imports more to Canada, he lifted the tariff from 25 per cent to 35 per cent. Trump hit New Zealand too, with a surprise 5 per cent rise to a 15 per cent tariff. None of this is set in stone and Trade Minister Don Farrell has confirmed Canberra will continue to lobby for the removal of all tariffs on Australian goods. But if Australia has dodged a bullet for the moment, there is no getting away from the harsh reality that the tariffs imposed by Trump on other major economies are likely to slow global economic activity and eventually could hurt our relatively small, export-driven economy. Loading Trump is attempting to put America First by scrapping the world trading system with his own scheme, which presumes nations must jump through his hoop. In an inconsiderate slight, the US did not even bother to confirm Australia was exempt from higher tariffs, but left it to a White House fact sheet to confirm any countries not on the new list would remain on 10 per cent. Last April, when the US tariffs were first announced, Opposition Leader Peter Dutton slammed Prime Minister Anthony Albanese as a leader of a bad government who could not get a phone call with Trump to discuss tariffs. Little appears to have changed.