Trump says US to meet with Iran next week as doubts remain about bombing impact

American Military News

2 days ago

This article was originally published by Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty and is reprinted with permission.
US President Donald Trump said his administration would meet with Iranian officials next week to discuss its nuclear program just days after the US military targeted three of its facilities with massive bombs.
'We're going to talk to them next week,' Trump said at a press conference in the Netherlands following the annual NATO summit. 'The only thing we'd be asking for [at the meeting] is what we were asking for before, about we want no nuclear.'
More than a dozen US B-2 bombers on June 22 dropped 13,600-kilogram bombs on Iran's uranium enrichment and storage sites. A US submarines also targeted one of the sites with missiles.
Trump said at the press conference that the facilities were 'destroyed,' refuting a preliminary and 'low confidence' US intelligence report that the attack may have only set back Iran's nuclear program by months.
'It's destroyed. I said Iran will not have nuclear. Well, we blew it up. It's blown up to kingdom come,' Trump said.
'I don't see them getting back involved in the nuclear business anymore. I think they've had it,' he added.
Trump said it wasn't clear if the US would sign an agreement with Iran about its nuclear program at next week's meeting.
Prior to the US strikes, Trump sought a deal whereby Iran would completely give up its nuclear enrichment program in exchange for sanctions relief.
Iran's regime has poured tens of billions of dollars into its nuclear program and ending it would have been a blow to Ali Khamenei, the country's long-serving supreme leader.
Intel Report
US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, who was also present at the NATO summit, said an FBI investigation would be launched into how details of the assessment, produced by the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA), the Pentagon's intelligence arm, were leaked to several media outlets including CNN, The New York Times, The Washington Post, and Reuters.
The assessment said the attack did not destroy the core components of Iran's nuclear program.
Some analysts have expressed doubt over claims by Trump and other US officials that the sites were destroyed.
CNN quoted a source who had been briefed on the contents of the assessment as saying intelligence suggests the strikes set Iran back 'maybe a few months, tops.'
The news reports also noted that the DIA analysis is ongoing and could change as more intelligence becomes available.
Hegseth said bombs dropped during the operation landed 'right where they were supposed to' and that there was 'devastation' left in their wake.
He earlier said the impact of the bombs 'is buried under a mountain of rubble,' so anyone who says the bombs were not devastating is just trying to undermine the president on a successful mission.
Since the June 21 bombings by the United States, a lack of detailed information on the results have fueled speculation over how effective they were.
Satellite images showed gaping holes in areas at the site, but with the facility deep underground, damage wasn't visible.
Israeli military spokesman Brigadier General Effie Defrin told a press conference on June 25 that 'it is still early to assess the results of the operation.'
'I believe we have delivered a significant hit to the nuclear program, and I can also say that we have delayed it by several years,' he added.
Rafael Grossi, head of the U.N. nuclear watchdog (IAEA), has said that the air strikes probably caused 'very significant' damage to Fordow, a major uranium enrichment facility, though 'at this time, no one, including the IAEA, is in a position to have fully assessed the underground damage.'
Grossi told reporters on June 25 that whatever the damage, the real question is how to proceed.
'What is important is that we need [a solution] that will stand the test of time,' he said.
The IAEA has not been able to carry out inspections in Iran because of the conflict, which has seen a halt in air strikes from both sides as a truce, agreed on June 24, continues to hold.
Nuclear nonproliferation expert and a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution Robert Einhorn noted that more than 400 kilograms of Iran's uranium stockpile enriched to 60 percent purity had been moved and had not been unaccounted for.
'Conceivably, if under Iran's possession, [the stockpile] could be taken to some secret location and used in a nuclear weapons program,' Einhorn told RFE/RL.
Grossi said he received a letter from Tehran on June 13 saying 'special measures' had been taken before the bombings to protect the uranium.
'They did not get into details as to what that meant but clearly that was the implicit meaning of that. We can imagine this material is there,' Grossi said, suggesting much of that material had survived the attacks.
Danny Danon, Israel's UN ambassador, also said it was still too early to assess the strikes, but noted 'we know we were able to push back the [nuclear] program.'
'We were able to remove the imminent threat that we had,' he said.