Court rules MyPillow CEO Mike Lindell does not have to pay out $5 million over ‘Prove Mike Wrong' stunt
Lindell, widely known as 'MyPillow Guy,' claimed that China interfered with the 2020 election results and he had evidence to back it up. He then launched a 'Prove Mike Wrong Challenge,' a stunt in which contestants tried to debunk his evidence, offering $5 million to anyone who could do it.
The judges in Lindell's stunt didn't believe Robert Zeidman, a software developer who participated, proved his case against Lindell's claim, but an arbitration panel found that he won the challenge and ordered Lindell to pay him his winnings.
The 8th Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the panel's decision, finding 'the arbitrators exceeded their powers.'
'It's a great day for our country,' Lindell told the Associated Press. 'This is a big win. It opens the door to getting rid of these electronic voting machines and getting paper ballots, hand-counted.'
Lindell hosted a 'Cyber Symposium' in South Dakota in August 2021, when he showed data that he claimed to prove election interference.
He then dared skeptics to participate in the 'Prove Mike Wrong Challenge,' offering the $5 million award.
Zeidman, who had been invited to the symposium, entered the challenge and submitted a 15-page report against his claims. The judge's disagreed and said he did not prove Lindell wrong.
The arbitration panel disagreed, finding that the software developer had met that requirement and won the challenge by pointing out that Lindell's so-called evidence didn't contain voting machines' data.
Lindell then filed a legal challenge to the judement. The appeals court found that the panel 'effectively amended' the challenge's rules, handing Lindell a victory.
'From the four corners of the Challenge contract as defined by the Official Rules, there is no way to read 'information related to the November 2020 election' as meaning only information that is packet capture data,' the appeals court found.
Zeidman, who previously told the New York Times that he is a Republican and voted for Donald Trump twice, believed Lindell's claims posed a danger to democracy.
'A false narrative about election fraud is just really damaging to this country,' he told the Times.
Last month, a federal jury in Colorado found that Lindell defamed Eric Coomer, the former security and product strategy director at Dominion Voting Systems, when he accused him of treason. Lindell was ordered to pay Coomer $2.3 million in damages — a ruling that the MyPillow CEO said he plans to appeal.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
3 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Doug Burgum escalates war on bird-killing windmills that Trump regularly rages against
The Trump administration has announced new policies targeting renewable energy sources, like the president's much-loathed wind turbines, in order to save migratory birds. The Department of the Interior (DOI) will release five policy updates on Tuesday afternoon to better align the agency with President Donald Trump 's affordable energy agenda, the Daily Mail has exclusively learned. Part of that mission is to cut federal funding to renewable wind energy sources like wind turbines on land and off-shore. The order seeks to end 'preferential treatment for unreliable energy sources like wind,' according to a drafted press release obtained by the Daily Mail. It also will prompt the DOI to identify policies favoring wind and solar energy and halt spending on 'energy supply chains controlled by foreign rivals.' Notably, China leads the globe in turbine and solar power manufacturing. Trump has said that 'no new windmills' will be built during his administration and he has recently slammed the towering turbines for 'killing the beauty of our scenery, our valleys, our beautiful plains—I'm not talking about airplanes, I'm talking about beautiful plains.' 'Beautiful areas in the United States, and you look up and you see windmills all over the place. It's a horrible thing,' Trump said this week while visiting Scotland. The DOI orders on Tuesday will make good on an executive order signed earlier this year where Trump halted wind leasing pending a review. The president decried wind turbines repeatedly this week after spotting some of the mammoth energy machines 'on the horizon' while playing on his golf course in Turnberry, Scotland. 'The whole thing is a con job,' the 79-year-old Republican said of the wind industry this week. He also repeated his past claim that off-shore wind turbines are at fault for disrupting sensitive ecosystems. 'It's driving [whales] loco, it's driving them crazy,' Trump said in Scotland. The DOI order will also prompt the department to review avian mortality rates caused by wind energy projects in migratory birds' flight paths Bird deaths that are caused by legal activities are considered 'incidental' under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) and the DOI will study whether wind turbines qualify for legal protections under the law. If not, turbine operators could be on the hook for killing birds even if it is unintentional. Trump has noted in the past that American bald eagles were being killed by turbines in California. 'You know, in California, they were killing the bald eagle. If you shoot a bald eagle, they want to put you in jail for 10 years. A windmill will kill many bald eagles. It's true,' Trump said in 2019. There are over 70,000 wind turbines in the U.S. and the American Bird Conservancy estimates that hundreds of thousands of birds are killed by them annually. 'These policy changes represent a commonsense approach to energy that puts Americans' interests first,' Interior Secretary Doug Burgum said in a statement. 'Leveling the playing field in permitting supports energy development that's reliable, affordable, and built to last,' it continued. 'We're also making sure tribes and local communities have a real seat at the table. This move is about responsible energy growth that works for every American.'
Reuters
3 minutes ago
- Reuters
Largest US rail union intends to oppose Union Pacific's buy of Norfolk Southern
July 29 (Reuters) - The largest rail union in the United States said on Tuesday it intends to oppose Union Pacific's (UNP.N), opens new tab proposed $85 billion acquisition of smaller rival Norfolk Southern (NSC.N), opens new tab in regulatory proceedings, citing concerns about how the largest-ever buyout in the sector will affect U.S. workers and infrastructure. At the same time, other interested parties - from soybean farmers to retailers and the Port of Los Angeles - see potential harm from rising shipping costs as well as the potential benefit of speedier, seamless service if regulators allow the companies to create the nation's first railroad stretching from the Atlantic to the Pacific. The transportation division of SMART, the International Association of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail and Transportation Workers, said it plans to oppose, opens new tab the merger when it comes before the Surface Transportation Board for review. SMART represents 230,000 members across several sectors including transportation, construction, and manufacturing. "We approach this development with measured skepticism rooted in the real-world impact such consolidation could have on rail workers, safety, service quality, and the long-term health of the freight rail industry," the union said in a statement. Union Pacific and Norfolk Southern said in announcing the deal that they intend to preserve union jobs and aim to be the safest railroad in the country. The deal, announced earlier on Tuesday, drew mixed reactions from Republicans in Congress. U.S. Senator Josh Hawley, a Republican from Missouri, said he was concerned. 'I don't know enough to know, but if they're concerned, I'm concerned,' Hawley told Reuters, referring to SMART, which endorsed him for reelection in 2024, citing his support for rail safety. 'It's going to be a great deal for America, it's going to be a great deal for Nebraska,' Senator Pete Ricketts, a Republican from Nebraska, where Union Pacific is based, told Reuters. Union Pacific shares were down 3.3% at $221.64 on Tuesday afternoon, while Norfolk Southern shares were down 3.4% at $276.97. If approved, the deal would create the country's first coast-to-coast freight rail operator, combining Union Pacific's stronghold in the western two-thirds of the United States with Norfolk's 19,500-mile (31,382 km) network that primarily spans 22 Eastern states. Union Pacific has had the most accidents, injuries, and fatalities in the industry in recent years, and has shown a willingness to lay off workers including engineers and conductors even during periods of stability, SMART's Transportation Division said. The union also raised concern that Union Pacific's practice of leasing out its infrastructure could affect service quality. Union Pacific spokesperson Kristen South said the railroad is the safest in the industry when it comes to personal injuries for the first five months of 2025 and has improved 30% on its derailment rate year to date. The labor union said the deal could lead to a duopoly in U.S. rail. Competitors BNSF, owned by Berkshire Hathaway (BRKa.N), opens new tab, and CSX (CSX.O), opens new tab are exploring merger options, Reuters has reported. "Both history and logic suggest this would drive higher rates, fewer service options, and diminished competition. Shippers and communities deserve more than a monopoly in disguise," SMART said. U.S. railroads have merged from thousands in the late 1800s to just a few players today. A merger of this scale would be a landmark moment for U.S. supply chains, as the resulting railroad would account for almost half of all containerized rail traffic in the country, said Jess Dankert, the Retail Industry Leaders Association's vice president of supply chain. "There are two elements to be watched closely: the promise of greater efficiency but also the risk of increased costs," Dankert said. "A lot of the consolidation that has occurred in the rail industry has resulted, at times, in higher rail rates and a decrease in service," said Mike Steenhoek, executive director of the Soy Transportation Coalition. "We want people competing for our business, that's good for us," Steenhoek said. At the busiest U.S. seaport in Los Angeles, about 25% of cargo enters or leaves the docks via rail - work that is split roughly equally between Union Pacific and Berkshire Hathaway-owned BNSF, said Gene Seroka, the port's executive director. Seroka supports the proposed merger, saying it has the potential to create a seamless service that could reduce costs and improve service, in part by reducing the number of times a rail car is handed off to a new train operator. Quick cargo clearance means the port can process more cargo. When it comes to supply chains, minimizing cargo hand-offs that add time and potential complications is vital. "It doesn't like to be passed around like a baton in a relay race," Steenhoek said.
Reuters
3 minutes ago
- Reuters
Trump approval rating sinks to 40%, the lowest of his term, Reuters/Ipsos poll finds
WASHINGTON, July 29 (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump's approval rating dropped one percentage point to 40%, the lowest level of his second term in office, as Americans remained concerned about his handling of the economy and immigration, a Reuters/Ipsos poll found. The three-day poll, which closed on Monday, surveyed 1,023 U.S. adults nationwide and had a margin of error of 3 percentage points. It showed a nation deeply polarized over Trump, with 83% of Republicans and just 3% of Democrats approving of his performance. About one-third of independents approved. Trump had a 41% approval rating in Reuters/Ipsos' most recent prior poll, conducted on July 15 and 16. The Republican campaigned on promises to supercharge the U.S. economy and crack down on immigration, and the poll found that Americans gave him mixed marks on both those areas, where his administration is using aggressive tactics. Some 38% of respondents approved of Trump's handling of the economy, up from 35% approval in the mid-July poll. His numbers were also up slightly on immigration, with 43% of respondents approving, compared with 41% in the earlier poll. All the shifts were within the poll's margin of error.
