EFF's Omphile Maotwe advocates for 'apartheid tax' to safeguard vulnerable families from VAT hike
EFF Treasurer-General Omphile Maotwe has urged the government to introduce an "apartheid tax" on inherited apartheid-era wealth instead of raising Value Added-Tax (VAT).
Speaking to journalists outside the Western Cape High Court on Tuesday—during the first hearing challenging the legality of the planned VAT hike—Maotwe argued that such a tax reform would not only generate significantly more revenue than the R28 billion shortfall the government seeks to address.
She said this would also ease growing tensions within the Government of National Unity (GNU) over fiscal policy.
She further criticised Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana for lacking the political will to impose taxes on the wealthy, suggesting that the Minister was 'afraid to approach the rich,' and instead opted for a VAT increase that disproportionately impacts the poor.
'That will give you far more money than the R28bn they're looking for. But the easy target is often the poor. We can't afford to put bread on the table. Imagine with the impact of the VAT increase.
'Our people will die from poverty. The triple oppression of poverty, inequality and unemployment is going to get worse,' she said.
The EFF and the DA requested the court to halt tax hikes, arguing that it will cripple the public's pockets. The court is yet to rule.
The hike is expected to come in on May 1.
In his defence, Finance Minister Godongwana emphasised the necessity of the VAT hike to sustain critical public services, including healthcare, education, transportation, and public safety.
Legal submissions from the Treasury argued that the VAT increase is the most viable and sustainable option given current fiscal constraints, limited borrowing capacity, and the risks associated with further budget cuts.
In contrast, Maotwe has advocated for a more progressive taxation approach.
She has called on the government to shift the fiscal burden onto high-net-worth individuals by introducing a wealth tax and closing loopholes that allow trusts and luxury properties to evade fair taxation.
'We are telling him he doesn't need to increase VAT. He needs to tax the rich. Introduce a wealth tax. Many trusts hold luxury properties which are not being taxed, but they use the portfolios to apply for loans at the banks,' she said.
She also proposed an increase in the corporate tax rate from the current 27% to 29%, citing strong profit margins in the private sector.
kamogelo.moichela@iol.co.za
IOL Politics
Get your news on the go, click here to join the IOL News WhatsApp channel.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
7 hours ago
- The Citizen
Reserve Bank and Ibex reach final settlement of R6.3 billion on Steinhoff fraud
Steinhoff imploded in December 2017 when the auditors refused to sign off on the financial statements due to irregularities. The South African Reserve Bank (Sarb) has reached a final settlement with Ibex of R6.3 billion after an extensive and complex investigation into the affairs of Steinhoff International Holdings and people or entities regarding possible contraventions of exchange control regulations. Ibex was formerly known as Steinhoff International Holdings. After its investigation, Sarb took administrative action against certain entities within and associated with the Steinhoff Group, because they did not comply with the exchange control regulations. The discovery of the now well-known accounting irregularities in the Steinhoff Group in December 2017 led to a sharp and immediate decline in the Steinhoff share price on both the Frankfurt and Johannesburg stock exchanges, eroding approximately 90% of the company's market capitalisation. ALSO READ: What we know so far about the secret PwC report on Steinhoff According to the Sarb the Steinhoff Group's external debt exceeded 10 billion euros (approximately R155 billion) at the time. The crisis threatened the Steinhoff Group's continued existence and risked consequences, including forced asset sales or 'fire sales', significant losses to South African and foreign financial institutions and investors and extensive job losses. There was also a risk that it could significantly affect South Africa's reputation as one of the most robust and well-regulated financial markets in the world, Sarb points out. Steps to restructure Steinhoff debt Complex multi-jurisdictional debt restructuring and settlement processes were implemented between 2018 and 2023 to prevent an uncontrolled liquidation and mitigate the financial distress facing the Steinhoff Group. These processes resulted in the Steinhoff Group fully repaying more than R28 billion owed to South African banks in 2018, as well as compensation to other South African investors amounting to approximately R18.5 billion as part of the global settlement, that involved a total settlement value of approximately R29.6 billion at the time and was approved and sanctioned by international and local courts. ALSO READ: Almost R67 million from Steinhoff accused forfeited to the state The Sarb says the Public Investment Corporation (PIC) was one of the main beneficiaries of the global settlement due to its investment in the Steinhoff Group. South African creditors and banks were able to exit and recover all or most of their money, as foreign creditors agreed to a restructuring of their debt and a deferral of their rights. According to the Sarb, these foreign financial creditors granted forbearance of their claims against members of the Steinhoff Group, ultimately to 30 June 2026, to enable the settlement of various other creditors, who were mainly South African, first. Disputes between Ibex and Sarb Various disputes arose between the Ibex Group and the Sarb in early 2023 regarding the Sarb's administrative actions against Ibex Group due to various alleged contraventions of the exchange control regulations revealed by the investigation. The Sarb says these disputes resulted in multiple legal proceedings between the parties, including the intervention of at least one of the Ibex Group's financial creditors. One of these disputes involved the forfeiture of an amount of about R6.3 billion for the benefit of the state, while others concerned the Sarb's blocking and prohibition orders over the Ibex Group's funds and assets that arose as part of the investigation. In line with legal advice and after careful consideration by the Sarb, all the disputes between the Ibex Group and the Sarb were ultimately resolved in a comprehensive settlement. ALSO READ: NPA secures first conviction and sentence in Steinhoff fraud case The Sarb says In concluding the settlement agreement and fully and finally resolving the disputes between them, the Sarb and the Ibex Group considered the public interest, the Sarb's mandate to enforce the exchange control regulations and the importance of enhancing investor confidence in South Africa. They also wanted to promote regulatory certainty by allowing the Ibex Group to settle its contractual obligations to its foreign financial creditors. 'In fulfilling these aims, the Ibex Group forfeited R6.3 billion plus interest of its funds to the state in full and final settlement of the Sarb's enforcement action against the Ibex Group regarding the alleged contraventions,' the Sarb says. Ibex granted permission to wind down and repay creditors In return, the Ibex Group withdrew its legal challenge to the forfeiture. In addition, the Sarb granted the Ibex Group permission to implement and take all steps necessary for the Ibex Group to implement its Dutch court-approved structured winding down process and repay its creditors and operational expenses. By agreement between the Sarb and Ibex Group, the High Court set aside the prohibition orders restricting the Ibex Group's ability to deal with some of its shares in Pepkor Holdings Limited and the Sarb agreed not to take any further administrative or enforcement action against the Ibex Group regarding the alleged contraventions. In addition, the Ibex Group and the Sarb, with the support of the majority of the Ibex Group's current creditors, withdrew all the litigation they instituted, while the Ibex Group and the financial creditors abandoned the judgments obtained in the course of the litigation. 'The Sarb as well as the Ibex Group consider the settlement reasonable, proportionate and justifiable considering the complex and competing interests. 'Considering the long history of the Steinhoff/Ibex matter, the wider ramification of the continued dispute between the Sarb and the Ibex Group for investor appetite for future investments in South Africa and the interests in finality, the Sarb and the Ibex Group consider this final settlement to be in the best interests of South Africa,' the Sarb says.
IOL News
9 hours ago
- IOL News
South Africa's proactive approach to finding new trade partners as US tariffs loom
Agriculture Minister John Steenhuisen says the country was working on minimising the impact of the looming US 30% tariff hike on its exports. Image: Henk Kruger / Independent Newspapers South Africa is quickly expanding its global trade partners as a solution to the United States of America's 30% tariff on its exports, said Agriculture Minister John Steenhuisen. Steenhuisen made the statement as the US tariff increase on South Africa is expected to come into effect on August 1. 'The real solution lies not just in playing defence, but in going on the offensive. This is why we are doubling down on market access expansion,' said Steenhuisen, who is the leader of the DA in the Government of National Unity. The tariff deadline will come as the country waits for the outcome of the proposed US-South Africa Bilateral Relations Review Act of 2025, which seeks to impose sanctions against some ANC leaders accused of, among others, supporting China, Russia, and Iran, and mismanaging state resources. Delivering a keynote address at the RSA Group Stakeholder Dinner in Muldersdrift outside Johannesburg on Thursday, Steenhuisen said his department was reaching out to other countries looking for markets to sell the country's agricultural products. He called on the country not to waste time by being overly reliant, but to be productive. He said the country was already strengthening its trade alliances with the likes of Chile, Peru, and New Zealand 'to jointly lobby for fair and stable trade treatment of fresh produce' through the Southern Hemisphere Association of Fresh Fruit Exporters. 'Over the past six months alone, we have finalised new phytosanitary protocols for the export of avocados to China; table grapes to Vietnam and the Philippines; and maize to India,' he said. Steenhuisen said there were trade negotiations with Indonesia, Thailand, and Bangladesh. 'Our goal is simple — to ensure that no South African fruit producer is ever left dependent on the goodwill of a single trading partner.' He said the country was also strengthening its plant health systems, expanding traceability capabilities, and digitising its export certification platforms to align with the European Union's Green Deal and Asia's growing demand for sustainability-linked imports as part of 'investments that are not just defensive; they are the launchpad for new growth'. He said the country's agriculture has always been one of ingenuity, grit, and partnership. 'We have overcome political transitions, trade embargoes, droughts, pandemics, and port crises. We will overcome these current headwinds (tariff increase) too,' he said. Steenhuisen said that to avert the effects of new tariffs more quickly and effectively, the country must be united and pull together. 'My department is open for business, open for reform, and open for ideas,' he said. Steenhuisen said the tariffs will damage the African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA), which is set to expire in September and is already under threat of not being renewed due to strained relations between South Africa and the US. 'Let me be clear: South African agriculture did not deserve this treatment. We do not dump, we do not distort, and we do not play geopolitical games with food,' he said. He said the Department of Trade, Industry and Competition (DTIC) was leading the country's formal engagement with the United States. 'And we continue to work hand in hand with Minister Tau and his team to ensure that the full impact on the agricultural sector is well understood,' he said. Soon after taking over the US presidency for the second time, Donald Trump came down heavy on South Africa by signing an Executive Order alleging that the country was mistreating its Afrikaner community by enabling genocide and passing oppressive policies. He also accused the country of being aggressive towards his country and its allies, 'including accusing Israel, not Hamas, of genocide in the International Court of Justice, and reinvigorating its relations with Iran to develop commercial, military, and nuclear arrangements'. 'The United States cannot support the government of South Africa's commission of rights violations in its country or its undermining of United States foreign policy, which poses national security threats to our Nation, our allies, our African partners, and our interests,' read the order. In reaction, Ramaphosa led a delegation, which comprised Steenhuisen and influential businessman Johann Rupert, to correct misinformation about Afrikaners' treatment and straighten the relationship with Trump's administration. However, the first phase of passing the US-South Africa Bilateral Relations Review Act of 2025, which, according to its author, US Congressman Ronny Jackson, seeks to punish ANC leaders, raised eyebrows. The act, which is now awaiting tabling at the full House of Representatives, accused the ANC's government leaders of undermining human rights by having a military and political relationship with the Russian government, which is at war with Ukraine. It accused the country of having allowed a US-sanctioned Russian cargo ship, the Lady R, to dock and transfer arms at a South African naval base in December 2022. 'The ANC published an article in their newspaper, ANC Today, in October 2024, promoting Russian propaganda about the war in Ukraine,' read the proposed act, which also accused ANC leaders of mismanaging Eskom and Transnet, and enabling the cholera outbreaks. University of South Africa's Thabo Mbeki African School of Public and International Affairs' international affairs expert, Dr Bongiwe Ngcobo, said the US actions were designed to force South Africa to abandon the International Court of Justice case against Israel on the Gaza conflict. She said South Africa's BRICS membership was also a concern for the US. 'If BRICS strengthen and grow, then it means they will have a challenger, and it means they will have less control over smaller countries like South Africa and other countries from the Global South,' she said. [email protected]
TimesLIVE
11 hours ago
- TimesLIVE
'I'm a new chief whip': MK Party's Makhubele plays down 'yes' vote blunder in Appropriation Bill
MK Party chief whip Colleen Makhubele has played down confusion about the Appropriation Bill in parliament where she mistakenly voted 'yes' for the bill the party maintained it would reject. During the budget vote on Wednesday, Makhubele announced the party was voting in favour of the bill, claiming 49 votes in support. However, after the house chair asked her to verify, she did a swift U-turn, declaring they were voting against the bill. Makhubele said she thought they were voting for the ad hoc committee to investigate the allegations by KwaZulu-Natal police commissioner Lt-Gen Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi. 'We are rejecting this. We are changing our vote. I thought we were dealing with the ad hoc committee. We will support it when it comes, that was the confusion,' Makhubele said. 'I'm just a new chief whip, I will make errors, so relax. We are voting against the bill.' Makhubele, who was appointed chief whip last month replacing Mzwanele Manyi, faced severe backlash from other MPs who mocked her in parliament. EFF leader Julius Malema criticised Makhubele's blunder during a media briefing on Thursday. 'It was a mess, a mess in action,' Malema said. 'That's what you elected South Africa. You are asked twice and you're saying, 'I'm voting in support'. That MK Party caucus almost collapsed yesterday [Wednesday]. You elect people who do not understand. The chairperson allows that. It's not principled. Once the voting is closed it's done. He undermined the decorum and the integrity of that process. MK Party will never reduce us in numbers anywhere else including in thinking.' The National Assembly approved the Appropriation Bill by 262 votes to 90. All 10 parties in the government of national unity voted in favour, while the MK Party, EFF, African Transformation Movement, United Africans Transformation and National Coloured Congress opposed the bill.
