Virginia federal judge sets hearing on Hegseth's censorship in military service members' kids' schools
Keep up with the latest in + news and politics.
The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia has set a June 3 hearing in E.K. v. Department of Defense Education Activity, a lawsuit brought in April by the American Civil Liberties Union on behalf of 12 students enrolled in Department of Defense Education Activity schools across Virginia, Kentucky, Japan, and Italy.
Related: Military families sue Trump administration to keep their school system diverse
At issue is the administration's enforcement of three executive orders—14168, 14185, and 14190—signed by President Donald Trump in January. The orders direct federal agencies to eliminate so-called 'gender ideology,' 'divisive concepts,' and 'discriminatory equity ideology' from government-funded programming. Within weeks, DoDEA implemented new restrictions that removed hundreds of books from school libraries, revised curricula, canceled cultural celebrations, and limited classroom discussions about race, gender, and LGBTQ+ identities.
DoDEA schools are among the most diverse and thriving in the American school system.
Related: Supreme Court allows Trump administration to enforce transgender military ban
The ACLU is seeking a preliminary injunction to halt the removals and restore access to materials it says are protected under the First Amendment. The Wednesday motion argues that the government has engaged in unconstitutional viewpoint discrimination by targeting specific content based on political ideology.
According to court documents, since January, DoDEA schools have removed titles such as To Kill a Mockingbird, Julian is a Mermaid, The Kite Runner, and Well-Read Black Girl. Instruction on topics like gender and sexuality was cut from AP Psychology courses, and health education was stripped of material related to puberty, consent, and reproductive health. Cultural observances like Black History Month and Pride Month were canceled across the system.
DoDEA operates 161 schools serving more than 66,000 students, primarily children of active-duty service members. According to the lawsuit, the censorship has been implemented unevenly across campuses but with consistent harm: students are being denied access to key parts of their education, including content that reflects their own identities or histories.
Related: Meet the transgender Army lieutenant who is challenging Donald Trump's military ban
The plaintiffs include elementary through high school students who report confusion, fear, and frustration as lessons disappear and library shelves are emptied without explanation. The lawsuit also documents a lack of transparency, with parents receiving vague or no answers when asking what materials have been removed or why.
The hearing before Judge Patricia Tolliver Giles was originally scheduled for May 29 but was rescheduled to June 3 at 10 a.m. in Alexandria. If granted, the injunction would block further enforcement of the executive orders in DoDEA schools and require the reinstatement of previously banned books and curricula.
The hearing could have far-reaching implications for education in federally operated schools and for the rights of students in military families to learn in inclusive, fact-based environments.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Biggest AIM-120 Missile Order Ever Just Signed By Pentagon
The Pentagon has signed a record $3.5 billion contract with Raytheon to procure AIM-120 Advanced Medium-Range Air-to-Air Missiles (AMRAAM), telemetry systems, spare parts and service. The deal will provide these missiles for foreign military sales (FMS) to 19 nations, including Japan, Germany, Poland, Australia, the U.K., Israel and Ukraine. Both Raytheon and the U.S. Air Force declined to say how many missiles will be provided under the contract. AIM-120s can cost over $1M per example, depending on variant. The deal for the missiles comes amid growing global tensions and the erosion of the existing AMRAAM stockpile. They can be carried by every fighter in the U.S. inventory as well as by those of most allied nations. Designed for beyond-visual-range air-to-air combat, they have also been used as surface-to-air missiles (SAMs) in the National Advanced Surface-to-Air Missile System (NASAMS). A product of Norway's Kongsberg Defense and Raytheon, NASAMS currently protects the U.S. Capital Region, over a dozen countries around the globe. It has been extensively battle-proven in Ukraine over nearly three years of operations. There is a voracious appetite for these weapons. The AMRAAMs were heavily used during the U.S. fight against Houthi drones as well as against drones over Syria and Iraq during the defense of Israel from multiple Iranian attacks. Ukraine has expended a large number of these missiles defending against Russian drones and cruise missiles via NASAMS and now its F-16 fighters, as well. These weapons came from the U.S. and NATO members. The deal with Raytheon follows a decision last month to finally provide AMRAAMs to Egypt, ostensibly for its new NASAMS order but potentially for its F-16s as well. Egyptian F-16s never received AIM-120s, instead having to rely on AIM-7 Sparrows and AIM-9 Sidewinders due to restrictions put in place that were focused on giving Israel a qualitative edge over its neighbors. You can read all about this in our recent report here. In addition, Thursday's award comes less than a year after Raytheon received another $1.2 billion FMS production contract for AIM-120s. Despite the massive combat-proven success of the AMRAAM that dates back multiple decades, the U.S. is working to both improve the range and effectiveness of the missiles as well as develop improved air-to-air missiles as concerns grow about a potential conflict with China. There are signs that a new AIM-120E variant may now be in development. Hints that work on the AIM-120E is underway came after the Air Force Life Cycle Management Center (AFLCMC) put out a notice in April regarding a sole-source contract that it had awarded to Raytheon (now formally known as RTX) earlier in March. The newest known variant of is the AIM-120D-3 In addition, the Air Force and Navy are working together on a new, longer-range air-to-air missile, the AIM-260 Joint Advanced Tactical Missile (JATM), details about which remain limited. There are other air-to-air missile programs — such as the AIM-174 — and initiatives in the works and development of new missiles is clearly moving forward in the classified realm, as well. The need to massively scale-up production of the AIM-120 is glaring. While many thousands of these missiles have been built (roughly 5,000 have been tested), the expenditure on multiple fronts of the stockpile in recent years is a major problem. This is especially true as one-way attack munitions (drones that act like cruise missiles) can be produced en-masse for cheap and can chew through effectors very quickly. While more cost effective ways of downing drones are emerging, the enemy is adapting these systems to make that harder. There is also a growing threat of traditional air-to-air combat with a major power and the danger traditional cruise missiles pose is also evolving. So, the AIM-120 will continue to be a primary of taking down any air-breathing target for years to come. All this combined with under investment in stockpiles for decades means that the U.S. and its allies are scrambling to produce enough weapons for future contingencies. These missiles are high-tech 'mini aircraft' in their own right and take a long time to build, with certain highly-specialized long-lead components being critical bottlenecks in the supply chain. This is why we are seeing big dollars being spent now to spin-up production, especially as Ukraine and activities in the Middle East, continue to burn through allied AMRAAM stocks. The situation with Patriot missile production appears even more dire. With a possible fight over Taiwan and Russia descending into a full-on wartime economy, the hope is these large orders aren't coming too late. Contact the author: howard@
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Where is Epstein's island? Trump said he ‘never had the privilege' to visit
President Donald Trump denied ever visiting late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein's private island in one of his "very good moments." Trump was in Scotland answering questions from reporters on July 28 as the controversy over the criminal case files on the financier indicted on sex trafficking charges continues to roil his administration. Epstein owned a small private island in the U.S. Virgin Islands, where sex trafficking of young girls allegedly occurred. 'I never had the privilege of going to his island, and I did turn it down, but a lot of people in Palm Beach were invited to his island," Trump said. 'In one of my very good moments, I turned it down. I didn't want to go to his island.' Where does the island fit in the Epstein saga? Here is what to know: More: Trump says poached Mar-a-Lago spa staff included Epstein accuser Virginia Giuffre What happened at Epstein's island? In January 2020, prosecutors with the U.S. Virgin Islands filed a lawsuit against Epstein's estate, alleging a criminal enterprise took place on his property there involving the sexual abuse of young girls. "Epstein owned and arranged for private planes, helicopters, boat and automobiles to transport victims to, from and within the Virgin Islands, and provided money to pay these young women and underage girls," the lawsuit stated. Numerous girls forced into his scheme were 12 to 17 years old, the lawsuit alleged, stating local authorities last observed related events happening in 2018. A web of companies owned by Epstein, dubbed the "Epstein Enterprise" by prosecutors, "deceptively lured underage girls and women into its sex trafficking ring with money and promises of employment, career opportunities and school assistance." One 15-year-old girl tried to escape by swimming, the lawsuit states. The estate settled the case with the U.S. Virgin Islands for $105 million in December 2022. More: Jeffrey Epstein, a survivor's untold story and the complexity of abuse Where is the Epstein island located? The island Epstein owned was in the U.S Virgin Islands. Epstein also owned property in New York and Palm Beach, where federal U.S. prosecutors also allege sex trafficking occurred. Ghislaine Maxwell eyes clemency as MAGA calls for Epstein transparency Trump has been dealing with questions and controversy over Epstein for weeks, with members of both parties calling for more transparency about the man's criminal case. Trump has called for the release of more documents, but one federal judge in Florida has already denied the request to unseal grand jury transcripts. The backlash has also led the Department of Justice back to Epstein's ex-partner Ghislaine Maxwell for more information. She is serving a 20-year prison sentence for trafficking a minor to Epstein for sexual abuse. She spoke with DOJ officials over two days last week, and Trump has not yet ruled out a pardon. Trump and Epstein shared a friendship for years, as they were both part of the Palm Beach, Florida, community, where Mar-a-Lago is located. 'I wouldn't talk to Jeffrey Epstein because he did something that was inappropriate. … He stole people that worked for me. I said, 'Don't ever do that again.' He did it again, and I threw him out of the place,' Trump said, in reference to his Mar-a-Lago club and residence. 'Persona non grata." Contributing: Josh Meyer and Aysha Bagchi, USA TODAY Kinsey Crowley is the Trump Connect reporter for the USA TODAY Network. Reach her at kcrowley@ Follow her on X and TikTok @kinseycrowley or Bluesky at @ This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Trump said he 'never had the privilege' to visit island Epstein owned Solve the daily Crossword
Wall Street Journal
6 hours ago
- Wall Street Journal
A Good Plan to Keep Social Security Solvent
Andrew Biggs's 'A Risky Plan for Social Security' warns that the bipartisan reform plan to provide long-term solvency for the Social Security system proposed by Sens. Bill Cassidy (R., La.) and Tim Kaine (D., Va.) is too risky (op-ed, July 25). But the Cassidy-Kaine plan is much less risky than ignoring Social Security's current $25 trillion funding gap and allowing its trust fund to be depleted by 2033. Messrs. Cassidy and Kaine based their proposal on extensive evidence that diversified investing produces much higher long-term returns than reliance on low-yield Treasury bonds.
