Gordon Wilson Flats' Heritage Protection Goneburger
'The Gordon Wilson Flats were used as social housing until 2012, when an engineer's report showed the building was so unsafe that large slabs of the concrete exterior could come off in an earthquake or even a strong wind. The building has sat vacant since then, becoming more dangerous and more of an eyesore every year,' Mr Bishop says.
'The Gordon Wilson Flats are currently listed as heritage protected in the Wellington City District Plan, making it nearly impossible for anyone to get a resource consent to demolish them or alter them.
'There has been attempt after attempt to deal with the Gordon Wilson Flats since 2012, all of which have failed. The Flats sit as an ugly scar on the Wellington skyline, emblematic of a failed planning system that prioritises preservation of heritage, no matter the economic cost.
'Cities shouldn't be museums. The Wellington City Council wants the Gordon Wilson flats demolished, the University (the current owner) wants them demolished, and the people of Wellington want them demolished too.
'The Government is not prepared to let the situation continue any longer.
'Cabinet has agreed to enable the demolition of Gordon Wilson Flats by amending the Resource Management (Consenting and Other System Changes) Amendment Bill, which has recently been reported back to Parliament.
'The amendment will remove the Flats' protected heritage status and will make its demolition a permitted activity under the RMA. This means the building can finally be demolished, without a resource consent.
'The amendments will not apply to any other heritage-protected buildings around the country. The Gordon Wilson Flats have been singled out because the building is owned by a public institution – Victoria University – and because that owner, the council and the community all want it gone.
'I know many Wellingtonians will be relieved to know the Gordon Wilson Flats' days of heritage protection are numbered, and that it is unlikely to mar our beautiful city's skyline for too much longer.
The Amendment Paper to the Resource Management (Consenting and Other System Changes) Amendment Bill will be introduced during the Bill's Committee of the Whole House stage, between its second and third readings. The Bill is expected to pass into law in the middle of 2025.
'The Bill also contains wider amendments to allow councils to de-list heritage buildings in their district plans faster and more easily. The wider issue of heritage protection is also being actively considered as part of the government's replacement legislation for the Resource Management Act, expected to be introduced later in the year.'
Victoria University may choose to demolish the Gordon Wilson Flats following the enactment of the Resource Management (Consenting and Other System Changes) Amendment Bill. While they would not need a resource consent for the demolition, they would still need a demolition consent under the Building Act 2004 to ensure appropriate management of matters such as handling and disposing of hazardous building materials and controlling silt runoff, excess noise and dust generated by the demolition.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Otago Daily Times
6 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Farm forestry ban too late to help: advocate
The farm-to-forest ban passed its first reading last week but a Southland Federated Farmers executive says its too late, the damage has been done and is continuing. Executive member and farmer Dean Rabbidge said since the ban's announcement on December 4, there has been a rush to convert arable land into forests. "If anything, we've only seen an acceleration of it since December 4 with people knowing that this is their last chance," he said. The sheep, beef and dairy farmer said after pulling pines out of his own property he has learned the damage the conifers do to the soil. "It's taking a lot of work to get it back into productive land through fertiliser and seed and stuff," he said. Pine needles themselves are quite toxic, he said, and do not let anything else grow. He said the farms that have been converted into forestry would have had soil that was at the optimum level for animal health and pasture production. "[The soil] has been cared for and looked after for maximum food production values, and now we're just planting it in pine trees," he said. The ban, or Climate Change Response (Emissions Trading Scheme — Forestry Conversions) Amendment Bill, will include exemptions. After the first reading, Minister for Agriculture Todd McClay said investors that were able to prove intent to afforest between January 2021 and December 4 would be exempt from the ban. This exemption, which was part of the December 4 announcement, was clarified by the minister. Mr McClay said that the combination of buying land and ordering of trees prior to December 4 would be an example of proof of a qualifying investment. He said each of these actions alone would not. This exemption has been a source of confusion for concerned farmers who have said the grey area of "evidence of intent" opened up a loophole that has been exploited. Mr Rabbidge said the grey area remains and his organisation will continue to hold government ministers to account over this issue. "There's still been some very, very questionable land purchases go on recently under the guise of, hey, we had seedlings ordered — that was their intent to plant," he said. "We're still going to keep the pressure on the government to make sure that all the loopholes are closed." The Wyndham farmer said the rapid conversion is visible to those living rurally, but it will take a while for urban residents to recognise the affect. "It's far too late, but people are finally waking up to the damage that forestry, both production and carbon, is doing to the rural sector," he said. "It's not until the urban areas feel the effects of it that it's going to be far too late."
Otago Daily Times
9 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Iwi leader rebuts claims of consent power grab
Ngāti Waewae leader Francois Tumahai has rejected claims that a revamped iwi agreement with the West Coast Regional Council gives Māori too much say in planning and resource consents. The regional council has reworded more than 20 clauses in its Mana Whakahono a Rohe partnership document with Poutini Ngai Tahu, mainly to clarify how it will work in practice. Former chair Allan Birchfield, who signed the original document in 2020, has strongly criticised the new version, saying it puts iwi on the same governance level as the council. 'I am voting against (the amendments) because they will give iwi full control of the Council's consenting and compliance role under the RMA,' he told yesterday's council meeting. Mr Tumahai, one of two iwi reps on the council, says Mr Birchfield is deluded. 'He's had it explained to him, but he won't listen. Every other councillor has supported the changes but he has his world view, and he won't change it,' the Ngāti Waewae chair told Local Democracy Reporting. The agreement spells out how staff will involve manawhenua in resource consenting - a requirement under the Resource Management Act (RMA). 'The council will treat Poutini Ngāi Tahu as an affected party for all applications … where there is potential for adverse cultural effects, unless it is demonstrated otherwise,' an expanded clause says. Council staff would decide if adverse effects were likely by talking to the environmental agencies of the region's two Rūnanga, Poutini Ngai Tahu partnership manager Ashley Stuart said. A new clause in the agreement says the council will also 'strongly encourage' people applying for resource consents to talk to manawhenua themselves early on, through the iwi's environmental consultancies. Without a letter of approval from the iwi, the council will treat the consent as 'limited notified', adding potential costs and delays. Ngāti Waewae's environmental agency was already issuing at least one letter of approval a week to people checking in over resource consents, Mr Tumahai said. The council held back three of the amendments for further clarification, but endorsed the majority. Cr Birchfield was the sole objector, saying independent legal advice should been provided before these were put to council. "These are major changes … they should be deferred and the community should also be consulted,' he said. The former chair said he had signed the Mana Whakahono agreement in 2020 on the understanding it was a consultation document that would help to speed up and lower the cost of consenting, but this had turned out not to be the case. 'I did receive considerable criticism at the time and those critics have proven to be correct. This agreement is part of the reason why the council's compliance and consent function is so costly and delayed.' Mr Tumahai told LDR there were multiple factors causing the delays. 'It's convenient to blame Māori - we're kind of used to it - but I think with the changes the council is making we should see an improvement within a couple of months.' Part of the problem was overly-complex consent forms, and the council's use of North Island consultants who did not understand the West Coast context, Mr Tumahai conceded. The council had been swamped with applications for resource consents as the price of gold soared, and had to hire external planners to cope, he said. 'We had a workshop today on creating new templates with standard conditions for alluvial mining, and a schedule that walks you through how to apply - that should simplify it for everyone and speed things up.' Cr Birchfield - a veteran miner - did not attend the workshop, telling LDR later he needed to be at work to smelt some gold. Mr Tumahai said the clamour over consent delays was coming from a handful of miners who had not been successful with their applications. "They're not coming to grips with modern requirements and they are the ones making the noise.' The revamped Mana Whakahono agreement also sets out priority areas for improvement in which the council and iwi will collaborate as Treaty partners. They include planning for new sewerage infrastructure, and coastal retreat where buildings are at risk from erosion, flooding or sea level rise. District council and industry discharges into rivers or the sea are also seen as priorities for change, but over time. 'The discharge of wastewater into freshwater and coastal waters is an outdated solution from the last century which is culturally abhorrent to Poutini Ngai Tahu and is becoming unacceptable to others within communities,' the agreement declares. - By Lois Williams, Local Democracy Reporter
RNZ News
10 hours ago
- RNZ News
Government begins negotiations with councils for regional deals
Minister Chris Bishop says all three regions have significant economic growth potential. Photo: RNZ / Samuel Rillstone The government is to begin negotiations with councils in Auckland, Otago and Western Bay of Plenty to set in place so-called city or regional deals. Mayors from those three regions have signed memoranda of understanding (MOUs) with the coalition, after earlier submitting "light-touch proposals". The proposed deals are a coalition initiative under which local and central government will agree funding and project priorities over 10 years. Infrastructure Minister Chris Bishop said all three regions had significant economic growth potential and had already demonstrated an ability to partner with government. "These initial regions put together compelling proposals that reflect the government's and the regions' priorities through strong propositions that provide a clear pathway to getting important work done," he said in a statement. "The government will now begin negotiations with the three regions, with a view to agreeing the first deal by the end of 2025." Bishop said, as part of negotiations, the government was prepared to offer easier access to new and existing funding and financing tools, as well as more collaboration with its experts and officials. It could also set up already funded "innovation facilities" - such as public research institutions - in a desired location. Bishop said in return, councils would have to sign up to the government's vision around economic growth, housing, water services and transport. Councils would have to do a better job looking after pipes, roads, and other important assets, he said. They would also be expected to do more than just the bare minimum when it came to encouraging new housing - especially near "rapid transit corridors" where the government had already helped pay for infrastructure. Bishop said the government also wanted councils to consider congestion charging, special rates for certain areas, or development charges. The government hoped to finalise its first deal by the end of the year.
