NATO hails Strong Cooperation with Iraq
NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte has visited Iraq, accompanied by Supreme Allied Commander Europe (SACEUR), U.S. Army General Christopher G. Cavoli.
During his visit, he met with President Dr. Abdul Latif Rashid, Prime Minister Mohammed Shia' Al-Sudani, and other senior officials to discuss NATO Mission Iraq (NMI), NATO-Iraq cooperation, and regional security.
Rutte commended the progress made through NATO's non-combat advisory and capacity-building mission, established in 2018 to support Iraqi security institutions. He emphasised NATO's commitment to evolving its support in alignment with Iraq's sovereignty and long-term stability goals.
The delegation also met with NMI Commander Lieutenant General Lucas Schreurs and NATO personnel in Baghdad. Iraqi authorities have prioritised cooperation with NMI in areas such as security education, logistics, cyber defence, and governance reform.
Full text of statement from NATO:
NATO Secretary General, Mark Rutte, visited Iraq on 4-5 February 2025, together with Supreme Allied Commander Europe (SACEUR), U.S. Army General Christopher G. Cavoli. During his trip, he met with the President, Dr. Abdul Latif Rashid, the Prime Minister, Mohammed Shia' Al-Sudani, and other high level officials of the Iraqi government, with whom he exchanged views on a range of topics, including the role of NATO Mission Iraq (NMI), the NATO-Iraq partnership, and the security situation in the region. He also met with the NMI Commander, Lieutenant General Lucas Schreurs, other NMI personnel and the NATO diplomatic community in Baghdad.
"Since 2018, through its advising and capacity-building efforts, NATO Mission Iraq has contributed to make Iraqi security forces, institutions and structures more effective, inclusive and sustainable for the long term. I congratulate our Iraqi partners and NMI's leadership and personnel for the excellent level of cooperation developed, in several domains, including security education, logistics, cyber defence, and good governance," the Secretary General said. "Together we have achieved a lot through our NATO-Iraq partnership. Upon request from the Iraqi authorities and in full respect of Iraq's sovereignty and territorial integrity, we are evolving the scope of our activities, in support to Iraq's ongoing efforts towards lasting security and stability for all of its citizens," he added.
At the NATO Summit in Brussels in July 2018, Allied leaders launched NATO Mission Iraq, following a request and upon invitation from the Government of Iraq. The mission was established in Baghdad in October 2018. Its current commander is Lieutenant General Lucas Schreurs, from the Netherlands.
NATO Mission Iraq is a non-combat advisory and capacity-building mission that assists Iraq in building more sustainable, transparent, inclusive and effective security institutions and forces, so that they themselves are able to stabilise their country, fight terrorism, and prevent the return of ISIS/Daesh. To achieve this, NATO advises relevant Iraqi defence and security officials in the Ministry of Defence, Office of the National Security Advisor, Prime Minister's National Operations Centre, and the Federal Police Command within the Iraqi Ministry of Interior. The mission also advises Iraq's professional military education institutions in the greater Baghdad area. Iraqi authorities have identified a number of primary objectives for cooperation with NMI. These include security education, logistics, cyber defence, and good governance.
(Source: NATO)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Rudaw Net
4 hours ago
- Rudaw Net
Sarsang oil field attack and the Hamrin oil, gas contracts: five key questions
Also in Opinions Kurdistan Region's oil production before, after drone strikes Decoding Ocalan's message: The question of PKK disarmament and the future of Kurdish politics Kurdish intellectuals face challenges amid Turkey's Kurdish question The 12-day war and silent transformations of western Asia A+ A- Early Tuesday, the Sarsang oil field was attacked by a drone. The American company HKN, which operates the field and owns 62 percent of its shares, is the main stakeholder. Hours later, the Iraqi ministry of oil announced the signing ceremony of the contract between the US-based HKN Energy and the North Oil Company for the development of the Hamrin oil field, with a daily production capacity of 60,000 barrels of oil and 45 to 50 million cubic feet of gas. 'The attack caused no casualties, but total production, which is 30,000 barrels of oil per day, has been halted until all assessments of the situation are completed,' HKN said on X. Drone attacks have become alarmingly routine in the Kurdistan Region. Two drones struck Khurmala on Monday, adding to a series of previous drone attacks that have targeted both civilian areas and political security sites across the Region. Notably, the recent targeting of the Sarsang field coincided with the presence of Matthew Zais, Deputy Director of HKN Energy, at the Iraqi Ministry of Oil, where he was working on finalizing a new contract for the company. Whatever the dimensions of these attacks may be, they highlight the weakness of the state and the dominance of political forces, as well as both legal and illegal groups in Iraq. These groups send three important signals through the attack on Sarsang. First, from a technical and security perspective, the attacks demonstrate the superiority of the aggressor. Second, from an economic standpoint, the objective appears to be the reduction of the Kurdistan Region's oil production capacity and disruption of its current sales method. Third - and perhaps most importantly - there is a political dimension that may be the primary motive behind the attack: to serve as a warning for the US not to penalize Iraq's State Oil Marketing Organization (SOMO) for its oil sales. In recent days, following US President Donald Trump's letter to the Iraqi prime minister regarding the imposition of a 30 percent tariff on Iraqi goods starting August 1, there have also been indications that the United States has warned Iraq about the sale of Iranian oil. On July 3, the US Department of the Treasury added several individuals and companies to its sanctions list for selling Iranian oil under the guise of Iraqi oil. Previously, Iraq's Oil Minister, Hayyan Abdul Ghani, stated that 'Iran uses Iraqi documents to sell its oil.' This statement helps explain the longstanding discrepancy between the revenue data reported by Iraq's Oil Ministry and that of the Finance Ministry. Iran's total oil production is also higher than Iraq's. According to Energy data for 2024, Iran's daily oil production was 5.062 million barrels, while Iraq produced 4.398 million barrels per day. This means that, in terms of annual production growth, Iran increased its output by 10.6 percent, whereas Iraq's production rose by only one percent. Within the borders of Duhok province, there are several other oil fields where international companies, particularly British, Norwegian, and Canadian ones, are operating as production partners. These include the Tawke, Peshkabir, Shekhan, and Bashiqa oil fields, which are geographically more accessible and, in some cases, even closer than Sarsang, if the sole objective of the attackers had been economic disruption or security destabilization. However, the selection of Sarsang as the target appears clearly intentional. These attacks underscore the complexity of Iraq's political system and the capabilities of various armed actors within it. Currently, oil production in the Kurdistan Region ranges between 280,000 and 300,000 barrels per day. However, as of the morning of Tuesday, production dropped by nearly 30,000 barrels. According to the Iraqi oil minister, the remaining disagreement between Erbil and Baghdad over resuming oil exports through the Ceyhan port in Turkey amounts to a gap of just 19,000 barrels. We should not overlook the fact that the timing and targeting of the Sarsang field demonstrate the advanced and sophisticated capabilities of the attacking side from all angles. This poses a serious threat that must not be forgotten, especially if a new agreement comes into effect. Another important reality is that targeting the HKN company effectively means targeting the lobbying power of international oil companies within the US Congress and administration. Much of the US administration's statements and exerting pressure on Erbil and Baghdad to resume Kurdistan's oil exports via pipelines - and to reach a new agreement - was driven by the interests tied to this company. Finally, while it is true that the attack took place and the agreement was signed, several critical questions remain unanswered. First: If the US Treasury Department threatens to sanction SOMO, should the illegal groups in Iraq target part of the Iraqi state's territory and demand its surrender along with its revenues? Second: Is there division among the current rulers of the state administration in managing files, or are official institutions one thing and what actually happens another thing? Third: Does the signing of HKN company's contract with the Iraqi ministry of oil put an end to the repeated claims of unconstitutional and illegal contracts with the Kurdistan Region? Fourth: Why did Iraq choose the HKN company from among dozens of major American oil companies at this stage? What connection does this have to lobbying? Fifth: What will be the response of the US administration to harming American companies and investors? Mahmood Baban is a research fellow at the Rudaw Research Center. The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position of Rudaw.
Iraqi News
5 hours ago
- Iraqi News
Turkey to terminate oil pipeline agreement with Iraq by 2026
Baghdad ( – Turkey revealed on Monday that the long-running oil pipeline arrangement with Iraq, reached in 1973, will be terminated in 2026. Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan issued a presidential decree, and the decision was published in the country's official newspaper. According to the notice, the initial agreement, established in July 1973, will expire on July 27, 2026, together with any relevant protocols, annexes, and extensions. The 1973 agreement paved the way for the Iraq-Turkey crude oil pipeline. This critical infrastructure project enabled the transit of millions of barrels of Iraqi oil to the Turkish port of Ceyhan on the Mediterranean. This legal framework later played an important role in arbitration procedures sparked by the Kurdistan Regional Government's (KRG) oil exports through the pipeline. The KRG began exporting oil freely via the pipeline, forcing Iraq's federal government in Baghdad to pursue an arbitration action against Turkey in 2014. Baghdad alleged that the KRG's independent oil exports through the pipeline violated the Iraqi constitution. Crude oil shipments through the Iraq-Turkey oil pipeline have been suspended since March 2023. This pipeline previously accounted for approximately 0.5 percent of the world's oil supply. After the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) in Paris ruled that Ankara had violated a 1973 treaty by permitting oil exports without the approval of the federal government in Baghdad, oil flows via the Iraq-Turkey oil pipeline were stopped. The ruling obligated Turkey to pay Baghdad $1.5 billion in compensation for losses caused by the KRG's illegal oil exports between 2014 and 2018. Efforts to resume oil exports have gathered speed in 2025, with the Iraqi cabinet approving a new oil accord between Baghdad and the KRG in July. With the 1973 agreement planned to expire in 2026, Ankara and Baghdad are expected to negotiate a new legislative framework for cross-border energy cooperation.
Iraqi News
5 hours ago
- Iraqi News
Turkish media: Erdogan ends 52-year Iraq-Turkey oil agreement
Baghdad ( – Turkish media outlets reported on Monday (July 21, 2025) that Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan has signed a decision to terminate a 'historic' oil agreement between Iraq and Turkey, after 52 years since its inception. This agreement has been one of the most prominent economic understandings between the two countries. Reports indicated that President Erdogan officially signed a decision to end the crude oil pipeline agreement, originally signed between Turkey and Iraq in 1973. The decision was published in the official gazette, bearing President Erdogan's personal signature. It stipulates the official termination of the agreement effective July 27, 2026. According to the reports, the decision was published in the Turkish Official Gazette, issue (10113). It also states that all protocols and additional documents linked to this historic agreement will cease to be valid. The agreement, signed over five decades ago, aimed to ensure the export of crude oil from Iraq to Turkey's Ceyhan port. It underwent several amendments over the years, with the last extension in 2010 for an additional 15 years, a period that will naturally conclude next year. This termination decision includes all associated protocols and additional documents, posing new options for the future of Iraqi oil exports via Turkish territory. This could potentially redraw the economic relationship between Baghdad and Ankara. The Iraq-Turkey pipeline has been a strategic artery for exporting Iraqi oil to global markets and a central point in the economic ties between the two nations, especially amidst recent tensions related to legal disputes between Baghdad and Erbil, and Ankara's use of the pipeline to export northern region's oil despite the Iraqi government's objections.
