Calderdale campaigners for natural flood defences meet MPs
He said they had worked with the National Trust on the project since 2017. "Leaky woody dams, if you put them into tributaries and small streams, slow the flow of water into the larger rivers," he said. "They all serve to create that slowing effect of water into the valley bottom, which if you do it enough times, has an effect of reducing the flood risk... into our towns and villages. "The work that we've been doing at Hardcastle Crags has been really important to prove a point, and to prove that this kind of work can work."
The group travelled to Parliament last year to lobby government on natural flood defences, but are going again now there is a Labour government. They plan to tell MPs about their "key messages" which include prioritising sustainable drainage systems for sewer overflows, stopping excess water flowing into rivers and streams, increasing funding to natural flood management schemes and developing skills and expertise in environmental issues. Mr Horton said they also wanted every local authority to follow Calderdale Council's example by appointing a natural flood management officer.
Meanwhile, in Leeds work is also taking place to slow the flow of water and reduce pressure on the city's flood defences. The Aire Resilience Company (ARC) was launched last week to help deliver long-term natural flood management interventions in the Aire Valley.It is a collaboration between Leeds City Council, Yorkshire Water, the Environment Agency and the Rivers Trust as a direct response to the threat of climate change and increasing flood risk. Leeds City Council said ARC's work would complement the recently-completed £200m Leeds Flood Alleviation Scheme, which protects the city and surrounding areas from extreme flooding.Councillor Jonathan Pryor, the council's deputy leader and executive member for economy, transport, and sustainable development, said: "By supporting nature-based solutions alongside our major flood defence schemes, we are not only strengthening flood resilience but also contributing to our wider environmental and net zero ambitions."
The Environment Agency has said it is committed to reducing future flood risk to communities in Calderdale. A spokesperson said: "We have completed schemes in Mytholmroyd, Shaw Wood Road in Todmorden and most recently in Copley Village."Construction is under way in Brighouse, along with several other projects in advance stages of development such as Hebden Bridge, Wheatley in Halifax, Walsden and Back Waterloo in Todmorden."Natural flood management will play an important part in reducing flood risk in Calderdale by working in unison with traditional flood alleviation schemes."
Listen to highlights from West Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
18 minutes ago
- Reuters
CEO of UK's water regulator Ofwat to step down
LONDON, Aug 5 (Reuters) - Britain's Ofwat said on Tuesday its chief executive, David Black, would step down following a government decision last month to abolish the water regulator. In a statement, which came after Sky News first reported the story, Ofwat announced that Black has decided the "time is right to pursue new opportunities" and would step down at the end of August. An interim replacement is set to be appointed in due course, the regulator added. It comes after environment minister Steve Reed said last month he had agreed to abolish Ofwat as part of a regulatory overhaul. Britain will create a new powerful regulator for its water industry following public fury over sewage spills.
The Independent
41 minutes ago
- The Independent
Trump is like a medieval king, former UK ambassador to US says
The former UK ambassador to the US has delivered a scathing rebuke of Donald Trump, describing the President as a 'medieval King'. Lord Kim Darroch accused the American leader of turning the ' Oval Office into a reality TV set'. The former diplomat was forced to quit his role in 2019 during Mr Trump's first term after leaked briefings showed him describing the President's government as 'dysfunctional', 'inept' and 'divided'. Speaking to broadcaster Iain Dale at the Edinburgh Festival Fringe, Lord Darroch defended the letter, which he said was a result of then prime minister David Cameron urging him to be honest and direct. He told the audience in Scotland's capital that his comments were borne out by Mr Trump's actions as president. The former ambassador said Mr Trump was ultimately an unpredictable leader as he cited the numerous firings of top officials by the president, the various changes to his tariff policies and the recent move to place nuclear submarines near Russia. 'He's sort of like a medieval king – that sort of capricious decision-making – than he is like a modern politician where consistency is seen as important,' he said. 'He doesn't think that's important at all. He thinks that every day is a fresh day. You're basically battling with media. 'You're battling with your opponents. If it suits you today to reverse something you did last week, just do it. 'If you look at tariffs, that's a perfect example of unpredictability of capriciousness.' Lord Darroch suggested that Mr Trump's style stemmed from his time on the US version of The Apprentice. 'Donald Trump was made by reality TV,' he said, describing him as 'the American version of Alan Sugar'. He added: 'He learned a lot about how to present himself from reality TV. 'I think he's now literally turned the Oval Office into a reality TV set.' During his discussion with Mr Dale, the former diplomat praised the Prime Minister's handling of foreign policy, including his relationship with the US President. He told the broadcaster: 'So far, against a lot of predictions, Keir Starmer has proved himself really quite an adept Trump whisperer. 'He's done some clever things, including phoning Trump up after the assassination attempt – that was a clever thing to do, going to see him to sort of kiss the ring before the election.' The peer said the Labour leader had been better on foreign policy than domestic policy, but warned the PM there were 'not many votes in foreign policy'. Asked about defence, Lord Darroch suggested the UK would not be able to cope with a Russian invasion, although he said the chances of that were low. 'The truth is I don't think we are close,' he said. 'I do think it's less distant than it was five years ago. 'I do think the important point really is that we are woefully underprepared.' Lord Darroch has been outspoken in his criticism of Mr Trump since he was forced to quit his stateside role. Mr Trump had criticised him as as a 'stupid guy' and a 'pompous fool'.
Times
an hour ago
- Times
Revealed: Labour group's £9,500 ‘cash for access' breakfasts
The Labour government faces questions over 'cash for access' after a Times investigation found that businesses have been offered private meetings with 'an influential Labour figure' as part of sponsorship packages costing almost £9,500. Since last summer, a Labour group has been approaching companies and offering them the chance to sponsor events at which they can meet 'key policymakers' in private and 'shape the discussion'. The companies have been sent a prospectus with a list of sponsorship packages, including a deal costing £7,850 plus VAT for a 'private breakfast/dinner roundtable with an influential Labour figure'. They have also been offered the chance to pay £11,750 plus VAT for a 'parliamentary panel event with key policymakers', and between £21,500 and £30,000 plus VAT to sponsor a 'Westminster drinks reception'. The day-to-day running of the group that has been offering these deals, the Labour Infrastructure Forum (LIF), is done by lobbyists, alongside an advisory council of senior Labour figures. It says that its mission is to develop policy proposals focused on 'getting Britain building and growing again' and it was launched in September at an event with speeches from Darren Jones MP, the chief secretary to the Treasury, and Varun Chandra, a business and investment adviser to Sir Keir Starmer. Its members have included Baroness Blake of Leeds, a government whip in the House of Lords, and its advisory council includes three Labour MPs — Kirsteen Sullivan, Bill Esterson and Mike Reader — as well as Ruth Kelly, a former Labour cabinet member, and Lord McNicol of West Kilbride, who was general secretary of the Labour Party from 2011 to 2018. Although the LIF is run by lobbyists and has an advisory council of senior Labour figures, it is not itself a lobbying company or part of the Labour Party. This means that it does not have to abide by any rules for lobbying firms or political parties, and has no legal obligation to publicly disclose details of payments it has received from sponsors, or of who has attended its private events. The Times asked the LIF to disclose details of the companies that had sponsored its events, the amounts they had paid, which organisation had received the money, and which Labour figures had attended, but the group declined to share all of this information. A spokesman for the LIF said the group used sponsorship money to cover its costs and that 'any LIF activity that is supported by sponsors will be made publicly available at the time and in our annual report, as is common across the industry'. The Labour Party also did not provide details of any Labour figures who had attended private LIF events, saying that it had no connection to the group and did not endorse its activities. When the LIF was approached by undercover Times reporters, its director, Gerry McFall, who runs the group alongside his regular job as a director of the lobbying firm Bradshaw Advisory, discussed the strength of his relationships with figures in government. Speaking about his work at Bradshaw Advisory, he said that one of the firm's clients had been able to have a meeting last year with Jonathan Reynolds, the business secretary. He said the meeting, at last year's Labour Party conference, had been to discuss 'opportunities' and 'inward investment' and added that his client — a big player in the nuclear industry — had been able to meet 'all the key people in government'. However, when reporters checked ministerial records, they found that this meeting between the Bradshaw client and the business secretary had not been declared publicly. Transparency rules say that ministers' meetings during party conferences often do not need to be disclosed when they do not relate to government business. However, if these meetings held on the margins of party conferences are in an official ministerial capacity, they should be recorded and published in the normal way. Reynolds declined to comment. The Times's investigation also found that, in the run-up to Christmas, the Labour Party's events team offered lobbyists the chance to pay £15,000 plus VAT to partner with the party for winter receptions at which their staff could meet MPs. Officials emailed the companies saying that the receptions would be for 'members from the front and back benches' and that the companies' payments to the party would not have to be publicised, saying: 'This is a commercial transaction and not a gift to the party, it is not a recordable donation.' No payments for any Labour Party winter receptions in partnership with lobbyists last year have been publicly disclosed. Electoral Commission rules say that donations to central parties of more than £500 — including sponsorship payments — have to be recorded by the parties, and if they are above £11,180, they have to be declared to the commission for publication on its website. The Labour Party does not disclose these payments publicly because it deems the payments for these events to be general 'commercial partnerships' rather than sponsorship for anything specific. The law appears to allow these payments not to be considered donations — so they do not have to be disclosed to the public. A Labour Party spokesman said: 'Commercial partnerships at events are a longstanding practice and have no bearing on party or government policy. The party fully complies with all rules relating to the reporting of donations.' Under the UK's lobbying rules, lobbying firms are not compelled to publicly disclose details of their meetings with politicians. The Electoral Commission said it was assessing the evidence from The Times. There have long been concerns about the influence of paid lobbying in parliament and that it could potentially allow some businesses and individuals to have unfair influence on policy for their own commercial benefit. Lobbying can be an important part of politics when it is done transparently, allowing an individual or a group to openly try to persuade someone in parliament to support a particular policy or campaign. There are rules to govern lobbying, and they are meant to ensure that the opportunity to lobby is fair. Political parties should be transparent about the money they accept and the meetings that lobbyists have with ministers and senior officials. The lobbying watchdog, the Office of the Registrar of Consultant Lobbyists (ORCL), is meant to ensure transparency in the work of consultant lobbyists. Although businesses registered with the watchdog regularly have to publicly declare general lists of the clients they are actively lobbying for, they do not have to publicly disclose details of any of the lobbying meetings they have. The register also applies only to consultant lobbying firms, not to in-house lobbyists employed directly by companies or to other organisations such as think tanks. The ORCL said it was considering the findings and renewed calls for legal changes to force lobbyists to be more transparent with the public about their work. It has said that there are 'significant deficiencies' in the UK's lobbying laws. The LIF has made some changes since The Times started its inquiries into the group. Its website has recently been updated with a new 'sponsorship policy' page. This says that the group does not lobby for its sponsors and that 'acceptance of sponsorship of the LIF does not imply any form of endorsement of the sponsor's products or services by the LIF, or by the Labour Party'. The group's homepage used to describe it as a network including Labour policymakers, but now says that it is a 'think tank'. The LIF's website has always included print at the bottom saying that the secretariat, research and policy work for the group is supported by Bradshaw Advisory. Lady Blake ended her involvement with the LIF several months ago. After McFall's call with the undercover reporter, he emailed to say that the LIF did not do lobbying and was 'editorially independent from commercial interests'. In the days afterwards, a version of the LIF's prospectus that did not include the page detailing its sponsorship deals was removed from the internet. McFall then met undercover reporters to discuss Bradshaw Advisory's work, stressing the importance of transparency, and told them 'nobody can promise that somebody's going to meet'. A spokesman for the LIF said it was 'an independent left-leaning think tank' that did not engage in consultant lobbying and so was not required to register with the ORCL, and that this was made clear to potential sponsors. He said that the LIF was 'an independent legal entity to Bradshaw Advisory' and that its advisory council members had never received payment for their involvement with the group and had no involvement in operational or sponsorship matters. The spokesman said the group made regular changes to its website and that, like all think tanks, it sought sponsorship to cover its costs. He said the group was 'committed to transparency' about its funding, journalists had attended its launch and that the group was 'trying to boost UK growth and create well-paying jobs around the country'. Bradshaw Advisory said it was proud of the work it had done with the LIF, that it had taken appropriate legal and compliance advice before doing the work and that it had 'complied with the law and disclosure rules at all times'. It said that it registered all relevant clients in the normal legal way, including its nuclear client. A spokesman added: 'All matters of government competition and transparency disclosures are a matter for the government. It will surprise nobody that a public affairs firm assists organisations in meeting politicians and senior civil servants.'
