
Appalling moment 'callous' speeding driver in stolen Porsche kills boy, two, and runs away - as his mother remains in coma and still doesn't know her son is dead
Sharjeel Shahzad, 30, had already been banned from getting behind the wheel and was awaiting a court date for dangerous driving when he caused the death of toddler Shehbaz Singh in the Porsche Cayenne.
He also seriously injured two others in the car, and Shehbaz's mother has still not awoken from her coma, meaning she doesn't know her little boy has died.
The collision in Smethwick, West Midlands, just before 11pm on December 14 last year was captured on camera and shows how Shahzad lost control of the vehicle while navigating a bend.
Within seconds he is seen exiting the vehicle and immediately sprinting off away from the crash, without so much as a glance in the other vehicle's direction.
Wolverhampton Crown Court heard the 30-year-old, of Cooksey Lane, Great Barr, West Midlands, had been driving at speeds of up to 50mph before he overtook a vehicle on approach to a sweeping blind bend on Dartmouth Road.
As he hit the corner he lost control of the high-powered Porsche, which had false plates.
He veered onto the opposite side of the road, into a Toyota Auris being driven by Baljeet Singh, who had been out celebrating a family birthday with his wife and Shehbaz's aunt and uncle that evening.
Also in the car were Amritpal Singh, Kushpreet Kaur and their two-year-old son Shehbaz Singh.
Shehbaz, who was unrestrained in the back of the Toyota, was pronounced dead, despite efforts to save him at the scene and at Birmingham Children's Hospital.
Ms Kaur suffered severe injuries to her brain and is still in hospital. She has not been told her son has died.
The court also heard Shahzad had been due to face court on December 23 in connection with a 19-minute, 30-mile pursuit he led police on in a stolen Audi on June 10, when he reached speeds of almost 150mph as he tried to evade officers.
He was only stopped when police rammed the Audi and he tried to flee the scene but was apprehended.
He had also been arrested for a similar incident the day before on June 9 but this case was not continued.
In October 2024, Shahzad was banned from driving for six months, despite only having a provisional driving licence, for driving without due care and attention.
Jailing him for 15 years and four months for causing the death by dangerous driving of Shehbaz Singh, Judge Jonathan Gosling said the impact of the fatal collision was 'catastrophic'.
He said: 'You destroyed the lives of Amritpal Singh and Kushpreet Kaur and devastated their family and friends. You killed that little boy.'
The judge said Shahzad's 'true character is revealed' by the fact he fled after the fatal collision with no regard for the hurt he had caused.
Within seconds Shahzad is seen exiting the vehicle and immediately sprinting off away from the crash, without so much as a glance in the other vehicle's direction
He added: 'You are not only a dangerous man, you are callous and cowardly.'
Shahzad was given sentences of 15 months for dangerous driving on June 10, three years each for two counts of causing serious injury by dangerous driving and four months for driving while disqualified, all of which will run concurrently.
While there was no evidence Shahzad was the one who stole the Porsche, by the time of the collision, it had false registration plates on which his fingerprint was found.
Judge Gosling said Shahzad had 'completely disregarded the consequences' of his actions when he fled the scene, adding: 'His only interest was to disappear. He was arrested two days later and denied being in the Porsche at the time.
'He complained he was being compelled to drive this way by men he feared. No one compelled him to drive like that.
'He ran from the car knowing he must, at the very least, have caused very serious injury to those in the Toyota.'
Defending Shahzad, Nicholas Berry told the court the defendant's life had 'spiralled in the most reckless manner' in the lead-up to the collision as his long-term relationship had ended and he had lost work.
He had written a letter to the judge expressing his remorse for what happened.
He pleaded guilty to the charges he faced at a hearing on April 11.
Judge Gosling also made Shahzad, who sat in the dock wearing a grey tracksuit and showed no emotion, subject to a three-year extended licence and banned him from driving for eight years upon his release.
He must also take an extended driving test before he is allowed to drive.
The judge recognised the efforts of two people who tried to help those in the Toyota and called out to Shahzad to stop as he fled by awarding them £500 each.
In a heartbreaking statement on a GoFundMe page to raise money for Shezbah's funeral, Mr Singh's brother wrote: 'My brother and his wife are the nicest people you could meet.
'They've always put others before themselves and are incredibly hardworking and dedicated to making a better life for themselves and their two-year-old son.
'Now, in the blink of an eye, the family has been devastated with the death of two-year-old Shehbaz.
'His mum, Khushpreet, remains in critical care in hospital. She is so ill she doesn't yet know of Shehbaz's death.
'It was just earlier this month we were celebrating Shehbaz's second birthday and now we are having to plan his funeral.
'We don't know if Shehbaz's mum, Khushpreet, will be able to attend the funeral as she is still sedated in critical care and very very ill.'
Detective Sergeant Paul Hughes from our serious collision investigation unit, said: 'Shehbaz lost his life at just two years old, due to the erratic and selfish driving of Shahzad.
'Knowing he caused a serious collision, instead of staying to help, Shahzad ran away from the devastation he caused.
'However, thanks to the combination of forensics and CCTV enquires we were able to quickly identify Shahzad as the driver.
'Shahzad will now face many years behind bars, which hopefully provide some sort of closure to Shehbaz's family.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
21 minutes ago
- BBC News
Cap on payouts for miscarriage of justice victims to increase
The government has increased the cap on payouts to victims of miscarriages of justice to ensure they are compensated for "the years they cannot get back".The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) said the maximum amount will be raised in England and Wales for the first time since 2008, from £1m to £ Malkinson, who had his conviction quashed in 2023 after spending 17 years in prison for a rape he did not commit, previously described the cap as "ridiculous".Reacting to the uplift, legal charity Appeal, which represented Mr Malkinson in challenging his wrongful conviction, argued the increase "falls far short of matching inflation". On Tuesday, the government said that the cap would be raised by 30%. This would bring the limit on compensation for people who have been in jail for 10 years or more to £1.3m, and £650,000 for up to a a statement, the MoJ said the increase would create "a fairer and better justice system".Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood said: "Fairness is the ideal that underpins our justice system. Where it has failed to meet that ideal, victims of devastating miscarriages of justice must be able to rebuild their lives."This uplift will ensure victims are compensated for the crimes they did not commit and the years they cannot get back."Once eligible, the level of compensation will be decided by an independent assessor. In a statement, investigator James Burley, who led Appeal's investigation into Mr Malkinson's case, said: "This is a step forward, but the increase falls far short of matching inflation since the cap's introduction in 2008."Wrongful conviction survivors like Andrew Malkinson have endured unimaginable pain. The compensation they receive to rebuild their lives should reflect that reality, not be limited by an arbitrary cap."


The Independent
21 minutes ago
- The Independent
Money laundering accused would-be politician to face trial in 2027
A lawyer and would-be politician accused of helping a group launder millions in cash is facing a two-year wait for trial. Akhmed Yakoob, 37, who ran against Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood in the 2024 election, is known for his popular legal videos on TikTok. The solicitor, who stood as an independent for the West Midlands mayoral election and the general election, is accused of assisting people 'that wanted help to launder cash of millions of pounds'. Yakoob, of Aldridge in Walsall, and accountant Nabeel Afzal, 38, from Birmingham, have already denied money laundering, encouraging money laundering and contravening a requirement to apply customer due diligence measures when establishing a business relationship between February 18, 2020 and January 8, 2021. If convicted, they could be jailed for up to 14 years. The pair appeared at Southwark Crown Court on Tuesday, where Yakoob wore patterned trousers and a waistcoat with tinted glasses in the dock. A number of supporters were in the public gallery to watch the short hearing. Yakoob stood in Ms Mahmood's Birmingham Ladywood constituency in last year's general election, coming second with 12,137 votes compared to her 15,558. He came third in the West Midlands mayoral election with 69,621 votes. As a solicitor he represented two brothers who were involved in an incident involving Greater Manchester Police officers at Manchester Airport in July 2024. A trial date was set for August 23, 2027.


The Independent
22 minutes ago
- The Independent
Teenager ‘grinned' before stabbing man in heart with Rambo knife, trial told
A balaclava-clad teenager who had an 'unhealthy interest' in knives grinned before fatally stabbing an 18-year-old man through the heart with a Rambo-style knife, a murder trial has heard. Jurors at Derby Crown Court heard that Charles Hartle, who was aged 17 at the time, allegedly carried out an 'utterly pointless killing' when he attacked Noah Smedley on a dark street in Ilkeston, Derbyshire, on the evening of December 28 last year with the knife he kept hidden in his tracksuit bottoms. The defendant, now aged 18, sat in the dock on Tuesday wearing glasses, a black jacket and white shirt while Adrian Langdale KC opened the prosecution case. Mr Langdale told the jury of seven women and five men: 'On December 28 2024 you will have been getting over Christmas and preparing for the new year – Charles Hartle was going out on the streets armed with a knife. 'He moved towards Noah, he grinned or smiled before deliberately aiming for and stabbing him in the chest. 'There is no dispute that this lethal weapon was in the hands of that young man Charlie Hartle. 'Noah Smedley, the Crown will say, did absolutely nothing wrong, he did nothing to deserve what happened to him. He wasn't himself armed… he did not offer any violence. 'The Crown will say it was an utterly pointless killing other than this defendant's unhealthy interest with knives and the fact he was, the Crown will say, a habitual carrier of knives. 'You will hear that the defendant was planning on meeting up with three of his friends who would later witness, and be feet away from, the murder.' The court was told that Hartle and his friends arranged to meet Mr Smedley who arrived at the scene on an electric scooter and sold them cannabis before the fatal attack. Mr Langdale continued: 'It was agreed to meet him at a bus stop on Heanor Road, Ilkeston, and so the defendant and his three mates are captured on CCTV shortly after 8pm going to meet the deceased. 'This defendant deliberately hangs back at the back of the group, whilst the others are chatting with Noah and he gives them the cannabis. 'All seemingly, in these matters of seconds, are in good spirits – there is no animosity. 'This defendant will pull his balaclava down over his face, he moves forward in the group to get closer to Noah and reaches into the back of his tracksuit. 'Hartle immediately takes one stride forward and in the same motion thrusts the knife forward and through Noah's heart.' The jury heard that Hartle and his friends ran from the scene leaving Mr Smedley 'staggering and bleeding profusely'. The knife penetrated the right ventricle of Mr Smedley's heart and his left lung causing internal bleeding and his lung to collapse, the prosecutor said. Mr Langdale told the court: 'The defendant raises the idea of self-defence claiming to the police he had recently been threatened by others with knives. As a result of that he decided to take this knife out. 'The Crown say this is an entirely false account, instead it was the defendant who routinely carried a Rambo knife… and did so for the kudos and bravado.' The prosecutor said Hartle carried the weapon to show others he was a 'big man'. Jurors heard the defendant, of Station Road in Stanley, Derbyshire, pleaded guilty to possessing a bladed article in a public place but denies murder. CCTV of the group was shown to the jury, including the moment Mr Smedley was fatally stabbed with a knife described to be 'eight to nine inches' long. The trial, which is expected to last two weeks, continues.