What we know about claim DOGE stopped payments to children whose parents died
Kaufmann said (at 44:10):
As an example, DOGE claims to have found Social Security loans going to 11-year-olds and under. Not! SBA is not a loan, it's a survivor benefit annuity to young children whose parents have passed. That's the problem with IT programmers and billionaires without a clue doing jobs they don't understand. You can't find what you don't know.
Kaufmann's claim spread across Facebook (archived), X (archived), Threads (archived), Reddit (archived) and Bluesky (archived).
However, it was unclear how Kaufmann backed his claim about the confusion over the two different SBAs. While it is almost certain from his wording that he was referring to DOGE's SBA loan announcement on March 9, the claim of the funding belonging to the survivor benefit annuity — a benefit paid to eligible spouses, or sometimes children, of federal retirees — clashes with what federal officials have said.
The Small Business Administration confirmed the existence of more than "5,500 loans, totaling about $312M" to businesses "whose only listed owner was 11 years old or younger" on March 12 — 10 days before Kaufmann's claim. DOGE had said it was working with the SBA to "solve this problem."
We have reached out to Kaufmann and the SBA to further understand the claim and await their replies.
A survivor benefit annuity is a benefit available to federal employees under the Civil Service Retirement System and the Federal Employees Retirement System. The benefit is normally paid to surviving spouses or ex-spouses, but according to the Office of Personnel Management (OPM), the federal government's central human-resources agency, children can be eligible if they are dependent on the retiree who chose the benefit. "Dependent" in this context means that the deceased "made regular and substantial contributions to the child's support."
We reached out to the OPM, which manages the federal retirement plans, to ask how much money it paid to children 11 or younger under this benefit in 2020-21, when DOGE said the loans were paid out, and await a reply.
Meanwhile, the details surrounding the loans allegedly discovered by DOGE remained unclear. The @DOGE or @DOGE_SBA X accounts, the former of which is generally used for DOGE's public communications, had not posted more information at the time of this writing. The SBA had not provided further details about the loans at the time of this writing.
acyn.bsky.social. "Kaufmann: DOGE Claims to Have Found Social Security Loans Going to 11 Year Olds and Under. ." Bluesky, 22 Mar. 2025, https://bsky.app/profile/acyn.bsky.social/post/3lkxzs7p6us2e.
An Autistic Witch. Learning witchcraft at every level. "Automatically Assuming SBA Payments Means 'Small Business Association' Loans and Not 'Survivor Benefits Annuity'." Facebook, 24 Mar. 2025, https://www.facebook.com/anautisticwitch/posts/pfbid02iEMqTZWR2a3EYXK94YQF1g2eFjmwHqr4eAYwtdWtfhnzodHE6cmxR84K3ehjkUzPl.
@Clobean4. "Kaufmann - "DOGE Claims to Have Found Social Security Loans Going to 11 Year Olds and Under." X, 24 Mar. 2025, https://x.com/Clobean4/status/1904245670728589468.
@DOGE. "In 2020-2021, SBA Granted 5,593 Loans for $312M to Borrowers Whose Only Listed Owner Was 11 Years Old or Younger at the Time of the Loan." X, 9 Mar. 2025, https://x.com/DOGE/status/1898587143796338826.
FEBA. "Understanding Your Federal Employee Benefits | What Is a Survivor Benefit Annuity?" FEBA, 10 Aug. 2023, https://www.myfeba.org/understanding-your-federal-employee-benefits-what-is-a-survivor-benefit-annuity/.
Give A Shift About Nature. "DOGE Claims to Have Found Social Security Loans Going to 11-Year-Olds and Under. ." Facebook, 23 Mar. 2025, https://www.facebook.com/giveashiftnature/posts/pfbid02ngeDE76WTnCg7Aruq6LEtbumLvMWd6S8njLd1fhyrfQJGua3vhwMo1qYuMMAqiD5l.
"Learn More about Survivor Benefits and Retirement." U.S. Office of Personnel Management, https://www.opm.gov/support/retirement/faq/survivor-benefits/. Accessed 25 Mar. 2025.
@seedanesti. "Elon Musk Told Millions of People That 8 and 11 Year Old Children Were Receiving Business Loans from Social Security." Threads, 20 Mar. 2025, https://www.threads.net/@seedanesti/post/DHbhY_GS_eA.
Social Security Works. "Hands Off Social Security." Facebook, 22 Mar. 2025, https://www.facebook.com/watch/live/?ref=watch_permalink&v=1273688310365508.
u/RoyalChris. "Kaufmann - ' 'DOGE Claims to Have Found Social Security Loans Going to 11 Year Olds and Under." Reddit, 22 Mar. 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/Fauxmoi/comments/1jhcekz/kaufmann_doge_claims_to_have_found_social/.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
3 Expat Havens Where Retirees' Social Security Checks Go a Long Way
Retirees living on a fixed income of Social Security are feeling the pinch—and they're turning to alternative ways to make their dollar stretch further, with many overseas for a different quality of life. Retired workers will collect an average Social Security check of $2,005.05 as of June 2025, according to the Social Security Administration. If this is your only retirement savings, you might read that number and panic. After all, the average mortgage payment in the country is currently $2,186, according to the Mortgage Bankers Association. The median asking rent, according to the latest rental report from in the 50 largest metros registered at $1,711—but it still doesn't mean there would be much left over for other basics such as food, clothing, transportation, home maintenance, insurance, pets and children, and more. The average retired American household spends around $5,000 a month just to live, according to the Federal Reserve's 2023 consumer expenditure survey. 'That's quite the shortfall,' writes Kathleen Peddicord, founder of Live and Invest Overseas, in Forbes. It's no wonder that Americans are increasingly looking abroad for retirement. Not only is the contentious political environment driving people away, but there are many places where that Social Security check will buy you a lot more. 'There are many retirement havens where you can live well on a budget of $2,000 a month or less,' writes Peddicord. What you should know Before you plunk down your credit card for the next flight out of Dodge, remember you will need a visa to legally reside in your chosen country. Retiree visas usually require proving a minimum monthly income (amounts vary by country) and that you carry health insurance. Many countries also require you to prove that you have a place to live and have a clean criminal history. Talk to an immigration attorney or relocation expert, and always check the country's website for current requirements. Also, know that other countries aren't necessarily going to be 'America but better.' They will all have their own customs, cultures, languages, and laws—ones you might be utterly unfamiliar with and perhaps slow to adapt to. 'If you are stuck in your ways and not very tolerant of change, expat life will not work out for you,' warns Cynthia Staton, who relocated from Las Vegas to Cuenca, Ecuador, with her husband, Edd, in search of a cheaper retirement. 'You've got to be really flexible, really patient,' she says. But if that sounds up your alley, here are three expat havens where your Social Security check will go much further. Phuket, Thailand Retiree visa: Non-Immigrant O-A Minimum monthly income: About $2,000 If you like tropical climes, turquoise waters, colorful architecture, and grand palaces, Thailand could be the place for you. That all sounds great, you might be thinking, but what about extreme weather events? It was only 20 years ago that a massive tsunami engulfed Phuket and killed 117 people, with an additional 214 missing, according to the Asian Disaster Reduction Center. Immigration attorney Jean-Francois Harvey, of Harvey Law Group, is bullish on Phuket. He points out that the tsunami, devastating though it was, affected only a small portion of the island, and that it has been rebuilt with much more resiliency in mind. 'Thailand has been dealing with extreme weather forever,' he tells Thailand has about 50,000 Americans living there, says Aaron Henry, owner of Bangkok marketing firm He's lived in the country for nine years, emigrating from Los Angeles. 'For most of us, moving to Thailand is a one-way trip,' he says. He lives in Bangkok but travels frequently to Phuket for business and leisure. Henry agrees that $2,000 would stretch further in Phuket, Thailand's biggest island, than in the U.S. but has some caveats. A $2,000 monthly budget 'is a bit of a lean,' he says, 'even for a single person who is living in Phuket or Bangkok and wanting a lifestyle comparable to the USA.' Phuket rents are slightly lower than $1,000 for a small condo, plus $150 in utilities, he adds. Then there's getting around town. 'Phuket doesn't have cheap, excellent public transportation like Bangkok does with the sky train and subway, and taxis there are expensive. You'll need a car or motorbike.' He says that a budget of $3,000 a month would allow you to live comfortably, but it doesn't factor in travel or other large expenses. If you want to live even cheaper, he suggests areas outside of Phuket, including lesser known cities of Khon Kaen and Buri Ram. There will be fewer expats here—which you might or might not welcome. Keep in mind that foreigners can't own land in Thailand, only a condo or portable house. Henry believes the country is superior than the U.S. in many ways besides affordability. He calls the food 'better than New York, Paris, or London.' Health care, as in most countries, is more affordable than the U.S. But Henry asserts it is also of higher quality. 'When you go to a doctor, you sense you are being taken care of, not exploited,' he says. In fact, he ranks everything from nightlife to public transport to culture to safety higher than what he experienced in the U.S. and says there is 'nothing' he misses about L.A. But before you pack your bags and catch the next flight to Phuket, he has a warning. 'Phuket can be paradise,' he says. 'But, as living long term or permanently in any other country requires, be prepared to check your preconceptions at the door. Think about what you can contribute as an outsider, not what you can take. 'Don't go seeking a place with better versions of what you're unhappy about at home—those expectations aren't likely to be perfectly met.' Mendoza, Argentina Retiree visa: Pensionado visa Minimum income requirement: About $2,000 Argentina, Mendoza, 'is a good choice for active retirees who aren't ready to sit back and rock on the front porch,' writes Peddicord. If wine is your jam, this is one place you don't want to overlook, as it is located in the middle of Argentina's wine country. Despite being a desert clime, Argentina has an ancient system of canals that distribute snowmelt from the mountains, creating spectacularly rich soil and vineyards, she says. 'Great wine, thick steaks, dramatic landscapes, brilliant weather, friendly people who enjoy nothing better than sitting around an open fire drinking the fruit of their vines, sharing their asado, and indulging in the lost art of conversation,' writes Peddicord on her website. She calls Mendoza 'the good life defined.' Additionally, the country is known for its temperate climate, vibrant culture, and spectacular geographical diversity, from jungles to arid climates to beaches. It also has the modern conveniences of Buenos Aires and other cities. And for those living on that $2,000 Social Security check, Mendoza might be the place. 'A monthly budget of $2,000 would see you living well here,' says Peddicord. Rent for a semifurnished two-bedroom apartment ranges from $400 to $1,000 per month. 'Catch a bus for 50 cents and dine out for $25,' she says. Minus rent, the average single person's expenses in this South American country are about $700 a month, according to citizenship solutions firm Golden Harbors. And you really can't beat the price of the country's health care system—over 60% of medical services are free for everyone, including expats. Santa Marta, Colombia Retiree visa: Migrant (Type M) Minimum income requirement: About $1,000 'Santa Marta is an under-the-radar gem popular with well-heeled, in-the-know Colombians who vacation here for reasons including its affordability, great climate, soft golden sands, and warm Caribbean waters,' says Peddicord. Ranked No. 3 in Live and Invest Overseas' list of the Best Places to Retire in 2025, Colombia has one of the lowest income requirements for retirees, with a basic requirement of only about $1,000 per month. 'Colombia is one of the easiest places we know to establish residency,' Peddicord writes on her blog. While Santa Marta has plenty of history, being one of the country's oldest colonial cities, it also has many new developments, including a seafront park, and plenty of cafes, bars and restaurants, and a large cruise ship port. However, Peddicord cautions that there isn't as much English spoken here as in other parts of the country, so be prepared to brush up on your high school Spanish. A 90-minute flight to the capital of Bogotá means you can hop back to the States relatively easily. A nonstop flight to New York is six hours. Related Articles Single-Family Home Construction Dips as Builders Admit Making Price Cuts To Spur Sales Paying Rent on Time Could Now Help You Get a Mortgage After Key Change at Fannie and Freddie What a Fed Chair Firing Could Mean for the Housing Market Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Trump admin: Social Security policy set for mid-August now optional
(NewsNation) — The Trump administration has clarified that a change to the Social Security Administration's phone policy is optional. The new policy, which had a start date of Aug. 18, would have required millions of Social Security recipients to travel to field offices for routine account updates and have to go online to get a security authentication PIN. AARP sent a letter to SSA Commissioner Frank Bisignano on Tuesday, saying that the change would create an obstacle for seniors, people with disabilities and those who lack access to a computer or internet. About 3.4 million more people would have been forced to go to a field office, which has recently seen staffing cuts. 85% of parents worry about tariffs affecting back-to-school cost: Survey The SSA later said that any Social Security beneficiaries and account holders aren't required to visit a field office if they choose not to use the authentication PIN, according to Axios. Some Social Security offices had plans to close this year due to federal spending cuts made by the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). SSA later said the offices would not close permanently, but only from a 'time to time basis' due to weather, damage or 'facilities issues.' More than 68 million people throughout the U.S. receive Social Security benefits, and more people are starting to rely heavily on the monthly payments. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
The Hill
6 hours ago
- The Hill
Trump's plan for White House ballroom sparks outrage from his critics
President Trump's plans to add a massive $200 million ballroom to the White House is angering critics, who see him moving forward with the long-sought project as part of his desire to leave a lasting mark not only on the office of the presidency but the first house as well. The construction of the ballroom, the cost of which the White House says will be covered by Trump and other donors, will begin in September. Trump is also paving the White House Rose Garden (though the rose bushes will be saved), which the White House says is necessary so people can walk more easily for events held in the space. And he's added his personal gold touch to the Oval Office. Trump says he sees the ballroom as a way to add to his legacy. And while detractors say his decorative and more substantial changes are out of touch and ostentatious, he says they are necessary. 'I always said I was going to do something about the ballroom because they should have one,' he told reporters Thursday. 'So we'll be leaving it, it will be a great legacy project. And, I think it will be special.' When asked if any government funds will be used to construct the 90,000 square foot facility, Trump replied, 'no government dollars, no.' The White House said the sprawling event space will be built adjacent to the White House where the East Wing sits. The goal is to complete construction before the end of Trump's term in January 2029. Trump's vision is for a space where he and future presidents can host state dinners, large gatherings with business leaders and other ritzy parties or functions. 'We've been planning it for a long time,' Trump said. 'They've wanted a ballroom at the White House for more than 150 years. There's never been a president that was good at ballrooms. I'm really good.' Democrats and regular Trump critics offered a sharp pushback on his plans. 'This is what DOGE was all about, folks,' Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) said in a video posted to social media hours after the White House announcement, referring to the president's Department of Government Efficiency. 'Cutting things from you, and giving it not to some place that needed it, giving it to the big shots who run the show, Donald Trump at the top of the list.' Others suggested Trump and his White House were planting an intentional distraction. 'You gotta hand it to MAGAs, for about a week they really did have everyone convinced they cared about kids and The Epstein Files,' journalist and pundit Seth Abramson wrote on social platform X. 'On to more important things! Did you hear Trump is building a $200M ballroom at the White House? Wowee!' The White House pushed back on those criticisms in a Friday statement to The Hill, saying 'as President Trump has said, for over 150 years, many presidents, administrations, and staff have all wanted a ballroom, and now we have a president who will accomplish building it.' 'President Trump is the best builder and developer in the entire world and the American people can rest well knowing that this project is in his hands,' a West Wing spokesperson said. 'Many future presidents and American citizens will enjoy it for generations to come.' The president, a longtime real estate mogul who is known for a hands-on approach in the design and construction of his resorts, golf courses and skyscraper office buildings, has long lamented the lack of sufficient event space at the White House. 'When it rains it's a disaster, and the tent's 100 yards, that's more than a football field away from the main entrance,' Trump said as part of his remarks to the press about the project. 'And people are shlopping down to the tent; it's not a pretty sight. The women with their lovely evening gowns, their hair all done, and they're a mess by the time they get [there].' There is longstanding precedent for presidents and first ladies putting their spin on the White House and its grounds. President Harry Truman oversaw a massive renovation from 1948 to 1952 that required he and his wife to move into the Blair House at the time and saw the White House completely gutted. Former first lady Jackie Kennedy, however, championed the historic preservation of the home and advocated that extreme renovations require oversight from the Committee for the Preservation of the White House. 'Every president and first family does make a mark on the White House — they already are a part of history and that snapshot in time,' said Anita McBride, former chief of staff to then-first lady Laura Bush. 'Since the cornerstone was laid, there have been additions, there have been changes that, at the time those happened, raised concerns.' The White House Historical Association welcomed Trump's planned ballroom. 'The history of the White House has evolved over 233 years since the cornerstone was laid in 1792. The South Portico, the North Portico, the East Wing, the West Wing, and the Truman Balcony all raised concerns at the time — but today, we can't imagine the White House without these iconic elements,' Stewart D. McLaurin, president of the association, told The Hill. He added, 'Since our founding by First Lady Jacqueline Kennedy in 1961, we have supported and partnered with every president and first lady caring for and adding to the White House and its Collection. We work to preserve the history of this remarkable museum, home, and office for generations to come.' Some agree with the president that a bigger events space at the White House is long overdue. 'I can understand why someone who thinks on a grand scale, as obviously President Trump does, would want this ballroom added,' said Barbara Perry, a presidential historian and co-chair of the Presidential Oral History Program at the University of Virginia's Miller Center. 'That being said, the optics for people who disagree with this president, it will probably have an impact on how they view this.' McBride agreed that the tents on the lawn, which have been constructed during more recent administrations, are not ideal. 'That doesn't come without challenges, putting up staging, putting up a covered structure, getting people to the actual location; dealing with inclement weather. And you're not really having your event in the White House,' she said. 'So you can see where that makes sense.' There are lingering questions about what the new ballroom location will mean for the staffers who work in the East Wing, which is where first lady's staff works. The East Wing is also where tours of the White House for the public are conducted. 'Betty Ford always called the East Wing the 'heart' of the White House,' McBride said. 'All the business and policy gets done in the West Wing, that's critically important. But the heart of the White House is the East Wing. And so what, what will be the new East Wing?' Others see the construction of an opulent addition to the president's residence as a matter of bad timing and poor optics given sluggish jobs reports and fears about how global tariffs might hurt the U.S. economy. 'This isn't something that's going to make or break another election, but it does add another page to the catalog of hypocrisy that these people read from when they want to lecture Americans about fiscal responsibility,' said Antjuan Seawright, a Democratic political strategist. 'It's a visible middle finger to working class Americans, many of whom voted for him.'
