logo
How Trump's Near-Assassination Was Downplayed and Memory-Holed in the Media

How Trump's Near-Assassination Was Downplayed and Memory-Holed in the Media

Newsweek12-07-2025
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
A year after the attempted assassination of Donald Trump at a campaign rally in Butler, Pennsylvania, some political commentators are arguing the incident was minimized by the media, while marveling at how quickly the near-murder of the former and future American president has faded from public consciousness.
On the eve of the 2024 Republican National Convention, a gunman opened fire on Trump from a rooftop near the Butler fairgrounds, grazing Trump's ear, killing a local firefighter, Corey Comperatore, and injuring two others. While the attack could have been a galvanizing national moment, some media critics say it was instead overshadowed by election coverage, partisan concerns, and editorial decisions meant to avoid amplifying Trump's near-death experience.
This week, Veteran political journalist Mark Halperin, on his Next Up podcast, called the muted response "one of the best ways to understand what we're still going through as a country."
In a conversation with Journalist Salena Zito, ahead of the release of her book 'Butler: The Untold Story of the Near Assassination of Donald Trump and the Fight for America's Heartland,' Halperin highlighted what he saw as a stark disconnect between how the media treated Trump's shooting and how it might have covered similar attacks on Democratic leaders.
This aerial photo of the Butler Farm Show, site of the Saturday, July 13, 2024 Trump campaign rally, shown Monday, July 15, 2024 in Butler, Pa.
This aerial photo of the Butler Farm Show, site of the Saturday, July 13, 2024 Trump campaign rally, shown Monday, July 15, 2024 in Butler, Pa.
AP Photo/Gene J. Puskar
"The left, the people who do not like Donald Trump, did not treat his attempted assassination the way they would have if it had been Barack Obama or Joe Biden," Halperin said, describing what he saw as an "extraordinary failure" to confront the shooter's motive or scrutinize the security breakdown.
Footage and investigations have since raised more questions about how the would-be assassin, Thomas Crooks, was able to position himself with a clear line of sight toward the presumptive Republican candidate for president. But as a cascade of security failures have come to light, public attention has waned.
Conservative commentator Drew Holden wrote in The Spectator that the effort to downplay the shooting "started moments after the shots rang out," with networks using vague language like "loud noises" and "popping sounds" to describe the scene — even after the Associated Press confirmed Trump had indeed been hit by live fire.
Holden noted that within weeks, coverage in major outlets dropped off dramatically, comparing it unfavorably to the media's treatment of the January 6 Capitol riot.
"Just a couple of months before the 2024 election, I think the press was afraid of adding fuel to the Trump campaign, especially since some polling at the time showed the assassination attempt had boosted his popularity," Holden told Newsweek about his findings.
'Abandoned Coverage'
Halperin and Holden have both sharply criticized the way media outlets covered — and then quickly abandoned — the story of Trump's near-assassination, framing it as a revealing moment about U.S. politics and journalism.
On his podcast, Halperin argued that the muted response reflected deep-seated hostility to Trump from mainstream institutions, which failed to interrogate the story the way they would have if the target were a Democrat. He cited examples of commentators and anchors — including Martha Raddatz of ABC News and Margaret Brennan of CBS News — who quickly pivoted to blaming Trump's own rhetoric rather than focusing on the attack itself.
'Can you imagine that? Someone tries to kill the president, former president, front runner, and between the government and the media, it is an absolute mystery…'@markhalperin reflects back on how the media and the Left blamed TRUMP for Butler assassination attempt – and… pic.twitter.com/Ky9uvJClpi — Next Up with Mark Halperin (@NextUpHalperin) July 8, 2025
"You see in the immediate aftermath of the near-death of Donald Trump, people wanting to hold him accountable for his own near murder. It's kind of incredible," Halperin said.
He also criticized commentators who cast doubt on the seriousness of Trump's injuries, including MSNBC's Michael Steele, the former Republican operative turned fierce Trump critic who speculated on-air whether the ear wound was caused by glass instead of a bullet.
JUST IN - YOUR REACTION: Former RNC Chair Michael Steele Demands Answers, Says, 'If Trump Was Shot with a High-Caliber Bullet, There Should Be Very Little Ear There,' Asks, 'Where is the Medical Report from the Hospital or Campaign?' Suggests a Cover-Up. WATCH pic.twitter.com/n6yjMXPa90 — Simon Ateba (@simonateba) July 17, 2024
"Even a week after he'd been shot and the doctors had spoken out, you heard all this skepticism from the left," Halperin noted.
Holden highlighted the media's coverage of the shooting in a detailed X thread, posting screenshots of early headlines from USA Today, NBC News, CNN and the Los Angeles Times that downplayed the attack as "popping noises" or an "incident."
He also pointed out that some in the media, including Joy Reid, formerly of MSNBC, and Raddatz of ABC, blamed Trump's own rhetoric for the shooting, even in the hours immediately afterward. It was a trend that, as Holden noted, continued even after the second attempt on Trump's life was thwarted last September.
Joy Reid of MSNBC is now suggesting that Donald Trump was never hit by a bullet, and that his campaign and the Secret Service colluded to kill two people in a fake assassination attempt just so Trump could have a photo op.
Outrageous. Insane. Defamatory.
NBC must take Reid off… pic.twitter.com/OLXz08fbE9 — Charlie Kirk (@charliekirk11) July 18, 2024
ABC's Martha Raddatz's seething hate is all apparent in her haggard face.
Here she is blaming Trump for the assassination attempt on his life using the 'bloodbath' hoax.
pic.twitter.com/HfItBcZcCT — John Ocasio-Rodham Nolte (@NolteNC) July 14, 2024
NBC's Lester Holt: "Today's apparent assassination attempt comes amid increasingly fierce rhetoric on the campaign trail. Mr. Trump, his running mate JD Vance continue to make baseless claims about Haitian immigrants" in Springfield, Ohio, resulting in bomb threats. pic.twitter.com/apw9WQ1liR — Curtis Houck (@CurtisHouck) September 15, 2024
On X, Holden highlighted coverage from networks like CBS, which questioned whether Trump "really needed all that bandaging on his ear" when he spoke days later at the Republican National Convention to formally accept the party's nomination.
Trump didn't require stitches on his ear because it was a scratch, not a gaping bullet wound.
So the wad of gauze was slapped on his ear for dramatic effect, as suspected. pic.twitter.com/17eKxvfFEG — Christopher Webb (@cwebbonline) July 20, 2024
Coverage in the print press also quickly dwindled, despite a flood of questions about Crooks' motives and background and the security failures on behalf of Secret Service and local law enforcement. Holden pointed to New Yorker columnist Jay Caspian Kang, who observed that just three days after the shooting "there were no stories about the shooting in the top slots on the websites of the New York Times, the Washington Post, or the Wall Street Journal."
By late August, he said, the coverage had all but ceased.
"The shooting happened less than a month after Biden stepped aside as the nominee following his disastrous debate performance. The last thing the press wanted was to make that worse," Holden told Newsweek.
The Butler assassination attempt came in the midst of a summer that many commentators across the political spectrum have acknowledged as the wildest few weeks in modern American politics. In the days that followed, Trump picked his running mate, JD Vance, while President Joe Biden — already reeling from the fallout from his debate performance weeks earlier — announced he was stepping aside as the Democratic nominee and endorsed his running mate to lead the ticket.
Trump would be reelected 15 weeks later.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

I Asked ChatGPT To Explain Trump's ‘Big Beautiful Bill' To Me Like I'm 12 — Here's What It Said
I Asked ChatGPT To Explain Trump's ‘Big Beautiful Bill' To Me Like I'm 12 — Here's What It Said

Yahoo

time11 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

I Asked ChatGPT To Explain Trump's ‘Big Beautiful Bill' To Me Like I'm 12 — Here's What It Said

I'm no stranger to sweeping legislation. I have 30 years of combined experience covering politics and state government, advocating for healthcare and education nonprofits, and negotiating policy from both sides of the table. Discover More: Try This: However, when President Donald Trump unveiled his 'Big Beautiful Bill,' even I had to pause. What exactly is in it? What's at stake for everyday people now and in the future? I asked ChatGPT to cut through the noise and condense sprawling policy documents to provide me with a clear, emotionally neutral summary. In other words, I asked ChatGPT to explain it in a way that I would understand, as if I were a 12-year-old. Here's what it said. It's All In the Branding There's no official legislation called the 'Big Beautiful Bill.' According to ChatGPT, it's a branding phrase Trump used to signal his agenda. It includes tax cuts, deep rollbacks, and restructuring of social safety nets, carrying significant implications for energy, education, and public debt. Read Now: What Does It Mean for Average Americans? One of my first questions while reviewing any public policy, including Trump's budget bill, is how it would affect regular citizens. Same with ChatGPT. I asked how Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' would affect average Americans. It said that workers could see slightly larger paychecks if payroll taxes are reduced. However, there's a catch. 'Those same payroll taxes fund programs like Social Security and Medicare, and without a replacement funding mechanism, the long-term stability of those benefits could be in jeopardy,' ChatGPT said. 'We've seen versions of this play out before: short-term relief, long-term risk.' Healthcare on the Chopping Block For those who rely on the Affordable Care Act, it could bring significant disruption. According to ChatGPT, 'Trump has repeatedly signaled interest in dismantling parts of the ACA. That could mean higher premiums, fewer protections for people with preexisting conditions, and a market-wide ripple effect for anyone who buys insurance independently or through the exchanges.' While the bill doesn't eliminate the ACA outright, it lays the groundwork for targeted rollbacks that could weaken coverage and affordability. For millions of Americans, especially gig workers, freelancers, and early retirees, this isn't just a policy; it's a potential threat to their health and finances. Student Debt Relief Could Disappear Tucked into the Big Beautiful Bill are provisions that would unwind key aspects of the Biden administration's student debt relief efforts. While not framed explicitly as an attack on borrowers, the bill signals a sharp policy reversal, one that could shut down or restrict forgiveness programs and income-driven repayment options. According to ChatGPT, 'If you have student loans or are counting on forgiveness programs, they could disappear overnight. The bill includes a rollback of debt relief efforts and the potential return of higher interest rates for federal loans. And if you're a parent planning for college, the financial aid landscape could shift beneath your feet.' Social Security Is Fine Until It Isn't While the Big Beautiful Bill doesn't explicitly cut Social Security, its structural changes to payroll taxes and entitlement spending raise serious questions about long-term funding. By lowering or eliminating certain employer-employee tax obligations, the bill could weaken the primary revenue stream that supports Social Security's solvency. ChatGPT explained: 'Reducing payroll taxes without a clear replacement funding mechanism puts pressure on programs like Social Security and Medicare. Even if benefits aren't cut immediately, the financial sustainability of those programs becomes more fragile.' For retirees and future beneficiaries alike, this isn't just theoretical. A weakened Social Security trust fund could lead to delayed payments, reduced benefits, or increased retirement age, all of which disproportionately affect low-income earners and workers with physically demanding jobs. The Real Power Play From an AI and systems-thinking perspective, the 'Big Beautiful Bill' revealed something deeper: it's not just about the policies; it's about who benefits from speed and opacity. According to ChatGPT: 'Wealthy donors and corporate lobbyists can plan for these changes before they hit. They have access, leverage, and legal teams. The average worker? They're just trying to make rent and keep the lights on.' With a degree of self-awareness, ChatGPT said. 'While AI can help decode the structure, it can't shield anyone from the real-world consequences. That's why clarity, accountability, and deliberate scrutiny still matter. Because in a system where speed favors power, the rest of us need time to see clearly, before the ground shifts beneath our feet.' More From GOBankingRates Clever Ways To Save Money That Actually Work in 2025 This article originally appeared on I Asked ChatGPT To Explain Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' To Me Like I'm 12 — Here's What It Said

3 Ways Trump's ‘Big Beautiful Bill' Could Hit Tesla Investors
3 Ways Trump's ‘Big Beautiful Bill' Could Hit Tesla Investors

Yahoo

time11 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

3 Ways Trump's ‘Big Beautiful Bill' Could Hit Tesla Investors

Tesla investors have had a rough go in 2025, with a stock price that's down by more than one-fifth year-to-date and a major slump in global electric vehicle sales. I'm a Self-Made Millionaire: Learn More: Now, the Elon Musk-led company faces more grim news in the form of President Donald Trump's 'Big Beautiful' spending bill, which was signed into law on July 4th. Among other things, the bill will bring an end to federal tax credits on certain EVs. Here are three ways the bill could hit Tesla investors. Tax Credits Will End Federal tax incentives played a big role in boosting Tesla's EV sales in recent years, but those incentives will soon come to an end. Because of Trump's bill, buyers have until Sept. 30 to qualify for the federal tax credits on Tesla EVs before they're terminated, CBS News reported. Before the bill passed, new EVs came with a $7,500 federal tax credit, while used EVs came with credits of up to $4,000. The idea behind the credits was to make EVs more affordable. That's important, because the average purchase price of a new EV is about $9,000 higher in the U.S. than the average new gas-powered car, according to Kelley Blue Book data cited by CBS News. Used EVs cost roughly $2,000 more than comparable gas cars, on average. An end to the tax credit will hurt Tesla — and Tesla shareholders — because it narrows the number of potential EV buyers. I Sold My Tesla: Rival EV Companies Will Get a Boost As Business Insider reported, one key provision in the new bill is that cars made by companies that sold more than 200,000 'accepted' EVs between December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2025 do not qualify for the tax credit. This provision will mainly impact Tesla, which sells a lot more cars than that in a single quarter. In contrast, rivals Rivian and Lucid have not reached the 200,000 milestone, meaning their customers can still get tax credits. This could give them an edge against Tesla, at least over the short term. Sales Could Decline Further Tesla's EV sales have already slumped badly this year. The company recently posted second-quarter car sales of 384,122 — down 13.5% from the previous year, CNN reported. It was the biggest year-over-year decline in Tesla history, and followed a similarly dismal first quarter. Trump's spending bill will likely hurt sales even further because buyers will no longer have the same tax incentives. This means they'll have to dish out more money to buy a Tesla than in the past. 'It's on Tesla to make the case for consumers to even slightly pay up today versus some other EVs,' Seth Goldstein, an equity strategist at Morningstar, told Business Insider. More From GOBankingRates 4 Housing Markets That Have Plummeted in Value Over the Past 5 Years This article originally appeared on 3 Ways Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' Could Hit Tesla Investors

Dana White explains why he's hesitant to put Jon Jones on UFC White House card
Dana White explains why he's hesitant to put Jon Jones on UFC White House card

Yahoo

time11 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Dana White explains why he's hesitant to put Jon Jones on UFC White House card

NEW ORLEANS – Dana White isn't so sure he'd feel comfortable booking Jon Jones on the promotion's highly anticipated card at the White House. With the event just shy of a year away after President Donald Trump's recent announcement, White admits it's too way too soon to matchmake the card. However, Jones repeatedly has mentioned the White House card being what could bring him out of retirement. White explained to reporters at Smoothie King Center on Saturday after UFC 318 that he has some hesitancy to oblige Jones' request. "It's not even about him winning the belt," White told MMA Junkie and other reporters. "You know how I felt about him. You know I can't risk putting him in big positions in a big spot and have something go wrong – especially the White House card." White's hesitance stems from Jones' long history of transgressions, one of which ruined the milestone UFC 200 that was supposed to be headlined by Jones vs. Daniel Cormier. Jones was flagged for an anti-doping violation during fight week, and the bout was canceled. Since Trump's impromptu announcement of a UFC card coinciding with the U.S.'s 250th anniversary on July 4, 2026, fighters have flocked to virtually raise their hands on social media for a spot on the card. From Jones to Conor McGregor to Nate Diaz, the working idea has caught the attention of many. Despite this, White said that, for now, his focus is simply on operational logistics. "I have other problems," White said. "I'm dealing with the logistics and all the things on figuring out how to make this thing happen. How do we want to do it? I'm going to fly out there in about 10 days, two weeks, and we're going to have all the renderings done. We'll sit down with (Trump) and go through the renderings and see what he wants to do and what he doesn't want to do." This article originally appeared on MMA Junkie: Dana White uneasy about putting Jon Jones on UFC White House card

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store