Astonishing images emerge from of Australia's MQ-28A Ghost Bat drone
The MQ-28A Ghost Bat drone successfully completed its first flight - codenamed Exercise Carlsbad at RAAF Base Tindal, near Katherine in the Northern Territory.
The exercise was part of a broader series of trials to demonstrate the Ghost Bat's capabilities in a simulated combat scenario.
The MQ-28A is an AI-enabled, autonomous, uncrewed Collaborative Combat Aircraft, designed to fly alongside traditional fighter jets and take on mission roles typically performed by pilots.
Developed by Boeing Australia in partnership with the Royal Australian Air Force, the Ghost Bat marks a major step forward in Australian aerospace innovation.
Over 80 Australian companies contributed to the program.
'This is a huge achievement of the collaborative work between the Royal Australian Air Force and Boeing Defence Australia,' Wing Commander Phillip Parsons said.
'Our success has also been due to ongoing work with the Collaborative Autonomous Systems Project Office, Air Force Headquarters, Air Warfare Centre, and the local base squadrons at RAAF Base Tindal.'
Live fire testing of air-to-air weapons is planned for late 2025.
'What we're going to do this year is, we're going to accelerate into a weapon shot from the drone,' Boeing Defense, Space & Security interim President and CEO Steve Parker said.
'We'll definitely look at air-ground in the future, but our focus priority is air-to-air. And we'll talk about what the weapon is in the future, at a future point in time.'
Exercise Carlsbad tested the MQ-28A Ghost Bat's ability to be deployed, redeployed, and operated effectively in unfamiliar conditions.
'The main intent of Exercise Carlsbad was to understand all the fundamental inputs to capability in relation to the MQ-28A,' Wing Commander Parsons said.
Before the flight, a series of ground-based checks were conducted to ensure all systems were functioning properly.
Wing Commander Parsons said the aircraft would provide the combat mass needed to defend Australia and its national interests.
'Capabilities such as the MQ-28A are important as they will save Australian lives and provide us with the combat mass to defend Australia and its national interests,' Wing Commander Parsons said.
Canberra is optimistic that the Ghost Bat program will open up significant export opportunities for the Australian defence industry.
At least one Ghost Bat has already been seen in the United States.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Eight storeys beneath Melbourne: first look inside the city's new metro stations
Melbourne's Metro Tunnel is expected to open in late 2025. Described as the most significant overhaul of the city's transport network since the City Loop opened in the 1980s, the tunnel has been taking shape beneath the city for the past eight years – with the bill ballooning to $14bn. With an eye on the 2026 state election, the long-serving Victorian Labor government – with its soaring debt of nearly $200bn – is banking on the project to turn its fortunes around. Guardian Australia's Victoria state correspondent, Benita Kolovos, gets a look at the city's newest train stations
Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
FLOURISHING AFTER 50: We're thinking of dropping our life insurance - but are we making a big mistake?
Hi Vanessa, I'm in my early 50s and my husband and I have had life insurance for over 15 years. We've always paid the premiums, even when things were tight. But lately with the cost-of-living skyrocketing, we're really struggling. We've been talking about whether we should just cancel the policy because it feels like a luxury we can't afford anymore. The hard part is that we still have a mortgage, and two teenage kids. I'm the main income earner, and if something happened to me, I honestly don't know how my husband would manage. But the premiums are high, and every month it gets harder to justify the spend. It's really stressing me out. We're not sure what to do - and we don't want to make a mistake we'll regret. Feeling the Pressure, VIC. First, please know you're not alone - so many families in their 50s are facing this same dilemma. It's tough balancing immediate living costs with protecting your family's future. Before you make any final decision, it's well worth exploring whether your policy could be adjusted to reduce your premiums. Many people don't realise that insurance can often be restructured - and sometimes, it makes sense to review your level of cover or how your premiums are paid. Adrian Chan, Principal Adviser at Zurich Assure, shared this practical reminder that might help you look at it differently. 'There are different ways to structure your insurances. One of those could be utilising superannuation to pay for insurance premiums. It's not a one-size-fits-all solution and comes with both benefits and downsides but could fulfil a need whilst cashflow remains tight. 'Before making any changes, I would encourage you to engage with a financial adviser to discuss your current situation and needs so that they can recommend a suitable plan that works within your budget.' This is exactly why a review with a trusted adviser can help you find the best option for your family - whether that's tweaking your benefit amount, changing premium structures, or checking if you're doubling up with cover inside your super fund. If you don't have an adviser you trust, I offer a free service to connect you with one who can look over your current arrangements and see if you can get a more competitive rate. You're doing the right thing by asking the question instead of quietly cancelling. These conversations can make a huge difference - and your future self (and family) will thank you for it. Good luck exploring your options,
The Guardian
4 hours ago
- The Guardian
Qantas attack reveals one phone call is all it takes to crack cybersecurity's weakest link: humans
All it can take is a phone call. That's what Qantas learned this week when the personal information of up to 6 million customers was stolen by cybercriminals after attackers targeted an offshore IT call centre, enabling them to access a third-party system. It is the latest in a series of cyber-attacks on large companies in Australia involving the personal information of millions of Australians, after the attack on Optus, Medibank and, most recently, Australia's $4t superannuation sector. The Qantas attack came just days after US authorities warned the airline sector had been targeted by a group known as Scattered Spider, using social engineering techniques, including impersonating employees or contractors to deceive IT help desks into granting access, and bypassing multi-factor authentication. While companies may spend millions keeping their systems secure and software up-to-date to plug known vulnerabilities, hackers can turn to this form of attack to target, often, the weakest link – humans. Social engineering is not new. It predates the internet, involving tricking someone into providing compromising information. The most common way people would see social engineering in practice is through phishing attacks – emails that are designed to look official to lure unsuspecting people into providing their login and passwords. The phone-call version of social engineering, known as vishing, can be more complicated for the attacker, requiring research into a company and its employees, and tactics to sound convincing over the phone to get the unwitting worker to let them in. Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email The arrival of easy-to-use artificial intelligence products, including voice cloning, will only make this easier for attackers. The Office of the Australian Information Commissioner's most recent data breaches report, covering the second half of 2024, noted a significant rise in reports of breaches caused by social engineering attacks, with government agencies reporting the most, followed by finance and health. The Qantas breach – that compromised information including names, email addresses, phone numbers, dates of birth and frequent flyer numbers – in isolation might not in isolation lead to financial loss, but the growing number of data breaches in Australia means hackers are able to collate data collected across the breaches and potentially launch attacks on unsuspecting new targets. In April, the nation's superannuation funds became aware of the dangers of hackers collecting compromised login details from other breaches to gain access to super accounts, in what is termed credential stuffing. The industry was fortunate only a handful of customers suffered losses, together approximately $500,000 – likely a combination of the funds locking down systems, and the high proportion of fund holders who have yet to reach the age where they can access their super. The Albanese government, however, has been warned that the attack was a canary in the coalmine for the financial sector. In advice to the incoming government in May – released this week under freedom of information laws – the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (Apra) warned super assets were at risk. 'Cyber-attacks at large superannuation funds, that look likely to increase in scope and frequency, highlight that capability in the management of cyber and operational risks must improve,' Apra said. 'While the number of member accounts that had funds fraudulently withdrawn was small, the incident highlighted the need for this sector to uplift its cybersecurity and operational resilience maturity. 'This need will only grow as the sector increases in size, more members enter retirement and the sector takes on greater systemic significance with inter-linkages to the banking sector.' Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion Apra had warned the sector in 2023 of the importance of multi-factor authentication – something some of the funds had failed to implement before the April attack. The regulator said there were also sustained cyber-attacks on banking and insurance businesses, and third-party providers that were 'continuing to test resilience and defences as attackers develop new technologies and approaches'. Healthcare, finance, technology and critical infrastructure, such as telecommunications, were most at risk from cyber threats, according to Craig Searle, global leader of cyber advisory at global cybersecurity firm Trustwave. 'The technology sector is uniquely exposed due to its central role in digital infrastructure and interconnected supply chains,' he said. 'An attack on a single tech provider can cascade to hundreds or thousands of downstream clients, as seen in recent high-profile supply chain breaches. 'Overall, the sectors most at risk are those with high-value data, complex supply chains, and critical service delivery.' Searle said attackers like Scattered Spider deliberately targeted third-party systems and outsourced IT support, as seen in the Qantas breach, representing a risk for large companies. 'The interconnected nature of digital supply chains means a vulnerability or misconfiguration in a partner or contractor can trigger a domino effect, exposing sensitive data and operations far beyond the initial breach,' he said. Christiaan Beek, senior director for threat analytics at cybersecurity firm Rapid7, said third-party systems had become an integral part of many organisations' business operations and, as a result, were increasingly targeted by threat actors. 'It's essential for organisations to apply the right levels of due diligence in assessing the security posture of such third-party systems to reduce the risk of their information being compromised.' Searle said organisations needed to shift from reactive to proactive cybersecurity, apply software patches promptly and enforce strong access control such as multi-factor authentication. Beek agreed organisations needed to be proactive, with executives held accountable for cybersecurity in their organisations, as well as board oversight. 'The novel tactics observed by modern-day cybercrime groups escape the typical confines of security management programmes,' he said. 'The no-limits approach of these criminals pushes us to rethink the typical boundary of defence, in particular surrounding social engineering and the ways in which we can be taken advantage of.'
