Budapest LGBTQIA+ march swells into massive anti-government demonstration
Tens of thousands of protesters have marched through Hungary's capital as a banned LGBTQIA+ rights rally has swelled into a mass anti-government demonstration.
In a major show of opposition to Prime Minister Viktor Orban, crowds set off across one of the main bridges, waving rainbow flags and with some people carrying signs mocking Mr Orban.
Eszter Rein Bodi, one of the marchers, said: "This is about much more. Not just about homosexuality … This is the last moment to stand up for our rights."
One sign read: "None of us are free until everyone is free."
Mr Orban's government has gradually curtailed the rights of the LGBTQIA+ community in the past decade, with a law passed in March that allows for the ban of Pride marches, citing the need to protect children.
Mr Orban's opponents see the move as part of a wider crackdown on democratic freedoms ahead of a national election next year when the veteran prime minister — whose party has dominated Hungary's political scene for 15 years — will face a strong opposition challenger.
Small groups of far-right counter-protesters attempted to disrupt the peaceful march, but police separated them and diverted the route of the march to avoid any clashes.
Mr Orban and his government, who promote a Christian-conservative agenda and have championed family values, have defended the restrictions, saying the need to protect children supersedes all other rights.
The prime minister posted a photo with his grandchildren on the morning of the march, with the caption: "This is what I am proud of."
Marchers included students, families and people from the countryside who said they had never attended a rally before.
The Erzsébet Bridge, built to carry six lanes of traffic, was engulfed with people.
Local media sites including 444.hu and Magyar Hang estimated the crowd at 100,000, though Reuters could not confirm that figure.
Budapest Mayor Gergely Karacsony told the rally that the message was "clear"; that the government had "no power over us".
March organisers said participants had arrived from 30 different countries, including 70 members of the European Parliament.
More than 30 embassies expressed support for the march and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen called on Hungarian authorities to let the parade go ahead.
Budapest's mayor had tried to circumvent the law banning the march by organising Pride as a municipal event, which he said did not need a permit.
Police however banned the event, arguing that it fell under the scope of the child protection law.
Mr Orban provided some clues on Friday about what participants could expect when he warned of "legal consequences" for organising and attending the march.
Earlier this week, Justice Minister Bence Tuzson warned in a letter sent to some foreign embassies in Budapest that organising a prohibited event was punishable by one year in jail, while attending counted as a misdemeanour.
The law that allows for the ban of Pride lets police impose fines and use facial recognition cameras to identify people who attend.
Mr Orban's attacks on Pride initially increased his support, political analyst Gabor Torok wrote on social media, but he said opinion shifted after the police ban and the legal debates surrounding the march.
Mr Orban's dominance and ability to set the political agenda has faced increasing challenges from centre-right Opposition Leader Peter Magyar's Tisza Party, which had a 15-point lead over Mr Orban's Fidesz in a poll this month.
Tisza, which has been avoiding taking a strong position on gay rights issues, did not specify, in response to Reuters questions, whether it believed the Pride march was lawful, but said those attending deserved the state's protection.
Reuters
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Sydney Morning Herald
an hour ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
They tried to ban Pride. Instead, they got Hungary's biggest anti-government protest in years
Warsaw: Tens of thousands of people defied a government ban to march through the streets of Budapest on Saturday, transforming a prohibited LGBTQ Pride parade into the largest anti-government protest Hungary has seen in years. Despite a warning from Prime Minister Viktor Orban of 'clear legal consequences' for anyone attending the event, police made no move to stop the march, which swelled well beyond the size of previous Pride gatherings. Organisers estimated the turnout exceeded 180,000, including more than 70 members of the European parliament and delegations from 30 countries. Many participants said they were marching not just for LGBTQ rights, but in opposition to what they see as an increasingly authoritarian government. 'This is about much more, not just about homosexuality,' protester Eszter Rein-Bódi told Reuters. 'This is the last moment to stand up for our rights.' The government's attempt to ban the march relied on a law passed in March that prohibits events 'depicting or promoting homosexuality' to minors. The law allows police to fine participants and use facial recognition technology to identify them – measures condemned by civil liberties groups and European Union politicians. In response, Budapest's progressive mayor, Gergely Karacsony, reclassified the event as a municipal celebration, celebrating Hungary's recovery of full freedom when Soviet troops pulled out in June 1991. On the day, the mayor stood firm in support of the protest. Later in the day, he added: 'The message is clear, they have no power over us.' Despite the official ban, police did not intervene, though they were present in large numbers and adjusted the march route after far-right groups attempted to block one of the city's main bridges. The demonstration remained peaceful.

News.com.au
19 hours ago
- News.com.au
UK considers envoy for Britons held abroad
Britain is preparing to emulate the United States by appointing an envoy tasked with freeing citizens arbitrarily detained abroad, as it faces calls to do more to bring them home. High-profile cases like jailed Egyptian-British activist Alaa Abdel Fattah and imprisoned Hong Kong media mogul Jimmy Lai have spotlighted the plight of Britons held in jails overseas. The UK foreign ministry insists it continues to press such cases with governments, but relatives of detainees and human rights organisations complain of a lack of urgency and transparency. "The government is committed to strengthening support for British nationals, including through the appointment of a new envoy," a Foreign Office spokesperson told AFP. Middle East Minister Hamish Falconer has said an "Envoy for Complex Consular Detentions" is expected to be appointed "before the summer". The government has not specified the terms of the role but it could be similar to America's Special Presidential Envoy for Hostage Affairs, a position created in 2015. Unlike the United States though, Britain does not take part in prisoner exchanges. Professor Carla Ferstman, an expert on arbitrary detentions at the Human Rights Centre at Essex Law School, said appointing someone would be the "clearest thing that the UK can do that it hasn't done yet". "When you have someone at the highest level they command a certain level of respect," she told AFP. Abdel Fattah was arrested in September 2019 and sentenced to five years in prison on charges of "spreading false news" after sharing a Facebook post about police brutality. He is still imprisoned despite a hunger strike by his mother and Britain's foreign ministry saying it is pushing for his release "at the highest levels of the Egyptian government". His sister Sanaa Seif said an envoy would mean "a proper continued focus on" freeing detainees. - 'Clear strategy' - "It's also important to have a focal point that can help coordinate between different government bodies so that they all work in synchronisation," she told AFP. Seif believes the government should consider revising travel advice to Egypt too, a call also made by lawmakers who have suggested the government should sanction Egyptian officials as well. "Is it not clear that words are no longer sufficient?" Conservative peer Guy Black asked in parliament's House of Lords recently. Ferstman said tightening travel guidance can be a powerful tool. "It's a big deal because all of a sudden tourists can't get insurance and it's harder for business travel to happen. There's all kinds of implications," she explained. Amnesty International recently called for the government to develop a "clear strategy" to support arbitrarily detained Britons, including by demanding that UK officials attend trials. The Labour government pledged in its general election-winning manifesto last year that it would introduce "a new right to consular assistance in cases of human rights violations". Amnesty also wants the government to call for a person's "immediate release", including publicly when it is requested by the family. It said London took three years to publicly call for Lai to be freed, something his son Sebastian said "sends the wrong message" to "autocratic states". "The quicker we have the government speak out post-arrest, that's the window of opportunity to have people released," Eilidh Macpherson, Amnesty's campaigns manager for individuals at risk told AFP. UK officials say the government can be wary of accusations it is interfering in another country's judicial system. "Sometimes it may need to be quiet about what it's doing, but this shouldn't come at the expense of transparency," said Ferstman. Jagtar Singh Johal, a Sikh blogger from Scotland, was arrested in India in November 2017 while there for his wedding on accusations of being part of a terror plot against right-wing Hindu leaders. He has not been convicted of a crime and in March was cleared in one of the nine charges against him. The foreign ministry spokesperson said Foreign Secretary David Lammy "continues to raise concerns" about the detention with India's government "at every appropriate opportunity". But his brother, Gurpreet Singh Johal complains of being kept in the dark. "We don't know what's actually being said," he told AFP. Gurpreet said an envoy would be a "good thing" but until the position is in place, "We won't know exactly what it means."

News.com.au
20 hours ago
- News.com.au
200,000 turn out for ‘illegal' rally in Hungary's capital
Residents of a major European city have defied the orders of their far-right Prime Minister to attend a protest which had been outlawed by the government. Organisers estimated that 200,000 people marched through Budapest, Hungary for its annual pride parade despite being threatened with legal action by nationalist leader Viktor Orban, Hungary's government this year amended laws and the constitution to prohibit the event, citing 'child protection' to justify its years-long clampdown on LGBT rights. Under new laws the 'depiction or promotion' of homosexuality to under 18s became an offence, in what Amnesty International called a 'full frontal attack' on LGBT people. Mr Orban said on Friday that while police would not break up the Pride march, those who took part should be aware of 'legal consequences'. The laws empowered authorities to use facial-recognition technology to identify those taking part, and cameras had recently been installed on lamp posts along the parade route. Parade organisers risked up to one year in prison, and attendees faced fines up to 500 euros ($897). But after the Budapest Mayor stepped in to co-host the event – making it an official council event – it drew a record crowd and dwarfed the previous expectation of 35,000 people. 'We believe there are 180,000 to 200,000 people attending,' the president of Pride, Viktória Radványi told AFP. 'It is hard to estimate because there have never been so many people at Budapest Pride.' One participant, 66-year-old Zoltan, said he was 'proud to be gay and I am very scared that the government wants to bring us down'. 'I am very surprised that there are so many people, I want to cry,' he added. Hungarian government spokesman Zoltan Kovacs in a post on X after the march claimed the opposition staged the parade 'at Brussels' command'. 'With Pride, the opposition incited against laws they don't like, mocked Hungary's sovereignty, and – with foreign backing – tried to force woke culture onto us,' he wrote. Earlier this week, European Union (EU) chief Ursula von der Leyen called on the Hungarian authorities to reverse the ban. Thirty-three nations, including most EU countries, have also released a statement in support of the march. Since Mr Orban's return to power in 2010, the country of 9.6 million people has been steadily rolling back LGBT rights. It is the first EU nation to ban a Pride march, and Mr Orban has said he has been emboldened by the anti-diversity push by US President Donald Trump. Opposition leader Peter Magyar said on Facebook that the government 'scored not a goal, but a huge own goal with their attempt to ban today's event'. 'Freedom and love can't be banned,' read one huge poster put up near city hall, the gathering point for the march.