What Harvey is doing to win the legal AI race it inadvertently started
In just three years, the company, which builds software for analyzing and drafting documents using legally tuned large language models, has drawn blue-chip law firms, Silicon Valley investors, and a stampede of rivals hoping to catch its momentum. Harvey has raised over half a billion dollars in capital, sending its valuation soaring to $3 billion.
On a recent Monday afternoon at Harvey's Manhattan office, I met cofounder and chief executive Winston Weinberg in a polished conference room named for Atticus Finch, a beloved character from the novel "To Kill a Mockingbird." I mentioned that since I started covering legal tech a month ago, my inbox has been flooded with pitches from legal-tech startups eager to explain how they're not Harvey.
Weinberg let out a soft chuckle. "I'll take that as a compliment, I guess."
In recent years, more competition has been encroaching on Harvey's territory, and fast. Hebbia, a knowledge-search platform, has made a more focused push into the legal sector, and Legora, which offers an AI-powered workspace where lawyers can draft, edit, and collaborate, is gaining traction with Harvey's core clientele of Big Law firms.
While legal tech was once the domain of ex-lawyers building tools for their peers, now it's attracting classically trained software engineers, eager to compete in a space without a staid market leader.
Harvey may have cracked the market open, but now it faces the classic innovator's dilemma: the very proof of concept it offered to the legal world is fueling a growing list of competitors.
The legal-tech land grab is on. The question is whether Harvey can maintain its first-mover advantage, or if it's simply cleared the path for the next breakout.
Want in? Get in line.
Part of what fueled Harvey's ascent is its go-to-market strategy. Early on, the company bet that winning over the country's most elite law firms would create a ripple effect across the industry.
It gated access to the product using a waitlist, allowing it to tightly tailor the tool to pilot users.
So far, its Big Law wager appears to be paying off. Weinberg said lawyers at eight of the 10 highest-grossing firms in the nation are now using Harvey.
The company tells Business Insider it crossed $70 million in annual recurring revenue last quarter, putting it on pace to smash its goal of $100 million ARR for the year.
"Once a subset of the market standardizes on a solution, it's kind of the solution," said Ilya Fushman, a venture capitalist who led Kleiner Perkins' investment in Harvey in 2023.
Leaning forward in a high-back, caramel-colored leather chair, Weinberg seemed unfazed by the growing competition.
Harvey's edge, he argued, lies in two places its rivals can't easily replicate: top-tier talent and a product strategy built on deep collaboration with its customers.
The 260-person startup has lured dozens of trained lawyers off the gilded path to Big Law partnership, offering stock options and a shot at shaping the future of legal practice.
To keep its edge, Harvey just made a key hire. Stripe veteran John Haddock has joined as chief business officer after a decade scaling one of Silicon Valley's most closely watched startups.
Haddock told BI he spoke to dozens of Harvey customers before accepting an offer. His decision boiled down to their love of the product. He called it Weinberg's "No. 1 maniacal focus."
"The best thing we can do is stay focused on: are we building stuff that lawyers really need and need every day?" he said. "Everything else takes care of itself."
Harvey goes multi-model
Harvey has been fighting the competition with one hand tied behind its back. Since its founding, the company has partnered closely with OpenAI to build custom models for lawyers. Its entire product ran on OpenAI's models.
It's a limitation that Harvey's rivals have been quick to point out. They argue their products are superior because they can cherry-pick from the best of Anthropic, Meta, or Google, depending on the task.
Now, Harvey wants to neutralize that criticism. The company tells BI it's going multi-model, starting with Anthropic's Claude and Google's Gemini.
Weinberg said Harvey didn't avoid other models out of loyalty to OpenAI, but necessity. Until recently, most major law firms would only approve AI tools that ran through Microsoft Azure, which meant models like Claude and Gemini couldn't clear security reviews.
Those constraints are falling away as vendors like Anthropic build the features enterprises demand and gain clout.
The move may also suggest Harvey is adapting to a clientele that's perhaps more opinionated about which models power their tools, especially as rivals pitch flexibility as a selling point.
Harvey's secret sauce
In a market where model performance offers marginal gains, Harvey is betting that its true edge lies in how deeply the product molds to the client.
"What I think is closer to a traditional moat," Weinberg said, "is we are very focused on customization, massively."
The company partners directly with firms to build bespoke legal workflow software. With A&O Shearman, for example, Harvey helped develop a merger control tool that taps the firm's global antitrust bench. For another client focused on private equity, the company built out deal-specific workflows.
Lawyers across those firms are using the tools, and the firms are selling that customized software to clients and other law firms, sharing a cut of the revenue with Harvey.
If customization is the moat, the obvious question becomes: how does it scale? One investor in a Harvey competitor asked at what point the company becomes overrun with service requests and support tickets.
The company's bet is that it can turn workflows from custom projects into reusable building blocks — a sort of Lego kit it can adapt for each new client.
It's a bold strategy, but in a crowded field, Weinberg believes that winning won't come from better answers. It'll come from building a system that grows with the people asking the questions.
"At the end of the day," he said, "what you want to do is build a solution that tracks the evolution of law over time."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Insider
2 hours ago
- Business Insider
The hottest jobs today didn't exist a few years ago — and degrees won't get you there, one of LinkedIn's top economists told BI
Some of today's most in-demand jobs didn't exist a few years ago, and no traditional degree can fully prepare you for them, one of LinkedIn's top economists told Business Insider. Chua Pei Ying, LinkedIn's head economist for Asia Pacific, told BI on the sidelines of the Fortune AI Brainstorm 2025 Conference in Singapore that employers were already shifting toward "skills-based hiring" even before the rise of AI. Employers don't just look at the candidate's degree or past job titles. They think about the skills candidates bring, especially because a lot of jobs are new, Chua said in the interview last month. According to LinkedIn data, more than one in five professionals hired in Asia Pacific hold job titles that didn't exist 20 years ago, from data scientists to content creators. "You can't hire someone for a brand-new type of job if that job never existed in the past," Chua said. "Similarly, you can't hire someone who has a degree for that area if this area is completely new," she added. The rise of new digital tools and platforms is changing how companies operate — and what they expect from workers. "AI literacy is going to be mainstream," Chua said. "It's going to be expected for everyone." Skill sets for the same job have changed by 40% since 2016, LinkedIn data showed. This will accelerate to 72% by 2030. What job seekers can do Chua said workers should "lean into technology" and not fear it by learning how to use it responsibly, verify its outputs, and treat it as a tool, not a crutch. Chua said soft skills like communication and collaboration are increasingly important for experienced workers and fresh graduates alike. Agility is another key trait employers are actively seeking, especially for entry-level workers, she said. Tech leaders have been vocal about AI shaking up jobs. Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei said that AI may eliminate 50% of entry-level white-collar jobs within the next five years. Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang has said AI won't kill jobs, but it will transform how every job is done. "I am certain 100% of everybody's jobs will be changed," he told CNN's Fareed Zakaria last month. "The work that we do in our jobs will be changed. The work will change. But it's very likely — my job has already changed." Perplexity's CEO, Aravind Srinivas, said in an interview with Matthew Berman that people need to spend more time using AI. "People who really are at the frontier of using AIs are going to be way more employable than people who are not," he said last month. "That's guaranteed to happen." Some tech leaders have also emphasized the importance of soft skills in setting candidates apart in the AI era. Salesforce's chief futures officer, Peter Schwartz, told BI in an interview that "the most important skill is empathy, working with other people." "That will be the most important thing because the AIs can deal with all the routine stuff," he added. Mark Zuckerberg said in a July interview with Bloomberg that he believed the most important skill was "learning how to think critically and learning values when you're young." "If people have shown that they can go deep and do one thing really well, then they've probably gained experience in, like, the art of learning something," Zuckerberg said, discussing what he looked for in job candidates.
Business Insider
6 hours ago
- Business Insider
A possible iPhone 17 spotting in the wild is yet another reminder that cameras are everywhere
Apple's mission to put a camera in everyone's hand may have backfired. The Apple community is buzzing about a photo posted on social media recently that purportedly shows an unreleased iPhone 17 being tested in the wild. In the photos, shared by X user @Skyfops, a person wearing sunglasses and a hat holds up two phones while walking down the street. One of them clearly looks like an iPhone with its Apple logo covered by a piece of black tape — the other device looks a bit different. The second device, which appears to be in a case, has a camera lens placement that looks similar to that of current models, but the relocated lidar and LED flash stand out. I just spotted a test development iPhone in the wild 🤩🤩🤩 — Fox Pupy 🦊🧡 (@Skyfops) July 28, 2025 The X user who shared the photos said he captured them in San Francisco's Union Square. Apple didn't immediately respond to a request for comment from Business Insider. If legitimate — Bloomberg's Mark Gurman wrote in his recent "Power On" newsletter that it was "likely" an iPhone 17 Pro — it would be a rare example of an unreleased iPhone being captured in the wild. And, like the viral Coldplay Kiss Cam moment, it's yet another reminder that cameras are everywhere these days. Longtime Apple fans likely remember the famous iPhone 4 leak, where an Apple employee left an unreleased test model at a bar, and Gizmodo got a hold of it and published a detailed analysis of the device in 2010. Apple is famously secretive, but it still needs to test unreleased products in real-world conditions, not just the lab. To do this, it often uses special cases that camouflage the device's outward appearance. That unreleased iPhone 4, for example, was found in a case that made it look like an iPhone 3GS. As for the iPhone 17's form factor, reports emerged last year that one of the models in the lineup would be a major redesign, a noticeably slimmer model. Informally referred to as the "iPhone 17 Air" within the Apple community, the device is expected to sacrifice some of the cutting-edge tech found in a "Pro" model in order to deliver on a thinner form factor. Morningstar analyst William Kerwin said the firm expects a new form factor from Apple this September. However, he's not yet convinced that a "slim" version would be enough to meaningfully move the needle on iPhone sales, saying that it's what's beneath the hardware that's more important. "We still think that Apple improving its AI software offering is the most critical strategy for revitalizing iPhone unit sales growth," Kerwin said. Despite the new placement of the flash, Forrester analyst Dipanjan Chatterjee told BI that "incremental enhancements" are still the name of the game for Apple. It's all about making the iPhone "a little bit better — a little bit slimmer," he said.
Business Insider
7 hours ago
- Business Insider
GitHub CEO delivers stark message to developers: Embrace AI or get out.
This story is available exclusively to Business Insider subscribers. Become an Insider and start reading now. In an unambiguous message to the global developer community, GitHub CEO Thomas Dohmke warned that software engineers should either embrace AI or leave the profession. His candid statement, part of a blog post titled "Developers, Reinvented," underscores the dramatic transformation underway in software development, a shift not just in how code is written, but in the very nature of what it means to be a developer. The blog drew from interviews with 22 developers already deeply integrating AI into their workflows. Their experiences paint a clear picture: AI isn't a distant future, it's a present necessity. "Either you have to embrace the Al, or you get out of your career," Dohmke wrote, citing one of the developers who GitHub interviewed. This is the latest example of a strange marketing strategy by AI companies. Instead of selling products based on helpful features and letting users decide, executives often deploy scare tactics that essentially warn people they will become obsolete if they don't get on the AI bandwagon. For instance, Julia Liuson, another executive at Microsoft, which owns GitHub, recently warned employees that "using AI is no longer optional." From skeptics to strategists Dohmke said developers who initially dismissed tools such as GitHub Copilot as gimmicks now see them as indispensable collaborators. Through trial and error, these people have evolved from skeptics to AI strategists, learning to delegate coding tasks to AI agents and focusing their efforts on context design, prompt engineering, and verification, the CEO added. This is no marginal change. Developers at the leading edge of this transition report that their roles have shifted from writing code to architecting and auditing the code generated by AI. They speak of themselves not as coders, but as "code enablers" or even "creative directors of code," Dohmke wrote in his blog. Redefining developer value The CEO argued that this transformation does not diminish developers' value, but redefines it. Those who adopt AI tools early gain leverage, not redundancy. The blog highlights a major mindset shift: instead of optimizing solely for speed or efficiency, developers are using AI to raise the ambition of what's possible, Dohmke wrote, while noting that complex, large-scale refactoring tasks or multi-agent feature builds that once seemed out of reach are now achievable. Related stories Business Insider tells the innovative stories you want to know Business Insider tells the innovative stories you want to know This reframing comes with a career challenge: adapt or risk becoming obsolete. As AI rapidly advances toward automating up to 90% of code writing — a timeline developers estimate could arrive within just two to five years — the skills that will matter most include system design, AI fluency, delegation, and quality assurance, he predicted. "The software developer role is set on a path of significant change. Not everyone will want to make the change," the CEO wrote. "Managing agents to achieve outcomes may sound unfulfilling to many, although we argue that's what developers have been doing on a lower level of abstraction, managing their computers via programming languages to achieve outcomes." Humans are often reluctant to change, and Dohmke ended his blog by saying "that's okay." What's clear is that the CEO thinks these humans should seek another profession. Maybe plumbing?
