logo
RCGP Urges Support to Save Declining GP Partnership Model

RCGP Urges Support to Save Declining GP Partnership Model

Medscape12-06-2025

The Royal College of General Practitioners (RCGP) has warned that GP partnerships are under threat, as the number of partners in England has dropped by 25% over the past decade.
In a new report, the college urged action to 'break down barriers to partnership' and called for modernisation of the model to make it more attractive to younger doctors.
While the RCGP reaffirmed its support for the independent contractor model, it said there was 'room for modernisation and innovation', and backed ' a mixed economy' of contractual models to deliver general practice.
Shift in Workforce
Between 2015 and 2025, the number of GP partners in England fell from 24,491 to 18,367. Over the same period, the number of salaried GPs rose by 81%, from 10,270 in September 2015 to 18,557 in December 2024.
As of June 2024, GP partners were a minority among fully qualified GPs for the first time.
The most significant drop in partnership was seen in younger doctors. Among GPs aged 30-34, numbers fell by 72.9%. The only age group to show growth was those aged 60-64, up by 19.5%.
Barriers to Partnership
Rising workload, administrative burdens, and concerns about financial risk were cited as major deterrents to partnership.
Professor Kamila Hawthorne, RCGP chair, said that many GPs were discouraged by the unlimited personal liability that comes with being a partner. She also pointed to the responsibilities of owning or leasing premises and managing staff, especially as patient demand increases.
Exploring Alternatives
The RCGP report explored alternative business models that could support general practice, including limited companies, limited liability partnerships (LLPs), and community benefit societies.
The college maintained that partnerships still offered flexibility and potential for innovation, particularly if financial and workload pressures could be reduced.
In 2024, more than half (55%) of RCGP members said they would be more likely to consider partnership if financial risks were lower.
A review by Lord Darzi highlighted the financial discipline of GP partnerships, noting that they could not run large deficits like other parts of the NHS.
Earlier this year, the Nuffield Trust described the current GP partnership model as 'withering'. The health think tank warned that the government's plans to improve GP access were at risk due to the fall in partner numbers.
Thea Stein, chief executive of the Nuffield Trust, told Medscape News UK : 'It is hard to see partnership being the dominant model in the future.' She called for support where the model works well, but said new models must also be explored.
Hawthorne maintained that 'there are elements of the traditional GP partnership that can be improved and modernised, while retaining its core strengths'. The GP partnership model has huge benefits for the NHS and for patients, she added.
Government Response
A Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) spokesperson acknowledged the strengths of the partnership model, including efficiency, innovation, and continuity of care. 'However, we also recognise that this is not the only model delivering general practice,' the spokesperson told Medscape News UK .
'GP practices can choose to organise themselves in different ways and also provide good outcomes in terms of staff engagement and patient experience.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘Strong probability' Viktor Gyokeres is sold below €100m clause, says Sporting CP president
‘Strong probability' Viktor Gyokeres is sold below €100m clause, says Sporting CP president

New York Times

time10 minutes ago

  • New York Times

‘Strong probability' Viktor Gyokeres is sold below €100m clause, says Sporting CP president

Sporting CP's president has said there is a 'strong probability' Viktor Gyokeres is sold this summer and the club will 'give in' to an offer below his €100million (£85.4m, $117.2m) release clause. Gyokeres scored 54 goals in 52 games in 2024-25 for the Portuguese club and is under consideration from Arsenal in their efforts to sign a No 9 this summer. Advertisement The 27-year-old Sweden international's preference is to play for a team in the Champions League, although Manchester United head coach Ruben Amorim remains a major admirer having worked together at Sporting before the Portuguese departed last winter. Frederico Varandas insists his club are 'very calm' about the striker's future and insisted they have no financial need to sell their prized asset, whom the president describes as 'one of the world's best players'. The Sporting president said both Gyokeres and his agent have been informed by Sporting of what their valuation is. When speaking in an interview with O Jogo of what he considered to be a fair market value for the Sweden international, the Sporting president cited United paying the £62.5m (€73.2m) release clause to sign Matheus Cunha from Wolverhampton Wanderers. United have also had a second bid for Brentford's Bryan Mbeumo, comprised of £55m upfront and £7.5m of bonuses, rejected by the west London club. 'These players do not have the market value or the quality of Viktor, in my opinion,' Varandas said. 'They (Cunha and Mbeumo) are being negotiated for values of around €75m. We are sensitive to Viktor's dreams or that of any players. 'Today I think there is a strong probability that he (Gyokeres) will leave.' Varandas added: 'I can guarantee, with absolute certainty, that Viktor will not leave for €60m plus €10m.' Gyokeres has scored 97 goals in 102 games since moving to Sporting from Coventry City in 2023. He helped them lift the Primeira Liga title last year and win a league and cup double this time around. He scored only one goal for Brighton & Hove Albion before departing on loan to both Swansea City and later Coventry. Coventry made the move permanent in 2021 and he went on to score 43 times in 117 games. The Swede joined Sporting for a club-record fee in July 2023, signing a five-year contract. (FILIPE AMORIM/AFP via Getty Images)

Chelsea step up planning for potential new stadium
Chelsea step up planning for potential new stadium

Yahoo

time30 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Chelsea step up planning for potential new stadium

Chelsea have held talks with the Mayor of London's office to discuss the prospect of building a new stadium. The West Londoners are deliberating plans to move to a new stadium or enhance their current home at Stamford Bridge. Chelsea's current venue has a capacity of 41,728, which will make it only the 11th-largest stadium in the Premier League next season. Advertisement Plans are in motion over a project to modernise the club's facilities and The Telegraph have revealed that talks have been held with the Mayor of London's office. Sadiq Khan, the Mayor of London, would need to approve any potential proposals. Should Chelsea decide to leave Stamford Bridge, a site at Earl's Court has been named as a potential new home. However, the management of the Earl's Court Development Company (ECDC), who own the plot, have said previously that the current project plans are for residential housing. The statement said: 'There is no plan within our plans for Chelsea FC to relocate to the Earl's Court site. We have a fully detailed design, shortly to be registered with both local authorities, which prioritises the delivery of thousands of homes and jobs, culture and open space through a well-designed and considered masterplan, which has evolved over four years of engagement. Advertisement 'This will see development commence in 2026 with the first residents and occupiers moving in from 2030. This is, and will remain, our primary focus.' Chelsea's talks with the Mayor of London's office could be the start of formulating a proposal for a new stadium. The Blues have the option to bid for the site at Earl's Court before development on current plans begin. The deadline to purchase the plot is unclear. Read – Liverpool have 'no plans' to meet Marc Guehi price tag See more – Iconic Performances: A teenage Pelé conquers the world Follow The Football Faithful on Social Media: Facebook | Instagram | Twitter | YouTube | TikTok

G.O.P. Toils to Find Votes for Policy Bill as Senate Prepares to Debate
G.O.P. Toils to Find Votes for Policy Bill as Senate Prepares to Debate

New York Times

time36 minutes ago

  • New York Times

G.O.P. Toils to Find Votes for Policy Bill as Senate Prepares to Debate

The Senate on Sunday moved toward a debate on the embattled Republican tax cuts and domestic policy bill, as G.O.P. leaders toiled to build enough support in their own ranks to push it through before a Fourth of July deadline set by President Trump. Democrats who are unified against the measure protested its consideration by forcing Senate clerks to read the 940-page bill aloud, a maneuver that delayed the debate and was likely push any major votes to Monday. But even as the endgame drew nearer for the legislation, which would extend tax cuts first enacted in 2017 and exact steep cuts in Medicaid and nutrition assistance programs to help pay for them, continued to change. The Senate official who enforces the chamber's rules determined that two last-minute provisions — added on Saturday to benefit Alaska and Hawaii and help secure the vote of Senator Lisa Murkowski, Republican of Alaska — violate Senate rules and would likely need to be dropped from the bill, according to an aide. Those provisions were crucial to winning the support of Ms. Murkowski on the initial procedural vote that narrowly passed late Saturday night on a 51-49 vote, with two Republicans and all Democrats opposed. It was uncertain whether she would still back the legislation if those sweeteners were dropped. The ruling by the chamber official, the Senate parliamentarian, involved a special boost to the states' Medicaid payment rates and one to the prices Medicare pays hospitals in those states for some medical services. Adding to the uncertainty around the measure were new estimates by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, which showed that it would pile at least $3.3 trillion to the already-bulging national debt over a decade, nearly $1 trillion more than the House-passed version. That could pose big problems for the measure in the House, which must give it final approval and where fiscal hawks have warned that the price tag of the measure must not rise. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store