&w=3840&q=100)
Pakistan: The land of delusion squeezed between two illegitimate power centres
How do you deal with a problem like Pakistan? This question has vexed Indian policymakers and the political establishment for several decades. We are none the wiser despite several wars and kinetic conflicts, the latest of which took place just a few days ago. At the heart of the problem is a revisionist state where the public stays in a state of permanent suspension of disbelief, while its all-powerful military runs a rentier economy and conjures up alternative realities at will.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Consider, for a moment, how Pakistan fared in the latest battle. We already know well enough about the 11 of the 12 key Pakistani airbases hit by Indian missile strikes, some of which are still inoperable.
It suggested a complete failure of Pakistan's China-supplied air defense system. The fact that Pakistan couldn't protect its sensitive air assets, nuclear weapon storage sites or even nuclear command and control centres is a telling commentary on its incompetence. It explains why Pakistan's beleaguered army chief ' went running to the United States seeking immediate intervention.'
That the Pakistani DGMO, carrying a message of cessation of hostilities, was made to wait several hours before the Indian side even agreed to take the call on May 10 tells you who emerged with the upper hand. As the fog of war slowly lifts, the magnitude of Pakistan's loss is slowly becoming clear.
The Pakistan Air Force (PAF) has lost 20 percent of its infrastructure, including hangers, hardened air shelters (HAS), critical maintenance equipment and several of its fighter jets, such as an airborne early warning SAAB-2000 aircraft (AWACS) flying 300 km inside its own airspace. These are expensive beasts, even more so for a rickety economy like Pakistan's that survives on doles.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
The SAAB Erieye-2000 flying radar was struck by India's S-400 SAM system that was activated 11 times during the conflict. That's not all. According to media reports quoting Indian defence sources, PAF lost one C-130 J medium lift aircraft, a JF-17 and two F-16 fighters to air-launched SCALP and BrahMos missiles. India also struck a Chinese-made LY-80 air defence system and took out the prized HQ-9 in Karachi using UAV and loitering munitions, reports Hindustan Times.
Pakistan also lost over 50 airmen, including squadron leader Usman Yusuf when Indian missiles struck Pakistan's Bholari airbase at Sindh. The loss of so many lives, as well as high value assets within a span of a few hours would have demolished the swagger and sapped the confidence of any military outfit. But this is Pakistan. Its army has 'never lost a war'. Within a few hours of the ceasefire that was agreed upon in distinctly dishonourable circumstances for the 'Lumber One' military, the Pakistanis declared a 'win', sparking nationwide 'celebrations'.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
As if at the flick of an invisible switch, Pakistan created an alternative reality where its all-powerful military not only beat back a much larger adversary, but scored an important tactical victory that further tightened the military's grip over every aspect of Pakistan's politics, society and economy.
Consider also the fact that within days of a demoralizing defeat, army chief Asim Munir was promoted to the rank of a Field Marshal, only the second military officer in Pakistan's history to get the honour after General Ayub Khan in 1959. Khan, having ousted then President Iskander Mirza in 1958, helped himself to the title a year later.
With Munir's 'promotion', Pakistan now has two illegitimate power centres in military and civil domains. Not even Shehbaz Sharif, heavily dependent on the military for survival, believes in his own legitimacy as the prime minister. Riddled with allegations of corruption, poor governance and lack of agency, the Sharif government had become deeply unpopular. As did the military, which for the first time in several decades was facing an organic pushback from the Pakistani middle class – that threw its lot with jailed former prime minister Imran Khan – for the military's outsized influence on Pakistan's polity.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
The war with India changed everything. Battlefield reverses notwithstanding, Pakistan's military was able to create an in illusion of victory in an 'existential' battle against India, with the aid of some creative myth making.
Losses were quickly hidden, the DGISPR shaped the counter-narrative on a war footing pressing into service dubious claims, fake news, AI generated video clips and round the clock press briefings. With the aid of the Western media's discourse power that bought into Pakistani claims that Chinese-built J-10s shot down up to five Indian aircraft, including several Rafales, the narrative coup was complete.
Pakistan is now firmly under the grip of military nationalism, and the new generation of army sceptics has been bought over. The tide of popularity has swung in favour of the hitherto unpopular Munir in such a way that the jury is out on whether Munir adorned himself with the title of Field Marshal (Failed Marshal would've been more accurate), or whether Sharif, eager to curry favour with the new 'hero' of the Pakistani masses, decided to be a little creative.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Either way, as the Pakistanis celebrate their hard-earned 'win' over India with a formal dinner with Munir as the 'showstopper' Pakistan.
Not even the mightiest of India's cruise or ballistic missiles may destroy Pakistan with efficacy from within the way Pakistan's military can. The most popular mass leader in decades is in jail under strictest of charges and harshest of conditions. The rebellion has been snuffed out. Sharif's writ lies eroded even further, and Pakistan is lurching ever so close to another military dictatorship. The vexing questions on the Rawalpindi generals' control over politics, economy, judiciary and even the media have now been put to rest. The military first claim to the poverty-stricken country's resources finds renewed public mandate.
None can save Pakistan from its dance of death. Its embrace of instability, religious fundamentalism and the population's collective somnambulance.
The writer is Deputy Executive Editor, Firstpost. He tweets as @sreemoytalukdar. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect Firstpost's views.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
21 minutes ago
- Business Standard
India-UK FTA clears road for British cars, but with speed bumps ahead
The recently signed Free Trade Agreement (FTA) between India and the United Kingdom marks a significant breakthrough in bilateral economic ties. While the deal eliminates duties on most Indian exports to the UK, the auto sector, a politically sensitive area for both sides, has been liberalised through a cautious, quota-based tariff reduction scheme spread over two decades. The agreement reduces or eliminates tariffs on 90–99 per cent of goods traded between the two countries. For UK automakers, however, market access to India will be limited by quantity caps and phased tariff cuts, especially on petrol, diesel and electric vehicles. The deal is not yet in force and awaits ratification. Why are automobiles the most protected sector in the FTA? Automobiles have been among the toughest issues to resolve in the India-UK FTA negotiations. At present, India imposes import tariffs above 100 per cent on fully built foreign cars. These tariffs provide high barriers to entry, protecting domestic manufacturers such as Maruti Suzuki, Mahindra, and Tata Motors in a highly price-sensitive market. UK officials and auto manufacturers pushed for steep tariff cuts to boost exports, but Indian negotiators sought long phase-in periods and strict import caps. A sudden influx of foreign vehicles, they argued, could hurt local industry and undermine domestic EV manufacturing goals. How will British petrol, diesel, and EVs enter the Indian market? Under the FTA, tariffs on UK petrol and diesel vehicles will be reduced to 10 per cent by 2031, but only for vehicles imported under a defined quota. For the highest-capacity engine cars, the first-year in-quota duty drops to 30 per cent, falling to 10 per cent by year five. Out-of-quota tariffs will decline more slowly, reaching 50 per cent by year ten. Luxury carmakers like Bentley and Jaguar Land Rover (owned by Tata Motors) will face import duties as high as 30 per cent initially. Lower-end vehicles will be subject to an even steeper 50 per cent duty before tapering to 10 per cent in year five. The number of vehicles qualifying for reduced tariffs is capped. The quota begins at 20,000 vehicles annually, expands to 37,000 by 2031, and then contracts to 15,000 units by 2046. Electric and hybrid vehicles follow a separate path. Only those priced above £40,000 qualify for tariff relief, starting at 4,400 units in 2031 and rising to 22,000 by 2040. EVs below this threshold remain excluded, in a bid to safeguard India's domestic clean mobility ecosystem. How are British automakers reacting to the agreement? Despite gaining a structured entry into the Indian market, UK automakers have responded with tempered optimism. Industry leaders welcomed the long-term tariff reductions but criticised the slow and complex implementation, according to the Financial Times. Manufacturers must wait until 2031 for the lowest tariff rate, with quotas declining after that. The phased approach, industry executives said, limits price competitiveness in the Indian market during the critical early years of the deal. Jaguar Land Rover may benefit in the longer term, but short-term opportunities are minimal. The British auto industry had lobbied for faster access and broader inclusion of mid-segment and electric models. How has India protected its domestic auto industry? India has maintained robust safeguards for its auto sector — arguably the most protected chapter of the FTA. While the UK gains limited long-term access, India continues to shield its mass-market segment through tariff-linked quotas and price thresholds. There is no major liberalisation for small or affordable EVs — a segment where Indian automakers are investing heavily. These measures are designed to support the domestic industry's global aspirations. However, Indian auto component manufacturers are expected to benefit from zero-duty access to the UK. Companies like Bharat Forge, Motherson Sumi, and Sundaram Clayton could see export gains, with Indian engineering goods likely to integrate deeper into British supply chains. When will the India-UK FTA come into effect? The FTA will take effect once it is ratified by both parliaments — likely in 2026. From there, a phased implementation plan will govern the roll-out of tariff cuts. The auto sector will follow a detailed timeline, including annual reviews, price-linked import quotas, and a bilateral safeguard mechanism designed to address any future trade disruptions.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
21 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Embassy REIT raises ₹2,000 crore through non-convertible debenture
Bengaluru-based Embassy Office Parks Real Estate Investment Trust (REIT), India's first listed REIT and the largest office REIT in Asia by area, has raised Rs 2,000 crore via a 10-year non-convertible debenture (NCD). The issue was priced at a coupon rate of 7.33 per cent with a 10-year tenor and a step-up structure of 7.25 per cent for the first five years and 7.45 per cent for the subsequent five years. This long-tenor issuance is the first by an Indian REIT, according to the REIT. The proceeds will be used to refinance certain existing debt, resulting in annual interest savings of approximately 70 basis points (bps). The REIT's net debt as of March 31, 2025, stood at Rs 19,655 crore, while net debt to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortisation (EBITDA) stood at 5.36x. Ritwik Bhattacharjee, chief executive officer of Embassy REIT, said, 'This transaction optimally staggers our liability profile and enables us to prudently manage future debt maturities.' Earlier, in the financial year 2025 (FY25), the REIT's net operating income grew by 10 per cent year-on-year, to Rs 3,283 crore. The REIT's portfolio occupancy by value stood at 91 per cent across its key markets—Bengaluru, Mumbai, and Chennai—during FY25. Occupancy by value refers to the occupancy of the commercial offices weighted by the gross asset value of completed commercial offices. In FY25, the REIT leased 6.6 million square feet (msf), delivered 2.5 msf of new development, and acquired 5 msf of assets. Sixty-one per cent of the REIT's leasing was driven by the global capability centres (GCCs).
Mint
21 minutes ago
- Mint
Parliamentary panel flags SVAMITVA scheme's slow progress
The Standing Committee on Rural Development and Panchayati Raj has flagged the slow progress of the SVAMITVA scheme, which verifies legal ownership of rural residential land through precise mapping and issues property cards to owners. The panel, which has submitted its report to Parliament, noted that achieving full coverage by 2025 may face delays, as 30,000 villages across Indian states and Union territories have yet to be surveyed. The committee, headed by Saptagiri Sankar Ulaka, Lok Sabha member from Odisha's Koraput, urged the government to accelerate drone surveys and issue property cards by providing targeted technical and logistical support to states. Drone surveys have been completed in nearly 318,000 villages, compared to a target of 346,000 villages. The central government launched the scheme in April 2020 with the primary objective of providing property ownership records to rural households. The scheme's core focus is on surveying rural inhabited lands using drones to prepare detailed maps with ownership details, which will then be digitized and integrated into official land records. The move is expected to help villagers access credit and reduce land-related disputes. According to the initial timeline set up by the ministry of panchayati raj, states and Union territories were expected to complete drone surveys by March 2025 and the preparation of property cards by March 2026. However, the government informed the panel that despite the delay, the work in the remaining villages is likely to be completed by the end of 2025-26. The panel also pointed out that, besides slow implementation, the funds provided by the government are not sufficient. 'The committee also observed that in rural areas, there are so many complications on the title of the property due to joint or undivided families and common and community land ownership by the tribal society,' it said in the report. 'As the legal action is a state subject. These issues need due thought by the government to resolve them in a systematic and within the legal framework. For the purpose, they need to deploy adequately trained, technically and legally qualified persons, adequate funds for implementation of the same,' it added. The committee recommended that a comprehensive timeline be fixed and published state-wise, with the respective state government consulted, and its progress monitored regularly to ensure timely completion.
