John James expresses confidence he'll get Trump endorsement in Michigan
'President Trump knows that I've been in his corner, he's been in mine, and I'm excited to use this opportunity I have to help make Michigan great again,' James said during an interview with The Hill's Mychael Schnell at the Hill Nation Summit on Wednesday.
An endorsement from Trump would be a key win for James in the primary field, which includes state Senate GOP leader Aric Nesbitt.
James brushed off the fact that Trump has yet to offer an endorsement, noting the president is busy with a number of things including trying to achieve 'peace.'
He noted he has received Trump's endorsement in the past and expressed confidence that Trump will be a supporter again.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
18 minutes ago
- USA Today
Trump is right to shrink our government. Even if I worry about how he'll do it.
The U.S. government has reached a level of bloat that needs to be dealt with. Trump is right to take that challenge head-on. The Trump administration received a huge win from the Supreme Court on July 14, allowing the government to proceed with its plan to fire more than 1,300 employees of the Department of Education. These staffing cuts come in addition to the State Department's recent layoffs of a similar size. I have been a critic of many of the government efficiency measures proposed by the Trump administration, not because I oppose shrinking government, but rather because they have been unlikely to succeed in achieving that goal. Many opponents of the Republican plan to downsize government don't come from my perspective. Many oppose the slashing of current government programs because the result is seen as unfair to government employees. But it is not immoral for the government to cut jobs for the sake of efficiency. Pursuing efficiency at the expense of existing jobs is a proper goal, even if how President Donald Trump is chasing that efficiency needs to be examined. Layoffs are hard, but that's no reason for government to stay bloated Fired State Department workers made a show out of their job loss this week, staging a sort of ceremony in the lobby as people packed up their desks. Teary federal employees made for great publicity for Democrats opposed to Trump's plans. Many believe that the human toll of these layoffs is a sufficient reason not to implement them at all. That view is significantly mistaken, and one of the reasons government bloat has reached its current level. Layoffs are difficult, but good companies do them all the time. While the common maxim that 'government should be run like a business' is often a ridiculous one, the attitude toward laying off workers in bloated departments ought to be the same among Americans as among managers at a Fortune 500 company. Opinion: Do you think the Supreme Court is partisan? Well you're wrong. When it comes to publicly traded companies, nobody disputes the right of a company to fire its employees for the sake of efficiency. In fact, it is their obligation. Even the charge that corporate layoffs are driven by greed tends to favor the layoffs when it comes to the government. Where a corporation may lay off workers in pursuit of maximizing profits, the government doing the same thing serves to decrease expenditures compared to revenue, which means lower budget deficits. I understand why the robotic calculation of reducing people's employment to a cost-benefit analysis is off-putting to some, but it's the sort of thing that is necessary when our federal workforce is far larger than it was ever intended to be. Cutting excessive positions is a sign of good governance. Again, I understand that being out of work sucks and that layoffs produce hard times for these employees and their families. I have plenty of sympathy for individuals going through tough times because of all this. The administration should take care not to callously celebrate shoving people out of their jobs, a caveat they are horribly failing at. Critics should focus on the 'how' of Trump's layoffs All of this is good in theory, but as with most things, the Trump administration has done little to earn the benefit of the doubt on the matter. Their approach looks more like pulling wires out of a machine on a whim than it does a butcher trimming fat precisely. The administration has already had to walk back many of the firings that took place under Elon Musk's DOGE initiative, signaling that they had gone too far in some instances. Your Turn: Musk caused US long-term damage. A citizen should never have this much power. | Opinion Forum There is plenty of opposition that can be raised regarding the "how" of the push to slash government bloat. However, this is not the sentiment that is sometimes being shared. Many are arguing that it is a mistake, or even immoral, for the Trump administration to perform layoffs, even if they do genuinely lead to cutting government waste. If the government is genuinely slashing necessary employees, then by all means, that position ought to be refilled. Layoffs go too far all the time, and those companies rehire for positions as needed. However, it is all the more likely that the federal government can do without many of these jobs, and if not, then the administration has already shown an indication that it will refill vital roles. Government is not a jobs program; it is meant to do a select number of things with the smallest intrusion into our lives possible. Those who oppose Trump's actions with regard to federal layoffs should focus on critiquing how he is going about these cuts, rather than arguing against the cuts themselves. Dace Potas is an opinion columnist for USA TODAY and a graduate of DePaul University with a degree in political science.
Axios
18 minutes ago
- Axios
MAHA diners are fueling a bone marrow boom in D.C.
Marrow is hot. Tallow is trending. Bone luges are back. D.C.'s "clean eating" MAHA diners are taking nose-to-tail to the next level. Why it matters: Trump's first term was all about well steak and fast food — largely divorced from local dining — but MAHA's unprocessed obsession is popularizing whole-animal trends and driving sales on odd-bits. Zoom in: At Capitol Hill's haute MAGA hangout Butterworth's, chef Bart Hutchins blows through some 500 beef bones a week for best-selling roasted marrow. It's Steve Bannon's go-to order, Hutchins tells Axios. VIPs like Marco Rubio get it compliments of the kitchen. Nigel Farage and other Brit Breitbart journos are eating it up, too. Patrons like a Port bone luge to "soak up the beefy, fatty flavor," Hutchins says. What they're saying: "Before, the audience for offal was Berkeley hippie types who knew about Alice Waters. Now it's right-wing staffers," Hutchins says. "I tell my staff, we're a success if we sell more head cheese than cheeseburgers — and that's happening naturally here." Hutchins has long pushed offal on reluctant diners. Now, bones mean bank. "It's buzzy. If you describe something with 'collagen,' it's poised to move for a certain economic class." The big picture: Chefs' whole-animal focus — more sustainable and economical — is compounded by wellness obsessives touting the health and beauty benefits of bone broth and " sipping collagen." Add in RFK Jr.'s war on seed oils and ultra-processed foods and you have diners going nose-to-tail, fat-to-bone. Between the lines: Blue Duck Tavern 's roasted bone marrow began as a W. Bush-era obsession. Today, "We can never take it off [menu]. People come in just for that," food and beverage director Jean-Claude Plihon tells Axios. The West End restaurant sells around 5,500 marrow dishes annually — roughly 210 pounds of bones a week. Like with other old-is-new-again crazes, traditionalists are caught off guard. "I had no idea, but I'm glad everyone is into it," Hai Le, the butcher turned chef behind Bloomingdale's new PhoXotic, tells Axios. Le brews intensely flavored bone broths and packs bowls with tendon, shank and marrow. "I have people coming in asking for pho broth as a daily dose for their skin." Meanwhile, beef tallow is becoming even more popular — an unlikely combination of beauty trend and right-wing fad touted by MAHA influencers as the anti-seed oil. "I didn't carry it two years ago, and now we're flying through cases," a rep for Baltimore wholesaler Fells Point Meat tells Axios. Naturally, tallow is the frying fuel of choice for Georgetown's new club Executive Branch, co-founded by Donald Trump Jr. The intrigue: The only frozen tallow fry in the U.S. market is Rockville-based Jesse & Ben's. Co-founder Jesse Konig took the popular fries from fast-casual Swizzler in Navy Yard, reengineering them for shoppers with avo oil or grass-fed tallow. They've blown up in a year, and now: Stock them in 1,500 Whole Foods nationwide. Use 15,000 pounds of tallow per month. Run 24-hour production to keep up with demand. What they're saying: "The movement toward less processed foods is a big part of it," says Konig of the success. "It's top of mind in the culture right now."
Newsweek
19 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Donald Trump's Biggest Allies Split With Him Over Jeffrey Epstein
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A number of President Donald Trump's biggest allies in the House of Representatives have split with him and called for the complete release of the Jeffrey Epstein files. Representatives Marjorie Taylor Greene and Lauren Boebert - both major supporters of Trump - co-sponsored a discharge petition announced by Republican Representative Thomas Massie and Democratic Representative Ro Khanna to force a vote in the House to release the complete files. The proposed act, called the Epstein Files Transparency Act, would mandate Attorney General Pam Bondi to make public all unclassified records, documents, communications, and investigative materials regarding Epstein that are in the Department of Justice's (DOJ) possession. It was co-sponsored by several other Republican representatives, including Tom Barrett, Cory Mills, Eric Burlison, Jeff Van Drew, Eli Crane and Tim Burchett. It was also sponsored by Democratic representative Rashida Tlaib. The petition requires 218 signatures to force House Speaker Mike Johnson to call a vote on the bill. It comes after Trump said earlier this week regarding Epstein: "I don't understand what the interest or what the fascination is. I really don't... I don't understand why the Jeffrey Epstein case would be of interest to anybody. It's pretty boring stuff, it's sordid, but it's boring. And I don't understand why it keeps going." But he added that Bondi should release any "credible information" that the DOJ has regarding him. President Donald Trump in the White House in Washington D.C. on Wednesday. President Donald Trump in the White House in Washington D.C. on Wednesday. Evan Vucci/AP Photo This is a developing story. More to follow.
