Speak up in Parliament for ‘marginalised' Muslims, Mehbooba urges Rahul
SRINAGAR: Former J&K chief minister and People's Democratic Party (PDP) president
Mehbooba Mufti
wrote Monday to
Rahul Gandhi
, urging Congress's LS leader of Opposition to take a firm stand during Parliament's current monsoon session against 'growing marginalisation of Muslims in India'.
In her letter, Mehbooba acknowledged that while key issues like the horrific Pahalgam attack, Operation Sindoor and other critical security matters were expected to dominate House discussions, she 'sincerely hopes the opposition, especially INDIA bloc, raises the growing concern of Muslim victimisation across the country'.
'Under the pretext of targeting 'Bangladeshis' and 'Rohingyas', Muslims are being pushed into increasingly desperate situations.
Disturbing media reports have even suggested that some were forced into the sea in attempts to expel them from India. As you rightly highlighted during your (recent) visit to Assam, the large-scale demolition of thousands of Muslim homes is deeply troubling,' Mehbooba's letter stated.
The PDP president also referred to the raging controversy over special intensive revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in poll-bound Bihar.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Search and Discover
search
Search Now
Undo
He described the exercise as 'yet another systematic effort to dispossess, disempower, and ultimately disenfranchise Muslims, effectively erasing their presence, both symbolically and literally'.
Mehbooba underscored Rahul's legacy to urge him to voice the concerns. 'Muslims who chose to remain in India during Partition did so because of the faith they had in the secular leadership of the Congress from Mahatma Gandhi to Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru.
Today, as the bearer of that legacy, the responsibility falls on your shoulders to uphold and defend the secular and democratic values enshrined in our Constitution,' the letter stated.
Mehbooba pointed out that when Hindus, minorities in neighbouring countries like Pakistan or Bangladesh, were targeted, 'our nation rightly expresses outrage and the Union government intervenes'. 'But when Muslims are targeted within our own country there is an unsettling silence, a fear that prevents many from speaking up,' she wrote.
As a politician from one of the 'only Muslim-majority regions that chose to join the Indian Union largely due to the vision and secular character of your great-grandfather (Nehru), I feel extremely helpless at times', the PDP chief wrote, urging Rahul to continue speaking up for a minority 'steadily marginalised and pushed to the fringes of Indian society'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
26 minutes ago
- Time of India
SC rejects plea on delimitation exercise in AP and Telangana
Vijayawada: The Supreme Court on Friday dismissed a petition challenging the notification issued for delimitation of constituencies in Jammu and Kashmir without including Andhra Pradesh and Telangana . The apex court observed that the rule of parity does not apply equally to states and union territories, and the doctrine of legitimate expectation cannot be invoked as an enforceable right when there is an express constitutional limitation. The SC further noted that the delimitation of constituencies in AP and Telangana can only be taken up based on the data from the first census conducted after 2026. Prof K Purushottam Reddy moved the Supreme Court, contending the non-inclusion of AP and Telangana in the notification issued for the delimitation of assembly and parliament constituencies in Jammu and Kashmir. He contended that, according to section 26 of AP Reorganisation Act, assembly constituencies in the two Telugu states should be increased from 175 and 119 to 225 and 153, respectively. Arguing on behalf of the petitioner, Rao Ranjit told the apex court that the exclusion of AP and Telangana from the scope of the delimitation exercise, as contemplated in the notification, suffers from the vice of intelligible differentia. The delimitation commission appointed pursuant to the issuance of the notification was the first after the bifurcation of Andhra Pradesh, and the electorate in both AP and Telangana have a legitimate expectation about a similar exercise, which is the constitutional responsibility of the Union govt as per AP Reorganisation Act, he said. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like No annual fees for life UnionBank Credit Card Apply Now The power under the Delimitation Act must be exercised uniformly by the Union govt, and there could be no plausible justification for omitting the two Telugu states from the delimitation exercise, he argued. Solicitor general Tushar Mehta and additional solicitor general KM Natraj, arguing on behalf of the Union govt, submitted that the petition is devoid of merits as there was an express bar on the delimitation of constituencies in the states governed by Article 170. They argued that the Jammu and Kashmir comes under Article 239A of the Constitution, not Article 170. As states and union territories are governed by different constitutional schemes of arrangements, there can be no claim of parity, they argued. Considering the arguments, the Supreme Court bench comprising of Justices Surya Kant and N Kotiswar Singh upheld the arguments of the Union govt. Noting that states and union territories are governed by different constitutional principles and there is an express bar on the delimitation of constituencies in states, the bench observed that if the petition is entertained, it will open flood gates with similar demands from other states. The bench also held that the doctrine of legitimate expectation and parity cannot be invoked in view of express constitutional provisions and dismissed the petition.
Time of India
27 minutes ago
- Time of India
YSRCP calls stampede probe report ‘biased' and ‘predetermined'
1 2 Vijayawada: Calling the one-man judicial commission report on the Tirupati stampede incident "biased" and "predetermined", opposition YSRCP on Friday demanded a probe by the CBI probe into the entire thing. Six persons died and over 30 were injured in the stampede on the evening of Jan 8 just before the Vaikuntha Ekadashi festival in Tirumala. Former TTD chairman Bhumana Karunakar Reddy claimed that the report seems to have spared the main persons and made a few lower-rung officials scapegoats. The state cabinet on Thursday accepted the report submitted by retired high court judge, Justice M Satyanarayana Murthy, on the stampede. "The report seems to be predetermined as it has let off the main persons responsible for the incident, but has selectively picked two persons and made them scapegoats. The entire process is a precursor to the various vigilance and other commission reports that would be released in the coming days," the senior YSRCP leader said, alleging that the probe report seems to be an eyewash and a case study for all future inquiries. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like American Investor Warren Buffett Recommends: 5 Books For Turning Your Life Around Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo He said the YSRCP govt had introduced extended darshan for 10 days for the convenience of devotees after consulting religious heads, but that practice was done away with by the NDA govt in the state which did not make proper arrangements for the lakhs of devotees who came for the Vaikuntha dwara darshan. "We reject the judicial commission report, which seems to be a premeditated one and demand a CBI inquiry for facts to come out," he said.
Time of India
27 minutes ago
- Time of India
Residents, devotees hold march to keep elephant in Nandani village of dist
Kolhapur: Shopowners kept their businesses shut in Nandani village on Friday while residents took out a silent march demanding that their beloved Madhuri should remain in Swastishree Jinsen Bhattarak Pattacharya Mahaswami Sansthan Mutt. Madhuri or Mahadevi is a 36-year-old elephant. Bombay High Court recently ordered rehabilitation of the elephant to Vantara's Radhe Krishna Temple Elephant Welfare Trust at Jamnagar, Gujarat, citing that the pachyderm's well-being must come before religious customs. After this decision, the Jain Mutt filed a petition in the Supreme Court. The hearing on this matter will be on July 28 in the Supreme Court. The silent march, comprising nearly 7,000 people, started from the village chowk and converged at Swastishree Jinsen Bhattarak Pattacharya Mahaswami Sansthan Mutt. The villagers displayed placards which said, "The fight is for the existence of Mahadevi, we will fight peacefully till the end, our elephant is our tradition." Former MP Raju Shetti, Shirol MLA Rajendra Patil-Yadravkar, Anil Madnaik, member of the mutt, Sagar Sambhushete, the manager of the mutt, also participated in the silent march. Former MP Raju Shetti said, "Nandani Mutt is 1,200 years old, and devotees from Maharashtra and Karnataka visit here. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Many Are Watching Tariffs - Few Are Watching What Nvidia Just Launched Seeking Alpha Read More Undo People from other religions also visit the Mutt. Just because someone wants a tamed elephant, shifting this elephant by using power is not good. The elephant is taken proper care of here. Although the matter is before the court, chief minister Devendra Fadnavis should pay attention to this issue, keeping in mind the religious sentiments of the villagers and devotees." MLC Satej Patil, through his official Twitter account, tweeted, "The elephant holds special significance in the Panchakalyan ritual of non-violent and animal-loving Jain community. The govt should intervene and find a suitable solution to this to maintain the respect and dignity of the religious sentiments of the Jain community."
