Father Chris Riley, founder of charity Youth Off The Streets, dies aged 70
Riley was born in Echuca, Victoria in 1954, and was ordained as a Catholic priest in 1982. He later relocated to Sydney, where he established Youth Off The Streets in 1991.
The charity began with a single food van providing meals to young people experiencing homelessness in Sydney's King's Cross, later expanding to provide crisis accommodation, counselling and education support services to young people aged 12 to 24 across NSW and Queensland.
Riley served as the organisation's chief executive for almost three decades before moving onto the board as founder and executive director in 2020. He stepped down from this role in 2022 due to illness, which the Herald first reported in 2021.
Riley, who joined the Salesian religious order straight from school, was inspired by the 1938 movie Boys Town, based loosely on the work of Father Edward Flanagan.
He decided at the age of 14 that he wanted to work with homeless young people. After graduating as a teacher and taking his vows, Riley worked for two years with the Boys' Town charity in Sydney, then studied for a theology degree at the Melbourne College of Divinity.
Riley told the Herald in 2012 that the four years of full-time study did not suit him. 'I found it really difficult to live in a non-working religious community, so I started to experiment,' he said.
In a statement posted to the charity's website on Friday, Youth Off The Streets chief executive Judy Barraclough said Riley's work to support young Australians in need had left a 'powerful legacy'.
'His vision, drive and determination will continue to inspire our organisation as we strive to provide growing numbers of disadvantaged children and young people with safety, support and education for a better future,' she said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
12 minutes ago
- ABC News
Two in five young Australians feel lonely
Loneliness is usually considered a problem for older people but a new report has found that 43 per cent of young Australians, feel lonely.
The Age
8 hours ago
- The Age
A Perth pet hospital nearly sent me broke. But the alternative was worse
Before you hurl fur balls at me, a recent survey by comparison website Finder found that, on average, Aussies would fork out around $6200 to save their furry friends from the 'green dream'. An impressive 8 per cent would spend more than $10,000 to prevent their pet from being euthanised. At the other end of the scale, 6 per cent of people wouldn't cough up a cent to stop their pooch or mouser going to animal heaven. However, before we rapidly point the finger at those miserly mutt and moggie-owners, there are undoubtedly moments when cash-strapped animal-lovers can't afford to splash out weeks' worth of wages to save their pet. I didn't have to subject myself to clinical trials for fast cash because our tax returns had just popped into our bank accounts. But with thousands of Australians drowning in the cost-of-living crisis, having to euthanise your pet because you couldn't afford the bill would be devastating. As a lapsed Catholic, I'm well-versed in guilt, but if I had lacked the coin to save my cat, I would have fallen into a self-condemnation that even the patron saint of suffering, Saint Dymphna, would find impossible to endure. There are quick-access loan schemes, but the exorbitant interest rates and fees mean you'll still be in debt long after Rover and Ruby Tuesday have crossed the rainbow bridge. Consumer watchdog CHOICE has previously slammed such schemes for 'enticing pet owners into unaffordable debt'. 'A beloved pet's illness can be one of the most stressful times in a person's life,' says CHOICE's Head of Policy, Patrick Veyret. 'Lenders … should not be profiting from people's anxieties about their pets.' Like many of these modern-day lay-by schemes, the scheme preys on the most vulnerable. I wouldn't have flinched or even read the fine print when signing up for a pay-later service to keep Salem alive. There will be widespread disagreements about spending money to save or prolong pets' lives. However, I agree with American philosopher and animal rights activist Jeff Sebo that we must remember that our furry friends are significant beings that belong to our moral community. Loading Sebo's The Moral Circle argues humans will prioritise themselves at the expense of many other beings and while our household animal companions might demand some of our attention, we don't always accord equal value to all animals. Sebo addresses some challenging ethical questions about the extent to which we should expand our moral circle, discussing everything from insects to AI. Whatever monetary misgivings I had about Salem instantly evaporated the moment he staggered onto my lap, while projecting phlegm onto my jumper.
Sydney Morning Herald
8 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
A Perth pet hospital nearly sent me broke. But the alternative was worse
Before you hurl fur balls at me, a recent survey by comparison website Finder found that, on average, Aussies would fork out around $6200 to save their furry friends from the 'green dream'. An impressive 8 per cent would spend more than $10,000 to prevent their pet from being euthanised. At the other end of the scale, 6 per cent of people wouldn't cough up a cent to stop their pooch or mouser going to animal heaven. However, before we rapidly point the finger at those miserly mutt and moggie-owners, there are undoubtedly moments when cash-strapped animal-lovers can't afford to splash out weeks' worth of wages to save their pet. I didn't have to subject myself to clinical trials for fast cash because our tax returns had just popped into our bank accounts. But with thousands of Australians drowning in the cost-of-living crisis, having to euthanise your pet because you couldn't afford the bill would be devastating. As a lapsed Catholic, I'm well-versed in guilt, but if I had lacked the coin to save my cat, I would have fallen into a self-condemnation that even the patron saint of suffering, Saint Dymphna, would find impossible to endure. There are quick-access loan schemes, but the exorbitant interest rates and fees mean you'll still be in debt long after Rover and Ruby Tuesday have crossed the rainbow bridge. Consumer watchdog CHOICE has previously slammed such schemes for 'enticing pet owners into unaffordable debt'. 'A beloved pet's illness can be one of the most stressful times in a person's life,' says CHOICE's Head of Policy, Patrick Veyret. 'Lenders … should not be profiting from people's anxieties about their pets.' Like many of these modern-day lay-by schemes, the scheme preys on the most vulnerable. I wouldn't have flinched or even read the fine print when signing up for a pay-later service to keep Salem alive. There will be widespread disagreements about spending money to save or prolong pets' lives. However, I agree with American philosopher and animal rights activist Jeff Sebo that we must remember that our furry friends are significant beings that belong to our moral community. Loading Sebo's The Moral Circle argues humans will prioritise themselves at the expense of many other beings and while our household animal companions might demand some of our attention, we don't always accord equal value to all animals. Sebo addresses some challenging ethical questions about the extent to which we should expand our moral circle, discussing everything from insects to AI. Whatever monetary misgivings I had about Salem instantly evaporated the moment he staggered onto my lap, while projecting phlegm onto my jumper.
