logo
Community councils need education on rules they are operating under, says councillor

Community councils need education on rules they are operating under, says councillor

Daily Record22-04-2025
Councillor Andy Doig believes recent events suggest certain aspects of the regulations are not widely understood.
Community council members in Renfrewshire need greater education on the rules under which the groups are operating, a veteran politician has admitted.
Councillor Andy Doig, an independent representative for Johnstone North and the surrounding villages, believes recent events suggest certain aspects of the regulations are not widely understood.

Reflecting on sagas in Renfrew and Ferguslie, the elected member is concerned there is a "lack of knowledge" over the ins and outs of a rulebook known as the scheme for the establishment of community councils.
In particular, he has pointed to the directive that the bodies should be non-party political – insisting they should instead focus on "civic issues" within their communities.
Councillor Doig said: "I want to say at the outset that the vast majority of community councils operate really well. There are some community councils within my own ward that are first class, they're excellent.
"They're committed to the community, they're full of volunteers who have expertise in other fields of life, other professions, that they bring to the table and they work effectively for their communities.
"But I think it's clear from recent events in Renfrew and Ferguslie there seems to be a lack of knowledge about the fact that community councils themselves are meant to be very strictly non-party political.
"When they start to enter into the realm of making political commentary or trying to promote or push certain political lines, they're really acting ultra vires and outwith their capacity.

"They're actually breaching the laws under which community councils are established."
It comes following the brief suspension of Renfrew Community Council earlier this year after it landed itself in hot water over a series of comments from members on social media.
In addition to that episode, a former chair of Ferguslie Community Council resigned after taking aim at Renfrewshire Council and its administration on Facebook.

Asked if there was a need for greater education on the rules, Councillor Doig responded: "Absolutely, I think that community council members should be made aware at all times that they should be acting in a non-political way.
"Their purpose is not to talk about the politics of the day, it's really to focus on civic issues in their own community."
The scheme, which is currently under review, could feature a more robust complaints process once a revised version is eventually agreed.

Councillor Doig believes this job should be officer-led as opposed to the suggestion of a panel of members drawn from other community councils.
He added: "We oversee them, therefore, if there's any issues, it's only correct and proper it's council officers who should set up procedures to deal with them.
"I don't think it's fair to expect a neighbouring community council to investigate issues within a community council in any given location. I don't think that's the way forward."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Donald Trump orders nuclear submarines to be moved near Russia as he blasts ‘foolish' nuke threat from Putin crony
Donald Trump orders nuclear submarines to be moved near Russia as he blasts ‘foolish' nuke threat from Putin crony

Scottish Sun

time12 hours ago

  • Scottish Sun

Donald Trump orders nuclear submarines to be moved near Russia as he blasts ‘foolish' nuke threat from Putin crony

MOVING IN Donald Trump orders nuclear submarines to be moved near Russia as he blasts 'foolish' nuke threat from Putin crony Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) PRESIDENT Donald Trump has ordered that two nuclear submarines be positioned near Russia following stern threats from Vladimir Putin's comrade. The move by the commander-in-chief comes after former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev warned the United States of Moscow's nuclear arsenal. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 1 President Donald Trump speaks to members of the media on board Air Force One on Tuesday Credit: Reuters More to follow... For the latest news on this story, keep checking back at The U.S. Sun, your go-to destination for the best celebrity news, sports news, real-life stories, jaw-dropping pictures, and must-see videos. Like us on Facebook at TheSunUS and follow us on X at @TheUSSun

Top MoD civil servant quits after major Afghan data breach
Top MoD civil servant quits after major Afghan data breach

The National

time13 hours ago

  • The National

Top MoD civil servant quits after major Afghan data breach

An MoD spokesperson said on Friday: 'Permanent Secretary David Williams will step down this autumn and the recruitment process for his successor is under way. 'Since 2021, David has led the department through a period of significant activity, and we thank him for his contribution.' Williams was appointed as MoD Permanent Secretary in April 2021. It comes after the department faced questions over a data breach in which a defence official released details of almost 19,000 people seeking to flee Afghanistan after the return of the Taliban. READ MORE: Father of boy, 8, sexually assaulted in tent in Loch Ness saw suspect 'walk away' Along with the Afghan nationals, the details of more than 100 British officials were compromised, including special forces and MI6 personnel. An injunction blocked reporting of the matter until it was lifted earlier this summer. Defence sources have said that details of MI6 spies, SAS and special forces personnel were included in the spreadsheet, after they had endorsed Afghans who had applied to be brought to the UK. The Ministry of Defence became aware of the blunder only when excerpts from the dataset were posted anonymously on a Facebook group in August 2023, and a superinjunction was granted at the High Court in an attempt to prevent the Taliban from finding out about the leak. The leak also led to the creation of the secret Afghanistan Response Route, which is understood to have cost about £400 million so far, with a projected final cost of about £850m. A total of about 6900 people are expected to be relocated by the end of the scheme. The official responsible for the email error was moved to a new role but not sacked. The superinjunction was in place for almost two years, covering Labour and Conservative governments. Labour MP and chairman of the defence select committee, Tanmanjeet Singh Dhesi, said: 'Defence permanent secretary David Williams' many years of dedicated public service deserve respect. 'It's not yet clear whether his decision to step down is linked to the recently revealed Afghan data breach. READ MORE: Archaeologists battle to save 1000-year-old island broch from falling into sea 'However, what is clear is that this grave failure of data protection demands proper scrutiny, which the defence committee certainly intends to provide. 'While our committee has agreed to inquire into this shocking situation, we have yet to determine the full scope for that, including who will be called to give evidence. 'The fact that this breach has put at risk our courageous British service personnel and the Afghans who bravely supported them, makes the situation even more shocking. 'I am sure the committee will want to investigate and understand how this could have been allowed to happen.'

Facebook must face DC attorney general's lawsuit tied to Cambridge Analytica scandal
Facebook must face DC attorney general's lawsuit tied to Cambridge Analytica scandal

Reuters

timea day ago

  • Reuters

Facebook must face DC attorney general's lawsuit tied to Cambridge Analytica scandal

July 31 (Reuters) - Meta's Facebook must face a consumer protection lawsuit brought by the District of Columbia's attorney general accusing the social media giant of misleading consumers about its data-privacy practices, an appeals court ruled on Thursday. The District of Columbia Court of Appeals revived the District's lawsuit for now in a unanimous three-judge ruling, opens new tab, finding that a lower court judge applied the wrong legal standard in dismissing the case in 2022. The District's lawsuit was part of a wave of court and regulatory actions stemming from revelations in 2018 that Facebook had allowed the now-defunct British political consulting firm Cambridge Analytica to access data from as many as 87 million users. The consultancy's clients included President Donald Trump's 2016 election campaign. Facebook has denied any wrongdoing, and said that it made clear and appropriate disclosures to users about its privacy policies. It still can seek dismissal of the lawsuit. In a statement, Facebook said it was weighing its options and remained confident it will prevail. The District attorney general's office had no immediate comment on Thursday's ruling. The District's lawsuit accused Facebook of duping users into thinking the company had strong enforcement measures to audit third-party applications. The lawsuit said Facebook allowed third parties like Cambridge Analytica to harvest user data without consent on a widespread basis. In the lower court ruling, Judge Maurice Ross of the Superior Court for the District of Columbia concluded that "Facebook did not materially mislead consumers as to their response to Cambridge Analytica." The appeals court said the attorney general should have a lower burden of proof in making renewed arguments that Facebook made unintentionally misleading claims to the platform's users about their control over their information shared on the site. Meta chief executive Mark Zuckerberg and current and former directors and officers of the company this month agreed to settle claims seeking $8 billion for alleged damage caused by allowing repeated violations of Facebook users' privacy. The accord, filed in the Delaware Court of Chancery, did not disclose a settlement amount. Facebook in 2022 said it would pay $725 million to resolve a class action in federal court in California over the Cambridge Analytica scandal. In 2019, Facebook agreed to pay a record-breaking $5 billion fine to resolve a U.S. Federal Trade Commission probe into its privacy practices. The case is District of Columbia v. Facebook, District of Columbia Court of Appeals, No. 23-CV-0550. For plaintiff: Jeremy Girton of D.C. attorney general's office For defendant: Joshua Lipshutz of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store