
Haryana govt cracks whip: 80 irrigation officials in soup over quality of concrete used in projects
The list of accused officials and employees includes names of JEs (junior engineers), SDOs (sub-divisional officers), and XENs (executive engineers). These officials have been charge-sheeted under Rule-7 of Haryana Civil Services (Punishment & Appeal) Rules, 2016.
Gurugram: Haryana government Wednesday initiated action against 80 officials of the Irrigation & Water Resources Department (I&WRD) for alleged corruption and negligence pertaining to quality of hardened concrete used in various projects under the department's aegis.
The names of these officials, however, have not yet been made public.
This crackdown follows a detailed probe triggered by substandard construction samples that have caused significant financial losses to the state exchequer.
Documents accessed by The Print suggest that a high-level committee, constituted on 5 June under commissioner and secretary Mohammed Shayin, IAS, was tasked with framing draft charge sheets and displeasure notes against the officials in question.
The committee includes senior officers including Jaideep Rao (chief engineer, I&WRD), Rakesh Kumar (superintending engineer), Hanish Kumar (executive engineer), Ajeet Hooda (executive engineer), and Mandeep Sheokand (executive engineer). Directed by Rao, the panel identified officials ranging from JEs to chief engineers for penalties under Rule-7.
Rule-7 provides for imposing a major penalty against a government employee, like dismissal, removal or compulsory retirement after giving him or her a reasonable opportunity to defend their actions.
Rule-8, on the other hand, mandates minor penalties like censure, withholding a promotion or an increment after giving the employee a fair chance to defend themselves.
The investigation stemmed from quality control failure uncovered in tests conducted earlier this year, for which 48 concrete samples were collected from multiple irrigation projects. Of these, 18 failed to meet standards.
A follow-up letter dated 7 June from chief engineer Jaideep Rao addressed to SEs of the department's vigilance wing revealed that officials failed to analyse test results against specifications, leading to significant deviations and financial losses.
The SEs were directed to submit a comprehensive report within two days, with daily progress updates to be shared with the department's commissioner and secretary.
'Any laxity in compliance is viewed very seriously,' Rao's letter warned.
Confirming the action while speaking to ThePrint Wednesday, Haryana Irrigation Minister Shruti Choudhry termed it as part of the government's zero-tolerance policy on corruption.
She highlighted that vigilance raids, prompted by repeated complaints, exposed systemic lapses as projects neared completion. The samples that failed quality tests included hardened concrete samples and HDP (high-density polyethylene) pipes, she said.
Choudhry noted that substantial payments had already been made to contractors, and the government is exploring recovery options. 'The charge sheets, outlining specific allegations and evidence, will pave the way for legal proceedings, with guilty officials facing dismissal, salary cuts, or promotion bans, though they retain the right to defend themselves.'
(Edited by Amrtansh Arora)
Also Read: 'Kulguru, not V-C'—all official correspondence with Haryana education minister now only in Hindi
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
22 minutes ago
- Time of India
HC upholds 15-yr recovery period for commuted pensions
1 2 Hyderabad: The Telangana high court has upheld the state govt's policy of recovering commuted pension amounts over a 15-year period, dismissing nearly 100 petitions filed by retired govt employees. The petitioners, including a former deputy conservator of forests, had challenged Rule 18 of the Telangana Civil Pensions (Commutation) Rules, arguing that full pension restoration should occur in 11 years and three months, rather than 15 years. A division bench comprising Justices P Sam Koshy and N Narsing Rao ruled that the 15-year period is in line with pay commission recommendations and reflects the central govt's policy on pension commutation. You Can Also Check: Hyderabad AQI | Weather in Hyderabad | Bank Holidays in Hyderabad | Public Holidays in Hyderabad Appearing for the govt, counsel S Suman submitted that commutation is voluntary, and employees are fully aware of the scheme's terms when they opt in. The bench concurred, stating it would be unjust to challenge the rule after availing its benefits. Accordingly, the court dismissed all the petitions, affirming the validity of Rule 18.


Time of India
37 minutes ago
- Time of India
Retd police officer's ‘defamation' suit in rape case dismissed
Mumbai: A city civil court dismissed a defamation suit filed by Sudarshanrao Yerragunta Rao, a retired assistant commissioner of police, seeking Rs 1.25 crore in damages with 12% interest from several police officers, including the now-deceased former police commissioner Hasan Gafoor and the state govt. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Rao claimed that he was maliciously prosecuted in a false custodial rape case in 1992. He was acquitted in the case in 1997 after the purported victim remained untraceable. The court ruled that the suit, filed for malicious prosecution, was barred by the statute of limitations and that Rao failed to prove malice or lack of probable cause in criminal proceedings against him. "On the contrary, admittedly, before lodging prosecution, an inquiry was conducted and the statement of the victim was recorded... From the cumulative reading of evidence, it is seen that the criminal prosecution was lodged after due inquiry. In these circumstances, the allegations of the plaintiff [Rao] that prosecution lodged on behalf of the defendant is without reasonable and probable cause and was with malice cannot be accepted," the judge said. Rao moved the civil court in 2010. Among defendants, he named now-retired Srikant K Bapat, RH Mendonca, PS Pasricha, retired ACP Ashok V Baware, retired head constable Shankar Rane, and the state of Maharashtra. Names of ACP Shivaji K Babar and Gafoor were deleted from the suit after their deaths. Rao, who retired in 1998 as ACP, alleged that he was falsely prosecuted for rape after a raid on two hotels in 1992. Rao was then senior inspector with Vigilance Cell of Crime Branch, CID. He submitted that soon after, there was news alleging a complaint against him by the rescued woman. He claimed it was false and appeared at the behest of those offended by the raid.


The Print
an hour ago
- The Print
Maharashtra's cattle trade comes to near standstill as traders allege ‘free rein' to gau rakshaks
But it has been getting worse with each passing year, especially during Bakra-Eid, they say. Shaikh comes from the Qureshi community. An estimated 2 lakh members of the community, who are part of the cattle trade in Maharashtra, have been on a strike since the start of July to protest harassment by cow vigilantes. The harassment, which can easily spiral into physical assault, has become a part and parcel of their profession over the past decade, since the passage of Maharashtra Animal Preservation (Amendment) Act, 2015. Mumbai: Hamid Shaikh is a licensed cattle trader and was on his way to sell a buffalo and three bulls. It would fetch him Rs 1.5 lakh, he hoped. But the 55-year-old returned home with bruises all over his body, no livestock and no money. 'Cow vigilantes stopped our truck and said we were taking these animals for slaughter which was not the case,' Shaikh told ThePrint about the incident from about three weeks ago. For instance, in Hamid Shaikh's case, he said he 'bought them (livestock) from Pachod (near Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar) market a few days ago and was taking them to Ch. Sambhajinagar (Aurangabad) market for selling them'. 'I have all proper documentation for animals. Despite that, they took away my animals. They slapped me twice. I told them to not hit me since I had a bypass (surgery), but they still hit me. I was scared,' he added. Imran Babu Qureshi, national vice-president of All India Jamaitul Qureshi, told ThePrint that members of the community decided to go on strike 'because there is no response' from either the state government or police. 'There is an increase in incidents of cow vigilantes hitting our drivers, traders. That is the reason we have called this bandh.' In March 2015, the BJP-Shiv Sena government led by Devendra Fadnavis banned sale, possession and consumption of beef by amending the Maharashtra Animal Preservation Act, 1976, which allowed slaughter of old bulls and bullocks with permission from civic authorities. The amendment brought about a complete ban on slaughter of cows and their progeny, bulls and bullocks. It allowed slaughter of buffaloes subject to certain conditions. On 15 July this year, the All India Jamiatul Quresh (AIJQ), a union of cattle traders, met Maharashtra Minister of State (MoS) for Home Yogesh Kadam as well as Director-General of Police (DGP) Rashmi Shukla with a letter, seeking protection from gau rakshaks. They sent another letter on 24 July, demanding the police issue directions/orders as assured to them to make sure cattle traders are not harassed by cow vigilantes. 'We would also like to state that due to pressure of such unauthorized persons/vigilantes, the concerned police officers in various villages, tehsils and districts in the state are pressured to proceed to seize such transport vehicles and animals which otherwise are permitted to be transported. This creates further harassment and troubles on the transporter and the trader,' the Maharashtra AIJQ president wrote in this letter. Members of the Qureshi community are now planning to meet again next week to decide on a plan of action. When contacted, Yogesh Kadam confirmed to ThePrint that he met AIJQ representatives and told ThePrint that there are always two sides to a story. The minister said he had already assured action against those harassing cattle traders. 'During our meeting, I told them to follow all the rules required to conduct their business as many times the transporters do not have requisite documents. At the same time, I have assured action against those who were harassing them and also asked to share their details. I have not received any information from them yet,' Kadam told ThePrint. On 14 July, MoS Home (Rural) Prakash Bhoyar told the Legislative Council that the state government was thinking of bringing in a new law against beef smuggling and also planning to withdraw cases against gau rakshaks by way of a new law to protect cow progeny. Also Read: Fodder for thought: Modi govt's cow welfare agency has been headless for 4 yrs, Rs 500 cr lying idle 'Will die of hunger' In Maharashtra, the slaughter of bovine is prohibited, and a certificate from a veterinary is required to slaughter buffaloes. This certificate needs to specifically mention that the buffalo is 'unfit' for milking and is not pregnant. Most of the 292 livestock markets in Maharashtra are now closed, barring some in Pune and Mumbai. These attract those who want to sell or buy animals for slaughter, and also farmers and traders who want to buy or sell animals either for farming or dairy businesses. The state government last year gave 'Rajyamata' status to cows and also approved the animal husbandry department's proposal to provide Rs 50 daily subsidy per animal to cow shelter operators. Members of the Qureshi community ThePrint spoke to say approximately 300-500 animals are traded at every market, each costing anywhere between Rs 10,000 to over a lakh, depending on the size, age and the fitness of the animal. They add that harassment of cattle traders at the hands of cow vigilantes has been steadily rising since the passage of the 2015 legislation. 'There is a lot of hooliganism in the name of gau raksha in the state. The police are not cooperating with us. We are all very scared. Markets used to be full of animals but everything is closed now. We are suffering huge economic losses as well,' said Aziz Qureshi, Nanded district coordinator, AIJQ. 'About 50,000 people from our community are in this trade in the entire district. They are saying we will die of hunger but think twice before going back into the trade,' he added. Community members said the bandh started about a month ago with the Nagpur market and slowly spread across the state. They also alleged that while police do not register their complaints, FIRs are filed against members of the Qureshi community instead. Asked to comment on these allegations, minister Kadam said, 'I told them to tell me which particular area they are facing issues with. Won't be happening all over Maharashtra. So they need to give me a particular area or organisation troubling them. I will make sure that I tell the police to act accordingly. But except for the letter, I haven't received any official complaint. If need be, we will talk to them again.' The Qureshi community is demanding strict action against vigilantes/extortionists and proper implementation of the provisions of sections 6 and 8 of the Maharashtra Animal Preservation Act, 1976, and the Transport of Animal Rules, 1978. Another allegation is that the animals gau rakshaks confiscate are taken to 'gaushalas' (cow shelters) operated by the government. Cattle trader Moinuddin Qureshi alleged his truck containing seven buffaloes was taken away by gau rakshaks on 6 June and an FIR was registered against him and the truck driver. ThePrint has seen a copy of the FIR. The animals were later sent to a gaushala while the police investigated the matter and found nothing suspicious, he said. According to Moinuddin, the police then wrote to the gaushala saying that 'during the investigation, we found that Qureshi has all the documentation including fitness certificate for the buffaloes' and that the complaint was made out of a 'misunderstanding'. ThePrint has seen a copy of the letter. However, Moinuddin is yet to get his livestock back. 'In fact, now the gaushala has gone to local court against us and refusing to give us our animals … Everything is legal, we have the documents but only because of our religion, we are being harassed.' Other cattle traders too said once the animals are sent to the local gaushala, it is very difficult to recover them. 'Behind every animal, the government gives a certain amount for nourishment of these animals at the gaushalas. But when our farmers and traders are trying to get back the animals from gaushalas, they are not there. So where did our animals go? Where are they taking them?' asked AIJQ acting president Javed Qureshi. Shaikh agreed. He was told his animals were taken to Badnapur gaushala. 'But even two days back when I went there, I did not see my animals there. Don't know where they are. I might never get them back now.' (Edited by Ajeet Tiwari) Also Read: BJP's 'cow protection brigade' gets official stamp in new animal husbandry ministry