
Trump worries more about South Africa's nonexistent genocide than real US racism
It's outraged by genocide that doesn't exist in South Africa but ignores the descendants of people brought to America on slave ships, forced into free labor, and subjected to innumerable rapes, countless lynchings, and brutalization for more than two centuries.
You've probably seen video of President Donald Trump welcoming South African President Cyril Ramaphosa to the White House May 21. The meeting quickly turned from courteous to contentious after Trump accused the South African government of seizing land from White landowners. Trump then played two video clips full of false claims about the genocide of farmers and handed out copies of news stories purporting to expose the truth.
"I don't know, all of these are articles over the last few days, death of people, death, death, death, horrible death," Trump said. "White South Africans are fleeing because of the violence and the racist laws."
Despite Ramaphosa countering those false claims with facts, Trump insisted that when a White farmer is killed, little is done in response. The South African leader acknowledged that while criminal activity does occur in his country, most victims are Black. Additional fact checking has shown that images Trump presented of dead farmers are from Congo, not South Africa.
Opinion: My kids shouldn't have to navigate race in sports. Let them play and be free.
I've long felt the Trump Administration harbored a troubling undercurrent of racism. What's surfaced over the first months of his second term is outright intolerance. It isn't just the Ramaphosa ambush or the welcoming of South Africans to be resettled in this country using the same false claims of persecution.
Look at Trump's attack on DEI and his executive orders which have struck hard at the heart of African American communities, delivering a blow so severe that it cannot be ignored. Or his desire to resurrect Confederate statues and memorials.
Whenever a person of color speaks out about racism, many insist it's not the case. However, as a Black man who grew up in this country and has been shaped by its realities, I've developed an internal radar. You feel it in your bones, and no one should be able to dictate how you feel. You know how you feel when you experience it.
What many felt and feared all along surfaced this week for all to see. I interviewed two Milwaukee historians who offered some context and a challenge about what's next.
In July, I wrote about being genuinely frightened by the Heritage Foundation's Project 2025 and what it could mean for the poor and marginalized. Trump disavowed Project 2025 when it became a political liability during the campaign. After he was elected, he hired the plan's architects and they've been enacting the agenda with chilling efficiency.
The fabric of the Department of Justice's Civil Rights Division has been unraveled. Slavery was abolished in this county in 1865, but officially sanctioned racial discrimination persisted through Jim Crow laws until U.S. Supreme Court rulings in the 1950s followed by civil rights and voting rights legislation in the 1960s began to remove the grip of oppression.
The dismantling of this division will leave a gaping void in the efforts to combat discrimination. For practical purposes it means: No enforcement of fair housing laws, no protections for voting rights, no accountability for hate crimes, and no investigations into police misconduct. This erosion of civil rights protections has created an environment of fear and uncertainty, signaling a dark chapter in the struggle for equality and justice.
The administration is not just rolling back basic protections, it's also trying to knock people down the economic ladder. In March, Trump issued an executive order that led to the layoffs of almost all employees at the Minority Business Development Agency. Last year, the agency supported over 35,000 entrepreneurs.
The Wisconsin MBDA business center closed in April. The agency has been a crucial resource for America's 12 million minority-owned businesses, facilitating access to over $1.5 billion in capital in 2024. Its closure means the loss of a vital government agency and a key opportunity for many entrepreneurs from marginalized communities.
Trump targeted the National Museum of African American History and Culture, a place on the National Mall dedicated to telling a story that started in 1619 when the first enslaved Africans arrived in the English colony of Virginia.
"Museums in our nation's capital should be places where individuals go to learn, not to be subjected to ideological indoctrination or divisive narratives that distort our shared history," Trump said in the executive order about parks and museums.
He argues that the museum does not align with the Founding Fathers' declaration that 'all men are created equal.' However, this view blindly overlooks that these same Founding Fathers enshrined slavery in the Constitution and defined enslaved people as three-fifths of a person.
Trump's executive orders also include plans to replace the statues and monuments of Confederate figures from the Civil War that were dismantled or destroyed amid Black Lives Matter protests following the killing of George Floyd in Minneapolis in 2020.
And don't get me started on Trump's "Big Beautiful Bill," which will be devastating. According to early estimates by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, Medicaid cuts in the bill that cleared the House May 22 will cause 7.6 million Americans to lose their health insurance over the next 10 years. That's just for starters.
Where is Trump focusing his energies? On May 12 a group of 59 people from South Africa, many descendants of Dutch colonists known as Afrikaners, began arriving in the U.S. as refugees under the guise of facing violence and discrimination that would be akin to 'White genocide.' Those claims are bogus.
The administration is offering reparations to group, who will be offered resettlement support, a pathway to citizenship, furnished housing, and will also be eligible for government benefits. Trump terminated U.S. aid to South Africa, citing 'egregious' allegations of genocide against Israel and claims of 'fueling disproportionate violence against racially disfavored landowners.'
Imagine if Trump expressed the same level of concern for Black lives, including those affected by enslavement, the destruction of Black Wall Street, lynchings during the Jim Crow era, and the numerous instances of violence against Black individuals due to racism.
Rob Smith, a history professor and director of the center for urban research at Marquette University, said given the negative impact of the executive orders and budget cuts of Trump administration on Black and brown families in America, the contrast is startling.
'We know what's happening here,' Smith said. 'It's interesting that Trump seems more concerned about the plight of White farmers in South Africa.'
Historian Reggie Jackson said he isn't surprised by Trump's actions, only the response here in America.
"What intensifies the situation is the unsettling silence of White people who aren't stepping up to confront this injustice," Jackson said.
Racism is not a hidden toxin; it is glaringly evident and can be proven with clarity and conviction. The real challenge, however, lies in our widespread reluctance to engage in open dialogue about it in this nation.
Confronting this uncomfortable truth would require us to address the deep-rooted issues head-on. Perhaps this is why it's much easier for Trump to denounce racism when he perceives it occurring 8,000 miles away against White farmers, rather than acknowledging its presence right under his nose.
Reach James E. Causey at jcausey@jrn.com; follow him on Twitter @jecausey.
This article originally appeared on Milwaukee Journal Sentinel: Trump's South Africa meeting showed his true priority | Opinion
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


USA Today
14 minutes ago
- USA Today
Guardians president responded to Trump's random tirade about name change
At this present moment in time, you might think Donald Trump would realize he has bigger fish to fry than ranting and raving about professional sports teams changing their nicknames to decidedly non-racist labels. And, well, you'd probably be right. But that didn't stop the 47th U.S. President from going on an arbitrary (and pretty nonsensical, with all things considered) diatribe about how American sports teams like the Washington Commanders and Cleveland Guardians should revert back to their old, decidedly racist nicknames. Somewhere along the way, Trump invented the concept of an "original six" in baseball out of thin air (which doesn't exist and is actually an NHL concept) to invoke the Guardians, for which an "original six" label wouldn't even apply. Again, it really seems like Trump may be brazenly trying to drum up some sort of cannon fodder grievance to distract from other, more pressing issues. I mean, I'm just saying that I wouldn't rule it out, is all. Shortly after Trump's Sunday morning shot in the dark, er, I mean, testimonial, Guardians president Chris Antonetti responded to his reference about the franchise's name. In short, Antonetti politely declined, citing an "opportunity to build the [Guardians'] brand" while being "excited" for the future. You know what the amusing kicker is here? It would take years for the Guardians, or anyone in a similar position, to go back and earnestly rebrand. It's not as if it's some overnight, effortless operation that can be done on someone's whim. How long have the Cleveland Guardians had their current nickname? After years of backlash, in late 2020, the Guardians revealed they would drop their old "Indians" nickname after the conclusion of the 2021 season. They have been the Guardians ever since. It was the eighth official name change in franchise history for an organization that officially started as the Columbus Buckeyes/Senators in 1896. It was the fifth name change since they started calling Cleveland home in 1900.


Chicago Tribune
14 minutes ago
- Chicago Tribune
Russia insists on achieving Ukraine goals despite President Donald Trump's ultimatum
Russia is open to peace with Ukraine, but achieving its goals remains a priority, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said Sunday, days after U.S. President Donald Trump gave Moscow a 50-day deadline to agree to a ceasefire or face tougher sanctions. Peskov and other Russian officials have repeatedly rejected accusations from Kyiv and its Western partners of stalling peace talks. Meanwhile, Moscow continues to intensify its long-range attacks on Ukrainian cities, launching more drones in a single night than it did during some entire months in 2024, and analysts say the barrages are likely to escalate. Russian President Vladimir Putin 'has repeatedly spoken of his desire to bring the Ukrainian settlement to a peaceful conclusion as soon as possible. This is a long process, it requires effort, and it is not easy,' Peskov told state television in an interview. 'The main thing for us is to achieve our goals,' he said. 'Our goals are clear.' The Kremlin has insisted that any peace deal should see Ukraine withdraw from the four regions that Russia illegally annexed in September 2022, but never fully captured. It also wants Ukraine to renounce its bid to join NATO and accept strict limits on its armed forces — demands Kyiv and its Western allies have rejected. In his nightly address on Saturday, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said that his officials have proposed a new round of peace talks this week. Russian state media on Sunday reported that no date has yet been set for the negotiations, but said that Istanbul would likely remain the host city. Trump threatened Russia on July 14 with steep tariffs and announced a rejuvenated pipeline for American weapons to reach Ukraine, hardening his stance toward Moscow after months of frustration following unsuccessful negotiations aimed at ending the war. The direct Russia-Ukraine negotiations in Istanbul resulted in several rounds of prisoner exchanges but little else. The U.S. president said that he would implement 'severe tariffs' unless a peace deal is reached within 50 days. He provided few details on how they would be implemented, but suggested they would target Russia's trading partners in an effort to isolate Moscow in the global economy. In addition, Trump said that European allies would buy 'billions and billions' of dollars of U.S. military equipment to be transferred to Ukraine, replenishing the besieged country's supplies of weapons. Included in the plan are Patriot air defense systems, a top priority for Ukraine as it fends off Russian drones and missiles. Doubts were recently raised about Trump's commitment to supply Ukraine when the Pentagon paused shipments over concerns that U.S. stockpiles were running low. Elsewhere, Ukraine's air force said that it shot down 18 of 57 Shahed-type and decoy drones launched by Russia overnight into Sunday, with seven more disappearing from radar. Two women were wounded in Zaporizhzhia, a southern Ukrainian region partly occupied by Russia, when a drone struck their house, according to the regional military administration. Two more civilians were wounded in Ukraine's northeastern Kharkiv province, after a drone slammed into a residential building, local Ukrainian officials said. Later Sunday, drones struck a leafy square in the center of Sumy, wounding a woman and her 7-year-old son, officials said. The strike also damaged a power line, leaving around 100 households without electricity, according to Serhii Krivosheienko, of the municipal military administration. Meanwhile, Russia's Defense Ministry said that its forces shot down 93 Ukrainian drones targeting Russian territory overnight, including at least 15 that appeared to head for Moscow. At least 13 more drones were downed on the approach to the capital on Sunday, Mayor Sergei Sobyanin said. One drone struck a residential building in Zelenograd, on the outskirts of Moscow, damaging an apartment, but caused no casualties, he said.


Boston Globe
14 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
As Trump courts a more assertive Beijing, China hawks are losing out
The move was a dramatic reversal from three months ago, when President Trump banned China from accessing the H20, while also imposing triple-digit tariffs on Beijing. That set off an economically perilous trade clash, as China retaliated by clamping down on exports of minerals and magnets that are critical to American factories, including automakers and defense manufacturers. China's decision to cut off access to those materials upended the dynamic between the world's largest economies. The Trump administration, which came into office determined to bully China into changing its trade behavior with punishing tariffs, appeared to realize the perils of that approach. Now, the administration has resorted to trying to woo China instead. Officials throughout the government say the Trump administration is putting more aggressive actions against China on hold, while pushing forward with moves that the Chinese will perceive positively. That includes the reversal on the H20 chip. Advertisement The H20 decision was primarily motivated by top Trump officials who agreed with Nvidia's arguments that selling the chip would be better for American technology leadership than withholding it, people familiar with the move say. But Trump officials have also claimed that it was part of the trade talks. After telling Congress in June that there was 'no quid pro quo in terms of chips for rare earths,' Scott Bessent, the treasury secretary, reversed those comments Tuesday, saying that the H20 move was 'all part of a mosaic' of talks with China. 'They had things we wanted, we had things they wanted, and we're in a very good place,' he said. Advertisement A Chinese Ministry of Commerce official seemed to reject that Friday, saying that the United States had 'taken the initiative' to approve the H20 sales. China believes the United States should continue to remove its trade and economic restrictions, the official said. A person familiar with the talks, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to speak publicly, said that the H20 chip was not specifically discussed in meetings between Chinese and US officials in Geneva and London this spring. But the reversal was part of a more recent cadence of warmer actions the United States and China have taken toward each other. For instance, Beijing agreed in recent weeks to block the export of several chemicals used to make fentanyl, an issue Trump has been concerned about. Recent events have underscored the influence that China has over the US economy. When Trump raised tariffs on Chinese exports in April, some top Trump officials thought Beijing would quickly fold, given its recent economic weakness. Instead, Beijing called Trump's bluff by restricting rare earths needed by American makers of cars, military equipment, medical devices, and electronics. As the flow of those materials stopped, Trump and other officials began receiving calls from CEOs saying their factories would soon shut down. Ford, Suzuki, and other companies shuttered factories because of the lack of supply. Advertisement Trump and his top advisers were surprised by the threat that Beijing's countermove posed, people familiar with the matter say. That brought the United States back to the negotiating table this spring to strike a fragile trade truce, which Trump officials are now wary of upsetting. That agreement dropped tariffs from a minimum 145 percent to 30 percent, with the Chinese agreeing to allow rare earths to flow as freely as before. The administration's caution when it comes to China has been amplified by Trump's desire for an invitation to Beijing later this year. The president, who has been feted on other foreign trips, wants to engage in face-to-face trade negotiations with Chinese leader Xi Jinping. Howard Lutnick, the commerce secretary, has begun recruiting chief executives for a potential delegation, setting off a competition over who will get to ride in Air Force One, according to people familiar with the plans. The Commerce Department declined to comment. The White House, the Treasury Department, and the Office of the United States Trade Representative did not respond to a request for comment. 'The government understands that forcing the world to use foreign competition would only hurt America's economic and national security,' said John Rizzo, a spokesperson for Nvidia. Opposition to China has fueled bipartisan action for the past decade. Now, Trump's more hawkish supporters are quietly watching as the president remakes the party's China strategy. Though few are willing to speak out publicly, officials in the Trump administration and in Congress have privately expressed concern that the trade war has given China an opening to finally bring US technology controls onto the negotiating table. Advertisement Christopher Padilla, a former export control official in the George W. Bush administration, said the fact that the United States was now negotiating over what were supposed to be security restrictions was 'a significant accomplishment for the Chinese.' 'They've been after this for decades, and now they've succeeded,' he said. 'I assume the Chinese are going to demand more concessions on export controls in return for whatever we want next.' This article originally appeared in