Women's Prize for Fiction ‘greatest honour' as an intersex woman, says winner
The book, which explores repressed desire and the unresolved aftermath of the Holocaust in post-Second World War Netherlands, was described as an 'astonishing debut' by the head of the judges.
The ceremony, held in central London on Thursday, saw the non-fiction prize awarded to physician Dr Rachel Clarke for The Story Of A Heart, which explores the human experience behind organ donation.
I am receiving, truly, the greatest honour of my life as a woman, presenting to you as a woman, and accepting this Women's Prize Yael van der Wouden
In her winner's speech, after thanking the judges, van der Wouden said: 'I was a girl until I turned 13, and then, as I hit puberty, all that was supposed to happen did not quite happen.
'And if it did happen, it happened too much, and all at once my girlhood became an uncertain fact.
'I won't thrill you too much with the specifics, but the long and the short of it is that, hormonally, I'm intersex.
'This little fact defined my life throughout my teens, until I advocated for the health care that I needed.
'The surgery and the hormones that I needed, which not all intersex people need. Not all intersex people feel at odds with their gender presentation.
'I mention the fact that I did, because in the few precious moments here on stage, I am receiving, truly, the greatest honour of my life as a woman, presenting to you as a woman, and accepting this Women's Prize.
Aria Aber, Miranda July, Nussaibah Younis, Elizabeth Strout, Sanam Mahloudji and Yael van der Wouden at the ceremony (Ian West Media Assignments/PA)
'And that is because of every single trans person who's fought for health care, who changed the system, the law, societal standards, themselves. I stand on their shoulders.'
The NHS website says intersex, or differences in sex development (DSD), is a group of rare conditions involving genes, hormones and reproductive organs that mean a person's sex development is different to most.
In contrast, people who are transgender identify as a gender separate to the sex they were born in and sometimes go through gender-affirming surgery.
Van der Wouden's novel follows Isabel, a young woman whose life in solitude is upended when her brother's girlfriend Eva comes to live in their family house in what turns into a summer of obsession, suspicion and desire.
The chairwoman of the judges for the fiction prize, writer Kit de Waal, said: 'This astonishing debut is a classic in the making, a story to be loved and appreciated for generations to come. Books like this don't come along every day.'
Van der Wouden will receive £30,000 and a limited-edition bronze statuette known as the Bessie, which was created and donated by artist Grizel Niven.
Rachel Clarke won the non-fiction prize (Ian West Media Assignments/PA)
The judging panel for the Women's Prize for Fiction included novelist and journalist Diana Evans, author and journalist Bryony Gordon, writer and magazine editor Deborah Joseph, and musician and composer Amelia Warner.
Clarke said she has 'literally been a feminist since I was too young to know what that word even meant', as she collected her award.
The physician's book recounts two family stories, documenting how medical staff take care of nine-year-old Kiera in her final hours after a car accident, while offering a new life to nine-year-old Max who is suffering from heart failure from a viral infection.
Clarke, who is behind the books Breathtaking and Your Life In My Hands: A Junior Doctor's Story, will receive £30,000 and a limited-edition piece of art known as the Charlotte, both gifted by the Charlotte Aitken Trust.
The judging panel for the non-fiction prize included writer and broadcaster Dr Leah Broad, whose work focuses on women's cultural history, and novelist and critic Elizabeth Buchan.
Previous winners of the fiction prize include Tayari Jones for An American Marriage and Madeline Miller for The Song Of Achilles, while the first non-fiction prize was awarded last year to Naomi Klein for Doppelganger: A Trip Into The Mirror World.
The awards were announced by the Women's Prize Trust, a UK charity that aims to 'create equitable opportunities for women in the world of books and beyond'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Neil Gray blasted for 'disgusting spin' on worst cancer wait times ever recorded
Neil Gray has been accused of a 'grotesque' attempt to 'spin' the worst ever cancer waiting times by hiding behind a statistic now exposed as another record failure. The SNP health secretary was urged to apologise yesterday after his 'crass' and 'desperate' bid to distract the public was revealed by the Lib Dems. The row blew up as Mr Gray faced further criticism over the Government's apparent inability to get a grip on waiting times in A&E. Public Health Scotland reported almost a third of patients waiting too long to be seen in casualty units last week barely changed from the week before. Mr Gray came under intense criticism last month when it emerged Scotland's NHS recorded its worst cancer waiting times in the first three months of 2025. Since 2016, the target has been for 95 per cent of patients referred with an urgent suspicion of cancer to start treatment within 62 days. But between January and March a record low of just 68.9 per cent were treated on time, down from 73.5 per cent the previous quarter. Mr Gray chose to lead a healthcare trade mission to Japan when the data was published, leading to claims he was 'missing in action' on a 'junket'. But he did issue a statement drawing attention to a different cancer statistic - which has now caused a second outcry. 'The median wait for urgent suspicion of cancer referral to treatment is 52 days, demonstrating the extensive work by staff across Scotland to treat people as quickly and effectively as possible,' he said. But official data has revealed this was a record high, up from 49 days the previous quarter, and from 41 days when records began in 2016. The median is the central point in a set of numbers. Scottish Lib Dem leader Alex Cole-Hamilton said: 'The SNP are fast running out of excuses. 'It is grotesque and dangerously misleading for the Health Secretary to suggest that the average wait of 52 days shows progress, when that too is the worst on record. 'This kind of desperate and irresponsible political spin does nothing to bring down waits. The Health Secretary ought to apologise to patients.' Tory public health spokesman Brian Whittle said: 'It is appalling that Neil Gray doubled down on trying to paint the worst cancer waiting times on record in a better light. 'His attempts to distract from the SNP's record-breaking failure is crass and deeply insulting to suffering patients. He should be focused on saving lives, not saving face. 'Under the SNP, cancer care is in crisis and no amount of PR can mask their shocking neglect of Scotland's health service.' But in response, Mr Gray refused to apologise and effectively repeated his original spin. He said: 'We want to improve cancer waiting times and we know some people are waiting too long. 'The median wait from urgent suspicion of cancer referral to treatment is 52 days, and once a decision has been taken to treat somebody, the median wait for that treatment to begin is three days. This demonstrates the extensive work by staff across Scotland to treat people as quickly and effectively as possible.' New data yesterday also showed A&E waits improved in the week to June 29, with 67.6 per cent of patients seen within the four-hour target, up from 67.3 per cent the previous week. Waits of over eight and 12 hours also fell by around 0.5 per centage points. But the marginal gains were only achieved after patient numbers slumped 9.3 per cent. Mr Gray said the numbers were 'moving in the right direction'. Tory MSP Dr Sandesh Gulhane said the health secretary was 'burying his head in the sand'. Scottish Labour deputy Dame Jackie Baillie added: 'The reality is that John Swinney and the SNP have no meaningful plan, no strategy, and no ideas to save our NHS.'
The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
NHS disruption expected as resident doctors vote for strike action
The NHS could face six months of disruption after resident doctors in England voted in favour of strike action. Downing Street said pay negotiations will not be reopened because the Government 'can't be more generous' than it has been already this year. The ballot gives resident doctors a mandate for strike action until January 2026. Some 90% of voting resident doctors in England, formerly known as junior doctors, said they would down their stethoscopes and take to picket lines amid an ongoing row over pay. The British Medical Association (BMA) said there was a turnout of 55%. The union has said resident doctors need a pay uplift of 29.2% to reverse 'pay erosion' since 2008/09. Health Secretary Wes Streeting said it was 'disappointing' that medics were threatening strike action, saying that the 'majority of resident doctors did not vote to strike'. BMA resident doctors committee co-chairs Dr Melissa Ryan and Dr Ross Nieuwoudt said in a statement: 'All we need is a credible pay offer and nobody need strike. 'Doctors don't take industrial action lightly – but they know it is preferable to watching their profession wither away. 'The next move is the Government's. 'Will it repeat the mistakes of its predecessor? Or will it do the right thing and negotiate a path to full pay restoration and the restoration of doctors' confidence in our profession's future?' Mr Streeting said: 'While the majority of resident doctors did not vote to strike, it is disappointing that the BMA are threatening strike action that would harm patients and set back all the progress we're making with the NHS. 'Thanks to this Government, resident doctors have received a 28.9% pay rise compared to three years ago, and the highest pay award of the entire public sector this year. 'I met with the BMA today, and while we can't go further on pay than we already have this year, I offered to work with them to resolve issues they face around working conditions. These are not grounds for strike action. My offer to meet their entire committee remains open.' A Number 10 spokesman said: 'We aren't going to reopen negotiations on pay. 'Resident doctors have received the highest pay award across the public sector for two years in a row, and we've been clear that we can't be more generous than we already have this year.' A fresh bout of walkouts could cause severe upheaval across the health service. Previous strikes by resident doctors and other staff groups saw some 1.5 million appointments, procedures and operations postponed as a result. The news will come as a blow to the Government after Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer's 'plan for change' pledged that by July 2029, 92% of patients will be seen within 18 weeks for routine hospital treatment such as hip and knee replacements. The waiting list for routine hospital treatment in England is currently at its lowest level for two years, according to the latest figures, with an estimated 7.39 million treatments waiting to be carried out at the end of April. Danny Mortimer, chief executive of NHS Employers, which is part of the NHS Confederation, said: 'Further strikes are the last thing health leaders wanted and could result in tens, if not hundreds, of thousands of operations and procedures being delayed or cancelled, leaving patients in pain or discomfort.' Daniel Elkeles, chief executive of NHS Providers, said: 'A return to industrial action would be a huge setback – bad for patients, for staff and for the NHS.' In September, BMA members voted to accept a Government pay deal worth 22.3% on average over two years. And the 2025/26 pay deal saw resident doctors given a 4% uplift plus £750 'on a consolidated basis' – working out as an average pay rise of 5.4%. The BMA call for a 29.2% uplift is based on Retail Prices Index (RPI) inflation, the measure of average changes in the price of goods and services used by most households. Edward Argar, shadow health secretary, said: 'We warned Labour that caving in to union demands for above-inflation pay rises without conditions would set a dangerous precedent and that the unions would simply come back for more. 'That warning has sadly become true with today's strike vote. 'We are now staring down the barrel of a summer of strikes.' There are around 77,000 resident doctors in England who work in various settings from GP surgeries to hospitals. Resident doctor is a catch-all term for all doctors in training, ranging from graduates to medics with a decade of experience.
Daily Mirror
2 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
'I work in NHS dental desert - I feel guilty but I'm quitting to go private'
Dentist Dr Tim Hodges explains how the 'absurd' payment contract meant he was treating his NHS patients effectively for free, relying on private patients to 'prop up' NHS care A dentist in one of Britain's worst 'dental deserts' has told of his guilt at quitting the NHS to go private. Dr Tim Hodges says the perverse NHS payment contract - which means dentists make a loss treating the most in-need patients - meant he was effectively doing NHS work 'for free' so will now do more lucrative private work instead. It is the latest in a series of Mirror special reports for the Dentists for All campaign from Devon - which NHS data suggests is one of Britain's worst dental deserts. There is a hidden oral health crisis that sees many families locked out of NHS care for years and children losing teeth having never seen a dentist. Today we report claims that the pressure to 'churn' through NHS patients could be contributing to high suicide rates among dentists. Tim, 42, is a local lad who grew up near Axminster in a big NHS family. Both his parents were local GPs and he is one of five siblings - three are now doctors and two are dentists. 'I feel a huge amount of guilt,' he admitted. 'My NHS work was breaking even. I don't want to say it felt like charity work, but basically it was doing it for nothing. The private side was propping it up which wasn't really fair on the private patients.' The NHS system includes two types of dentists; Associate dentists, who are essentially self-employed, have their own patient lists and pay a rent to the practice business to use the premises, support staff and materials. Then there is the owner, or partner in ownership, of the practice business. Dr Tim Hodges has been a partner at Axminster Dental Practice since 2011 when it saw mostly NHS patients and he became the sole owner in 2024. The NHS contract pays the practice for each Unit of Dental Activity - known as a UDA. A check-up is worth one UDA while a filling is worth three. Axminster Dental Practice, owned by Dr Hodges, was receiving £30 from the NHS per UDA, and of that, an associate dentist would be paid £13.65. Dr Hodges said: 'You're not talking very different pay from a tradesman and you start to think, is £80,000 worth of debt from university worth it for that level of salary? 'My issue was that we have three associate dentists at the practice. They were happy but they would have eventually gone to private practice where they could earn more money, unless I could pay them more.' Dr Hodges added: 'The NHS side literally broke even and made nothing so sadly it had to go. All of our adult NHS patients, we told them we couldn't see them on the NHS any more. This is a practice I did work experience at when I was 15. I did my foundation training here after I qualified as a dentist. "Having grown up in the area with mum and dad being well known local GPs, I never really had to build up my reputation because they had done it for me. I just tried not to disappoint them. But my main feeling about it all is guilt. But it was just unviable. If you actually follow the NHS contract to the letter, and look after your patients as you're meant to, it's not really workable.' The NHS dentistry payment contract has been deemed 'not fit for purpose' by Parliament's Health and Social Care Committee. MPs on the committee will question dentistry minister Stephen Kinnock on the crisis on Wednesday. Labour 's 2024 General Election manifesto pledged fundamental reform of the NHS contract which currently means dentists get paid the same for a patient having three fillings as 20. Dr Hodges said: 'It disincentivises treating the patient who needs more care, which is just madness. Then over the years when they haven't increased the rates despite inflation then it's just become totally unmanageable.' Despite stopping seeing adult patients on the NHS, such is the demand in Devon, Dr Hodges still has 1,200 patients on his waiting list to become private patients. Dr Hodges still sees his remaining child patients but has closed the list. READ MORE: Dentist being fined £150K by NHS for keeping patients' teeth too healthy He said: 'When you compare the NHS contract now to what you can earn privately, the gap is just vast. But it's not just that. It's actually having the freedom to look after the patient as well as you can rather than churning through them like you're on a treadmill. 'You can book that patient in for a long enough time to care for them properly. And also for your own personal wellbeing. There's actually a quite high suicide rate among dentists and I think a lot of that is due to the pressures that come with having to churn through patients.' UK research in 2020 suggested that around 10% of dentists had recently considered suicide. Dr Hodges warns that children not getting regular dental check-ups risks life-long health harms. He said: 'You're going to have kids with no teeth basically. And with young kids fortunately it might not make a big difference but once they hit teenage years it's a real worry. 'Fortunately I've not come across it much but it's almost more of a worry that I've not come across it because it's known that the government only funds dentistry for 50% of the population. So if everyone wanted to see an NHS dentist only half the population could. We're in a scenario where those that really need NHS care don't get it and it is pretty upsetting really.' Emergency measures announced by the Government on Tuesday will attempt to begin to change a situation where dentists are disincentivised from treating the patients who need care most. The interim measures include a new time-limited 'care pathway' for higher needs patients so dentists get paid more for clinically complex cases. Other proposals going out to consultation include paying dentists extra for a special course of treatment for patients with severe gum disease or with at least five teeth with tooth decay. There will also be more money for denture modifications. Last week's Ten Year Health Plan sparked fears that proper reform will be kicked into the long grass until after the next General Election. It only said that by 2035 a new dental contract would be at the heart of a "transformed" NHS system. And there is uncertainty as to what extent the Treasury will fund radical reform. The British Dental Association has labelled the contract 'absurd' and calculates that a typical practice loses over £40 producing a set of dentures £7 on a new patient exam. BDA Chair Eddie Crouch said: "Savage cuts mean many dentists aren't just working for free, they're delivering NHS care at a loss. No health professional should be expected to work on this basis, and no business can stay afloat. If NHS dentistry is going to have a future we need real reform and sustainable funding." Health Minister Stephen Kinnock said: 'We inherited a broken NHS dental system that is in crisis. We have already started fixing this, rolling out 700,000 urgent and emergency appointments and bringing in supervising toothbrushing for 3 to 5 year olds in the most deprived areas of the country. "But to get us to a place where patients feel NHS dentistry is reliable again, we have to tackle the problems in the system at their root. These reforms will bring common sense into the system again, attracting more NHS dentists, treating those with the greatest need first and changing the system to make it work. "This is essential to our Plan for Change - building an NHS fit for the future and making sure poor oral health doesn't hold people back from getting into work and staying healthy.' Dentists for All campaign Save NHS Dentistry petition Sign our petition to save NHS dentistry and make it fit for the 21st century Our 3 demands Everyone should have access to an NHS dentist More than 12 million people were unable to access NHS dental care last year – more than 1 in 4 adults in England. At the same time 90% of dental practices are no longer accepting new NHS adult patients. Data from the House of Commons Library showed 40% of children didn't have their recommended annual check-up last year. Restore funding for dental services and recruit more NHS dentists The UK spends the smallest proportion of its heath budget on dental care of any European nation. Government spending on dental services in England was cut by a quarter in real terms between 2010 and 2020. The number of NHS dentists is down by more than 500 to 24,151 since the pandemic. Change the contracts A Parliamentary report by the Health Select Committee has branded the current NHS dentists' contracts as 'not fit for purpose' and described the state of the service as "unacceptable in the 21st century". The system effectively sets quotas on the maximum number of NHS patients a dentist can see as it caps the number of procedures they can perform each year. Dentists also get paid the same for delivering three or 20 fillings, often leaving them out of pocket. The system should be changed so it enables dentists to treat on the basis of patient need. Have you had to resort to drastic measures because you couldn't access an NHS dentist? Are you a parent struggling to get an appointment for a child? Email or call 0800 282591 The interim measures will now form part of a six-week public consultation on the future of the NHS dental system. Jason Wong, Chief Dental Officer for England, said: 'Far too many patients are waiting too long to see a dentist, and while steps have been taken to turn this around, there is still further to go. That is why I'm urging the public to take part in this consultation and give their views on our plans, so we can strengthen this vital part of the NHS.'
